The sonic side of organizing: theorizing acoustemology for blind and visually impaired people's inclusion in the workplace

References

• Abrams, Thomas. 2016. “Cartesian Dualism and Disabled Phenomenology.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 18 (2): 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2014.995219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babri, Maira, Hervé Corvelle, and Herman I. Stål. 2022. “Material Affordances in Circular Products and Business Model Development: For a Relational Understanding of Human and Material Agency.” Culture and Organization 28 (1): 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2021.1986506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, Colin, 2013. “Reflections on Doing Emancipatory Disability Research.” In Disabling Barriers, Enabling Environments, edited by John Swain, Sally French, Colin Barnes, and Carol Thomas, 48–53. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bathurst, Richard J. 2010. The Music of Organizations: An Aesthetic Ethnography. Saarbrucken: Lambert Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, Joy E., David C. Baldridge, Stephan A. Boehm, Mukta Kulkarni, and Adrienne J. Colella. 2019. “On the Treatment of Persons with Disabilities in Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda.” Human Resource Management 58 (2): 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, Joy E., Sophie Hennekam, and Mukta Kulkarni. 2023. De Gruyter Handbook of Disability and Management. Amsterdam: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bend, Gemma L., and Vincenza Priola. 2023. “‘There Is Nothing Wrong with Me’: The Materialisation of Disability in Sheltered Employment.” Work, Employment and Society 37 (3): 645–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170211034762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, David. 2005. “From Blindness to Visual Impairment: Terminological Typology and the Social Model of Disability.” Disability & Society 20 (5): 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590500156246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxenbaum, Eva, Candace Jones, Renate E. Meyer, and Silvyia Svejenova. 2018. “Towards an Articulation of the Material and Visual Turn in Organization Studies.” Organization Studies 39 (5-6): 597–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618772611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branham, Stacy M., and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. “The Invisible Work of Accessibility: How Blind Employees Manage Accessibility in Mixed-Ability Workplaces.” In Proceedings of the 17th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers & accessibility, 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809864.
   Google Scholar
• Bronner, Kai, and Rainer Hirt. 2009. Audio-branding: Brands, Sound and Communication. München: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Buchter, Lisa. 2022. “Educating the Sighted: When Activists Reorganize Solidarity by Prefiguring New Social Scripts of Help and Interaction.” Organization 29 (2): 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084211051051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Ayse, Ruth Rentschler, Karen Williams, and Fara Azmat. 2022. “Exploring Barriers to Social Inclusion for Disabled People: Perspectives from the Performing Arts.” Journal of Management & Organization 28 (2): 308–328. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooren, François. 2018. “Materializing Communication: Making the Case for a Relational Ontology.” Journal of Communication 68 (2): 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, J. Martin. 2003. “Sound Organisation: A Brief History of Psychosonic Management.” Ephemera. Critical Dialogues on Organization 3 (4): 265–276.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Christoph. 2011. “Beyond Representation and Signification: Toward a Sonic Materialism.” Journal of Visual Culture 10 (2): 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412911402880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deppermann, Arnulf. 2013. “Multimodal Interaction from a Conversation Analytic Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicks, Bella. 2019. “Multimodal Analysis.” In Sage Research Methods Foundations, edited by Paul Atkinson, Sara Delamont, Alexandru Cernat, Joseph K. Sakshaug, and Richard A. Williams, 1–28. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036805699
   Google Scholar
• Di Scipio, Agostino. 2015. “The Politics of Sound and the Biopolitics of Music: Weaving Together Sound-Making, Irreducible Listening, and the Physical and Cultural Environment.” Organised Sound 20: 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771815000205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobusch, Laura. 2021. “The Inclusivity of Inclusion Approaches: A Relational Perspective on Inclusion and Exclusion in Organizations.” Gender, Work & Organization 28 (1): 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobusch, Laura, Lotte Hock, and Sarah Luise Muhr. 2021. “The Im-/possibility of Hybrid Inclusion: Disrupting the ‘Happy Inclusion’ Story with the Case of the Greenlandic Police Force.” Organization 28 (2): 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420973310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, Frances. 2014. The Tone of Our Times: Sound, Sense, Economy and Ecology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, Wolfgang. 2016. Sonic Time Machines: Explicit Sound, Sirenic Voices and Implicit Sonicity. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_r_01396.
