References

  • Abubakar, A. T. (2020). News values and the ethical dilemmas of covering violent extremism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(1), 278–298. doi:10.1177/1077699019847258
  • Aliapoulios, M., Bevensee, E., Blackburn, J., Bradlyn, B., De Cristofaro, E., Stringhini, G., & Zannettou, S. (2021). An early look at the parler online social network. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.03820.
  • Baugut, P., & Neumann, K. (2019). How right-wing extremists use and perceive news media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(3), 696–720. doi:10.1177/1077699018803080
  • Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Brady, W. J., Crockett, M. J., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2020). The MAD model of moral contagion: The role of motivation, attention, and design in the spread of moralized content online. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 978–1010.
  • Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Childs, M., Buntain, C., Z. Trujillo, M., & D. Horne, B. (2022, June). Characterizing youtube and bitchute content and mobilizers during us election fraud discussions on twitter. In 14th ACM Web Science Conference 2022 (pp. 250–259)
  • Clarke, I., Grieve, J., & Danforth, C. M. (2019). Stylistic variation on the Donald Trump Twitter account: A linguistic analysis of tweets posted between 2009 and 2018. PLoS One, 14(9), e0222062. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0222062
  • Coe, K., & Griffin, R. A. (2020). Marginalized identity invocation online: The case of President Donald Trump on Twitter. Social Media+ Society, 6(1), 2056305120913979. doi:10.1177/2056305120913979
  • Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2015). The rise of Twitter in the political campaign: Searching for intermedia agenda-setting effects in the presidential primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(4), 363–380. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12124
  • Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Cambridge, England: Polity.
  • Dai, Y., & Kustov, A. (2022). When do politicians use populist rhetoric? Populism as a campaign gamble. Political Communication, 39(3), 1–22. doi:10.1080/10584609.2022.2025505
  • Dehghan, E., & Nagappa, A. (2022). Politicization and radicalization of discourses in the alt-tech ecosystem: A case study on gab social. Social Media+ Society, 8(3), 20563051221113075. doi:10.1177/20563051221113075
  • Donovan, J., & Boyd, D. (2021). Stop the presses? Moving from strategic silence to strategic amplification in a networked media ecosystem. The American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 333–350. doi:10.1177/0002764219878229
  • Dowling, D. O., Johnson, P. R., & Ekdale, B. (2022). Hijacking journalism: Legitimacy and metajournalistic discourse in right-wing podcasts. Media and Communication, 10(3), 17–27. doi:10.17645/mac.v10i3.5260
  • Ernst, N., Blassnig, S., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., & Esser, F. (2019). Populists prefer social media over talk shows: An analysis of populist messages and stylistic elements across six countries. Social Media+ Society, 5(1), 2056305118823358.
  • Faris, R., Clark, J., Etling, B., Kaiser, J., Roberts, H., Schmitt, C., Tilton, C., & Benkler, Y. (October 22, 2020). Partisanship, Impeachment, and the Democratic Primaries: American Political Discourse. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University. Retrieved October 27,2022 from https://cyber.harvard.edu/publication/2020/partisanship-impeachment-and-democratic-primaries-american-political-discourse
  • Faris, R. M., Roberts, H., Etling, B., Bourassa, N., Zuckerman, E., & Benkler, Y. (2017). Partisanship, propaganda, and disinformation: Online media and the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3019414.
  • Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. A., Rucht, D., & Gerhards, J. (2002). Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Francia, P. L. (2018). Free media and twitter in the 2016 presidential election: The unconventional campaign of Donald Trump. Social Science Computer Review, 36(4), 440–455. doi:10.1177/0894439317730302
  • Freelon, D., Marwick, A., & Kreiss, D. (2020). False equivalencies: Online activism from left to right. Science, 369(6508), 1197–1201. doi:10.1126/science.abb2428
  • Gilardi, F., Gessler, T., Kubli, M., & Müller, S. (2022). Social media and political agenda setting. Political Communication, 39(1), 39–60. doi:10.1080/10584609.2021.1910390
  • Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Heidenreich, T., Eberl, J. M., Tolochko, P., Lind, F., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2022). My voters should see this! What news items are shared by politicians on Facebook?. The International Journal of Press/politics, 19401612221104740.
  • Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53–78. doi:10.1086/228951
  • Jasser, G., McSwiney, J., Pertwee, E., & Zannettou, S. (2021). ‘Welcome to #GabFam’: Far-right virtual community on gab. New Media & Society, 25(7), 1728–1745. doi:10.1177/14614448211024546
  • Jungherr, A., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020). Retooling politics: How digital media are shaping democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kor-Sins, R. (2021). The alt-right digital migration: A heterogeneous engineering approach to social media platform branding. New Media & Society. 25(9), 2321–38.
  • Lazarus, J., & Thornton, J. R. (2021). Bully pulpit? Twitter users’ engagement with President Trump’s tweets. Social Science Computer Review, 39(5), 961–980. doi:10.1177/0894439320946578
  • Lewandowsky, S., Jetter, M., & Ecker, U. K. (2020). Using the president’s tweets to understand political diversion in the age of social media. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–12. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19644-6
  • Lischka, J. A. (2021). Logics in social media news making: How social media editors marry the Facebook logic with journalistic standards. Journalism, 22(2), 430–447. doi:10.1177/1464884918788472
  • Lukito, J., Suk, J., Zhang, Y., Doroshenko, L., Kim, S. J., & Wells, C. (2020). The wolves in sheep’s clothing: How Russia’s Internet Research Agency tweets appeared in US news as vox populi. The International Journal of Press/politics, 25(2), 196–216.
