Affordances and challenges of artificial intelligence in K-12 education: a systematic review

References

• Adams, C., Pente, P., Lemermeyer, G., & Rockwell, G. (2021). Artificial intelligence ethics guidelines for K-12 education: A review of the global lands. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78270-2_4
   Google Scholar
• Adamson, D., Dyke, G., Jang, H., & Rosé, C. P. (2014). Towards an agile approach to adapting dynamic collaboration support to student needs. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(1), 92–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-013-0012-6
   Google Scholar
• Ali, S. G. A. (2020). Using an artificial intelligence application for developing primary school pupils’ oral language skills. Journal of Education, 75, 68–110. https://doi.org/10.12816/EDUSOHAG
   Google Scholar
• Alsubait, T., Parsia, B., & Sattler, U. (2016). Ontology-based multiple-choice question generation. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 30(2), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/274949
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, T. (2016). Teaching in the machine age: How innovation can make bad teachers good and good teachers better. Christensen Institute. https://www.christenseninstitute.org/publications/teaching-machine-age/
   Google Scholar
• Arroyo, I., Woolf, B. P., Burleson, W., Muldner, K., Rai, D., & Tai, M. (2014). A multimedia adaptive tutoring system for mathematics that addresses cognition, metacognition and affect. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 387–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0023-y
   Google Scholar
• Avancena, A. T., Nishihara, A., & Kondo, C. (2015). Developing an algorithm learning tool for high school introductory computer science. Education Research International, 2015, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/840217
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., Smith, L., & Anissa, N. (2019). Educ-AI-tion rebooted? Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges. Nesta, February. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Future_of_AI_and_education_v5_WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Belur, J., Tompson, L., Thornton, A., & Simon, M. (2021). Interrater reliability in systematic review methodology: Exploring variation in coder decision-making. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(2), 837–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benotti, L., Martínez, M. C., & Schapachnik, F. (2018). A tool for introducing computer science with automatic formative assessment. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2682084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergdahl, N., Nouri, J., Karunaratne, T., Afzaal, M., & Saqr, M. (2020). Learning analytics for blended learning: A systematic review of theory, methodology, and ethical considerations. International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence for Education (iJAI), 2(2), 46. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijai.v2i2.17887
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, C. D. D. (2012). Student use of animated pedagogical agents in a middle school science inquiry program. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. H. J., Wu, J. C., Yang, C. T. Y., & Pan, I. (2016). Developing and evaluating a Chinese collocation retrieval tool for CFL students and teachers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.889711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Xie, H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020). A multi-perspective study on artificial intelligence in education: Grants, conferences, journals, software tools, institutions, and researchers. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1(October), 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100005
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1(July), 100002–100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, C. H., & Liu, W. X. (2017). An appraisal model based on a synthetic feature selection approach for students’ academic achievement. Symmetry, 9(282), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9110282
   Google Scholar
• Chung, J. Y., & Lee, S. (2019). Dropout early warning systems for high school students using machine learning. Children and Youth Services Review, 96(November 2018), 346–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.030
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, H. (2017). Moving toward a mobile learning landscape: Presenting a mlearning integration framework. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(2), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-02-2017-0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crompton, H., Bernacki, M. L., & Greene, J. (2020). Psychological foundations of emerging technologies for teaching and learning in higher education. Current Opinion in Psychology, 36, 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2020). Mobile learning and pedagogical opportunities: A configurative systematic review of PreK-12 research using the SAMR framework. Computers & Education, 156(December 2019), 103945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103945
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, H., Burke, D., Gregory, K. H., & Gräbe, C. (2016). The use of mobile learning in science: A systematic review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9597-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crompton, H., & Song, D. (2021). The potential of artificial intelligence in higher education. Revista Virtual Universidad Católica Del Norte, 62, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.35575/rvuen.n62a1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutumisu, M., Blair, K. P., Chin, D. B., & Schwartz, D. L. (2017). Assessing whether students seek constructive criticism: The design of an automated feedback system for a graphic design task. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 27(3), 419–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0137-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, S. A., Varner, L. K., McNamara, D. S. (2013, May 22–24). Cohesion-based prompt effects in argumentative writing [Paper presentation]. FLAIRS 2013 – Proceedings of the 26th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, St. Pete Beach, Florida, 202–207.
   Google Scholar
• Della Ventura, M. (2018). Twitter as a music education tool to enhance the learning process: Conversation analysis. In L. Deng, W. W. K. Ma, & C. W. R. Fong (Eds.), New Media for Educational Change (pp. 81–88). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8896-4
   Google Scholar
• Essa, A., & Ayad, H. (2012). Improving student success using predictive models and data visualisations. Research in Learning Technology, 20(SUPPL), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19191
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, A. J., Hollister, J. R., DeMara, R. F., Leigh, J., Lanman, B., Lee, S. Y., Parker, S., Walls, C., Parker, J., Wong, J., Barham, C., & Wilder, B. (2017). AI in informal science education: Bringing Turing back to life to perform the Turing test. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 27(2), 353–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0144-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2010). Utility in a fallible tool: A multi-site case study of automated writing evaluation. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 8(6), 4–43.
   Google Scholar
• Han, K. W., Lee, E. K., & Lee, Y. J. (2010). The impact of a peer-learning agent based on pair programming in a programming course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 53(2), 318–327. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2009.2019121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrastinski, S., Olofsson, A. D., Arkenback, C., Ekström, S., Ericsson, E., Fransson, G., Jaldemark, J., Ryberg, T., Öberg, L.-M., Fuentes, A., Gustafsson, U., Humble, N., Mozelius, P., Sundgren, M., & Utterberg, M. (2019). Critical imaginaries and reflections on artificial intelligence and robots in post digital K-12 education. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(2), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00046-x
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C. J., Liu, M. C., Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., Huang, T. H., Chen, C. H., Shen, H. Y., Huang, K. L., Liao, J. J., Hu, K. W., Luo, Y. C., & Chang, T. Y. (2010). A learning assistance tool for enhancing ICT literacy of elementary school students. Educational Technology and Society, 13(3), 126–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G.-J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001–100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
   Google Scholar
• Kabudi, T., Pappas, I., & Olsen, D. H. (2021). AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100017
   Google Scholar
• Keshav, N. U., Vogt-Lowell, K., Vahabzadeh, A., & Sahin, N. T. (2019). Digital attention-related augmented-reality game: Significant correlation between student game performance and validated clinical measures of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Children, 6(72), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/children6060072
   Google Scholar
• Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44(September 2019), 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450
   Google Scholar
• Kurdi, G., Leo, J., Parsia, B., Sattler, U., & Al-Emari, S. (2020). A systematic review of automatic question generation for educational purposes. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(1), 121–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-019-00186-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, E. L.-C., & Heintz, M. (2021). Augmented reality applications for K-12 education: A systematic review from the usability and user experience perspective. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 30(December 2021), 100321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100321
   Google Scholar
• Lenat, D. B., & Durlach, P. J. (2014). Reinforcing math knowledge by immersing students in a simulated learning-by-teaching experience. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(3), 216–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0016-x
   Google Scholar
• Leprince-Ringuet, D. (2021). ‘Are we willing to pull the plug ?’ Tech projects are under scrutiny as digital ethics concerns increase: Tech analysis firm anticipates a shift towards privacy that might mean some tough. ZDNet Tech News. https://www.zdnet.com/article/are-we-willing-to-pull-the-plug-tech-projects-are-under-scrutiny-as-digital-ethics-concerns-increase/
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers and Education, 95, 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, R., Stamper, J., Davenport, J., Crossley, S., McNamara, D., Nzinga, K., & Sherin, B. (2019). Learning linkages: Integrating data streams of multiple modalities and timescales. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. https://www.pearson.com/content/dam/corporate/global/pearson-dot-com/files/innovation/Intelligence-Unleashed-Publication.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda, N., Weng, W., & Wall, N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive scaffolding for learning by teaching a teachable agent. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-019-00190-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2007). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK): Confronting the wicked problems of teaching with technology. In R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. A. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (pp. 2214–2226) AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabiyev, V., Karal, H., Arslan, S., Erumit, L. A. K., & Cebi, A. (2013). An artificial intelligence-based distance education system: Artimat. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 14(2), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.20021
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, C. M., Murphy, S. K., Christel, M. G., Stevens, S. M., & Zollman, D. A. (2016). Automated analysis of short responses in an interactive synthetic tutoring system for introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010122-1-010122–16. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noss, R., Poulovassilis, A., Geraniou, E., Gutierrez-Santos, S., Hoyles, C., Kahn, K., Magoulas, G. D., & Mavrikis, M. (2012). The design of a system to support exploratory learning of algebraic generalisation. Computers and Education, 59(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouri, J., Ebner, M., Ifenthaler, D., Saqr, M., Malmberg, J., Khalil, M., Bruun, J., Viberg, O., Conde González, M. Á., Papamitsiou, Z., & Berthelsen, U. D. (2019). Efforts in Europe for data-driven improvement of education – A review of learning analytics research in seven countries. International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence for Education (iJAI), 1(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijai.v1i1.11053
   Google Scholar
• Nye, B. D. (2015). Intelligent tutoring systems by and for the developing world: A review of trends and approaches for educational technology in a global context. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 25(2), 177–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0028-6
   Google Scholar
• O’Shea, T., & Self, J. (1986). Learning and teaching with computers: The artificial intelligence revolution. Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference. https://doi.org/10.5555/576781
   Google Scholar
• Orduña, P., Rodriguez-Gil, L., López-de-Ipiña, D., & Garcia-Zubia, J. (2012). Sharing remote labs: A case study. International Journal of Online Engineering, 9(SPECIAL ISSUE 1), 26–27. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v9iS1.2348
   Google Scholar
• Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 372(71), n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pareto, L. (2014). A teachable agent game engaging primary school children to learn arithmetic concepts and reasoning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(3), 251–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0018-8
   Google Scholar
• Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PRISMA Statement. (2021). PRISMA endorsers. PRISMA statement website. http://www.prisma-statement.org/Endorsement/PRISMAEndorsers
   Google Scholar
• Qazdar, A., Er-Raha, B., Cherkaoui, C., & Mammass, D. (2019). A machine learning algorithm framework for predicting students performance: A case study of baccalaureate students in Morocco. Education and Information Technologies, 24(6), 3577–3589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09946-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, S., Anderson, J. R., Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. (2007). Cognitive tutor: Applied research in mathematics education. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roscoe, R. D., Snow, E. L., Brandon, R. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Educational game enjoyment, perceptions, and features in an intelligent writing tutor [Paper presentation]. Twenty-Sixth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, Palo Alto, California, 520–525. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/FLAIRS/FLAIRS13/paper/view/5855
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage. https://www.amazon.com/Coding-Manual-Qualitative-Researchers-Third/dp/1473902495
   Google Scholar
• Skenderi, L., & Skenderi, F. (2017). Teachers’ perceptions of technology use in the schools [Paper presentation]. 14th International Conference “the Power of Knowledge.” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328492337_TEACHERS’_PERCEPTIONS_OF_TECHNOLOGY_USE_IN_THE_CLASSROOM
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1995). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Tissenbaum, M., & Slotta, J. D. (2019). Developing a smart classroom infrastructure to support real-time student collaboration and inquiry: A 4-year design study. Instructional Science, 47(4), 423–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09486-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F. H. (2017). An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in flipped classroom supported by learning management system. Computers & Education, 114, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, W., Cole, R., Bolaños, D., Buchenroth-Martin, C., Svirsky, E., & Weston, T. (2013). My science tutor: A conversational multimedia virtual tutor. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1115–1125. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, D. M., Allen, J. R. (2018). How artificial intelligence is transforming the world. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/research/how-artificial-intelligence-is-transforming-the-world/
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Xia, L., & Zhao, Q. (2019). An automated grader for Chinese essay combining shallow and deep semantic attributes. IEEE Access. 7, 176306–176316. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2957582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousafzai, B. K., Hayat, M., & Afzal, S. (2020). Application of machine learning and data mining in predicting the performance of intermediate and secondary education level student. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 4677–4697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10189-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuravlova, L., Sheremet, M., Suprun, D., Fedorenko, S., & Dubiaha, S. (2021). Results of the examination of primary school students by means of speech therapy screening. Brain. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(1), 326–342. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/12.1/185
   Google Scholar