   Google Scholar
• Feld, Steven. 2015. “Acoustemology.” In Keywords in Sound, edited by David Novak and Matt Sakakeeny, 12–21. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822375494-002
   Google Scholar
• Ferdman, Bernardo M. 2017. “Paradoxes of Inclusion: Understanding and Managing the Tensions of Diversity and Multiculturalism.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 53 (2): 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886317702608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 2017. “Building a World with Disability in It.” In Culture – Theory – Disability: Encounters between Disability Studies and Cultural Studies, edited by Anne Waldschmidt, Hanjo Berressem, and Moritz Ingwersen, 51–62. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, Silvia. 1995. Gender, Symbolism and Organizational Cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5221(99)00034-2.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, Dennis A., Kevin G. Corley, and Aimee L. Hamilton. 2013. “Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology.” Organizational Research Methods 16 (1): 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovannoni, Elena, and Christopher J. Napier. 2023. “Multimodality and the Messy Object: Exploring How Rhetoric and Materiality Engage.” Organization Studies 44 (3): 401–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221089598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203788387.
   Google Scholar
• Hamraie, Aimi, and Kelly Fritsch. 2019. “Crip Technoscience Manifesto.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 5 (1): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v5i1.29607.
   Google Scholar
• Hidegh, Anna Laura, C. Svastics, S. Csillag, and Z. Győri. 2023. “The Intersectional Identity Work of Entrepreneurs with Disabilities: Constructing Difference through Disability, Gender, and Entrepreneurship.” Culture and Organization 29 (3): 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2023.2201006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höllerer, Marcus, Theo van Leeuwen, Dennis Jancsary, Renate E. Meyer, Thomas Hestbæk Andersen, and Eeero Vaara. 2021. Visual and Multimodal Research in Organization and Management Studies. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315455013.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Bill, and Kevin Paterson. 1997. “The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Towards a Sociology of Impairment.” Disability & Society 12 (3): 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599727209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, John. 2017. Notes on Blindness. A Journey Through the Dark. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Iedema, Rick. 2007. “On the Multi-Modality, Materially and Contingency of Organization Discourse.” Organization Studies 28 (6): 931–946. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607075264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jammaers, Eline. 2023a. “On Ableism and Anthropocentrism: A Canine Perspective on the Workplace Inclusion of Disabled People.” Human Relations 76 (2): 233–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211057549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jammaers, Eline. 2023b. “Theorizing Discursive Resistance to Organizational Ethics of Care through a Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Disability Inclusion Practices.” Journal of Business Ethics 183 (2): 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05079-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jammaers, Eline, and Patrizia Zanoni. 2021. “The Identity Regulation of Disabled Employees: Unveiling the ‘Varieties of Ableism’ in Employers’ Socio-Ideological Control.” Organization Studies 42 (3): 429–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619900292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, N. 1996. “‘Body Language’: Context and Embodiment in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Health Research 6 (2): 261–276.
