Coding choreography: Understanding student responses to representational incompatibilities between dance and programming

References

• Allen-Handy, A., Ifill, V., Schaar, R. Y., Rogers, M., & Woodard, M. (2020). Black girls STEAMing through dance: Inspiring STEAM literacies, STEAM identities, and positive self-concept. In K. Thomas & D. Huffman (Eds.), Challenges and opportunities for transforming from STEM to STEAM education (pp. 198–219). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A., & Eglash, R. (2013). cSELF (computer science education from life): Broadening participation through design agency. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 8(4), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijwltt.2013100103
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A., Eglash, R., Lachney, M., & Babbitt, W. (2016). Design agency: Diversifying computer science at the intersections of creativity and culture. In M. Raisinghani (Ed.), Revolutionizing education through web-based instruction (pp. 35–56). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Bergner, Y., Mund, S., Chen, O., & Payne, W. (2021). Leveraging interest-driven embodied practices to build quantitative literacies: A case study using motion and audio capture from dance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2013–2036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09804-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, C. (2018). Modelling and the representational imagination. ZDM, 50(1–2), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0926-4
   Google Scholar
• Brady, C. (2021). Patches as an expressive medium for exploratory multi-agent modelling. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(3), 1024–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, C., Gresalfi, M., Steinberg, S., & Knowe, M. (2020). Debugging for art’s sake: Beginning programmers’ debugging activity in an expressive coding context. In M. Gresalfi, & I. S. Horn (Eds.), The interdisciplinarity of the learning sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020 (Vol. 3, pp. 1229–1236). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, C., Orton, K., Weintrop, D., Anton, G., Rodriguez, S., & Wilensky, U. (2016). All roads lead to computing: Making, participatory simulations, and social computing as pathways to computer science. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60(1), 59–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, C., Stroup, W., Petrosino, A., & Wilensky, U. (2018). Group-based simulation and modelling: Technology supports for social constructionism. In Proceedings of Constructionism.
   Google Scholar
• Buechley, L., Eisenberg, M., Catchen, J., & Crockett, A. (2008). The LilyPad Arduino: Using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 423–432).
   Google Scholar
• Champion, D. (2018). The STEAM dance makerspace: A context for integration: An investigation of learning at the intersections of STEM, art, making and embodiment [PhD dissertation, Northwestern University].
   Google Scholar
• Danish, J. A., & Enyedy, N. (2007). Negotiated representational mediators: How young children decide what to include in their science representations. Science Education, 91(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DesPortes, K., Payne, W., & Bergner, Y. (2021). danceOn: Exploring embodiment in a dance and computing learning application. Presented at the International Society of the Learning Sciences Annual Meeting 2021.
   Google Scholar
• DesPortes, K., Spells, M., & DiSalvo, B. (2016). Interdisciplinary computing and the emergence of boundary objects: A case-study of dance and technology. International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, E. (2019). Programming as art. In E. Edmonds & M. Boden (Eds.), From fingers to digits, an artificial aesthetic (pp. 209–222). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fadjo, C. L. (2012). Developing computational thinking through grounded embodied cognition [Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University].
   Google Scholar
• Farris, A. V., Dickes, A. C., & Sengupta, P. (2016). Development of disciplined interpretation using computational modeling in the elementary science classroom. In C. K. Looi, J. L. Polman, U. Cress, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Transforming learning, empowering learners: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2016, Volume 1. Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Flesch, B., Gabaldón, C., Nabity, M., & Thomas, D. (2021). Choreographing increased understanding and positive attitudes towards coding by integrating dance. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 4(3), n3.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, D., Coenraad, M., Palmer, J., Eatinger, D., Zipp, A., Anaya, M., White, M., Pham, H., Gökdemir, O., Weintrop, D. (2020). An analysis of use-modify-create pedagogical approach’s success in balancing structure and student agency. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 14–24).
   Google Scholar
• Garneli, V., Giannakos, M. N., & Chorianopoulos, K. (2015). Computing education in K-12 schools: A review of the literature [Paper presentation]. 2015 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 543–551). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2015.7096023
   Google Scholar
• Gerofsky, S. (2010). Mathematical learning and gesture: Character viewpoint and observer viewpoint in students’ gestured graphs of functions. Gesture, 10(2–3), 321–343. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.10.2-3.10ger
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri, S. (2022, March). Supporting novice learners’ coding through productive failure-based debugging activities. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Vol. 2, pp. 1175–1175).
   Google Scholar
• Gravel, B. E., & Svihla, V. (2021). Fostering heterogeneous engineering through whole-class design work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(2), 279–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1843465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G., & Hall, R. P. (1997). Practicing representation: Learning with and about representational forms. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 361–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, S. M., Rowsell, J., Winters, K. L., Vietgen, P., McLauchlan, D., & McQueen-Fuentes, G. (2017). A reason to respond: Finding agency through the arts. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 18(25), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R. (1996). Representation as shared activity: Situated cognition and Dewey’s cartography of experience. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(3), 209–238. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0503_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R., Ma, J. Y., & Nemirovsky, R. (2014). Rescaling bodies in/as representational instruments in GPS drawing. In V.R. Lee (Ed.), Learning technologies and the body (pp. 124–143). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayathirtha, G., & Kafai, Y. B. (2020). Interactive stitch sampler: A synthesis of a decade of research on using electronic textiles to answer the who, where, how, and what for K–12 computer science education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 20(4), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3418299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasien, L., & Gresalfi, M. (2021). The role of participatory identity in learners’ hybridization of activity across contexts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(4-5), 676–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jörg, S., Leonard, A. E., Babu, S., Gundersen, K., Parmar, D., Boggs, K., & Daily, S. B. (2014). Character animation and embodiment in teaching computational thinking [Paper presentation]. ACM Siggraph 2014 Posters (pp. 1–1). https://doi.org/10.1145/2614217.2630597
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B. (2016). From computational thinking to computational participation in K-12 education. Communications of the ACM, 59(8), 26–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/2955114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., DeLiema, D., Fields, D. A., Lewandowski, G., & Lewis, C. (2019, February). Rethinking debugging as productive failure for CS education [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 169–170).
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., Lee, E., Searle, K., Fields, D., Kaplan, E., & Lui, D. (2014). A crafts-oriented approach to computing in high school: Introducing computational concepts, practices, and perspectives with electronic textiles. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2576874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 379–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802212669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 45–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.591717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. K. (2009). Productive failure in CSCL groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9059-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelton, M. L., & Ma, J. Y. (2020). Assembling a torus: Family mobilities in an immersive mathematics exhibition. Cognition and Instruction, 38(3), 318–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopcha, T. J., Ocak, C., & Qian, Y. (2021). Analyzing children’s computational thinking through embodied interaction with technology: A multimodal perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 1987–2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09832-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremling, J., Arndt, N., Roman, A., Zilm, M., & Straehler-Pohl, H. (2018). Dancing on the junction of mathematics and bodily experience. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 15(1–2), 201–227. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, A. E., & Daily, S. B. (2014). The Dancing Alice Project: Computational and embodied arts research in middle school education. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, A. E., Daily, S. B., Jörg, S., & Babu, S. V. (2021). Coding moves: Design and research of teaching computational thinking through dance choreography and virtual interactions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1760754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. M., & Shah, N. (2015). How equity and inequity can emerge in pair programming [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 41–50).
   Google Scholar
• Litts, B. K., Kafai, Y. B., Searle, K. A., & Dieckmeyer, E. (2016). Perceptions of productive failure in design projects: High school students’ challenges in making electronic textiles. International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Litts, B. K., Searle, K. A., Brayboy, B. M. J., & Kafai, Y. B. (2020). Computing for all?: Examining critical biases in computational tools for learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 842–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lytle, N., Catete, V., Isvik, A., Boulden, D., Dong, Y., Wiebe, E., & Barnes, T. (2019). From ‘use’ to ‘choose’: Scaffolding CT curricula and exploring student choices while programming (Practical Report) [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 14th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 1–6).
   Google Scholar
• Ma, J. Y. (2016). Designing disruptions for productive hybridity: The case of walking scale geometry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(3), 335–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1180297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, J. Y. (2017). Multi-party, whole-body interactions in mathematical activity. Cognition and Instruction, 35(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2017.1282485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, B., & Walker, R. (1975). Case‐study and the social philosophy of educational research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 5(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764750050101
   Google Scholar
• O’Dell, D. H. (2017). The Debugging Mindset: Understanding the psychology of learning strategies leads to effective problem-solving skills. Queue, 15(1), 71–90.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, C. B., Dobbins, A., Lansing, E., Lansing, E., Keppers, N., Levinson, M., & Rhodes, M. (2016). Dancing computer: Computer literacy through dance [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multi Media (pp. 174–180).
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, W. C., Bergner, Y., West, M. E., Charp, C., Shapiro, R. B. B., Szafir, D. A., Taylor, E. V., & DesPortes, K. (2021, May). danceON: Culturally responsive creative computing [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16).
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, K. M., Strickland, C., Binkowski, T. A., & Franklin, D. (2019, February). A K-8 debugging learning trajectory derived from research literature [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 745–751). https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287396
   Google Scholar
• Ryoo, J. J. (2019). Pedagogy that supports computer science for all. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, )19(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A., & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies, 13(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(92)90268-F
   Google Scholar
• Shamir, M., Kocherovsky, M., & Chung, C. (2019). A paradigm for teaching math and computer science concepts in k-12 learning environment by integrating coding, animation, dance, music and art [Paper presentation]. 2019 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) (pp. 62–68). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISECon.2019.8882015
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, F., Vogelstein, L., Brady, C., Steinberg, R., Thomas, C., Champion, D., Lindberg, L., Enyedy, N., DesPortes, K., Payne, W., Bergner, Y., Taylor, E., & Shapiro, R. B. (2021). Embodying STEM: Learning at the intersection of Dance and STEM. In E. de Vries, Y. Hod, & J. Ahn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2021 (pp. 819–826). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vogelstein, L., & Brady, C. (2019). Taking the patch perspective: A comparative analysis of a patch based participatory simulation. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 512–519.
   Google Scholar
• Vogelstein, L., Brady, C., & Hall, R. (2019). Reenacting mathematical concepts found in large-scale dance performance can provide both material and method for ensemble learning. ZDM, 51(2), 331–346.
   Google Scholar
• Vogelstein. L., Brady, C., Steinberg, R., Thomas, C. (2021). Flares in the Soup Game: Improvisational Collective Choreography and Computational Expressivity. In the Symposium Expansive Modeling: Broadening the scope of modeling in K-12 education in the proceedings of the International Society of the Learning Sciences Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Warshauer, H. K. (2015). Productive struggle in middle school mathematics classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(4), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9286-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2019). Transitioning from introductory block-based and text-based environments to professional programming languages in high school computer science classrooms. Computers & Education, 142, 103646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U. J., & Stroup, W. (1999). Learning through participatory simulations: Network-based design for systems learning in classrooms. In C. M. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 Conference. International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U., & Reisman, K. (2006). Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories—An embodied modelling approach. Cognition and Instruction, 24(2), 171–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2402_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2015). Children, meaning-making and the arts. Pearson Higher Education AU.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Tian, F., & Umapathy, K. (2019). Block-based versus text-based programming environments on novice student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis study. Computer Science Education, 29(2–3), 177–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2019.1565233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar