Exploring student roles in mixed-proficiency triads for dialogic peer feedback learning

References

• Allen, D., & Mills, A. (2016). The impact of second language proficiency in dyadic peer feedback. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 498–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814561902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colina, S. (2008). Translation quality evaluation: Empirical evidence for a functionalist approach. The Translator, 14(1), 97–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2008.10799251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2001). A common European framework of reference for language learning and teaching. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, Y., & Wu, Z. (2022). Mobile-assisted peer feedback on EFL pronunciation: Outcome effects, interactional processes, and shaping factors. System, 111, 102953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & J. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2017). Peer feedback on college students’ writing: Exploring the relation between students’ ability match, feedback quality and essay performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(7), 1433–1447. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1325854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, T.-Y. (2012). Reliability and validity of a scale-based assessment for translation tests. Meta, 56(3), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.7202/1008341ar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M.-K. (2015). Peer feedback in second language writing: Investigating junior secondary students’ perspectives on inter-feedback and intra-feedback. System, 55, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. (1995). Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions, and content. Language Learning, 45(4), 605–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00456.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man, D., Kong, B., & Chau, M. H. (2022). Developing student feedback literacy through peer review training. RELC Journal, 003368822210783. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221078380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2020). Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schei, V., Rognes, J. K., & Shapiro, D. L. (2011). Can individualists and cooperators play together? The effect of mixed social motives in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2007). Scripting by assigning roles: Does it improve knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2–3), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9016-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen-Utheim, A., & Wittek, A. L. (2017). Dialogic feedback and potentialities for student learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 15, 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, W. (2022). Masked ball for all: How anonymity affects students’ perceived comfort levels in peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(4), 502–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2089348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, W., & Huang, A. (2022). More enjoyable to give or to receive? Exploring students’ emotional status in their peer feedback of academic writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(7), 1005–1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2004389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, L., & Li, L. (2018). Chinese EFL learners’ perception of peer oral and written feedback as providers, receivers and observers. Language Awareness, 27(4), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2018.1535602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, R., & Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. (2019). Assigned roles as a structuring tool in online discussion groups: Comparison of transactional distance and knowledge sharing behaviors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(5), 1303–1325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118786855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2015). Understanding EFL students’ participation in group peer feedback of L2 writing: A case study from an activity theory perspective. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 572–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Q., & Carless, D. (2018). Dialogue within peer feedback processes: Clarification and negotiation of meaning. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(4), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1446417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Q., & To, J. (2022). Proactive receiver roles in peer feedback dialogue: Facilitating receivers’ self-regulation and co-regulating providers’ learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(8), 1200–1212. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2017403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, W. (2001). Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), 251–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00043-1
   Google Scholar