Rock mass strength variability for probabilistic open-pit slope stability analysis

REFERENCES

• Abdulai, M., & Sharifzadeh, M. (2021). Probability methods for stability design of open pit rock slopes: An overview. Geosciences, 11(8), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11080319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoushahi, S., Grenon, M., Locat, J., & Turmel, D. (2018). Deterministic and probabilistic stability analysis of a mining rock slope in the vicinity of a major public road — Case study of the LAB chrysotile mine in Canada. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 55(10), 1391–1404. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arman, A., Poplin, J., & Ahmad, N. (1975). Study of the vane shear. Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers Conference on In-Situ Measurement of Soil Properties, Raleigh, North Carolina (Vol. 1, pp. 93–120).
   Google Scholar
• Baecher, G., & Christian, J. (2003). Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R., Azizian, A., Clayton, C., & Slater, M. (2017, June 25-28). Geomechanical characterization of a sheared coal seam and implications for open pit slope design. [ Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 51st US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, CA, USA: American Rock Mechanics Association, Alexandria.
   Google Scholar
• Bieniawski, Z. (1968). The effect of specimen size on compressive strength of coal. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 5(4), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(68)90004-1
   Google Scholar
• British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources. (2018). The East Kootenay coalfields. British Columbia Geological Survey Information Circular. 2018–6.
   Google Scholar
• Chiwaye, H., & Stacey, T. (2010). A comparison of limit equilibrium and numerical modelling approaches to risk analysis for open pit mining. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 110(10), 571–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, C., Barnett, R., & Slater, M. (2020). Case study: Back-analysis of a historical open pit highwall failure at a coal mine in Canada, In P. M. Dight (Ed.), Slope Stability 2020: Proceedings of the 2020 International Symposium on Slope Stability in Open Pit Mining and Civil Engineering, (pp.873–888). Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth. https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_repo/2025_57
   Google Scholar
• Doruk, P. (1991). Analysis of the Laboratory Strength Data Using the Original and Modified Hoek-Brown Criteria [ Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Eberhardt, E. (2012). The hoek–brown failure criterion. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 45(6), 981–988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0276-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, I., & Pomeroy, C. D. (1966). The strength, fracture and workability of coal. Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentzis, T., Deisman, N., & Chalaturnyk, R. J. (2007). Geomechanical properties and permeability of coals from the foothills and mountain regions of western Canada. International Journal of Coal Geology, 69(3), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2006.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieve, D., & Price, R. (1987). Geological setting of the south half of the Elk Valley coalfield, Southeastern British Columbia. Preliminary Map 63. Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Geological Survey Branch.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, A. (1924). Theory of rupture. In: C. B. Biezeno & J. M.Burgers (Eds.), Proc. First International Congress on applied mechanics, Delft (pp. 55–63). J. Waltman, Jr.
   Google Scholar
• Hata, Y., Ichii, K., & Tokida, K. (2012). A probabilistic evaluation of the size of earthquake induced slope failure for an embankment. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 6(2), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2011.604583
   Google Scholar
• Hoek, E., & Brown, E. (2019). The hoek–brown failure criterion and GSI –2018 edition. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 11(3), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoek, E., Carranza-Torres, C., & Corkum, B. (2002). Hoek-Brown criterion – 2002 edition. In: R. Hammah, W.Bawden, J.Curran, & M.Telesnicki (Eds.), Mining and Tunnelling Innovation and Opportunity: Proceedings of the 5th North American Rock Mechanics Symposium and 17th Tunnelling Association of Canada Conference. University of Toronto (pp. 267–273).
   Google Scholar
• Javankhoshdel, S., & Bathurst, R. (2016). Influence of cross correlation between soil parameters on probability of failure of simple cohesive and c–ϕ slopes. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 53(5), 839–853. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javankhoshdel, S., Luo, N., & Bathurst, R. (2016). Probabilistic analysis of simple slopes with cohesive soil strength using RLEM and RFEM. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 11(3), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2016.1235712
   Google Scholar
• Langford, J., & Diederichs, M. (2015). Quantifying uncertainty in Hoek-Brown intact strength envelopes. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 74, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macciotta, R., Creighton, A., & Martin, C. (2020). Design acceptance criteria for operating open-pit slopes: An update. CIM Journal, 11(4), 248–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/19236026.2020.1826830
   Google Scholar
• Medhurst, T., & Brown, E. (1998). A study of the mechanical behaviour of coal for pillar design. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 35(8), 1087–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(98)00168-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgenstern, N., & Price, V. (1965). The analysis of the stability of general slip surfaces. Géotechnique, 15(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1965.15.1.79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phoon, K., & Kulhawy, F. (1999). Characterization of geotechnical variability. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 36(4), 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phoon, K., Prakoso, W., Wang, Y., & Ching, J. (2016). Uncertainty representation of geotechnical design parameters. Reliability of geotechnical structures in ISO2394.
   Google Scholar
• Pozo, R. (2022). Comparative analysis of different calculation methods of the Geological Strength Index (GSI) based on qualitative and quantitative approaches. Rudarsko-geološko-naftni zbornik, 38(3), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.17794/rgn.2022.3.10
   Google Scholar
• Prakoso, W. (2002). Reliability-Based Design of Foundations on Rock for Transmission Line & Similar Structure [ Unpublished master’s thesis]. Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Rafiei Renani, H., & Martin, C. (2019). Slope stability analysis using equivalent mohr–coulomb and Hoek–Brown criteria. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 53(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01889-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafiei Renani, H., Martin, C., Varona, P., & Lorig, L. (2019). Stability analysis of slopes with spatially variable strength properties. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 52(10), 3791–3808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01828-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocscience Inc. (2023). Slide2 Modeler – 2D limit equilibrium analysis for slopes, version 9.027.
   Google Scholar
• Wesseloo, J., & Read, J. (2009). Acceptance criteria. In: J. Read & P.Stacey (Eds.), Guidelines for open pit slope design (pp. 221–236). CRC Press/Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Yucemen, M., Tang, W., & Ang, A. (1973). A probabilistic study of safety and design of earth slopes. In Civil engineering studies, structural research series (Vol. 402, p. 222). University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., Li, D., Cao, Z., Xiao, T., & Zhao, J. (2018). Revisiting statistical correlation between Mohr–coulomb shear strength parameters of Hoek–Brown rock masses. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 77, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar