2,054
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Multidisciplinary Perspectives on a Video Case of Children Designing and Coding for Robotics

, , , , , , , , , , , & show all

References

  • Abbot, L. (Ed.). (2014, August 26). 21st Century skills definition. The Glossary of Education Reform. Retrieved from http://edglossary.org/21st-century-skills/
  • Berglund, A., & Heintz, F. (2014). Integrating soft skills into engineering education for increased student throughput and more professional engineers. In Proceedings of the LTHs 8:e Pedagogiska Inspirationskonferens. Lunds Tekniska Högskola. Retrieved from http://www.lth.se/fileadmin/lth/genombrottet/konferens2014/11_Berglund_Heintz.pdf
  • Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematics education in its cultural context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19(2), 179–191.
  • Bruce, C. D., Davis, B., Sinclair, N., McGarvey, L., Hallowell, D., Drefs, M., … Woolcott, G. (2016). Understanding gaps in research networks: Using “spatial reasoning” as a window into the importance of networked educational research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, online, 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10649-016-9743-2
  • Bruce, C. D., & Hawes, Z. (2015). The Role of 2D and 3D mental rotation in mathematics for young children: What is it? Why does it matter? And what can we do about it? ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47, 331–343.
  • Bussi, M. G. B., & Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2015). Geometry in early sources: Sowing seeds for a mathematical definition of squares and rectangles. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47, 391–405.
  • Casey, B. M., Dearing, E., Vasilyeva, M., Ganley, C. M., & Tine, M. (2011). Spatial and numerical predictors of measurement performance: The moderating effects of community income and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 296–311.
  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Clements, D. H. (2004). Geometric and spatial thinking in early childhood education. In D. H. Clements, J. Sarama, & A.-M. DiBiase (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 267–298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Cohen, C. A., & Hegarty, M. (2012). Inferring cross sections of 3D objects: A new spatial thinking test. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 868–874.
  • Davis, B., Okamoto, Y., & Whiteley, W. (2015). Spatializing school mathematics. In B. Davis (Ed.), Spatial reasoning in the early sources: Principles, assertions, and speculations (pp. 139–150). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Francis, K., Khan, S., & Davis, B. (2016). Enactivism, spatial reasoning and coding. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2, 1–20.
  • Francis, K., & Whitely, W. (2015). Interactions between three dimensions and two dimensions. In B. Davis (Ed.), Spatial reasoning in the early years: Principles, assertions, and speculations (pp. 121–136). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Fu, T. Z. J., Song, Q., & Chiu, D. M. (2014). The academic social network. Scientometrics, 101, 203–239.
  • Hawes, Z., Tepylo, D., & Moss, J. (2015). Developing spatial thinking: Implications for early mathematics education. In B. Davis & Spatial Reasoning Study Group (Eds.), Spatial reasoning in the early sources: Principles, assertions and speculations (pp. 29–44). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2002, July). Problematising statistical meanings: A sociocultural perspective. Paper presented at the International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Cape Town, South Africa. Retrieved from https://iase-web.org/documents/papers/icots6/2e3_hoyl.pdf
  • Khan, S., Francis, K., & Davis, B. (2015). Accumulation of experience in a vast number of cases: Enactivism as a fit framework for the study of spatial reasoning in mathematics education. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47, 1–11.
  • McGraw-Hill. (2014). Home—The Geometer's Sketchpad Resource Center. Retrieved from http://dynamicgeometry.com/
  • Mioduser, D., & Levy, S. T. (2010). Making sense by building sense: Kindergarten children's construction and understanding of adaptive robot behaviors. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 15(2), 99–127.
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2014, January 8). Engineering design process. Retrieved from http://www.nasa.gov/audience/foreducators/best/edp.html
  • Newman, M., Barabási, A.-L., & Watts, D. J. (2006). The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1971). Mental imagery in the child: A study of the development of imaginal representation. British Journal of Educational Studies, 19(3), 343–344.
  • Presmeg, N. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 205–235). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • QSR International. (2016). NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Retrieved from http://www.qsrinternational.com/
  • Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82, 330–348.
  • Rowe, S. (2004). Discourse in activity and activity as discourse. In R. Rogers (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 79–96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=104206&site=ehost-live
  • Sorby, S. A. (2009). Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 459–480.
  • Spatial Reasoning Study Group (SRSG). (n.d.). The Spatial Reasoning Study Group. Retrieved from http://www.spatialresearch.org/
  • Steve Jobs says everyone should learn to program. (2012). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCDkxUbalCw
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 352–402.
  • Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 sources of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–835.