Engaging students via synchronous peer feedback in a technology-enhanced learning environment

References

• Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., Airasian, P., Cruikshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P., & Wittrock, M. C. (2000). A taxonomy for learning, “Teaching, and assessing-a revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives”. Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, P., & Corbin, L. (2012). Student engagement: Rhetoric and reality. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 759–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.655711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Bundick, M., Quaglia, R., Corso, M., & Haywood, D. (2014). Promoting student engagement in the classroom. Teachers’ College Record, 116(4), 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J., & Krutka, D. (2014). Chat it up. Learning & Leading with Technology, 41(5), 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. F. (2009). Peer review through synchronous and asynchronous CMC modes: A case study in a Taiwanese college English writing course. The JALT CALL Journal, 5(1), 45–64. https://www.castledown.com/articles/JALTCALL_5_1_j72.pdf https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v5n1.72
   Google Scholar
• Cheong, K. C., & Ong, B. (2016). An evaluation of the relationship between student engagement, academic achievement, and satisfaction. In S. Tang & L. Logonnathan (Eds.), Assessment for learning within and beyond the classroom (pp. 409–416). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0908-2_34
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, T. (2022). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), S14–S30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, S. (2014). Information technology, its impact on society and its future. Advances in Computing, 4(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ac.20140401.07
   Google Scholar
• Demirbilek, M. (2015). Social media and peer feedback: What do students really think about using wiki and facebook as platforms for peer feedback? Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(3), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415589530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djenno, M., Insua, G., & Pho, A. (2015). From paper to pixels: Using Google Forms for collaboration and assessment. Library Hi Tech News, 32(4), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-12-2014-0105
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., Richardson, J. C., Belland, B., Camin, D., Connolly, P., Coulthard, G., Lei, K., & Mong, C. (2007). Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00331.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., Richardson, J. C., Lehman, J. D., Newby, T. J., Cheng, X., Mong, C., & Sadaf, A. (2010). Peer feedback in a large undergraduate blended course: Perceptions of value and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.43.1.e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, K. S., Harrington, S. J., & Santiago, J. (2009). The effect of engagement and perceived course value on deep and surface learning strategies. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 12, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.28945/435
   Google Scholar
• Foo, S. Y. (2021). Analyzing peer feedback in asynchronous online discussions: A case study. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4553–4572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10477-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1966). The purpose and credibility of qualitative research. Nursing Research, 15(1), 56–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanrahan, S., & Isaacs, G. (2001). Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students’ views. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360123776
   Google Scholar
• Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, C. D., Barrett, A. F., & Frick, T. W. (2010). Anonymity to promote peer feedback: Pre-service teachers’ comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(1), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.43.1.f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P., & Wells, J. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students’ sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Krutka, D., & Milton, M. (2013). The enlightenment meets Twitter: Using social media in the social studies classroom. Ohio Social Studies Review, 50(2), 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., Gonyea, R. M., & Gonyea, M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurt, G., Atay, D., & Öztürk, H. A. (2022). Student engagement in K12 online education during the pandemic: The case of Turkey. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), S31–S47. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1920518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, C., & Habil, H. (2020). Peer feedback in technology-supported learning environment: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(9), 762–784. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i9/7866
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., Liu, X., & Zhou, Y. (2012). Give and take: A re‐analysis of assessor and assessee’s roles in technology‐facilitated peer assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01180.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., & Law, N. (2012). Online peer assessment: Effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science, 40(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, T. (2016). Enabling microblogging-based peer feedback in face-to-face classrooms. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(2), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.995202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, T., Dani, D., & Cheng, L. (2016). Viability of using Twitter to support peer instruction in teacher education. International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, 4(4), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMILE.2016.081280
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Y., Xie, M., & Lian, Z. (2019). Emotional engagement and student satisfaction: A study of Chinese college students based on a nationally representative sample. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(4), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00437-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallette, M., & Barone, D. (2013). On using Google Forms. The Reading Teacher, 66(8), 625–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, M., Valdivia, I., & Ortiz, A. (2015). Making learning more visible through e-assessment: Implications for feedback. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(1), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-015-9091-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilson, L. B. (2003). Improving student peer feedback. College Teaching, 51(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550309596408
   Google Scholar
• Öztürk, M. (2021). Asynchronous online learning experiences of students in pandemic process: Facilities, challenges, suggestions. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.767378
   Google Scholar
• Rasi, P., & Vuojärvi, H. (2018). Toward personal and emotional connectivity in mobile higher education through asynchronous formative audio feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman, T., Brantley-Dias, L., Dias, M., & Edwards, B. (2022). Addressing student engagement during COVID-19: Secondary STEM teachers attend to the affective dimension of learner needs. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1920519
   Google Scholar
• Saadé, R. G. G., Morin, D., & Thomas, J. D. E. (2012). Critical thinking in E-learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1608–1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, H. (2017). An exploration of asynchronous and synchronous feedback modes in EFL writing. Journal of Higher Education, 29, 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9154-0
   Google Scholar
• Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, J., & Holbeck, R. (2018). Five elements that impact quality feedback in the online asynchronous classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 15(3), n3. https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2018.15.3.10
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang, A. (2020). Enhancing learners’ awareness of oral presentation (delivery) skills in the context of self-regulated learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 21(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417731214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Boom, G., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2007). Effects of elicited reflections combined with tutor or peer feedback on self-regulated and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 532–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. (2022). Making peer feedback work: The contribution of technology-mediated dialogic peer feedback to feedback uptake and literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1914544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008). The impact of two types of peer assessment on students’ performance and satisfaction within a wiki environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, K. (2013). What do the numbers say? The influence of motivation and peer feedback on students’ behaviour in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 288–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01291.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, K., Yu, C., & Bradshaw, A. C. (2014). Impacts of role assignment and participation in asynchronous discussions in college-level online classes. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yallop, R., Taremaa, P., & Leijen, D. (2021). The affect and effect of asynchronous written feedback comments on the peer feedback process: An ethnographic case-study approach within one L2 English doctorate writing group. Journal of Writing Research, 12(3), 531–600. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2021.12.03.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Liu, K., Li, M., & Li, S. (2022). Students’ affective engagement, parental involvement, and teacher support in emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from a cross-sectional survey in China. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), S148–S164. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1922104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, L., Cui, P., Li, X., & Huang, R. (2018). Synchronous discussion between assessors and assessees in web-based peer assessment: Impact on writing performance, feedback quality, meta-cognitive awareness and self-efficacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1370533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar