Analyzing learners engagement in a micromasters program compared to non-degree MOOC

References

• Al-Shabandar, R., Hussain, A., Laws, A., Keight, R., Lunn, J., & Radi, N. (2017, May). Machine learning approaches to predict learning outcomes in massive open online courses [Paper presentation]. In 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (pp. 713–720). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2017.7965922
   Google Scholar
• Cabral, P. B., Jorge, N. R., & van Valkenburg, W. (2017). MicroMasters: the pursuit of the holy grail in online learning [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of the Online, Open and Flexible Higher Education Conference: Higher Education for the Future (pp. 219–225).
   Google Scholar
• Dalipi, F., Imran, A., & Kastrati, Z. (2018, April). MOOC dropout prediction using machine learning techniques: Review and research challenges [Paper presentation]. In 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1007–1014). IEEE. http://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363340
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D., Kizilcec, R., Hauff, C., & Houben, G. J. (2018). Scaling effective learning strategies: Retrieval practice and long-term knowledge retention in moocs. Journal of Learning Analytics, 5(3), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2018.53.3
   Google Scholar
• De la Roca, M., Morales, M., Teixeira, A., Hernández, R., & Amado-Salvatierra, H. (2018, September). The experience of designing and developing an edX’s micromasters program to develop or reinforce the digital competence on teachers [Paper presentation]. In 2018 Learning with MOOCS (LWMOOCS) (pp. 34–38). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/LWMOOCS.2018.8534697
   Google Scholar
• Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2020). Learner engagement in moocs: Scale development and validation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillahunt, T. R., Ng, S., Fiesta, M., & Wang, Z. (2016). Do massive open online course platforms support employability? [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 233–244. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819924
   Google Scholar
• Doolittle, P. E., Bryant, L. H., & Chittum, J. R. (2015). Effects of degree of segmentation and learner disposition on multimedia learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1333–1343. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannakos, M. N., Chorianopoulos, K., & Chrisochoides, N. (2015). Making sense of video analytics: Lessons learned from clickstream interactions, attitudes, and learning outcome in a video-assisted course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 260–283. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregori, E. B., Zhang, J., Galván-Fernández, C., & de Asís Fernández-Navarro, F. (2018). Learner support in moocs: Identifying variables linked to completion. Computers & Education, 122, 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, H., Zheng, Q., Dong, B., & Yu, H. (2018). Measuring student’s utilization of video resources and its effect on academic performance [Paper presentation]. 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 196–198. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2018.00053
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A., Chuang, I., Reich, J., Coleman, C., Whitehill, J., Northcutt, C., … Petersen, R. (2015). Harvardx and mitx: Two years of open online courses fall 2012-summer 2014. Available at SSRN 2586847. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2586847
   Google Scholar
• Hollands, F., & Kazi, A. (2019). Benefits and costs of mooc-based alternative credentials: 2018-2019 results from end-of-program surveys. Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Ingolfsdottir, K. (2016). Winds of change in higher education. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 37(12), 990–992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2016.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizilcec, R. F., & Schneider, E. (2015). Motivation as a lens to understand online learners: Toward data-driven design with the OLEI scale. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 22(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2699735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloft, M., Stiehler, F., Zheng, Z., & Pinkwart, N. (2014, October). Predicting mooc dropout over weeks using machine learning methods [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of the EMNLP 2014 Workshop on Analysis of Large Scale Social Interaction in MOOCs (pp. 60–65). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14-4111
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2020). Evaluation of fairness trade-offs in predicting student success. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.00088. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.00088
   Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Baker, R., & Warschauer, M. (2020). Using clickstream data to measure, understand, and support self-regulated learning in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 45, 100727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). Accessing online learning material: quantitative behavior patterns and their effects on motivation and learning performance. Computers & Education, 114, 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littenberg-Tobias, J., & Reich, J. (2020). Evaluating access, quality, and equity in online learning: A case study of a mooc-based blended professional degree program. The Internet and Higher Education, 47, 100759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, J., Li, C., & Zheng, L. (2016, August). Machine learning application in MOOCs: Dropout prediction [Paper presentation]. In 2016 11th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE) (pp. 52–57). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE.2016.7581554
   Google Scholar
• Makhlouf, J., & Mine, T. (2020). Analysis of click-stream data to predict stem careers from student usage of an intelligent tutoring system. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 12(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4008050
   Google Scholar
• Mbouzao, B., Desmarais, M. C., & Shrier, I. (2020). Early prediction of success in mooc from video interaction features. In I. Bittencourt, M. Cukurova, K. Muldner, R. Luckin, & E. Millán (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education. AIED 2020. Lecture notes in computer science (vol. 12164). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_35
   Google Scholar
• Merzdorf, H. E., & Douglas, K. A. (2020). Surveying motivation and learning outcomes of advanced learners in online engineering graduate moocs [Paper presentation]. 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), October, 1–4. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9273965
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, A. A. (2019). Predicting student dropout in a micromasters program [Doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122250
   Google Scholar
• Ponce-Cueto, E., & Caplice, C. (2019). MicroMasters are not just a bunch of MOOCs: Lessons from the first MicroMasters program [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of EMOOCs 2019: Work in Progress Papers of the Research, Experience and Business Tracks.
   Google Scholar
• Rivas, M. J., Baker, R. B., & Evans, B. J. (2020). Do moocs make you more marketable? An experimental analysis of the value of moocs relative to traditional credentials and experience. AERA Open, 6(4), 233285842097357. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420973577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizvi, S., Rienties, B., Rogaten, J., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2020). Investigating variation in learning processes in a futurelearn mooc. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(1), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09231-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, B. E., Fukuta, J., & Gordon, F. (2010). Live lecture versus video podcast in undergraduate medical education: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Medical Education, 10(1), 68. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/10/68 https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stöhr, C., Stathakarou, N., Mueller, F., Nifakos, S., & McGrath, C. (2019). Videos as learning objects in moocs: A study of specialist and non‐specialist participants’ video activity in moocs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, M., Lester, J., Rangwala, H., & Johri, A. (2016). Next-term student performance prediction: A recommender systems approach. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 8(1), 22–51. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3554603
   Google Scholar
• Xing, W., Tang, H., & Pei, B. (2019). Beyond positive and negative emotions: Looking into the role of achievement emotions in discussion forums of moocs. The Internet and Higher Education, 43, 100690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhenghao, C., Alcorn, B., Christensen, G., Eriksson, N., Koller, D., & Emanuel, E. J. (2015). Who’s benefiting from MOOCs, and why. Harvard Business Review, 25(1), 2–8. https://hbr.org/2015/09/whos-benefiting-from-moocs-and-why
   Google Scholar