   Google Scholar
• Kleege, Georgina. 2017. More Than Meets the eye: What Blindness Brings to art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koivunen, Nina. 2002. “Organizational Music: The Role of Listening in Interaction Processes.” Consumption, Markets and Culture 5 (1): 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1025386029003145
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther. 2009. “What Is Mode?” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, edited by Carey Jewitt, 54–67. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• LaBelle, Brandon. 2018. Sonic Agency: Sound and Emergent Forms of Resistance. London: Goldsmith University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, Paul M.. 2012. “Materiality, Sociomateriality, and Socio-Technical Systems: What Do These Terms Mean? How Are They Related? Do We Need Them?.” In Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, edited by Paul M. Leonardi, Bonnie A. Nardi, and Jannis Kallinikos, 25–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Makkawy, Armin, and Shawn Long. 2021. “Visual Impairment in the Workplace: Exploration, Experience, and Interpretation.” Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 115 (4): 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X211028396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauksch, Stefanie. 2023. “Being Blind, Being Exceptional: Work Integration, Social Entrepreneurship and the Reimagination of Blind Potential in Nepal.” Disability & Society 38 (3): 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2021.1933387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauksch, Stefanie, and Pascal Dey. 2023. “Treating Disability as an Asset (Not a Limitation): A Critical Examination of Disability Inclusion through Social Entrepreneurship.” Organization 0 (0): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084221150586
   Google Scholar
• McDonnall, Michele C., and Zhen Sui. 2019. “Employment and Unemployment Rates of People Who Are Blind or Visually Impaired: Estimates from Multiple Sources.” Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 113 (6): 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X19887620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRuer, Robert. 2006. Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, Geof.. 2004. “From Critique to Practice: Emancipatory Disability Research.” In Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Research, edited by Colin Barnes and Geof Mercer, 118–137. Leeds: Centre for Disability Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Michalko, Rod. 1999. The Two in One: Walking with Smokie, Walking with Blindness. New York: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirabile, Mario. 2020. “Il lavoro per un cieco è luce che ritorna: un’analisi su disabilità e occupazione.’” Accessed March 27, 2023. http://www.comune.torino.it/pass/sensoriali/2020/05/05/il-lavoro-per-un-cieco-e-luce-che-ritorna-unanalisi-su-disabilita-e-occupazione/.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, David T., and Sharon Snyder. 2015. The Biopolitics of Disability: Neoliberalism, Ablenationalism, and Peripheral Embodiment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mor Barak, E. Michàlle. 2015. “Inclusion Is the Key to Diversity Management, but What Is Inclusion?” Human Service Organizations Management, Leadership & Governance 39 (2): 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2015.1035599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napolitano, Domenico. 2022. “AI Voice between Anthropocentrism and Posthumanism: Alexa and Voice Cloning.” Journal of Interdisciplinary Voice Studies 7 (1): 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1386/jivs_00053_1
   Google Scholar
• Napolitano, Domenico, Vito Lasala, and Silvio Ripetta. 2022. “Limits of Inclusion: Multimodal Action-Nets and the Challenge of Communication Technologies for Disability.” ImpresaProgetto. Electronic Journal of Management 3:1–19. https://doi.org/10.15167/1824-3576/IPEJM2022.3.1511.
   Google Scholar
• Napolitano, Domenico, and Luigi M. Sicca. 2021. “Organizing in Sound: Sound Art and the Organization of Space.” Studi Organizzativi 2 (1): 93–120. https://doi.org/10.3280/SO2021-002004
   Google Scholar
• Naraine, Mala D., and Peter H. Lindsay. 2011. “Social Inclusion of Employees Who Are Blind or Low Vision.” Disability & Society 26 (4): 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2011.567790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkomo, Stella M. 2014. “Inclusion: Old Wine in New Bottles?” In Diversity at Work: The Practice of Inclusion, edited by B. M. Ferdman and B. R. Deane, 580–592. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2011.567790.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, Michael. 1996. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. London: Macmillan International Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.15453/0191-5096.2372.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, Walter J. 1982. Orality and Literacy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, Wanda J. 2007. “Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work.” Organization Studies 28 (9): 1435–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papakonstantinou, Doxa, and Konstantinos Papadopoulos. 2010. “Forms of Social Support in the Workplace for Individuals with Visual Impairments.” Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 104 (3): 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1010400306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, Kevin. 2019. “It’s about Time! Understanding the Experience of Speech Impairment.” In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by Nick Watson and Simo Vehmas, 206–218. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pinch, Trevor, and Karin Bijsterveld. 2012. “New Keys to the World of Sound”. In The Oxford Handbook of Sound Studies, edited by T. Pinch and K. Bijsterveld, 3–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, Sarah. 2009. Doing Sensory Ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Prichard, Craig, Marek Korczynski, and Michael Elmes. 2007. “Music at Work: An Introduction.” Group & Organization Management 32 (1): 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106294485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Report on the World Social Situation. 2016. Leaving No One Behind: The Imperative of Inclusive Development. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, Tom. 2013. Hearing and the Hospital: Sound, Listening, Knowledge and Experience. Canon Pyon: Sean Kingston.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, Tom. 2018. “Acoustemology.” In The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, edited by Hilary Callan and Simon Coleman, 1–7. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2000
   Google Scholar
• Rice, Tom, and Steven Feld. 2021. “Questioning Acoustemology: An Interview with Steven Feld.” Sound Studies 7 (1): 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/20551940.2020.1831154
   Google Scholar
• Rodas, Julia Miele. 2009. “On Blindness.” Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 3 (2): 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1353/jlc.0.0013
   Google Scholar
• Schalk, Sami. 2018. Bodyminds Reimagined: (Dis)ability, Race, and Gender in Black Women’s Speculative Fiction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schillmeier, Michael. 2006. “Othering Blindness – on Modern Epistemological Politics.” Disability & Society 21 (5): 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590600785910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schur, Lisa, Lisa Nishii, Meera Adya, Douglas Kruse, Susanne M. Bruyère, and Peter Blanck. 2014. “Accommodating Employees with and Without Disabilities.” Human Resource Management 53 (4): 593–621. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, Tom. 2006. Disability Rights and Wrongs. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sicca, Luigi Maria. 2000. “Chamber Music and Organization Theory: Some Typical Organizational Phenomena Seen Under the Microscope.” Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies 6 (2): 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10245280008523545
   Google Scholar
• Siebers, Tobin. 2008. Disability Theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Śliwa, Martyna, Lisi Gordon, Katy Mason, and Nic Beech. 2022. “‘That’s Bang out of Order, Mate!’: Gendered and Racialized Micro-Practices of Disadvantage and Privilege in UK Business Schools.” Gender, Work & Organization n/a (n/a). Accessed July 11, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne, Jonathan. 2012. “Sonic Imaginations.” In The Sound Studies Reader, edited by J. Sterne, 1–17. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sterne, Jonathan. 2021. Diminished Faculties: A Political Phenomenology of Impairment. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Styhre, Alexander. 2010. “Knowledge Work and Practices of Seeing: Epistemologies of the Eye, Gaze, and Professional Vision.” Culture and Organization 16 (4): 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2010.519931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Styhre, Alexander. 2013. “Sound, Silence, Music: Organizing Audible Work Settings.” Culture and Organization 19 (1): 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2011.634197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, Melissa. 2019. “Reassembling Difference? Rethinking Inclusion through/as Embodied Ethics.” Human Relations 72 (1): 48–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718764264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2007. “Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol.” Opened for signature March 30, 2007, United Nations Treaty Series, Article 1. Accessed July 16, 2022. https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Van Laer, Koen, Eline Jammaers, and Wendy Hoeven. 2022. “Disabling Organizational Spaces: Exploring the Processes through Which Spatial Environments Disable Employees with Impairments.” Organization 29 (6): 1018–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419894698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, Theo. 1999. Speech, Sound, Music. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2017. “Multimodality in Organization Studies: Afterword.” In Multimodality, Meaning, and Institutions, edited by Marcus Höllerer, Thibault Daudigeos, and Dennis Jancsary, 235–242. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, Samantha. 2008. “Empirical Challenges in Organizational Aesthetics Research: Towards a Sensual Methodology.” Organization Studies 29 (4): 559–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607083104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, Meredith M., Luke Thelen, and Jennifer Ruark. 2007. “Workspace Personalization and Organizational Culture: Does Your Workspace Reflect You or Your Company?” Environment and Behavior 39 (5): 616–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506295602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wettermark, Anna. 2023. “‘You’re the One That I Want’: Differentiating between Beneficiaries in Voluntary Organizations.” Culture and Organization 29 (3): 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2023.2167083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, Peter. 2012. “Sightless Vision: Reflections on a Paradox.” Culture and Organization 18 (4): 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2012.705527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitburn, Ben, and Rod Michalko. 2020. “Blindness/Sightedness: Disability Studies and the Defiance of Di-vision.” In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies. 2nd ed., edited by N. Watson and S. Vehmas, 219–233. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zanoni, Patrizia, and Maddy Janssens. 2015. “The Power of Diversity Discourses at Work: On the Interlocking Nature of Diversities and Occupations.” Organization Studies 36 (11): 1463–1483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615593584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar