Chitosan modifies the substrate and influences growth of chili seedlings

References

• Anonymous. 2005. Characteristics and properties of established soil series in the north and central plain regions of Thailand (document NO. 54/03/48). Office Of Soil Survey And Land Use Planning, Land Development Department, Ministry Of Agriculture And Cooperatives, Thailand. 9 July 2023. http://oss101.ldd.go.th/web_standard/_doc_std/series_desc/D_Cseries_thai.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 2012. Official methods of analysis. 19th ed. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 2014. Nutritional recommendations for pepper in open-field, tunnels and greenhouse. Polanco, Mexico: Haifa Chemicals Co. Ltd. https://www.ingrasamintenpk.ro/images/piper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, A.V., and G.M. Bryson. 2007. Nitrogen, pp. 21–50. In: A.V. Barker and D.J. Pilbeam (eds.). Handbook of plant nutrition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, H.L., and B.B. Hunter. 1998. Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi. 4th ed. United States of America: APS Press, St. Paul. MN.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, G.R. 1965. Bulk density, pp. 374–390. In: C.A. Black (ed.). Methods of soil analysis, part 1: Physical properties, (agronomy vol. 9). American Soil Association, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, N.C., and R.R. Weil. 2001. The nature and properties of soils. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Chesnin, L., and C.H. Yien. 1951. Turbidimetric determination of available sulphates. Soil Sci. Soc Amer Proc 15:149–151. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1951.036159950015000C0032x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chookhongkha, N., S. Miyagawa, Y. Jirakiattikul, and S. Photchanachai. 2012. Chilli growth and seed productivity as affected by chitosan. Proceedings International Conference on Agriculture Technology and Food Science (ICATFS’2012), 17–18, Manila, Philippines, Nov.
   Google Scholar
• Chookhongkha, N., T. Sopondilok, and S. Photchanachai. 2013. Effect of chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles on fungal growth and chili seed quality. Acta Hortic. 973:231–237. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.973.32.
   Google Scholar
• Christopher, K., and E. Bruno. 2003. Chapter 8: Identification of bacterial species. 3. Identification of bacterial species, tested studies for laboratory teaching. Proceedings 24th Workshop/Conference of the Association for Biology Laboratory Education, 11–14, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, Jun.
   Google Scholar
• Dzung, N.A. 2010. Enhancing crop production with chitosan and its derivatives, pp. 619–631. In: S.K. Kim (ed.). Chitin, chitosan, oligosaccharides and their derivatives. Biological activities and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
   Google Scholar
• Escudero, N., F. Lopez-Moya, Z. Ghahremani, E.A. Zavala-Gonzalez, A. Alaguero-Cordovilla, C. Ros-Ibañez, A. Lacasa, F.J. Sorribas, and L.V. Lopez-Llorca. 2017. Chitosan increases tomato root colonization by Pochonia chlamydosporia and their combination reduces root-knot nematode damage. Front. Plant. Sci. 8: 1415. article no. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follett, R.H., L.S. Murphy, and R.L. Donahue. 1981. Fertilizers and soil amendments. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Rincon, J., J. Vega-Perez, M.G. Guerra–Sanchez, A.N. Hernandez-Lauzardo, A. Pena-Diaz, and V.M.G. Velazquez-Del. 2010. Effect of chitosan on growth and plasma membrane properties of Rhizopus stolonifer (Ehrenb.Fr.) Vuill. Pestic. Biochem. Phys 97(3):275–278. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2010.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goy, R.C., S.T. Morais, and O.B. Assis. 2016. Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chitosan and its quaternized derivative on E. coli and S. aureus growth. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn 26(1):122–127. doi: 10.1016/j.bjp.2015.09.010.
   Google Scholar
• Han, L., M. Mo, Y. Gao, H. Ma, D. Xiang, G. Ma, and H. Mao. 2022. Effects of new compounds into substrates on seedling qualities for efficient transplanting. Agronomy. 12(5):983. article no. 983. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12050983.
   Google Scholar
• Hidangmayum, A., P. Dwivedi, D. Katiyar, and A. Hemantaranjan. 2019. Application of chitosan on plant responses with special reference to abiotic stress. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 25(2):313–326. doi: 10.1007/s12298-018-0633-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M.L. 1960. Chloride determination in soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Kamari, A., I.D. Pulfold, and J.S.J. Hargreaves. 2011. Chitosan as a potential amendment to remediate metal contaminated soil - a characterization study. Colloids Surf. B. 82(1):71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.08.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H.X., Z.J. Chen, T. Zhou, Y. Liu, and J.B. Zhou. 2018. High potassium to magnesium ratio affected the growth and magnesium uptake of three tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cultivars. J. Integr. Agric 17(12):2813–2821. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(18)61949-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, W.L., and W.A. Norvell. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42(3):421–428. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, L.T., L.V. Tan, V.N. Boi, and T.S. Trung. 2017. Antifungal activity of water-soluble chitosan against Colletotrichum capsici in postharvest chili pepper. J. Food Process. Preserv 42(13):e13339. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.13339.
   Google Scholar
• Majeti, N.V., and R. Kumar. 2000. A review of chitin and chitosan applications. React. Funct. Polym 46(1):1–27. doi: 10.1016/S1381-5148(00)00038-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Camachoa, A.P., M.O. Cortez-Rochaa, J.M. Ezquerra-Brauera, A.Z. Graciano-Verdugob, F. Rodriguez-Felixa, M.M. Castillo-Ortegac, M.S. Yepiz-Gomeza, and M. Plascencia-Jatomea. 2010. Chitosan composite films: Thermal, structural, mechanical and antifungal properties. Carbohyd. Polym. 82(2):305–315. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyasaka, S.C., N.V. Hue, and M.A. Dunn. 2007. Aluminum, In: pp. 439–487. In: A.V. In: Barker and D.J. Pilbeam (eds.). Handbook of plant nutrition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, R. 1982. Formulae for determination of chlorophyllous pigments extracted with N, N-dimethylformamide. Plant Physiol. 69(6):1376–1381. doi: 10.1104/pp.69.6.1376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosavikia, A.A., S.G. Mosavi, M. Seghatoleslami, and R. Baradaran. 2020. Chitosan nanoparticle and pyridoxine seed priming improves tolerance to salinity in milk thistle seedling Silybum marianum L. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobot. Cluj Napoca. 48(1):221–233. doi: 10.15835/nbha48111777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, K.C., and T. Chang. 2012. Effect of chitosan on microbial community in soils planted with cucumber under protected cultivation. Korean J. Hortic. Sci. Technol 30(3):261–269. doi: 10.7235/hort.2012.11148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoades, J.D. 1996. Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids, pp. 417–435. In: D.L. Sparks, A.L. Page, P.A. Helmke, R.H. Loeppert, P.N. Soltanpour, M.A. Tabatabai, C.T. Johnston, and M.E. Sumner (eds.). Methods of soil analysis part 3: Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Schroth, G., J. Lehmann, and E. Barrios. 2003. Soil nutrient availability and acidity, pp. 93–130. In: G. Schroth and F.L. Sinclair (eds.). Trees, crops and soil fertility. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Seeley, H.W., Jr., P.J. Vandenmark, and J.J. Lee. 1981. Microbes in action: A laboratory manual of microbiology. 4th ed. W.H. Freeman, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Simard, R.R. 1993. Ammonium acetate extractable elements, pp. 39–43. In: R. Martin and S. Carter (eds.). Soil sampling and method of analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Strong, W.M., and M.G. Mason. 1999. Nitrogen, pp. 171–186. In: K.I. Peverill, L.A. Sparrow, and D.J. Reuter (eds.). Soil analysis, an interpretation manual. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, K.H. 2005. Soil sampling, preparation, and analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, Y., L.H. Qian, and J. Xie. 2011. Effect of chitosan on membrane permeability and cell morphology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphyloccocus aureus. Carbohyd. Polym. 86(2):969–974. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.05.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traynor, J. 1980. Ideas in soil and plant nutrition. Kovak Books, Bakersfield, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Van, S.N., H.D. Minh, and D.N. Anh. 2013. Study on chitosan nanoparticles on biophysical characteristics and growth of robusta coffee in green house. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2(4):289–294. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2013.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• van Reeuwijk, L.P. 2002. Procedures for soil analysis. 6th ed. International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Vomocil, J.A. 1965. Porosity, pp. 299–314. In: C.A. Black (ed.). Methods of soil analysis, part 1: Physical and mineralogical properties, including statistics of measurement and sampling. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Walkey, A., and I.A. Black. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and propose modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil. Sci 37(1):29–38. doi: 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003.
   Google Scholar
• Wan Ngah, W.S., L.C. Teong, and M.A.K.M. Hanafiah. 2011. Adsorption of dyes and heavy metal ions by chitosan composites: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 83(4):1446–1456. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weißpflog, J., A. Gündel, D. Vehlow, C. Steinbach, M. Müller, R. Boldt, S. Schwarz, and D. Schwarz. 2020. Solubility and selectivity effects of the anion on the adsorption of different heavy metal ions onto chitosan. Molecules. 25(11):2482. article no. doi: 10.3390/molecules25112482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, H., Y. Du, and Z. Dong. 2016. Chitin oligosaccharide and chitosan oligosaccharide: Two similar but different plant elicitors. Front Plant. Sci 7:522. article no. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar