Students’ cross-sectioning in the math-art studio

References

• Anderson, T. (1993). Defining and structuring art criticism for education. Studies in Art Education, 34(4), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320404
   Google Scholar
• Atit, K., Gagnier, K., & Shipley, T. F. (2015). Student gestures aid penetrative thinking. Journal of Geoscience Education, 63(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.5408/14-008.1
   Google Scholar
• Bickley-Green, C. A. (1995). Math and art curriculum integration: A post-modern foundation. Studies in Art Education, 37(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320488
   Google Scholar
• Boe, B. L. (1968). Experimental programs: A study of the ability of secondary school pupils to perceive the plane sections of selected solid figures. The Mathematics Teacher, 61(4), 415–421. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.61.4.0415
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, C. A., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Sources of difficulty in imagining cross sections of 3D objects. In D. S. McNamara, & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 179–184). Cognitive Science Society. https://escholarship.org/content/qt98p7t49b/qt98p7t49b.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, C. A., & Hegarty, M. (2012). Inferring cross sections of 3D objects: A new spatial thinking test. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 868–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, C. A., & Hegarty, M. (2014). Visualizing cross sections: Training spatial thinking using interactive animations and virtual objects. Learning and Individual Differences, 33, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cossentino, J., & Shaffer, D. W. (1999). The math studio: Harnessing the power of the arts to teach across disciplines. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 33(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.2307/3333689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dana-Picard, T., & Hershkovitz, S. (2019). Geometrical features of a Jewish monument: Study with a DGS. Journal of Mathematics and the Arts, 13(1-2), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513472.2018.1552067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danesi, M. (2020). Mathematical cognition and the arts. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 10(1), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.202001.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, E. J. (1973). A study of the ability of school pupils to perceive and identify the plane sections of selected solid figures. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4(3), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/748507
   Google Scholar
• Diego-Mantecón, J. M., Blanco, T. F., Búa Ares, J. B., & González Sequeiros, P. (2019). Is the relationship between art and mathematics addressed thoroughly in Spanish secondary school textbooks? Journal of Mathematics and the Arts, 13(1-2), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513472.2018.1552068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberle, R. S. (2014). The role of children’s mathematical aesthetics: The case of tessellations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 35, 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. (2010). The lab: Creativity and culture. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, J. B., & Nemirovsky, R. (2016). Arguments for integrating the arts: Artistic engagement in an undergraduate foundations of geometry course. PRIMUS, 26(4), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1123784
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, E. B., & Woods, D. (1981). Art criticism and Reading. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 15(4), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/3332547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenyvesi, K., & Lähdesmäki, T. (2017). Aesthetics of interdisciplinarity: Art and mathematics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57259-8.
   Google Scholar
• Fenyvesi, K., Lehto, S., Brownell, C., Nasiakou, L., Cavicsa, Z., & Kosola, R. (2020). Learning mathematical concepts as a whole-body experience: Connecting multiple intelligences, creativities and embodiments with the STEAM framework. In P. Burnard, & L. Colucci-Gray (Eds.), Why science and art creativities matter: (Re-) configuring STEAM for future-making education (pp. 300–336). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Fleron, J. F., & Ecke, V. (2011). Navigating between the dimensions. The Mathematics Teacher, 105(4), 286–292. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.105.4.0286
   Google Scholar
• Forseth, S. D. (1980). Art activities, attitudes, and achievement in elementary mathematics. Studies in Art Education, 21(2), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320145
   Google Scholar
• Gagnier, K. M., Atit, K., Ormand, C. J., & Shipley, T. F. (2017). Comprehending 3D diagrams: Sketching to support spatial reasoning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(4), 883–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamwell, L. (2016). Mathematics and art: A cultural history. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, L. T., Hetland, L., Hoyle, C., & Winner, E. (2016). Visual-spatial thinking in geometry and the visual arts. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gönenç-Sorguç, A., & Arslan-Selçuk, S. (2013). Computational models in architecture: Understanding multi-dimensionality and mapping. Nexus Network Journal, 15(2), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-013-0150-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyotte, K. W., Sochacka, N. W., Costantino, T. E., Walther, J., & Kellam, N. N. (2014). Steam as social practice: Cultivating creativity in transdisciplinary spaces. Art Education, 67(6), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2014.11519293
   Google Scholar
• Haas, B., Kreis, Y., & Lavicza, Z. (2021). Integrated STEAM approach in outdoor trails with elementary school pre-service teachers. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 205–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., Keehner, M., & Cohen, C. (2007). The role of spatial cognition in medicine: Applications for selecting and training professionals. In G. Allen (Ed.), Applied spatial cognition (pp. 285–316). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veneema, S., & Sheridan, K. (2013). Studio thinking 2: The real benefits of visual arts education. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, R., & Huckstep, P. (2003). Art and mathematics in education. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 37(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1353/jae.2003.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khooshabeh, P., & Hegarty, M. (2010). Inferring cross-sections: When internal visualizations are more important than properties of external visualizations. Human-Computer Interaction, 25(2), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370020903586704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kösa, T. (2016). The effect of using dynamic mathematics software: Cross section and visualization. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 23(4), 121–128.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtuluş, A. (2019). Spatial visualization training using computer-aided cross sections of surfaces. European Journal of Educational Studies, 6(4), 180–196.
