35
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘Making the global local’: Insights from the cities for CEDAW (C4C) campaign in the United States

References

  • Armaline, W., Glasberg, D. S., & Purkayastha, B. (2011). Human rights in our own backyard: Injustice and resistance in our own backyard. University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Bunch, C., & Reilly, N. (1994). Demanding accountability: The global campaign and Vienna tribunal for women’s human rights. UNIFEM.
  • Cities for CEDAW. (2023). Cities for CEDAW 2022-23 annual report. Women’s Intercultural Network.
  • Cities for CEDAW. (2020). http://citiesforcedaw.org/2020/01/29/mapping-cedaw-toward-greater-rights-for-women-one-city-at-a-time/
  • Cities for CEDAW. (2019). http://citiesforcedaw.org/wp-content/ uploads/2020/03/Landscape-Cities-for-CEDAW-Branded-for-Website-June-27-2019.pdf Status of Local Activities.
  • Chouinard, M. (2017). Vernacularization of CEDAW in the United States: Localization process and sustainability of CEDAW instruments to prevent and combat violence against women. Columbia University. https://doi.org/10.7916/D84N0N31
  • City and County of San Francisco. Department on the Status of Women. (2010). Human rights in action. San Francisco’s local implementation of the United Nation’s Women’s Treaty. CEDAW.
  • Dale, A. (2018). Intersectional human rights at CEDAW: Promises, transmissions, and impacts [Doctoral Dissertation]. York University.
  • Davis, M. (2024). Institutionalizing human rights in the United States: Advocacy for a National Human Rights Institution. Journal of Human Rights, 23(2), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2024.2329154
  • Desai, M. (2016). Subaltern movements in India: The gendered geography of struggles against neoliberal development. Routledge.
  • Desai, M. (1996). From Vienna to Beijing: Women’s human rights and the human rights community. New Political Science, 35(Spring), 107–119.
  • Eckert, J. (2006). From subjects to citizens: Legalism from below and the homogenisation of the legal sphere. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 38(53-54), 45–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2006.10756598
  • Ezer, T. (2022). Localizing human rights in the city. Review of Law and Social Justice, 31(1), 67–134.
  • Gender Equity Commission of Pittsburgh. (2020). Building an equitable new normal: Responding to the crises of racist violence and COVID-19.
  • Goodhart, M. (2019). Human rights cities: Making the global local. In A. Brysk, & M. Stohl (Eds.), Contesting human rights (pp. 142–158). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Grewal, I. (2005). Transnational America: Feminisms, diasporas, neoliberalisms. Duke University Press.
  • Hopgood, S., J. Snyder, & L. Vinjamuri (Eds.) (2017). Human rights futures. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kaufman, R., & Ward, J. (2017). The local turn in U.S. human rights: Introduction to the special symposium issue. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 49(1), 1–11.
  • Koutsioumpas, K., & MacNaughton, G. (2020). Mapping perceptions of human rights and cultivating Boston as a human rights city. Journal of Human Rights, 19(3), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2020.1746178
  • MacNaughton, G., & Gill, M. (2012). Economic and social rights in the United States: Implementation without ratification. Northeastern University Law Journal, 4(2), 365–406.
  • MacNaughton, G., Weeks, S. M., Kamau, E., Sajadi, S., & Tarimo, P. (2020). The promises and challenges of human rights cities. In J. Zajda (Ed.), Human rights education globally (pp. 109–132). Springer. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3722592
  • Merry, S. (2006). Human rights and gender violence: Translating international law into local justice. University of Chicago Press.
  • Meszaros, G. (2013). Social movements, law, and the politics of land reform. Routledge.
  • Montez, P. (2021). Women’s rights are human rights: CEDAW’s limits and opportunities. Berkeley Journal of International Law https://www.berkeleyjournalofinternationallaw.com/post/women-s-rights-are-human-rights-cedaw-s-limits-and-opportunities
  • Murphy, M. (2021). Queering women’s rights: Re-examining CEDAW. https://www.humanrightspulse.com/mastercontentblog/queering-womens-rights-re-examining-cedaw
  • Och, M. (2018). The local diffusion of international rights norms—Understanding the Cities for CEDAW campaign. International Feminist Journal for Politics, 1–19.
  • Och, M. (2022). More than just moral urbanism? The incorporation of CEDAW principles into local governance structures in the United States. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 14(3), 1060–1081. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huac033
  • Oömen, B., Davis, M. F., & Grigolo, M. (Eds.) (2016). Global urban justice: The rise of human rights cities. Cambridge University Press.
  • Oömen, B., & Baumgärtel, M. (2014). Human rights cities. In A. Mihr, & M. GIbney (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of human rights (pp. 709–732). Sage. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/277775662_Human_Rights_Cities
  • Reilly, N. (2011). Doing transnational feminism, transforming human rights: the emancipatory possibilities revisited. Irish Journal of Sociology, 19(2), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.7227/IJS.19.2.5
  • Rosenblum, D. (2011). Unsex CEDAW, or what’s wrong with women’s rights. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 20(2), 98–194. https://doi.org/10.7916/cjgl.v20i2.2623 http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawfaculty/810/.
  • Runyan, A., & Sanders, R. (2021). Prospects for realizing international women’s law through local governance: The case of Cities for CEDAW. Human Rights Review, 22(3), 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-021-00635-z
  • Scottish Human Rights Commission. (2021). https://www.scottishhumanrights.com/projects-and-programmes/human-rights-budget-work/
  • Smith, J. (2023). Human rights cities movements: Building a people-centered future. Paper prepared for the Next System Studies Workshop. University of Pittsburgh.
  • Smith, J. (2018). Local responses to right-wing populism: Building human rights cities. Studies in Social Justice, 11(2), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v11i2.1394
  • Tsutsui, K., & Smith, J. (2019). Human rights and social movements: From the boomerang pattern to a sandwich effect. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi, & H. McCammon (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements. New York.
  • United Nations Association of the United States of American. UNA Women’s Affinity Group. (2015). Cities for CEDAW: Promoting women’s equality in your community: guidelines and toolkit. https://unausa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/UNAWomenCEDAWToolkit.pdf?emci=05d81494-9cbc-eb11-a7ad-501ac57b8fa7&emdi=4a713dd8-70c5-eb11-a7ad-501ac57b8fa7&ceid=2749364
  • Zwingel, S. (2023). Women’s rights close to home? The Miami-Dade county CEDAW ordinance as local practice. Politics & Gender, 20(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X2300034X

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.