İżnik Town and Its Rural Landscape: Decision Making, Socio-Demographic Profiling and Conservation Policy Development

Bibliography

• Agboola, O. P. “The Significance of Rural Markets As a Public Space in Nigeria.” Habitat International 122 (2022): 102519. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agboola, O. P., M. Farid Azizul, M. Hisyam Rasidi, and I. Said. “The Cultural Sustainability of Traditional Market Place in Africa: A New Research Agenda.” Journal of Rural Studies 62, no. July (2018): 87–106. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• Akbaygil, I., H. İnalcık, and O. Aslanapa. Tarih Boyunca İznik. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Alioğlu, F., and Y. K. Erkan. “Nicaea/Iznik: A City Image As Heritage.” The Image of Heritage: Changing Perception, Permanent Responsabilities: Proceedings of the International Conference of the ICOMOS International Scientific Committee for Theory and the Philosophy of Conservation and Restoration, edited by A. Tomaszewski, S. Giometti, Florence, Italy, March 6–8 2009, 2009. https://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/1782/1/Falser%20(2011)%20The%20Bamiyan%20Buddhas,%20performative%20iconoclasm%20and%20the%20image%20of%20heritage.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ankara Büyükşehir Belediyesi. “Mor Haritam Ankara.” https://morharitam.ankara.bel.tr/.
   Google Scholar
• Antrop, M. “Why Landscapes of the Past Are Important for the Future.” Landscape and Urban Planning 70, no. 1–2 (2005): 21–34. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, B., M. Buizer, L. Horlings, V. Ingram, C. van Oosten, and P. Opdam. “Landscape Approaches: A State-Of-The-Art Review.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 42, no. 1, October 17 (2017): 439–463. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aykaç, G. “Muhtars Becoming Real Estate Agents: Changing Roles of Neighborhood Representatives in Relation to the State-Led Urban Transformation in Çinçin, Ankara, Turkey.” Journal of Urban Affairs 46, no. 1, March 16 (2022): 160–178. doi:10.1080/07352166.2022.2027779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, G., and J. Lefort. La Bithynie Au Moyen Age. Paris: Lethielleux, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Bertin, J. Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams Networks Maps. USA: Esri Press, 2011. doi:10.1515/9783110854688.
   Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, A., A. Nelson, and T. McMenomy. “Global Mapping of Urban-Rural Catchment Areas Reveals Unequal Access to Services.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118, no. 2 (2021). doi:10.1073/PNAS.2011990118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdea, D., and L. Mastronardi. “Integrated Approach in the Planning Stage for Landscape Conservation in the Coastal Italian Areas.” International Journal of Design and Nature and Ecodynamics 9, no. 4 (2014): 296–306. doi:10.2495/DNE-V9-N4-296-306.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, L. “Going Bush: The Implications of Urban-Rural Migration.” Geographical Research 45, no. 1 (March, 2007): 85–94. doi:10.1111/J.1745-5871.2007.00430.X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. “European Landscape Convention.” ETC No. 176. Florence, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the European Cultural Heritage Strategy for the 21st Century. Council of the European Union, 2017. https://www.open-heritage.eu/the-european-cultural-heritage-strategy-for-the-21st-century/.
   Google Scholar
• Crossman, N. D., B. A. Bryan, B. Ostendorf, and S. Collins. “Systematic Landscape Restoration in the Rural-Urban Fringe: Meeting Conservation Planning and Policy Goals.” Biodiversity and Conservation 16, no. 13 (2007): 3781–3802. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9180-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Montis, A. “Measuring the Performance of Planning: The Conformance of Italian Landscape Planning Practices with the European Landscape Convention.” European Planning Studies 24, no. 9, September 4 (2016): 1727–1745. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1178215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Peyssonel, C. “Yılında İzmit ve İznik’e Yapılmış Bir Gezinin Öyküsü (Relation d’un Voyage Fait a Nicomedie et Nicee En 1745).” In Kocaeli Yüksek Öğrenim Derneği Kültür Yayınları No. 3, edited by F. Y. Ulugün. Kocaeli: Kocaeli Yükseköğrenim Derneği, 2005. http://marefateadyan.nashriyat.ir/node/150.
   Google Scholar
• di Fazio, S., and G. Modica. “Historic Rural Landscapes: Sustainable Planning Strategies and Action Criteria. The Italian Experience in the Global and European Context.” Sustainability 10, no. 11 (2018): 3834. doi:10.3390/su10113834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskişehir Büyükşehir Belediyesi. “Mor Haritam Eskişehir.” http://morharitam.eskisehir.bel.tr/.
