Truncating the spliceosomal ‘rope protein’ Prp45 results in Htz1 dependent phenotypes

References

• Herzel L, Ottoz DSM, Alpert T, et al. Splicing and transcription touch base: co-transcriptional spliceosome assembly and function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18(10):637–650. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley DL. Coupling mRNA processing with transcription in time and space. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15(3):163–175. doi: 10.1038/nrg3662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luco RF, Allo M, Schor IE, et al. Epigenetics in alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Cell. 2011;144(1):16–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanzo M, VanderSluis B, Koch EN, et al. A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function. Science. 2016;353(6306):aaf1420–aaf 1420. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrillo Oesterreich F, Preibisch S, Neugebauer KM. Global analysis of nascent RNA reveals transcriptional pausing in terminal exons. Mol Cell. 2010;40(4):571–581. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrillo Oesterreich F, Herzel L, Straube K, et al. Splicing of nascent RNA coincides with intron exit from RNA polymerase II. Cell. 2016;165(2):372–381. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodor YL, Rodriguez J, Abruzzi KC, et al. Nascent-seq indicates widespread cotranscriptional pre-mRNA splicing in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 2011;25(23):2502–2512. doi: 10.1101/gad.178962.111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nojima T, Rebelo K, Gomes T, et al. RNA polymerase II phosphorylated on CTD serine 5 interacts with the spliceosome during Co-transcriptional Splicing. Mol Cell. 2018;72(2):369–379.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan L, Sayou C, Tuck A, et al. RNA polymerase II stalling at pre-mRNA splice sites is enforced by ubiquitination of the catalytic subunit. Elife. 2017;6:e27082. doi: 10.7554/eLife.27082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslanzadeh V, Huang Y, Sanguinetti G, et al. Transcription rate strongly affects splicing fidelity and cotranscriptionality in budding yeast. Genome Res. 2018;28(2):203–213. doi: 10.1101/gr.225615.117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrocci TJ, Neugebauer KM. Pre-mRNA splicing in the nuclear landscape. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2019;84:11–20. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2019.84.040402
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fica SM. Cryo-EM snapshots of the human spliceosome reveal structural adaptions for splicing regulation. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2020;65:139–148. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2020.06.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moehle EA, Ryan CJ, Krogan NJ, et al. The yeast SR-Like protein Npl3 links chromatin modification to mRNA processing. Buratowski S, editor. PLOS Genet. 2012;8(11):e1003101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minocha R, Popova V, Kopytova D, et al. Mud2 functions in transcription by recruiting the Prp19 and TREX complexes to transcribed genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(18):9749–9763. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cech TR. RNA in biological condensates. RNA. 2022;28(1):1–2. doi: 10.1261/rna.079051.121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson FQ, Merkhofer EC, Johnson TL. Dynamic histone acetylation is critical for cotranscriptional spliceosome assembly and spliceosomal rearrangements. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(5):2004–2009. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011982108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hérissant L, Moehle EA, Bertaccini D, et al. H2B ubiquitylation modulates spliceosome assembly and function in budding yeast: histone marks and mRNA splicing. Biol Cell. 2014;106(4):126–138. doi: 10.1111/boc.201400003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson MR, Jha DK, Ucles SA, et al. Histone H3K36 methylation regulates pre-mRNA splicing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA Biol. 2016;13(4):412–426. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2016.1144009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung CS, Douglass SM, Morselli M, et al. H3K36 methylation and the chromodomain protein Eaf3 are required for proper cotranscriptional spliceosome assembly. Cell Rep. 2019;27(13):3760–3769.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao W, Ding Z, Zheng Z-Z, et al. Prp5−Spt8/Spt3 interaction mediates a reciprocal coupling between splicing and transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(11):5799–5813. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maudlin IE, Beggs JD. Spt5 modulates cotranscriptional spliceosome assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA. 2019;25(10):1298–1310. doi: 10.1261/rna.070425.119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinkova K, Lebduska P, Skruzny M, et al. Functional mapping of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Prp45 identifies the SNW domain as essential for viability. J Biochem (Tokyo). 2002;132(4):557–563. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a003257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenstra TL, Benschop JJ, Kim T, et al. The specificity and topology of chromatin interaction pathways in yeast. Mol Cell. 2011;42(4):536–549. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görnemann J, Kotovic KM, Hujer K, et al. Cotranscriptional spliceosome assembly occurs in a stepwise fashion and requires the cap binding complex. Mol Cell. 2005;19(1):53–63. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque N, Oberdoerffer S. Chromatin and splicing. Methods Mol Biol Clifton NJ. 2014;1126:97–113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hnisz D, Shrinivas K, Young RA, et al. A phase separation model for transcriptional control. Cell. 2017;169(1):13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henninger JE, Oksuz O, Shrinivas K, et al. RNA-Mediated feedback control of transcriptional condensates. Cell. 2021;184(1):207–225.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat P, Honson D, Guttman M. Nuclear compartmentalization as a mechanism of quantitative control of gene expression. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(10):653–670. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00387-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moehle EA, Braberg H, Krogan NJ, et al. Adventures in time and space: splicing efficiency and RNA polymerase II elongation rate. RNA Biol. 2014;11(4):313–319. doi: 10.4161/rna.28646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslanzadeh V, Beggs JD. Revisiting the window of opportunity for cotranscriptional splicing in budding yeast. RNA. 2020;26(9):1081–1085. doi: 10.1261/rna.075895.120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chathoth KT, Barrass JD, Webb S, et al. A splicing-dependent transcriptional checkpoint associated with prespliceosome formation. Mol Cell. 2014;53(5):779–790. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.01.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen KM, Trotta KL, Smith EE, et al. Comprehensive RNA polymerase II interactomes reveal distinct and varied roles for each phospho-CTD residue. Cell Rep. 2016;15(10):2147–2158. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosonina E, Yurko N, Li W, et al. Threonine-4 of the budding yeast RNAP II CTD couples transcription with Htz1-mediated chromatin remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(33):11924–11931. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412802111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu H, Yu D, Hansen AS, et al. Phase-separation mechanism for C-terminal hyperphosphorylation of RNA polymerase II. Nature. 2018;558(7709):318–323. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0174-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maita H, Nakagawa S. What is the switch for coupling transcription and splicing? RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain phosphorylation, phase separation and beyond. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2020;11(1):e1574. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo YE, Manteiga JC, Henninger JE, et al. Pol II phosphorylation regulates a switch between transcriptional and splicing condensates. Nature. 2019;572(7770):543–548. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1464-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church MC, Fleming AB. A role for histone acetylation in regulating transcription elongation. Transcription. 2018;9(4):225–232. doi: 10.1080/21541264.2017.1394423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen E, Zafrir Z, Tuller T. A code for transcription elongation speed. RNA Biol. 2018;15(1):81–94. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2017.1384118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahhal R, Seto E. Emerging roles of histone modifications and HDACs in RNA splicing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(10):4911–4926. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemette B, Gaudreau L. Reuniting the contrasting functions of H2A.Z. This paper is one of a selection of papers published in this special issue, entitled 27th international west coast chromatin and chromosome conference, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process. Biochem Cell Biol Biochim Biol Cell. 2006;84(4):528–535. doi: 10.1139/o06-077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billon P, Côté J. Precise deposition of histone H2A.Z in chromatin for genome expression and maintenance. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2012;1819(3–4):290–302. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewis HT, Wang AY, Gaub A, et al. What makes a histone variant a variant: changing H2A to become H2A.Z. Schneider R, editor. PLOS Genet. 2021;17(12):e1009950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims RJ, Millhouse S, Chen C-F, et al. Recognition of trimethylated histone H3 lysine 4 facilitates the recruitment of transcription postinitiation factors and pre-mRNA splicing. Mol Cell. 2007;28(4):665–676. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong N, Saldi T, Sheridan RM, et al. RNA Pol II dynamics modulate co-transcriptional chromatin modification, CTD phosphorylation, and transcriptional direction. Mol Cell. 2017;66(4):546–557.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick KL, Ryan CJ, Xu J, et al. Genetic interaction mapping reveals a role for the SWI/SNF nucleosome remodeler in spliceosome activation in fission yeast. Bentley D, editor. PLOS Genet. 2015;11(3):e1005074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen KE, Homer CM, Ryan CJ, et al. The histone variant H2A. Z promotes splicing of weak introns. Genes Dev. 2017;31(7):688–701. doi: 10.1101/gad.295287.116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves LT, Douglass S, Spreafico R, et al. The histone variant H2A.Z promotes efficient cotranscriptional splicing in S. cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 2017;31(7):702–717. doi: 10.1101/gad.295188.116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai R, Yan C, Wan R, et al. Structure of the post-catalytic spliceosome from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell. 2017;171(7):1589–1598.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596(7873):583–589. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruff KM, Pappu RV. AlphaFold and implications for intrinsically disordered proteins. J Mol Biol. 2021;433(20):167208. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan R, Bai R, Yan C, et al. Structures of the catalytically activated yeast spliceosome reveal the mechanism of branching. Cell. 2019;177(2):339–351.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albers M, Diment A, Muraru M. Identification and characterization of Prp45p and Prp46p, essential pre-mRNA splicing factors. RNA. 2003;9(1):138–150. doi: 10.1261/rna.2119903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan R, Bai R, Zhan X, et al. How is precursor messenger RNA spliced by the spliceosome? Annu Rev Biochem. 2020;89(1):333–358. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-013118-111024
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yan C, Wan R, Bai R, et al. Structure of a yeast step II catalytically activated spliceosome. Science. 2017;355(6321):149–155. doi: 10.1126/science.aak9979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaschka C, Newman AJ, Nagai K. Structural basis of nuclear pre-mRNA splicing: lessons from yeast. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2019;11(5):a032391. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a032391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson ME, Fica SM, Galej WP, et al. Postcatalytic spliceosome structure reveals mechanism of 3′–splice site selection. Science. 2017;358(6368):1283–1288. doi: 10.1126/science.aar3729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan R, Yan C, Bai R, et al. Structure of an intron lariat spliceosome from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell. 2017;171(1):120–132.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahura O, Abrhámová K, Skružný M, et al. Prp45 affects Prp22 partition in spliceosomal complexes and splicing efficiency of non-consensus substrates. J Cell Biochem. 2009;106(1):139–151. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon TS, Holehouse AS, Rosen MK, et al. Intrinsically disordered linkers determine the interplay between phase separation and gelation in multivalent proteins. Elife. 2017;6:e30294. doi: 10.7554/eLife.30294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Baudino TA, Dowd DR, et al. Ternary complexes and cooperative interplay between NCoA-62/Ski-interacting protein and steroid receptor coactivators in vitamin D receptor-mediated transcription. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(44):40614–40620. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106263200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prathapam T, Kühne C, Banks L. Skip interacts with the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor and inhibits its transcriptional repression activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(23):5261–5268. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brès V, Gomes N, Pickle L, et al. A human splicing factor, SKIP, associates with P-TEFb and enhances transcription elongation by HIV-1 Tat. Genes Dev. 2005;19(10):1211–1226. doi: 10.1101/gad.1291705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Zhang L, Jones KA. SKIP counteracts p53-mediated apoptosis via selective regulation of p21Cip1 mRNA splicing. Genes Dev. 2011;25(7):701–716. doi: 10.1101/gad.2002611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brès V, Yoh SM, Jones KA. The multi-tasking P-TEFb complex. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20(3):334–340. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Újvári A, Luse DS. Newly initiated RNA encounters a factor involved in splicing immediately upon emerging from within RNA polymerase II. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(48):49773–49779. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409087200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrozková M, Půta F, Fuková I, et al. The fission yeast ortholog of the coregulator SKIP interacts with the small subunit of U2AF. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;284(5):1148–1154. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hálová M, Gahura O, Převorovský M, et al. Nineteen complex–related factor Prp45 is required for the early stages of cotranscriptional spliceosome assembly. RNA. 2017;23(10):1512–1524. doi: 10.1261/rna.061986.117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark TA, Sugnet CW, Ares M. Genomewide analysis of mRNA processing in yeast using splicing-specific microarrays. Science. 2002;296(5569):907–910. doi: 10.1126/science.1069415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soutourina J. Transcription regulation by the mediator complex. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19(4):262–274. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Driessche B, Tafforeau L, Hentges P, et al. Additional vectors for PCR-based gene tagging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe using nourseothricin resistance. Yeast Chichester Engl. 2005;22(13):1061–1068. doi: 10.1002/yea.1293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storici F, Lewis LK, Resnick MA. In vivo site-directed mutagenesis using oligonucleotides. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19(8):773–776. doi: 10.1038/90837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong AHY, Boone C. Synthetic genetic array analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol Clifton NJ. 2006;313:171–192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winzeler EA, Shoemaker DD, Astromoff A, et al. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science. 1999;285(5429):901–906. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5429.901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Převorovský M, Hálová M, Abrhámová K, et al. Workflow for genome-wide determination of pre-mRNA splicing efficiency from yeast RNA-seq data. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2016/4783841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baryshnikova A. Systematic functional annotation and visualization of biological networks. Cell Syst. 2016;2(6):412–421. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson BL, Lagerstedt JO, Pratt JR, et al. Regulation of phosphate acquisition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet. 2003;43(4):225–244. doi: 10.1007/s00294-003-0400-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvin CD, Kladde MP. Effectors of Lysine 4 methylation of histone H3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are negative regulators of PHO5 and GAL1-10. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(32):33057–33062. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405033200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison MA, Lederer AR, Warner MH, et al. The Paf1 complex broadly impacts the transcriptome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2019;212(3):711–728. doi: 10.1534/genetics.119.302262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Query CC, Konarska MM. Suppression of multiple substrate mutations by spliceosomal prp8 alleles suggests functional correlations with ribosomal ambiguity mutants. Mol Cell. 2004;14(3):343–354. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00217-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konarska MM, Vilardell J, Query CC. Repositioning of the reaction intermediate within the catalytic center of the spliceosome. Mol Cell. 2006;21(4):543–553. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung NC, Miasojedow B, Startek M, et al. Jaccard/Tanimoto similarity test and estimation methods for biological presence-absence data. BMC Bioinf. 2019;20(S15):644. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3118-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gu M, Naiyachit Y, Wood TJ, et al. H2A.Z marks antisense promoters and has positive effects on antisense transcript levels in budding yeast. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1247-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sorenson MR, Stevens SW. Rapid identification of mRNA processing defects with a novel single-cell yeast reporter. RNA. 2014;20(5):732–745. doi: 10.1261/rna.042663.113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun M, Schwalb B, Pirkl N, et al. Global analysis of eukaryotic mRNA degradation reveals Xrn1-dependent buffering of transcript levels. Mol Cell. 2013;52(1):52–62. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci Publ Protein Soc. 2021;30(1):70–82. doi: 10.1002/pro.3943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion MF, Kaplan T, Kim M, et al. Dynamics of replication-independent histone turnover in budding yeast. Science. 2007;315(5817):1405–1408. doi: 10.1126/science.1134053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrhámová K, Nemčko F, Libus J, et al. Introns provide a platform for intergenic regulatory feedback of RPL22 paralogs in yeast. Palazzo AF, editor. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0190685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzel L, Neugebauer KM. Quantification of co-transcriptional splicing from RNA-Seq data. Methods. 2015;85:36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.04.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderSluis B, Costanzo M, Billmann M, et al. Integrating genetic and protein–protein interaction networks maps a functional wiring diagram of a cell. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2018;45:170–179. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2018.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Shen Y, Garre E, et al. Stress granule-defective mutants deregulate stress responsive transcripts. Anderson P, editor. PLOS Genet. 2014;10(11):e1004763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavella TA, Cassiano GC, Costa FTM, et al. Yeast-based high-throughput screens for discovery of kinase inhibitors for neglected diseases. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2021;124:275–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–2504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuras L, Borggrefe T, Kornberg RD. Association of the mediator complex with enhancers of active genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003;100(24):13887–13891. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2036346100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larschan E, Winston F. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Srb8-Srb11 complex functions with the SAGA complex during Gal4-activated transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25(1):114–123. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.1.114-123.2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagai S, Davis RE, Mattei PJ, et al. Chromatin potentiates transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114(7):1536–1541. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620312114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munding EM, Shiue L, Katzman S, et al. Competition between pre-mRNAs for the splicing machinery drives global regulation of splicing. Mol Cell. 2013;51(3):338–348. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore D, Zencir S, Albert B. Transcriptional control of ribosome biogenesis in yeast: links to growth and stress signals. Biochem Soc Trans. 2021;49(4):1589–1599. doi: 10.1042/BST20201136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson ME, Charenton C, Nagai K. RNA splicing by the spliceosome. Annu Rev Biochem. 2020;89(1):359–388. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-091719-064225
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bagchi DN, Battenhouse AM, Park D, et al. The histone variant H2A.Z in yeast is almost exclusively incorporated into the +1 nucleosome in the direction of transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019:gkz1075. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz1075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer VR. The specificity of H2A.Z occupancy in the yeast genome and its relationship to transcription. Curr Genet. 2020;66(5):939–944. doi: 10.1007/s00294-020-01087-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holstege FCP, Jennings EG, Wyrick JJ, et al. Dissecting the regulatory circuitry of a eukaryotic genome. Cell. 1998;95(5):717–728. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81641-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basehoar AD, Zanton SJ, Pugh BF. Identification and distinct regulation of yeast TATA box-containing genes. Cell. 2004;116(5):699–709. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00205-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oss SB, Cucinotta CE, Arndt KM. Emerging insights into the roles of the Paf1 complex in gene regulation. Trends Biochem Sci. 2017;42(10):788–798. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2017.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischl H, Howe FS, Furger A, et al. Paf1 has distinct roles in transcription elongation and differential transcript fate. Mol Cell. 2017;65(4):685–698.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y-H, Ahn SH. A Bre1-associated protein, large 1 (Lge1), promotes H2B ubiquitylation during the early stages of transcription elongation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(4):2361–2367. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.039255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatasubrahmanyam S, Hwang WW, Meneghini MD, et al. Genome-wide, as opposed to local, antisilencing is mediated redundantly by the euchromatic factors Set1 and H2A. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA. 2007;104(42):16609–16614. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700914104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayou C, Millán-Zambrano G, Santos-Rosa H, et al. RNA binding by histone methyltransferases Set1 and Set2. Mol Cell Biol. 2017;37(14):e00165–17. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00165-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hang M, Smith MM. Genetic analysis implicates the Set3/Hos2 histone deacetylase in the deposition and remodeling of nucleosomes containing H2A.Z. Genetics. 2011;187(4):1053–1066. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.125419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogan NJ, Kim M, Tong A, et al. Methylation of histone H3 by Set2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is linked to transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(12):4207–4218. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.12.4207-4218.2003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal D, Turniansky R, Green EM. Choose your own adventure: the role of histone modifications in yeast cell fate. J Mol Biol. 2017;429(13):1946–1957. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.10.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson A, Fair BJ, Pleiss JA. Interconnections between RNA-processing pathways revealed by a sequencing-based genetic screen for pre-mRNA splicing mutants in fission yeast. G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics. 2016;6(6):1513–1523. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.027508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang WW, Venkatasubrahmanyam S, Ianculescu AG, et al. A conserved RING finger protein required for histone H2B monoubiquitination and cell size control. Mol Cell. 2003;11(1):261–266. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00826-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleiss JA, Whitworth GB, Bergkessel M, et al. Transcript specificity in yeast pre-mRNA splicing revealed by mutations in core spliceosomal components. Black DL, editor. PLOS Biol. 2007;5(4):e90. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown T, Howe FS, Murray SC, et al. Antisense transcription-dependent chromatin signature modulates sense transcript dynamics. Mol Syst Biol. 2018;14(2):e8007. doi: 10.15252/msb.20178007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Johansson MJO. The pre-mRNA retention and splicing complex controls expression of the mediator subunit Med20. RNA Biol. 2017;14(10):1411–1417. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2017.1294310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao P, Will CL, Urlaub H, et al. The RES complex is required for efficient transformation of the precatalytic B spliceosome into an activated Bact complex. Genes Dev. 2017;31(23–24):2416–2429. doi: 10.1101/gad.308163.117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauhut R, Fabrizio P, Dybkov O, et al. Molecular architecture of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae activated spliceosome. Science. 2016;353(6306):1399–1405. doi: 10.1126/science.aag1906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Chen C, Johansson MJO. The pre-mRNA retention and splicing complex controls tRNA maturation by promoting TAN1 expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(11):5669–5678. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherrer FW, Spingola M. A subset of Mer1p-dependent introns requires Bud13p for splicing activation and nuclear retention. RNA. 2006;12(7):1361–1372. doi: 10.1261/rna.2276806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spingola M. Mer1p is a modular splicing factor whose function depends on the conserved U2 snRNP protein Snu17p. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(3):1242–1250. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Q, Battistella L, Morse RH. Mediator requirement downstream of chromatin remodeling during transcriptional activation of CHA1 in yeast. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(9):5276–5286. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708266200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho W-K, Spille J-H, Hecht M, et al. Mediator and RNA polymerase II clusters associate in transcription-dependent condensates. Science. 2018;361(6400):412–415. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza-Ochoa GI, Barrass JD, Maudlin IE, et al. Blocking late stages of splicing quickly limits pre-spliceosome assembly in vivo. RNA Biol. 2019;16(12):1775–1784. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2019.1657788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutz B. A dual role for BBP/ScSF1 in nuclear pre-mRNA retention and splicing. Embo J. 2000;19(8):1873–1886. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.8.1873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legrain P, Rosbash M. Some cis- and trans-acting mutants for splicing target pre-mRNA to the cytoplasm. Cell. 1989;57(4):573–583. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90127-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baejen C, Torkler P, Gressel S, et al. Transcriptome maps of mRNP biogenesis factors define pre-mRNA recognition. Mol Cell. 2014;55(5):745–757. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björk P, Wieslander L. Integration of mRNP formation and export. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74(16):2875–2897. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2503-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Yin C, Du X, et al. A U2-snRNP–independent role of SF3b in promoting mRNA export. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116(16):7837–7846. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818835116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galy V, Gadal O, Fromont-Racine M, et al. Nuclear retention of unspliced mRNAs in yeast is mediated by perinuclear Mlp1. Cell. 2004;116(1):63–73. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)01026-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner JM, Smoyer CJ, Stensrud ES, et al. Targeting of the SUN protein Mps3 to the inner nuclear membrane by the histone variant H2A.Z. J Cell Bio. 2011;193(3):489–507. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201011017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonde MM, Voegeli S, Baudrimont A, et al. Quantification of pre-mRNA escape rate and synergy in splicing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(20):12847–12860. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Moura TR, Mozaffari-Jovin S, Szabó CZK, et al. Prp19/Pso4 is an autoinhibited ubiquitin ligase activated by stepwise assembly of three splicing factors. Mol Cell. 2018;69(6):979–992.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.02.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanarat S, Sträßer K. Splicing and beyond: the many faces of the Prp19 complex. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA – Mol Cell Res. 2013;1833:2126–2134. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.05.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanarat S, Seizl M, Sträßer K. The Prp19 complex is a novel transcription elongation factor required for TREX occupancy at transcribed genes. Genes Dev. 2011;25(11):1147–1158. doi: 10.1101/gad.623411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress TL, Krogan NJ, Guthrie C. A single SR-like protein, Npl3, promotes pre-mRNA splicing in budding yeast. Mol Cell. 2008;32(5):727–734. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayani S, Chanfreau GF. Sequential RNA degradation pathways provide a fail-safe mechanism to limit the accumulation of unspliced transcripts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA. 2012;18(8):1563–1572. doi: 10.1261/rna.033779.112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Y, Ren Y. Mechanisms of nuclear mRNA export: a structural perspective. Traffic. 2019;20(11):829–840. doi: 10.1111/tra.12691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander RD, Innocente SA, Barrass JD, et al. Splicing-dependent RNA polymerase pausing in yeast. Mol Cell. 2010;40(4):582–593. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Pugh BF. What do transcription factors interact with? J Mol Biol. 2021;433(14):166883. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.166883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huranová M, Ivani I, Benda A, et al. The differential interaction of snRnps with pre-mRNA reveals splicing kinetics in living cells. J Cell Bio. 2010;191(1):75–86. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201004030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neugebauer KM. Nascent RNA and the coordination of splicing with transcription. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2019;11(8):a032227. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a032227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Coelho Ribeiro ML, Espinosa J, Islam S, et al. Malleable ribonucleoprotein machine: protein intrinsic disorder in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae spliceosome. PeerJ. 2013;1:e2. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Feltz C, Hoskins AA. Structural and functional modularity of the U2 snRNP in pre-mRNA splicing. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2019;54(5):443–465. doi: 10.1080/10409238.2019.1691497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen KM, Churchman LS. The code and beyond: transcription regulation by the RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18(4):263–273. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Protter DSW, Rosen MK, et al. Formation and maturation of phase-separated liquid droplets by RNA-Binding proteins. Mol Cell. 2015;60(2):208–219. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.08.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Q, Shi X, Wang X. RNA and liquid-liquid phase separation. Non-Coding RNA Res. 2021;6(2):92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2021.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaban HA, Barth R, Bystricky K. Navigating the crowd: visualizing coordination between genome dynamics, structure, and transcription. Genome Biol. 2020;21(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02185-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duss O, Stepanyuk GA, Puglisi JD, et al. Transient protein-RNA interactions guide nascent ribosomal RNA folding. Cell. 2019;179(6):1357–1369.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers ML, Woodson SA. Transcription increases the cooperativity of ribonucleoprotein assembly. Cell. 2019;179(6):1370–1381.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frumkin I, Yofe I, Bar-Ziv R, et al. Evolution of intron splicing towards optimized gene expression is based on various cis- and trans-molecular mechanisms. Hurst LD, editor. PLOS Biol. 2019;17(8):e3000423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao SE, Regev O. Splicing at the phase-separated nuclear speckle interface: a model. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(2):636–645. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon JM, Phizicky DV, Neugebauer KM. Nuclear mechanisms of gene expression control: pre-mRNA splicing as a life or death decision. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2021;67:67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2020.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar