For the people: How we make online LAM collections more democratized

References

• Ahmed, S. (2021). Complaint! Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. (2020). Some Provocations on the digital future of museums. In K. Winesmith & S. Anderson (Eds), The Digital Future of Museums: Conversations and provocations (pp. 10–25). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, H., Berry, D. J., Caringola, E. M., Diaz, A., Hamerman, S., Hurley, E., Neatrour, A., Rodriguez, S., Senseney, M., Tillman, R., Wickner, A., Wildenhaus, K., Williams, E. (2020, January). Do Better – Love(,) Us: Guidelines for developing and supporting grant-funded positions in digital libraries, archives, and Museums. https://dobetterlabor.com.
   Google Scholar
• Avenier, P. (1999). Putting the Public First: The French Experience. Museum International (UNESCO), No 204: Museums and the Internet, 51(4), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0033.00227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, J. P. (1996). A declaration of the independence of cyberspace. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence.
   Google Scholar
• Bearman, D. (2008). Representing Museum knowledge. In P. F. Marty and K. Jones (Eds.), Museum informatics: People, information, and technology in Museums (pp. 35–57). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203939147
   Google Scholar
• Bearman, D. (2010). Standards for Networked Cultural Heritage. In R. Parry (Ed.) Museums in a digital age (pp. 48–63). Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, T. (1990). The political rationality of the Museum. Continuum, 3(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304319009388148
   Google Scholar
• Berry, D. (2021). Centering the margins in digital project planning. Journal of Critical Digital Librarianship, 1(1), Article 3. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/jcdl/vol1/iss1/3 https://doi.org/10.31390/jcdl.1.1.03
   Google Scholar
• Berry, D. (2018). Digitizing and enhancing description across collections to make African American Materials More Discoverable on Umbra Search African American History. The Design for Diversity Learning Toolkit. https://des4div.library.northeastern.edu/digitizing-and-enhancing-description-across-collections-to-make-african-american-materials-more-discoverable-on-umbra-search-african-american-history/.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, D., von Daacke, K., Walker, S. (2022). Examining the Roots of Universities in Slavery and Anti-Black Racism. Webinar from SPARC’s Knowledge Equity Discussion Series, July 27. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SilcFvxrMU.
   Google Scholar
• Bertoldi, H., Griesinger, P., Hartzler, J., & Mattison, S. (2022). Thematic Metadata Solutions Report. February 4. https://osf.io/dv6tg/.
   Google Scholar
• Bertoldi, H., Griesinger, P., & Narlock, M. (2023). All we want are the facts, ma’am: Negotiating user needs and creator privacy in name authority records. In A. Provo, K. Burlingame, & B. M. Watson (Eds.), Ethics in linked data (pp. 381–409). Library Juice Press.
   Google Scholar
• Besser, H. (1987). Digital images for Museums. Museum Studies Journal, 3, 74–81.
   Google Scholar
• Besser, H. (1997). The changing role of photographic collections with the advent of digitization. In K. Jones-Garmil (Ed.), The wired Museum: Emerging technology and changing paradigms (pp. 117–127). American Association of Museums.
   Google Scholar
• Billey, A. (2019). Just because we can, doesn’t mean we should: An argument for simplicity and data privacy with name authority work in the linked data environment. Journal of Library Metadata, 19(1–2), 1–17. s https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2019.1589684
   Google Scholar
• Billey, A., Drabinski, E., & Roberto, K. R. (2014). What’s gender got to do with it? A critique of RDA 9.7. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 52(4), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.882465
   Google Scholar
• Bohlmann, R., & Hosselkus, E. (2021). Stories of power and diversity during COVID: Building an online exhibition with primary sources. Society of America Archivist Case Studies on Teaching with Primary Sources (TWPS), 2021, 47. https://doi.org/10.7274/r0-fn8d-sj47
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C. (2000). Biodiversity, datadiversity. Social Studies of Science, 30(5), 643–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631200030005001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broussard, M. (2018). Artificial unintelligence. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D., & Nicholas, G. (2012). Protecting indigenous cultural property in the age of digital democracy: Institutional and communal responses to Canadian First Nations and Ma ¯ori heritage concern. Journal of Material Culture, 17(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183512454065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullard, J. (2021). Ambushing authors with the catalogue: What creators can tell us about identity terms.” Authors, Authority, and Identity: Facilitating Self-Identification for Discovery & Inclusive Knowledge Production, November 3, 2021. https://harvard.zoom.us/rec/play/FNkScxfqphm9Tuc3ckrcvFr2uGyMOtPV7LMeVqvWnE_wIcf5563N5cbyNFof5dAvIK5uWdHXwIKg5z0.36uI83Au-tEvqKsu?startTime=1637234279834&_x_zm_rtaid=mGTyYL6yRyKUu5gQ6E9R1g.1638546940448.b24de9f8a5146ad5c1ec4bcc0dca48d4&_x_zm_rhtaid=942.