   Google Scholar
• Kus, M., & Cakiroglu, E. (2022). Mathematics in the informal setting of an art studio: Students’ visuospatial thinking processes in a studio thinking-based environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110(3), 545–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10142-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, J., & D'Adamo, K. (2018). Art studio as thinking lab: Fostering metacognition in art classrooms. Art Education, 71(6), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2018.1505377
   Google Scholar
• McGarvey, L. M., Luo, L., & Hawes, Z. (2018). Spatial skills framework for young engineers. In L. D. English, & T. Moore, Spatial Reasoning Study Group (Eds.), Early engineering learning (pp. 53–82). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8621-2_5.
   Google Scholar
• Meira, L. (1998). Making sense of instructional devices: The emergence of transparency in mathematical activity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(2), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.2307/749895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2018). Matematik ögretim programı (Illkokul ve ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar) [Mathematics education curriculum (Primary and middle school grades 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8]. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education].
   Google Scholar
• Mix, K. S., & Battista, M. (2018). Visualizing mathematics: The role of spatial reasoning in mathematical thought. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98767-5
   Google Scholar
• Nemirovsky, R. (2018). Pedagogies of emergent learning. In G. Kaiser, H. Forgasz, M. Graven, A. Kuzniak, E. Simmt & B. Xu (Eds.), Invited lectures from the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education. ICME-13 Monographs (pp. 401–412). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72170-5_23
   Google Scholar
• Nemirovsky, R., Kelton, M. L., & Civil, M. (2017). Toward a vibrant and socially significant informal mathematics education. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 90–101). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Nemirovsky, R., Kelton, M. L., & Rhodehamel, B. (2013). Playing mathematical instruments: Emerging perceptuomotor integration with an interactive mathematics exhibit. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(2), 372–415. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.2.0372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe, N. S., & Shipley, T. F. (2015). Thinking about spatial thinking: New typology, new assessments. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Studying visual and spatial reasoning for design creativity (pp. 179–192). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9297-4.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, O. L., & Ferrara, F. (2020). Towards a materialist vision of ‘learning as making’: The case of 3D printing pens in school mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(5), 925–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10000-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. Constructionism, 36(2), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Parzysz, B. (1988). “Knowing” vs “Seeing”. Problems of the plane representation of space geometry figures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00428386
   Google Scholar
• Pittalis, M., & Christou, C. (2010). Types of reasoning in 3D geometry thinking and their relation with spatial ability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9251-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittalis, M., & Christou, C. (2013). Coding and decoding representations of 3D shapes. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 673–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.08.004
   Google Scholar
• Portaankorva-Koivisto, P., & Havinga, M. (2019). Integrative phenomena in visual arts and mathematics. Journal of Mathematics and the Arts, 13(1-2), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513472.2018.1504269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley, C. F., & Herro, D. (2016). “Finding the joy in the unknown”: implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school science and math classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9602-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratliff, K. R., McGinnis, C. R., & Levine, S. C. (2010). The development and assessment of cross-sectioning ability in young children. In S. Ohlsson, & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2816–2821). https://escholarship.org/content/qt8t62n16v/qt8t62n16v.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, A. (2003). Robert Smithson: Learning from New Jersey and elsewhere. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M. (1996). Where is the context in contextual word problem?: Mathematical practices and products in grade 8 students’ answers to story problems. Cognition and Instruction, 14(4), 487–527. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1404_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2017). Teaching creativity in art and design studio classes: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoevers, E. M., Leseman, P. P., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2020). Enriching mathematics education with visual arts: Effects on elementary school students’ ability in geometry and visual arts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(8), 1613–1634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10018-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1988). Toward a marriage of artistry & applied science in the architectural design studio. Journal of Architectural Education, 41(4), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1988.10758496
   Google Scholar
• Seah, R., & Horne, M. (2018). Perceiving and reasoning about geometric objects in the middle years. In J. Hunter, P. Perger, & L. Darragh (Eds.), Making waves, opening spaces (pp. 677–684). MERGA.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. W. (1997). Learning mathematics through design: The anatomy of Escher’s world. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(97)90019-5
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. (2002). Sliceforms: Mathematical models from paper sections. Tarquin.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, K., Halverson, E. R., Litts, B., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505–531. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.brr34733723j648u
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, N. (2006). Mathematics and beauty: Aesthetics approaches to teaching children. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, R. (1966). Mirror stratum [sculpture]. Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago. https://mcachicago.org/collection/items/robert-smithson/898-Mirror-Stratum.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, R. (1967). Glass stratum [sculpture]. National Gallery of Art, Washington. https://www.nga.gov/collection/art-object-page.161687.html.
   Google Scholar
• Tishman, S., & Palmer, P. (2006). Artful thinking: Stronger thinking and learning through the power of art. Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinhandl, R., & Lavicza, Z. (2021). Real-world modelling to increase mathematical creativity. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 11(1), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.202101.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, E., Goldstein, T. R., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2013). Educational research and innovation art for art’s sake? The impact of arts education. OECD.
   Google Scholar