   Google Scholar
• Farmar-Bowers, Q. “Why Farming Families Decide to Maintain Native Biodiversity on Their Farms and the Implications of Demographic Change for Conservation Policies.” In Demographic Change in Australia’s Rural Landscapes , edited by R. Luck, G. W. Race, and D. Black, Vol. 12, 233–257. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011. Landscape Series.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, T., A. Penagos, S. Scherr, L. Buck, and E. Ramirez. “Territorial Approaches for Sustainable Development: Stocktaking on Territorial Approaches- Experiences and Lessons.” In GIZ, edited by A. MacKenzie, 7–26. Bonn and Eschborn, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Sector Project Sustainable Rural Areas, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Ullate, M., L. Rieutort, A. Kamara, A. S. Santos, A. Pirra, and M. G. Solís. “Demographic Challenges in Rural Europe and Cases of Resilience Based on Cultural Heritage Management. A Comparative Analysis in Mediterranean Countries Inner Regions.” European Countryside 12, no. 3 (2020): 408–431. doi:10.2478/euco-2020-0022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosnell, H., and J. Abrams. “Amenity Migration: Diverse Conceptualizations of Drivers, Socioeconomic Dimensions, and Emerging Challenges.” Geo Journal 76, no. 4 (2011): 303–322. doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9295-4.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, M. V. “Classification As an Impediment to the Reliable and Valid Use of Spatial Information: A Disaggregate Approach.” In Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS, edited by S. Hirtle, 137–167. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Gretter, A., C. D. Torre, F. Maino, and A. Omizzolo. “New Farming As an Example of Social Innovation Responding to Challenges of Inner Mountain Areas of Italian Alps.” Revue de Géographie Alpine, no. 107–2 (2019, September 25). doi:10.4000/rga.6106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habiyaremye, A., G. Kruss, and I. Booyens. “Innovation for Inclusive Rural Transformation: The Role of the State.” Innovation and Development 10, no. 2 (2019): 155–168. doi:10.1080/2157930X.2019.1596368.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, J. V. Hammer Seyahatnamesi: İstanbul’dan Bursa ve Uludağ’a Gidiş-İznik İzmit Üzerinden Dönüş, Translated by Nilüfer Epçeli. İstanbul: Timaş Yayıncılık, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Heiland, S., S. Spielmans, and B. Demuth. “Demographic Change: Impacts on Rural Landscapes.” Nature and Culture 4, no. 3 (2009): 255–274. doi:10.3167/nc.2009.040303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, J., and N. Argent. “Rural Transitions in the Nambucca Valley: Socio-Demographic Change in a Disadvantaged Rural Locale.” Journal of Rural Studies 48 (2016): 129–142. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugo, G. “Regional Australian Populations: Diversity, Dynamism and Dichotomy.” The academy of the social sciences session on rural communities at the Outlook 2002 conference, Canberra, Australia, March 5–7, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS. Charter on the Built Vernacular Heritage. Mexico, 1999. https://www.icomos.org/en/participer/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/164-charter-of-the-built-vernacular-heritage.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS. Florence Declaration on Heritage and Landscape As Human Values. Florence, 2014. https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Secretariat/2015/GA_2014_results/GA2014_Symposium_FlorenceDeclaration_EN_final_20150318.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS-IFLA. ICOMOS-IFLA Principles. New Delhi, 2017. https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Charters/GA2017_6-3-2_HistoricUrbanPublicParks_EN_adopted-15122017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• İl Yıllığı Hazırlama Komitesi. 1973 Bursa İl Yıllığı. Edited by Kenan Kolukısa and Mehmet Yörük. Ankara: Ajans Türk Matbaası, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplanoğlu, R. Kocaeli Livası Tahrir Defterleri İznik Kazası. Bursa: Avrasya Etnografya Vakfı Yayınları, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. W. “The Importance of Rural Development in the 21st-Century: Persistence, Sustainability and Futures.” IN First National Conference on the Future of Australia’s Country Towns, 2001. http://www.regional.org.au/au/countrytowns/keynote/keller.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kumaş, N. “Vilayet Salnameleri ve TUIK Verileri Işığında İznik’in Idari ve Demografik Yapısı (1870-1950).” Social Sciences Studies Journal 4, no. 19 (2018): 2133–2151. doi:10.26449/sssj.608.
   Google Scholar
• Lebart, L. “Complementary Use of Correspondence Analysis and Cluster Analysis.” In Correspondence Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by J. Blasius, M. Greenacre, 162–178, London: Academic Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, H. W. “Gezginlerin Gözünden ve Idari Kayıtlardaki Bilgilerin Işığında Osmanlı Döneminde İznik, 1331-1923.” In Tarih Boyunca İznik, edited by I. Akbaygil, H. İnalcık, O. Aslanapa, K. Kaya, 135–174, İstanbul: İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Massicard, E. Street-Level Governing: Negotiating the State in Urban Turkey. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Rural-Urban Partnerships: An Integrated Approach to Economic Development. OECD Rural Policy Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2013. doi:10.1787/9789264204812-4-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. “Rural 3.0 ‘People-Centred Rural Policy’.” 2018. https://www.oecd.org/rural/rural-development-conference/documents/Rural-3.0-Policy-Highlights.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Orsi, F., C. Cavaco, and J. Gil. “From Territorial Capital to Regional Design: A Multidimensional Model for Territorial Analysis and Scenario Evaluation.” Planning Practice & Research 39, no. 1, September 12 (2022): 116–135. doi:10.1080/02697459.2022.2120490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto-Dorn, K. Das Islamische Iznik: Mit Einem Quellenkundlichen Beitrag. Berlin: Istanbuler Forschungen, 1941.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. J., and P. Selman. “Attitudes Toward Rural Landscape Change in England.” Environment and Behavior 43, no. 2 (2011): 182–206. doi:10.1177/0013916509355123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pola, A.-P. “When Heritage Is Rural: Environmental Conservation, Cultural Interpretation and Rural Renaissance in Chinese Listed Villages.” Built Heritage 3, no. 2 (2019): 64–80. doi:10.1186/bf03545728.
   Google Scholar
• Raby, J. “A Seventeenth Century Description of Iznik-Nicaea.” Istanbuler Mitteilungen 26 (1976): 162–164.
   Google Scholar
• Race, D., R. Black, and G. W. Luck. Demographic Change in Australia’s Rural Landscapes, Edited by Gary W. Luck, Rosemary Black, and Digby Race. Vol. 12. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011. Landscape Series.
   Google Scholar
• Race, D., G. W. Luck, and R. Black. “Patterns, Drivers and Implications of Demographic Change in Rural Landscapes.” In Demographic Change in Australia’s Rural Landscapes, edited by G. W. Luck, R. Black, and D. Race, Vol. 12 , 1–22. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010. Landscape Series. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9654-8_1.
   Google Scholar
• Salt, B. The Big Shift: Welcome to the Third Australian Culture. Melbourne: Hardie Grant, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Stanners, D., and P. Bourdeau. Europe’s Environment: The Dobris Assessment. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, H. T. L., D. Race, and A. Curtis. “Demographic Change and the Implications for Commercial Forestry: Lessons from South-East Australia.” In Demographic Change in Australia’s Rural Landscapes, edited by G. W. Luck, R. Black, and D. Race, Vol. 12, 207–231. 2010. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9654-8_9.
   Google Scholar
• Strabon. Antik Anadolu Coğrafyası (Geographika: XII-XIII-XIV). Edited by Adnan Pekman and Nezih Başgelen. Istanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Suttie, D., and K. Hussein. “Territorial Approaches, Rural-Urban Linkages and Inclusive Rural Transformation.” (2015, December 23).
   Google Scholar
• Taaffe, E. J., H. L. Gauthier, and M. E. O’Kelly. Geography of Transportation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• T.C. İçişleri Bakanlığı Sivil Toplumla İlişkiler Genel Müdürlüğü. “İllere ve Faaliyet Alanlarına Göre Dernekler.” n.d. https://www.siviltoplum.gov.tr/illere-ve-faaliyet-alanlarina-gore-dernekler.
   Google Scholar
• Trapani, F. “A Territorial Approach to the Production of Urban and Rural Landscape.” International Journal of Environmental Science & Sustainable Development 3, no. 1 (2018): 70–93. doi:10.21625/essd.v3iss1.188.
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Statistical Institute (TUİK). “Genel Nüfus Sayımları.” 2021. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/nufusmenuapp/menu.zul.
   Google Scholar
• Türkiye Ekonomik ve Sosyal Etüdler Vakfı. “Kent95.” https://harita.kent95.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ulusan, E. “Analysis of Management Planning and Governance Systems for Cultural Heritage Places in Türkiye.” PhD diss.Middle East Technical University, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. The International Protection of Landscapes. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, H., J. Pittock, and K. A. Daniell. “China: A New Trajectory Prioritizing Rural Rather Than Urban Development.” Land 10, no. 5 (2021): 514. doi:10.3390/land10050514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, M., S. Chu, and X. Du. “Safeguarding Traditional Villages in China: The Role and Challenges of Rural Heritage Preservation.” Built Heritage 3, no. 2 (2019): 81–93. doi:10.1186/bf03545729.
   Google Scholar