“How Do We Put the Country Back Together?” Mitigating Affective Polarization Through Mediated Intergroup Contact

References

• Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Perseus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., Bessarabova, E., & Massey, Z. B. (2020). Meta-analysis on mediated contact and prejudice. Human Communication Research, 46(2–3), 120–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaa004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boysen, G. A., Vogel, D. L., & Madon, S. (2006). A public versus private administration of the implicit association test. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(6), 845–856. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, J. J., Walter, N., Rosenthal, E. L., & Folb, K. L. (2022). Contentious entertainment: The role of character and narrative features in shaping audience response to abortion storylines. Journal of Health Communication, 27(4), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2022.2091064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., Pogacar, R., Pullig, C., Kouril, M., Aguilar, S., LaBouff, J., Isenberg, N., & Chakroff, A. (2019). Survey-software implicit association tests: A methodological and empirical analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 2194–2208. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01293-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M., Dong, Y., & Wang, J. (2023). A meta-analysis examining the role of character-recipient similarity in narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 51(1), 56–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231204834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, A. H., & Slater, M. D. (2013). Reducing stigma and out-group distinctions through perspective-taking in narratives. Journal of Communication, 63(5), 894–911. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Hershman-Shitrit, M. (2017). Mediated relationships with TV characters. Scientific Study of Literature, 7(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.7.1.05coh
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Weimann-Saks, D., & Mazor-Tregerman, M. (2018). Does character similarity increase identification and persuasion? Media Psychology, 21(3), 506–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1302344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, K. R., & Moyer-Gusé, E. (2020). Interdependence in mediated intergroup contact: Exploring the common ingroup identity model in a fictional narrative. Journal of Media Psychology, 33(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. B. (2021). Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01012-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. B. (2022). (Mis)estimating affective polarization. The Journal of Politics, 84(2), 1106–1117. https://doi.org/10.1086/715603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., & Levendusky, M. S. (2019). What do we measure when we measure affective polarization? Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(1), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J., Bail, C. A., Cikara, M., Ditto, P. H., Iyengar, S., Klar, S., Mason, L., McGrath, M. C., Nyhan, B., Rand, D. G., Skitka, L. J., Tucker, J. A., Van Bavel, J. J., Wang, C. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2020). Political sectarianism in America. Science, 370(6516), 533–536. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe1715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2002). In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations. Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606648
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hinyard, L. J., & Kreuter, M. W. (2007). Using narrative communication as a tool for health behavior change: A conceptual, theoretical, and empirical overview. Health Education and Behavior, 34(5), 777–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198106291963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffner, C., & Buchanan, M. (2005). Young adults’ wishful identification with television characters: The role of perceived similarity and character attributes. Media psychology, 7(4), 325–351. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0704_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, G. A., & Malhotra, N. (2017). Political homophily in social relationships: Evidence from online dating behavior. The Journal of Politics, 79(1), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1086/687533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igartua, J. J. (2010). Identification with characters and narrative persuasion through fictional feature films. Communications, 35(4), 347–373. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2010.019
   Google Scholar
• Igartua, J. J., & Frutos, F. J. (2017). Enhancing attitudes toward stigmatized groups with movies: Mediating and moderating processes of narrative persuasion. International Journal of Communication, 11, 158–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. R., Jasper, D. M., Griffin, S., & Huffman, B. L. (2013). Reading narrative fiction reduces Arab-Muslim prejudice and offers a safe haven from intergroup anxiety. Social Cognition, 31(5), 578–598. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2013.31.5.578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, N., & Harwood, J. (2014). Improving intergroup attitudes through televised vicarious intergroup contact: Social cognitive processing of ingroup and outgroup information. Communication Research, 41(5), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212447944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanazawa, S. (2002). Bowling with our imaginary friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(3), 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00098-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M. S. (2018). When efforts to depolarize the electorate fail. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(3), 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M., & Malhotra, N. (2016). Does media coverage of partisan polarization affect political attitudes? Political Communication, 33(2), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1038455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, B., Rodriguez, N. S., Dunn, J. A., & Martinez, J. (2018). Stereotyped identification: How identifying with fictional latina characters increases acceptance and stereotyping. Mass Communication and Society, 21(5), 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1457699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, F. (2009). Entertaining anti-racism. Multicultural television drama, identification and perceptions of ethnic threat. Communications, 34(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.016
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. T., Frank, L. B., Moran, M. B., & Patnoe-Woodley, P. (2011). Involved, transported, or emotional? Exploring the determinants of change in knowledge, attitudes, and behavior in entertainment-education. Journal of Communication, 61(3), 407–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01554.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C., & Goldman, S. K. (2010). Mass media. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 241–257). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200919
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz, M., & Harwood, J. (2007). A social cognitive theory approach to the effects of mediated intergroup contact on intergroup attitudes. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 51(4), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150701626487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. (2012). Mediated intergroup contact: Concept explication, synthesis, and application. Mass Communication and Society, 15(1), 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.558804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2017). The partisan divide on political values grows even wider: partisan animosity, personal politics, views of trump. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2017/10/05/8-partisan-animosity-personal-politics-views-of-trump/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2019a). Partisan antipathy: More intense, more personal. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/10/10/partisan-antipathy-more-intense-more-personal/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2019b). Public highly critical of state of political discourse in the U.S. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/06/19/public-highly-critical-of-state-of-political-discourse-in-the-u-s/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2020). Few trump or biden supporters have close friends who back the opposing candidate. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/09/18/few-trump-or-biden-supporters-have-close-friends-who-back-the-opposing-candidate/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2021). The state of online harassment. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/01/13/the-state-of-online-harassment/
   Google Scholar
• Robison, J., & Mullinix, J. (2016). Elite polarization and public opinion: How polarization is communicated and its effects. Political Communication, 33(2), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1055526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiappa, E., Allen, M., & Gregg, P. B. (2007). Parasocial relationships and television: A meta-analysis of the effects. In R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, & M. Allen (Eds.), Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 301–314). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72(1), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363775052000342544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiappa, E., Hewes, D. E., & Gregg, P. B. (2006). Can one TV show make a difference? Will & grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(4), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v51n04_02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriram, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). The brief implicit association test. Experimental Psychology, 56(4), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, W. G., Stephan, C. W., & Gudykunst, W. B. (1999). Anxiety in intergroup relations: A comparison of anxiety/uncertainty management theory and integrated threat theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(4), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00012-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks-Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N., & Cohen, J. (2010). Understanding audience involvement: Conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation. Poetics, 38(4), 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2010.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrant, M., Calitri, R., & Weston, D. (2012). Social identification structures the effects of perspective taking. Psychological Science, 23(9), 973–978. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612441221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M., & Azrout, R. (2016). I saw you in the news: Mediated and direct intergroup contact improve outgroup attitudes. Journal of Communication, 66(6), 1032–1060. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M., & Kim, N. (2016). How to improve attitudes toward disliked groups: The effects of narrative versus numerical evidence on political persuasion. Communication Research, 43(6), 785–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215618480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M., & Warner, B. R. (2020). Can interparty contact reduce affective polarization? A systematic test of different forms of intergroup contact. Political Communication, 37(6), 789–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1760406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Rojas, H., Wojcieszak, M., Aalberg, T., Coen, S., Curran, J., Hayashi, K., Iyengar, S., Jones, P. K., Mazzoleni, G., Papathanassopoulos, S., Rhee, J. W., Rowe, D., Soroka, S., & Tiffen, R. (2016). Why are “others” so polarized? Perceived political polarization and media use in 10 countries. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(5), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar