Mere presence effect on pro-environmental behavior: exploring the role of social influence

References

• Ajaps, S., McLellan, R., Gritter, K., & Gritter, K. (2015). “We don’t know enough”: Environmental education and pro-environmental behaviour perceptions. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1124490. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1124490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology (pp. 798–27). Clark University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Shatti, E., Marc, O., Philippe, O., & Michel, Z. (2022). Impression management on Instagram and unethical behavior: The role of gender and social media fatigue. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 9808. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argo, J. J., Dahl, D. W., & Manchanda, R. V. (2005). The influence of a mere social presence in a retail context. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1086/432230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, X. M., Park, J. C., & Joung, S. H. (2019). Determinants of eco-friendly consumption behavior: Focusing on eco-friendly attitude, environmental identity and normalization of eco-friendly consumption behaviors. Consumer Policy and Education Review, 15(3), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.15790/cope.2019.15.3.127
   Google Scholar
• Barclay, P., & Barker, J. L. (2020). Greener than Thou: People who protect the environment are more cooperative, compete to be environmental, and benefit from reputation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, 101441. Article 101441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batolas, D., Perkovic, S., & Mitkidis, P. (2023). Psychological and hierarchical closeness as opposing factors in whistleblowing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 38(2), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09849-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, S. E., & Ferrell, M. E. (1998). Impulse buying: Modeling its precursors. Journal of Retailing, 74(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80092-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begley, P. T. (2004). Understanding valuation processes: Exploring the linkage between motivation and action. International Studies in Educational Administration, 32(2), 4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/209154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benenson, J., Markovits, H., & Hultgren, B. (2013). Social exclusion: More important to human females than males. Public Library of Science ONE, 8(2), e55851. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055851
   Google Scholar
• Blankenberg, A., & Alhusen, H. (2019). On the determinants of pro-environmental behavior: A literature review and guide for the empirical Economist. Behavioral & Experimental Economics eJournal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3473702
   Google Scholar
• Bolino, M. C., Kacmar, K. M., Turnley, W. H., & Gilstrap, J. B. (2008). A multi-level review of impression management motives and behaviors. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1080–1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308324325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (1999). Measuring impression management in organizations: A scale development based on the Jones and Pittman Taxonomy. Organizational Research Methods, 2(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819922005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casaló, L. V., & Escario, J. J. (2018). Heterogeneity in the association between environmental attitudes and pro-environmental behavior: A multilevel regression approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, F. B., Adnan, A., & Marilyn, D. V. (2010). Social impairment of complex learning in the wake of public embarrassment. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1801_4
   Google Scholar
• Childers, T. L., & Rao, A. R. (1992). The influence of familial and peer-based reference groups on consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1086/209296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 151–192). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, S. L., Chiarella, S. G., Raffone, A., & Simione, L. (2023). Understanding the environmental attitude-behaviour gap: The moderating role of dispositional mindfulness. Sustainability, 15(9), 7285. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottrell, N. B., Wack, D. L., Sekerak, G. J., & Rittle, R. H. (1968). Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audience and the mere presence of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(3), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVille, N. V., Linda, P. T., Olivia, P. S., Grete, E. W., Teresa, H. H., Kathleen, L. W., Eric, B., Peter, H. K., Jr., & Peter, J. (2021). Time spent in nature is associated with increased pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7498. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, S., & Badgaiyan, A. J. (2016). Towards improved understanding of reverse logistics – examining mediating role of return intention. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 107(12), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.11.021
   Google Scholar
• ElHaffar, G., Durif, F., & Dubé, L. (2020). Towards closing the attitude-intention-behavior gap in green consumption: A narrative review of the literature and an overview of future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122556–122556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etienne, H., & Charton, F. (2023). A mimetic approach to social influence on Instagram. eprint arXiv:2305.04985. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.04985
   Google Scholar
• Evans, O. G. (2023). Social impact theory in psychology. Retrieved September 20, 2023. https://www.simplypsychology.org/social-impact-theory.html
   Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L. R., & Norris, M. E. (2012). Conformity, compliance and obedience. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199828340-0075
   Google Scholar
• Farjam, M., Nikolaychuk, O., & Bravo, G. (2019). Experimental evidence of an environmental attitude-behavior gap in high-cost situations. Ecological Economics, 166, 106434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, S., Qiu, S., Gibson, D., & Ifenthaler, D. (2022). The effect of social closeness on perceived satisfaction of collaborative learning. Open and inclusive educational practice in the digital world. Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age. Springer, Cham. 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18512-0_7
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, K. S., & Hornsey, M. J. (2016). A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Insights and opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filimonau, V., Matute, J., Kubal-Czerwińska, M., & Mika, M. (2023). Religious values and social distance as activators of norms to reduce food waste when dining out. Science of the Total Environment, 868(10), 161645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161645
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1974). Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 81(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Furukawa, Y., Fuji, S., & Sugimura, S. (2023). Good children do not always do good behavior: Moral licensing effects in preschoolers 1, 2, 3. Japanese Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, W. L., & Martinko, M. J. (1988). Impression management in organizations. Journal of Management, 14(2), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638801400210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, J., Long, R., Chen, H., & Li, W. (2017). Exploring the motivation-behavior gap in urban residents’ green travel behavior: A theoretical and empirical study. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 125, 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.06.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerell, M. (2021). CCTV in deprived neighbourhoods – a short-time follow-up of effects on crime and crime clearance. Nordic Journal of Criminology, 22(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/2578983X.2020.1816023
   Google Scholar
• Gholamzadehmir, M., Sparks, P., & Farsides, T. (2019). Moral licensing, moral cleansing and pro-environmental behaviour: The moderating role of pro-environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 101334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, S. C. (2023). Llocutionary force, speech act norms, and the coordination and mutuality of conversational expectations. Sbisà on Speech as Action, 2147483647–2147483647. Palgrave-Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22528-49
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 900–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J., & Bergh, B. V. D. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, A. F. C., & Lind, F. (2016). Audience effects: What can they tell us about social neuroscience, theory of mind and autism? Culture of Brain, 4(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-016-0044-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamzah, M. I., & Tanwir, N. S. (2021). Do pro-environmental factors lead to purchase intention of hybrid vehicles? The moderating effects of environmental knowledge. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque, I. U., Khan, S., & Mudarik, M. S. (2023). Effect of social media influencer on consumer purchase intention: A PLS-SEM study on branded luxury fashion clothing. Journal of Mass Communication, 28(1), 2219–2627. https://doi.org/10.22555/pbr.v25i1.887
   Google Scholar
• Härtel, T., Randler, C., & Baur, A. (2023). Using species knowledge to promote pro-environmental attitudes? The association among species knowledge, environmental system knowledge and attitude towards the environment in secondary school students. Animals (Basel), 13(6), 972. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13060972
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatcher, J. W., Cares, S., Detrie, R., Dillenbeck, T., Goral, E., Troisi, K., & Whirry-Achten, A. M. (2016). Conformity, arousal, and the effect of arbitrary information. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(4), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216670525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hau, Y., & Dong, F. (2022). Can environmental responsibility bridge the intention-behavior gap? Conditional process model based on valence theory and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 376, 134166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazlett-Stevens, H., & Fruzzetti, A. E. (2021). Regulation of physiological arousal and emotion. In A. Wenzel (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive behavioral therapy: Overview and approaches (pp. 349–383). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000218-012
   Google Scholar
• Helen, V. F., Nia, H. J., Andrew, J. D., Brendan, J. G., Jenna, R. J., Imogen, E. N., Coleen, C. S., Gareth, J. W., Lucy, C. W., & Heather, J. K. (2022). The fundamental links between climate change and marine plastic pollution. Science of the Total Environment, 806(1), 150392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150392
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huberman, J. S., Suschinsky, K. D., Lalumière, M. L., & Chivers, M. L. (2013). Relationship between impression management and three measures of women’s self-reported sexual arousal. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 45(3), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X., Zhang, Y., & Mai, X. (2023). The impact of social distance on the processing of social evaluation: Evidence from brain potentials and neural oscillations. Cerebral Cortex, 33(12), 7659–7669. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, D. L. (2007). Feelings: The perception of self – chapter 4. Autonomic arousal and emotional feeing. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195098891.003.0004
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, B. B. (2010). Knowledge, action and pro-environmental behaviour. Environment Education Research, 8(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145474
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., Pittman, T. S., & Jones, E. E. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1, pp. 231–262). https://www.scirp.org/(S(vtj3fa45qm1ean45%20vvffcz55))/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=1781340
   Google Scholar
• Kang, C., Chen, H., Teng, D., Mao, M., Shen, Y., Gan, T., & Hou, G. (2023). The influence of partner presence on cooperation and norm formation. Organizational Psychology, licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2755542/v1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kawamura, Y., & Kusumi, T. (2018). Relationships between two types of reputational concern and altruistic behavior in daily life. Personality and Individual Differences, 121(15), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.003
   Google Scholar
• KEITI. (2021). Research on public perception of pro-environmental products and policies. https://www.keiti.re.kr/site/keiti/ex/board/View.do?cbIdx=318&bcIdx=34000
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. H. (2013). The effect of perceived risk, environmental value orientation and perceived psychological distance on environmental behavior. Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 14(1), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.21074/kjlcap.2013.14.1.155
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. H., Kim, T. H., & Jeon, J. A. (2008). The influence of Chemyon (social face) on unplanned upward consumption. Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 9(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.21074/kjlcap.2008.9.2.149
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. Y., Yun, J. O., Lee, S. J., Jeong, D. W., & Jeong, Y. J. (2022). Analysis of the effectiveness of CCTV for preventing illegal dumping of garbage and alternative proposals. 2022 D.M.T Program Awards in Korea. https://www.bigdata-map.kr/datastory/new/story_43
   Google Scholar
• Klineberg, S. L., McKeever, M., & Rothenbach, B. (1998). Demographic predictors of environmental concern: It does make a difference how it’s measured. Social Science Quarterly, 79(4), 734–754. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42863844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
   Google Scholar
• Kwahk, K. Y., & Ge, X. (2012). The effects of social media on e-commerce: A perspective of social impact theory. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA, 1814–1823. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.564
   Google Scholar
• Lalot, F., & Abrams, D. (2023). A stranger or a friend? Closer descriptive norms drive compliance with COVID-19 social distancing measures. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 231(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, T., Daniele, N., & Silvia, S. (2023). Law and norms: Empirical evidence. American Economic Review, 113(5), 1255–1293. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20210970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenbach, B. P., Berger, S., Baumgartner, T., & Knoch, D. (2020). Cognitive resources moderate the relationship between pro-environmental attitudes and green behavior. Environment and Behavior, 52(9), 979–995. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916519843127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latané, B., & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review, 88(5), 438–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, M. R. (2019). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. eBook : 9780429497384.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429497384
   Google Scholar
• Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A Literature Review and Two-Component Model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Du, J., & Long, H. (2019). Dynamic analysis of international green behavior from the perspective of the mapping knowledge domain. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(6), 6087–6098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-04090-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., Li, J., Li, H., Zhang, G., Fan, W., & Zhong, Y. (2022). Interpersonal distance modulates the influence of social observation on prosocial behaviour: An event-related potential (ERP) study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 176, 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Bai, Y. (2014). An exploration of firms’ awareness and behavior of developing circular economy: An empirical research in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 87, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X. (2008). How does shopping with others influence impulsive purchasing? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1504_3
   Google Scholar
• Maedeh, G., Paul, S., & Tom, F. (2019). Moral licensing, moral cleansing and pro-environmental behaviour: The moderating role of pro-environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 101334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, H. (1978). The effect of mere presence on social facilitation: An unobtrusive test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(4), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(78)90034-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martino, J. D., Nanere, M. G., & Dsouza, C. (2019). The effect of pro-environmental attitudes and eco-labelling information on green purchasing decisions in Australia. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 31(2), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2019.1589621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maryam, T., & Tye, W. J. (2020). Environmental knowledge gap: The discrepancy between perceptual and actual impact of pro-environmental behaviors among university students. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(2), e2426. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matczak, P., Wójtowicz, A., Dabrowski, A., Leitner, M., & Dutkowska, N. S. (2023). Effectiveness of CCTV systems as a crime preventive tool: Evidence from eight Polish cities. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 47(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2021.1976237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur, S., & Sood, K. (2023). Policing perspective on pre-emptive and probative value of CCTV architecture in the security of the smart city - Gandhinagar. International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, 15(3), 252–258. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESDF.2023.130655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, L. A., Hendricks, J. L., & Ward, W. B. (2023). A contextual framework for understanding impression management. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont, T. L., & Duckitt, J. (2010). The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L. B., Rice, R. E., Gustafson, A., & Goldberg, M. H. (2022). Relationships among environmental attitudes, environmental efficacy, and Pro-environmental Behaviors Across and within 11 countries. Environment and Behavior, 54(7–8), 1063–1096. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165221131002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montag, C., Yang, H., & Elhai, J. D. (2021). On the psychology of TikTok use: A first glimpse from empirical findings. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 641–673. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.641673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monterio, D., Wang, A., Wang, L., Li, H., Barrett, A., Pack, A., & Liang, H. N. (2023). Effects of audience familiarity on anxiety in a virtual reality public speaking training tool. Universal Access in the Information Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-00985-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naguyen, H. V., Nguyen, C. H., & Hoang, T. T. B. (2018). Green consumption: Closing the intention-behavior gap. Sustainable Development, 27(1), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugroho, B., Anggreni, M., Afnanda, M., Arta, D., & Tannady, H. (2023). The role of academic fraud as an intervening variable in relationship of determinant factors Student ethical attitude. Journal on Education, 5(3), 9584–9593. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i3.1832
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2022). Plastic pollution is growing relentlessly as waste management and recycling fall short, says OECD. https://www.oecd.org/newsroom/plastic-pollution-is-growing-relentlessly-as-waste-management-and-recycling-fall-short.htm
   Google Scholar
• O’Riordan, T. (2009). Why carbon-reducing behavior is proving so frictional. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(5), 2. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.5.c2-c2
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. H., & Oh, K. H. (2014). Environmental knowledge, eco-friendly attitude and purchase intention about eco-friendly fashion products of fashion consumers. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 16(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2014.16.1.91
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., Shin, J., & Ponti, G. (2017). The influence of anonymous peers on prosocial behavior. Public Library of Science ONE, 12(10), e0185521. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185521
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, M., Kühn-Popp, N., Licata, M., Sodian, B., & Meinhardt, J. (2013). Neural correlates of prosocial behavior in infancy: Different neurophysiological mechanisms support the emergence of helping and comforting. Neuroimage: Reports, 66(1), 522–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.041
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Vega, R., Kathryn, W., & Kevin, O. (2016). Social impact theory: An examination of how immediacy operates as an influence upon social media interaction in Facebook fan pages. The Marketing Review, 16(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1362/146934716X14636478977791
   Google Scholar
• Pernelet, H. R., & Brennan, N. M. (2023). Impression management at board meetings: Accountability in public and in private. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(9), 340–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2022-6050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piza, E. L., Welsh, B. C., Farrington, D. P., & Thomas, A. L. (2019). CCTV surveillance for crime prevention: A 40-year systematic review with meta-analysis. Criminology & Public Policy, 18(1), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preissner, C. E., Oenema, A., & Vries, H. D. (2022). Examining socio-cognitive factors and beliefs about mindful eating in healthy adults with differing practice experience: A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychology, 10(1), 268. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00977-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramaswamy, V., & Bergin, C. (2009). Do reinforcement and induction increase prosocial behavior? Results of a teacher-based intervention in preschools. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 23(4), 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540909594679
   Google Scholar
• Renondo, I., & Puelles, M. (2017). The connection between environmental attitude–behavior gap and other individual inconsistencies: A call for strengthening self-control. Education, Environmental Science, 26(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2016.1235361
   Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education: A critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7(3), 207–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620120065230
   Google Scholar
• Rook, D. W. (1987). The buying impulse. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1086/209105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rook, D., & Fisher, R. (1995). Normative influences on impulsive buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1086/209452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rook, D. W., & Gardner, M. P. (1993). In the mood: Impulse buying’s affective antecedents. Research in Consumer Behavior, 6(7), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Roos, B. A., Mobach, M., & Heylighen, A. (2023). Challenging behavior in context: A case study on how people, space, and activities interact. Health Environments Research and Design Journal, 16(4), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867231178312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saracevic, S., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2021). The impact of social norms on pro-environmental behavior: A systematic literature review of the role of culture and self-construal. Sustainability, 13(9), 5156. WU Vienna, 1020 Vienna, Austria. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassenrath, C. (2020). “Let me show you how nice I am”: Impression management as bias in empathic responses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(6), 752–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619884566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Schlenker, B. R., & Britt, T. W. (1999). Beneficial impression management: Strategically controlling information to help friends. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 559–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlenker, B. R., & Weigold, M. F. (1992). Interpersonal processes involving impression regulation and management. Annual Review of Psychology, 43(1), 133–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.001025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
   Google Scholar
• Seifi, M., Cozens, P., Reynald, D., Haron, S. H., & Abdullah, A. (2023). How effective are residential CCTV systems: Evaluating the impact of natural versus mechanical surveillance on house break-ins and theft in hotspots of Penang Island, Malaysia. Security Journal, 36(1), 49–81. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-022-00331-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shojaati, N., & Osgood, N. D. (2023). An agent-based social impact theory model to study the impact of in-person school closures on nonmedical prescription opioid use among youth. Systems, 11(2), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11020072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvi, M., & Padilla, E. (2021). Pro-environmental behavior: Social norms, intrinsic motivation and external conditions. Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(6), 619–632. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista Research Department. (2023). Global plastic production 1950-2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/282732/global-production-of-plastics-since-1950/
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szerszynski, B. (2007). The post-ecologist condition: Irony as symptom and cure. Environmental Politics, 16(2), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701211965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasimi, A., & Young, L. (2016). Memories of good deeds past: The reinforcing power of prosocial behavior in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 147, 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thian, H., Zhang, J., & Li, J. (2019). The relationship between pro-environmental attitude and employee green behavior: The role of motivational states and green work climate perceptions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(7), 7341–7352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07393-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. L., Piza, E. L., Welsh, B. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2022). The internationalisation of CCTV surveillance: Effects on crime and implications for emerging technologies. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 46(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2021.1879885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, H., Zhang, J., & Li, J. (2019). The relationship between pro-environmental attitude and employee green behavior: The role of motivational states and green work climate perceptions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(7), 7341–7352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07393-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. The American Journal of Psychology, 9(4), 507–533. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412188
   Google Scholar
• Uhm, J. P., Kim, S., Do, C., & Lee, H. W. (2022). How augmented reality (AR) experience affects purchase intention in sport E-commerce: Roles of perceived diagnosticity, psychological distance, and perceived risks. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, 103027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Iddekinge, C. H., McFarland, L. A., & Raymark, P. H. (2007). Antecedents of impression management use and effectiveness in a structured interview. Journal of Management, 33(5), 752–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307305563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1981). Environmental concern: Does it make a difference how it’s measured? Environment and Behavior, 13(6), 651–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581136001
   Google Scholar
• Vesely, S., & Klöckner, C. A. (2018). Global social norms and environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 50(3), 247–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517702190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Lu, H., & Wang, D. (2020). Buy or not: How the presence of others affects the occurrence of consumers’ impulsive buying behavior. Journal of Contemporary Marketing Science, 3(2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCMARS-01-2020-0002
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R. C. (1995). Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 232–260. https://doi.org/10.2307/256734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkie, S., & Trotter, H. (2022). Pro-environmental attitudes, pro-environmental behaviours and nature-relatedness: Differences based on place preferenceAttitudes pro-environnementales, comportements pro-environnementaux et relation avec la nature : différences basées sur la préférence du lieu. European Review of Applied Psychology, 72(2), 100705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2021.100705
   Google Scholar
• Wyss, A. M., Knoch, D., & Berger, S. (2022). When and how pro-environmental attitudes turn into behavior: The role of costs, benefits, and self-control. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, 101748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18(5), 459–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.920180503
   Google Scholar
• YuSheng, K., & Ibrahim, M. (2020). Innovation capabilities, innovation types, and firm performance: Evidence from the banking sector of Ghana. SAGE Open, 10(2), 215824402092089. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020920892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation: A solution is suggested for an old unresolved social psychological problem. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 149(3681), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.149.3681.269
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B., & Sales, S. M. (1965). Social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2(2), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(66)90077-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, J., Jiang, M., & Yuan, M. (2020). Environmental risk perception, risk culture, and pro-environmental behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Ao, J., & Deng, J. (2019). The influence of high–low power on green consumption: The moderating effect of impression management motivation. Sustainability, 11(16), 4287. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Bai, X., Mills, F. P., & Pezzey, J. C. V. (2016). Examining the attitude-behavior gap in residential energy use: Empirical evidence from a large-scale survey in Beijing, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295(1), 126510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126510
   Google Scholar
• Zsóka, Á., Szerényi, Z. M., Széchy, A., & Kocsis, T. (2013). Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar