From Emergency Call to Crime Scene: Information Transference in the Criminal Investigation

References

• De Gruijter, M., C. Nee, and C. De Poot. 2017. Identification at the crime scene: The sooner, the better? Constructing scenarios with rapid identification information at the crime scene. Science and Justice 57:296–306. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2017.03.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Keijser, J. W., M. Malsch, R. Krandendonk, and M. De Gruijter. 2012. Written records of police interrogation: Differential registration as determinant of statement credibility and interrogation quality. Psychology, Crime and Law 18:613–29. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2010.526119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Poot, C. J., R. J. Bokhorst, P. J. van Koppen, and E. R. Muller. 2004. Rechercheportret: Over dilemma's in de opsporing [portrait of detectives: About dillemas in the investigative process]. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Dror, I. E. 2013. Practical solutions to cognitive and human factor challenges in forensic science. Forensic Science, Policy & Management 4:1–9. doi:10.1080/19409044.2014.901437.
   Google Scholar
• Dror, I. E., D. Charlton, and A. E. Péron. 2006. Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications. Forensic Science International 156:74–8. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.10.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dror, I. E., and G. Hampikian. 2011. Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation. Science and Justice 51:204–208. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2011.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, H. 1893. Handbuch für Untersuchungsrichter als System der Kriminlistik. Berlin: Schweizer.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, M. 2003. Investigating murder: Detective work and the police response to criminal homicide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., I. E. Dror, and J. Kukucka. 2013. The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 2:42–52. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeuwen, C. H., J. A. Hulsenbek, and W. J. M. Velings. 2011. Evaluatieonderzoek naar aanleiding van de vermissing van Milly Boele” [evaluation of the missing persons case of Milly Boele]. Retrieved from: http://media.rtl.nl/media/actueel/rtlnieuws/2011/rapportboele.pdf. (Accessed on July 20, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, N. K. P., S. Woods, J. Kieser, and R. Zajac. 2014. Does contextual information bias bitemark comparisons? Science & Justice 54:267–73. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2013.12.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, N. K. P., M. C. Taylor, and R. Zajac. 2016. Exploring the role of contextual information in bloodstain pattern analysis: A qualitative approach. Forensic Science International 260:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.12.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxburgh, G., J. Ost, and J. Cherryman. 2012. Police interviews with suspected child sex offenders: Does use of empathy and question type influence the amount of investigation relevant information obtained? Psychology, Crime and Law 18:259–73. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2010.481624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnikoff, T., O. Ribaux, A. Baylon, M. Jendly, and Q. Rossy. 2015. The polymorphism of crime scene investigation: An exploratory analysis of the influence of crime and forensic intelligence on decisions made by crime scene examiners. Forensic Science International 257:425–34. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.10.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribaux, O., A. Baylon, C. Roux, E. Delémont, C. Lock, C. Zingg, and P. Margot. 2010a. Intelligence-led crime scene processing. Part I: Forensic intelligence. Forensic Science International 195:10–16. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.10.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribaux, O., A. Baylon, C. Roux, E. Delémont, C. Lock, C. Zingg, and P. Margot. 2010b. Intelligence-led crime scene processing. Part II: Intelligence and crime scene examination. Forensic Science International 199:63–71. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.03.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholtens, A., M. den Hengst, and R. Waterreus. 2016. Het real-time informeren van noodhulpeenheden [real-team informance of emergency response units]. Politie & Wetenschap.
   Google Scholar
• Sollie, H., N. Kop, and M. C. Euwema. 2017. Mental resilience of crime scene investigators: How police officers perceive and cope with the impact of forensic investigations. Journal of Criminal Justice and Behavior. doi:10.1177/0093854817716959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talarico, J. M., and D. C. Rubin. 2003. Confidence, not consistency, characterizes flashbulb memories. Psychological Science 14:455–61. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.02453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Technical Working Group on Crime Scene Investigation. 2013. Crime scene investigation: A guide for law enforcement. Retrieved from: https://www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/forensics/Crime-Scene-Investigation.pdf (accessed on August 17, 2017)
   Google Scholar
• Van Amelsvoort, A., and H. Groenendal. 2013. Handleiding optreden plaats delict. Amsterdam: Reed.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Eeden, C. A. J., C. J. De Poot, and P. J. Van Koppen. 2016. Forensic expectations: Investigating a crime scene with prior information. Science and Justice 56:475–81. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2016.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Eeden, C. A. J., J. Ost, C. J. De Poot, and P. J. Van Koppen. Submitted. Solving the puzzle: The effects of contextual information and feedback on the interpretation of a crime scene. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling.
   Google Scholar