   Google Scholar
• CalPoly Robert, E., Library, K. (2022). Gaps and silences in the archives: Critical use of archives and primary sources. Retrieved March 3, 2022, https://guides.lib.calpoly.edu/archives/critical.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, F. (2003). Digital futures I: Museum collections, digital technologies, and the cultural construction of knowledge. Curator, 46(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2003.tb00098.x
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, F. (2010). Museum collections, documentation, and shifting knowledge paradigms. In R. Parry (Ed.) Museums in a digital age (pp. 80–95). Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, F., & Mengler, S. (2009). Complexity, transdisciplinarity and museum collections documentation: Emergent metaphors for a complex world. Journal of Material Culture, 14(2), 189–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183509103061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, F., & Robinson, H. (2007). Digital knowledgescapes: Cultural, theoretical, practical, and usage issues facing museum collection databases in a digital epoch. In F. Cameron & S. Kenderdine (Eds.), Theorizing digital cultural heritage: A critical discourse (pp. 165–191). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, F., & Sarah, K. (2007). Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: A Critical Discourse. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caswell, M. (2019). Dusting for fingerprints: Introducing feminist standpoint appraisal. Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies, 3(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v3i2.113
   Google Scholar
• Caswell, M. (2017). Teaching to dismantle white supremacy in the archives classroom. Aftermath: Libraries, Democracy, and the 2016 U.S. Election, Edited by Ursula Gorham, Paul T. Jaeger, and Natalie Green Taylor (with graphic design by Gracen Brilmyer), Special issue, Library Quarterly 87(3), 222–235. [Mismatch ” In
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. (2002). Museum in Late Democracies. Humanities Research IX, 1, 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Christen, K., & Anderson, J. (2019). Toward slow archives. Archival Science, 19(2), 87–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09307-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, M. (2005). Words, ontologies and aboriginal databases. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture & Policy, 116(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X0511600107
   Google Scholar
• Clough, G. W. (2013). Best of Both Worlds: Museums, Libraries, and Archives in a Digital Age. Smithsonian Press, Washington D.C. http://www.si.edu/bestofbothworlds.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, E., & Baca, M. (2004). Beyond the gallery walls: Tools and methods for leading end-users to collections information. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 30(5), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.323
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, A. (2020). Using the anti-racism digital library and thesaurus to understand information access, authority, value and privilege. Theological Librarianship, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.31046/tl.v13i1.560
   Google Scholar
• Community Tech Network (2023). What is digital redlining and how does it perpetuate poverty? https://communitytechnetwork.org/blog/digital-redlining-and-how-it-perputates-poverty/.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. (2007). Archival music: Verne Harris and the cracks of memory. In Verne Harris, archives and justice: A South African perspective. Society of American Archivists.
   Google Scholar
• Cubitt, S. (2006). Library. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2–3), 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406063783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data Feminism. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Vorsey, K. L., Elson, C., Gregorev, N. P., Hansen, J. (2006). “The development of a local Thesaurus to improve access to the Anthropological Collections of the American Museum of Natural History.” D-Lib Magazine 12.4. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april06/devorsey/04devorsey.html.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, K. (1998). The best of intentions: Public access, the web & the evolution of museum automation. Museums and the Web An International Conference, Los Angeles, CA March 16–19, 1997. http://www.archimuse.com/mw97/speak/donovan.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Doty, P. (1990). Automating the documentation of museum collections. Museum Management and Curatorship, 9(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647779009515196
   Google Scholar
• Drabinski, E. (2013). Queering the catalog: Queer theory and the politics of correction. The Library Quarterly, 83(2), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1086/669547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas, M. G. (2021). “What is slow librarianship? | Information Wants To Be Free,” October 18, https://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/2021/10/18/what-is-slow-librarianship/.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, A. M. (2008). The ethics and integrity of cataloging. Journal of Library Administration, 47(3–4), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930820802186514
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1997). Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, L. (2016). Valuing Critical Inquiry Skills in Museum Literacy. Social Studies Research and Practice, 11(3), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-03-2016-B0005
   Google Scholar
• Gitelman, L. (2006). Always Already New: Media, History and the Data of Culture. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, A. (2003). Media technology and museum display: A century of accommodation and conflict. In D. Thorburn & H. Jenkins (Eds), Rethinking media change: The aesthetics of transition (pp. 375–389). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, T., & Taylor, A. G. (2005). What have we got to lose? The effect of controlled vocabulary on keyword searching results. College & Research Libraries, 66(3), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.66.3.212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunkel, D. J., & Gunkel, A. H. (1997). Virtual geographies: The new worlds of cyberspace. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 14(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039709367003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurian, E. H. (2010). Curator: From soloist to impresario. In F. Cameron & L, Kelly, Hot topics, public culture, museums (pp. 95–111). Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, M. H., Hannah, S. A., & Harris, P. C. (1998). Into the future: The foundations of library and information services in the post-industrial era. Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Harvard Library. (2023). Digital collections. https://library.harvard.edu/digital-collections.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, D., & Harp, D. (2002). New hope or old power: Democracy, pornography and the Internet. Howard Journal of Communications, 13(4), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170216119
   Google Scholar
• Hein, H. S. (2000). The museum in transition: A philosophical perspective. The Smithsonian Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henning, M. (2006a). Museums, media and cultural theory. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henning, M. (2006b). New media. In S. Macdonald (Ed.), A companion to museum studies (pp. 302–318). Blackwell Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Hermon, S., & Hazan, S. (2013 Rethinking the virtual museum. Digital Heritage and International Congress 2013, Marseille, France, 28 October – 1 November 2013, Vol. 2. pp. 625–632.