  • Mukerjee, S., Yang, T., & Peng, Y. (2023). Metrics in action: How social media metrics shape news production on Facebook. Journal of Communication, 73(3), 260–272.
  • Nadler, A. (2022). Political identity and the therapeutic work of US conservative media. International Journal of Communication, 16 (2022), 2621–2633.
  • Oschatz, C., Stier, S., & Maier, J. (2022). Twitter in the news: An analysis of embedded tweets in political news coverage. Digital Journalism, 10(9), 1526–1545. doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.1912624
  • Ott, B. L., & Dickinson, G. (2019). The Twitter presidency: Donald J. Trump and the politics of white rage. Routledge.
  • Pain, P., & Masullo Chen, G. (2019). The president is in: Public opinion and the presidential use of twitter. Social Media+ Society, 5(2), 2056305119855143. doi:10.1177/2056305119855143
  • Park, R. E., & Mitchell, B. M. (1980). Estimating the autocorrelated error model with trended data. Journal of Econometrics, 13(2), 185–201. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(80)90014-7
  • Peucker, M., & Fisher, T. J. (2023). Mainstream media use for far-right mobilisation on the alt-tech online platform gab. Media Culture & Society, 45(2), 354–372. doi:10.1177/01634437221111943
  • Rathje, S., Van Bavel, J. J., & Van Der Linden, S. (2021). Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(26), e2024292118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2024292118
  • Roberts, H., Bhargava, R., Valiukas, L., Jen, D., Malik, M. M., Bishop, C. S., Ndulue, E. B., Dave, A., Clark, J., Etling, B., Faris, R., Shah, A., Rubinovitz, J., Hope, A., D’Ignazio, C., Bermejo, F., Benkler, Y., & Zuckerman, E. (2021, May). Media cloud: Massive open source collection of global news on the open web. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (Vol. 15, pp. 1034–1045).
  • Rogers, R. (2020). Deplatforming: Following extreme Internet celebrities to telegram and alternative social media. European Journal of Communication, 35(3), 213–229. doi:10.1177/0267323120922066
  • Ross, A. S., & Caldwell, D. (2020). ‘Going negative’: An appraisal analysis of the rhetoric of Donald Trump on Twitter. Language & Communication, 70, 13–27. doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2019.09.003
  • Scacco, J. M., & Coe, K. (2016). The ubiquitous presidency: Toward a new paradigm for studying presidential communication. International Journal of Communication, 10(2016), 2014–2037.
  • Stocking, G., Mitchell, A., Matsa, K. E., Widjaya, R., Jurkowitz, M., & Aubin, C. S. (2022). The role of alternative social media in the news and information environment. Pew Research Center.
  • Van Dijck, J., de Winkel, T., & Schäfer, M. T. (2021). Deplatformization and the governance of the platform ecosystem. New Media & Society, 25(12), 3438–3454. doi:10.1177/14614448211045662
  • Walters, P. (2021). Reclaiming control: How journalists embrace social media logics while defending journalistic values. Digital Journalism, 10(9), 1–20. doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.1942113
  • Wells, C., Shah, D., Lukito, J., Pelled, A., Pevehouse, J. C., & Yang, J. (2020). Trump, Twitter, and news media responsiveness: A media systems approach. New Media & Society, 22(4), 659–682. doi:10.1177/1461444819893987
  • Wells, C., Shah, D. V., Pevehouse, J. C., Yang, J., Pelled, A., Boehm, F., & Schmidt, J. L. (2016). How Trump drove coverage to the nomination: Hybrid media campaigning. Political Communication, 33(4), 669–676.
  • Wells, C., Zhang, Y., Lukito, J., & Pevehouse, J. C. (2020). Modeling the formation of attentive publics in social media: The case of Donald Trump. Mass Communication & Society, 23(2), 181–205. doi:10.1080/15205436.2019.1690664
  • Widjaya, R., & Smith, A. (2023). Links shared by prominent accounts on twitter differ widely from those shared on alternative social media. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/01/12/links-shared-by-prominent-accounts-on-twitter-differ-widely-from-those-shared-on-alternative-social-media/
  • Wilson, T., & Starbird, K. (2021). Cross-platform information operations: Mobilizing narratives & building resilience through both’Big’&‘Alt’Tech. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1–32. doi:10.1145/3476086
  • Wu, T. (2017). The attention merchants: The epic scramble to get inside our heads. New York, NY: Vintage.
  • Zannettou, S., Bradlyn, B., De Cristofaro, E., Kwak, H., Sirivianos, M., Stringini, G., & Blackburn, J. (2018, April). What is gab: A bastion of free speech or an alt-right echo chamber. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018 (pp. 1007–1014).
  • Zhang, Y., Lukito, J., Su, M. H., Suk, J., Xia, Y., & Wells, C. (2021). Assembling the networks and audiences of disinformation: How successful Russian IRA Twitter accounts built their followings, 2015–2017. Journal of Communication, 71(2), 305–331.
  • Zhang, Y., Wells, C., Wang, S., & Rohe, K. (2018). Attention and amplification in the hybrid media system: The composition and activity of Donald Trump’s Twitter following during the 2016 presidential election. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3161–3182. doi:10.1177/1461444817744390
  • Zhou, Y., Dredze, M., Broniatowski, D. A., & Adler, W. D. (2019). Elites and foreign actors among the alt-right: The Gab social media platform. First Monday.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.