85
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Oral interactions of an online writing group: Do they provide support?

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 25 Aug 2023, Accepted 22 Apr 2024, Published online: 26 Apr 2024

References

  • Aitchison, C. (2010). Learning together to publish: Writing group pedagogies for doctoral publishing. In C. Aitchison, B. Kamler, & A. Lee (Eds.), Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond (pp. 83–100). Routledge.
  • Allen, T. J. (2019). Facilitating graduate student and faculty member writing groups: Experiences from a university in Japan. Higher Education Research and Development, 38(3), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1574721
  • Bourgault, A. M., Galura, S. J., Kinchen, E. V., & Peach, B. C. (2022). Faculty writing accountability groups: A protocol for traditional and virtual settings. Journal of Professional Nursing, 38, 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.12.007
  • Brooke, C. T., Martin, J. M., & Short, R. A. (2021). Peer writing groups as productivity, research, and support networks for extension agents. Journal of the NACAA, 14(1). https://www.nacaa.com/journal/index.php?jid=1193
  • Cassese, E. C., & Holman, M. R. (2018). Writing groups as models for peer mentorship among female faculty in political science. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(2), 401–405. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517002049
  • Chai, P. R., Carreiro, S., Carey, J. L., Boyle, K. L., Chapman, B. P., & Boyer, E. W. (2019). Faculty member writing groups support productivity. The Clinical Teacher, 16(6), 565–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12923
  • Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(3), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004
  • Colombo, L., & Rodas, E. L. (2021). Interdisciplinarity as an opportunity in Argentinian and Ecuadorian writing groups. Higher Education Research and Development, 40(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1756750
  • Colombo, L. M., Bruno, D. S., & Silva, V. S. (2020). Grupos de escritura, vínculos y afectividad en el nivel de posgrado. Praxis Educativa, 24(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.19137/praxiseducativa-2020-240310
  • Coronel, V., & Orellana-Alvear, J. (2022). Folleto informativo del Programa de Mentoría para Mujeres Científicas (PROMEMCI). Departamento de Recursos Hídricos y Ciencias Ambientales (iDRHiCA). Universidad de Cuenca.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2017). Global academic publishing: Policies, perspectives and pedagogies. Multilingual Matters.
  • Ferris, D. R. (2019). Guiding junior scholars into and through the publication process. In P. Habibie & K. Hyland (Eds.), Novice writers and scholarly publication (pp. 215–231). Palgrave.
  • Gardner, J., Barcza-Renner, K., Bowen, A. M., & Chongwony, L. (2020). Forming an intellectual community of practice for scholarly writing at a professionally focused university. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 51(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.51.2.02
  • Guerin, C., & Aitchison, C. (2018). Peer writing groups. In S. Carter & D. Laurs (Eds.), Developing research writing: A handbook for supervisors and advisors (pp. 51–55). Routledge.
  • Haas, S. (2014). Pick-n-Mix: A typology of writers’ groups. In C. Aitchison & C. Guerin (Eds.), Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: Innovations in practice and theory (pp. 30–47). Routledge.
  • Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2014). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • Kaufhold, K., & Yencken, D. E. (2021). Writing groups as dialogic spaces: Negotiating multiple normative perspectives. Journal of Academic Writing, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v11i1.748
  • Kwan, P. P., Sharp, S., Mason, S., & Saetermoe, C. L. (2021). Faculty writing groups: The impact of protected writing time and group support. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100100
  • Maxwell, J. A. (2010). Using numbers in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364740
  • Mochizuki, N. (2016). Oral interactions in a writing group as mediating artefacts: The case of a multilingual international PhD student’s motives, scaffolding, and response. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 39(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.39.2.05moc
  • Paré, A. (2014). Writing together for many reasons: Theoretical and historical perspectives. In C. Aitchison & C. Guerin (Eds.), Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: Innovations in practice and theory (pp. 18–29). Routledge.
  • Rodas, E. (2022). Sustaining writing-for-publication practices during Covid-19: Online writing groups at an Ecuadorian university. In J. Fenton, J. Gimenez, K. Mansfield, M. Percy, & M. Spinillo (Eds.), International perspectives on teaching and learning academic English in turbulent times (pp. 167–177). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003283409.
  • Rodas, E. L., Colombo, L., Calle, M. D., & Cordero, G. (2023). Looking at faculty writing groups from within: Some insights for their sustainability and future implementations. International Journal for Academic Development, 28(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2021.1976189
  • Seeley, J., Frahm, T., & Lynch, E. (2019). Just show up: Reflections from a motley writing group. In N. Simmons & A. Singh (Eds.), Critical collaborative communities (pp. 43–52). Koninklijke Brill NV. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004410985_004.
  • Skarupski, K., & Foucher, K. C. (2018). Writing Accountability Groups (WAGs): A tool to help junior faculty members build sustainable writing habits. The Journal of Faculty Development, 32(3), 47–54. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/fac_development/_documents/career-path/skarupski-wags-article.pdf
  • Subedi, K. R., Sharma, S., & Bista, K. (2022). Academic identity development of doctoral scholars in an online writing group. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 17, 279–300. https://doi.org/10.28945/5004
  • van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  • Wilmot, K., & McKenna, S. (2018). Writing groups as transformative spaces. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(4), 868–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1450361

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.