   Google Scholar
• Hollinger, R. E., John, E., Jr., Jacobs, H., Moran-Collins, L., Thome, C., Zastrow, J., Metallo, A., Waibel, G., & Rossi, V. (2013). Tlingit-smithsonian collaborations with 3D digitization of cultural objects. Museum Anthropology Review, 7(1–2), 201–253.
   Google Scholar
• Honan, W. H. (1988). The Museum of the future: It’s all in the chips. New York Times, 27 November: H-1 and H-9.
   Google Scholar
• Honma, T. (2005). Trippin’ over the Color Line: The invisibility of race in library and information studies. InterActions, 1(2), 540. https://doi.org/10.5070/D412000540
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, B. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1992). Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hypothesis Inc. (2023). Hypothes.is. https://web.hypothes.is.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Museum and Library Services. (2023). The Santa Barbara Statement on Collections as Data. https://collectionsasdata.github.io/statement/.
   Google Scholar
• Jimerson, R. C. (2013). Archivists and social responsibility: A response to Mark Greene. The American Archivist, 76(2), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.76.2.2627p15350572t21
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. M. (2018). Markup bodies: Black [Life] Studies and Slavery [Death] studies at the digital crossroads. Social Text, 13736(4), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-7145658
   Google Scholar
• Keene, S. (1998). Digital Collections: Museums and the Information Age. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kellner, D. (1995). Intellectuals and new technologies. Media, Culture & Society, 17(3), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344395017003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsley, R. P., & Wittman, A. (2016, February). Bringing self-examination to the center of social justice work in Museums. Museum, 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Koot, G.-J. (2001). Museum librarians as information strategists. INSPEL, 35(4), 248–258.
   Google Scholar
• Krmpotich, C., & Somerville, A. (2016). Affective presence: The metonymical catalogue. Museum Anthropology, 39(2), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/muan.12123
   Google Scholar
• Liew, C. L., & Cheetham, F. (2016). Participatory culture in memory institutions: Of diversity, ethics and trust? D-Lib Magazine, 22(7/8), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1045/july2016-liew
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luker, T. (2017). Decolonising archives: Indigenous challenges to record keeping in ‘reconciling’ settler colonial States. Australian Feminist Studies, 32(91–92), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2017.1357011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, G. F., & Alsford, S. (1991). The Museum as information utility. Museum Management and Curatorship, 10(3), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647779109515282
   Google Scholar
• Markham, A. (2016). OKCupid Data Release Fiasco: It’s time to rethink ethics education. Data & Society: Points. May 18 https://points.datasociety.net/okcupid-data-release-fiasco-ba0388348cd.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. M. (2021). Records, responsibility, and power: An overview of cataloging ethics. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(2–3), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1871458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marty, P. F. (2008). Information representation. In P. F. Marty & K. Jones (Eds.), Museum informatics: People, information, and technology in Museums (pp. 29–34). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203939147
   Google Scholar
• Mazurek, M. (2022, June 29). Members of Proud Boys hate group disrupt LGBTQ-themed event at Tutt Branch of library. South Bend Tribune. https://www.southbendtribune.com/story/news/2022/06/29/proud-boys-library-disrupt-lgbtq-event-south-bend/7770036001/.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, G. (2007). Finding a future for digital cultural heritage resources using contextual information frameworks. In F. Cameron & S. Kenderdine (Eds.), Theorizing digital cultural Heritage: A critical discourse (pp. 245–260), MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moyle, M., Tonra, J., & Wallace, V. (2011). Manuscript transcription by crowdsourcing: Transcribe Bentham. LIBER Quarterly, 20(3–4), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.7999
   Google Scholar
• Narlock, M., & Griesinger, P. (2021). Comparing apples and oranges: Prioritizing digital collections. Against the Grain, 32(6), 88. https://doi.org/10.7274/r0-mtnv-ka88
   Google Scholar
• Narlock, M., & Shelton, A. (2021). The same but different: Collaborating on user interface expectations for a campus art museum, library, and archives. Designing 4 Digital, online presentation. https://doi.org/10.7274/r0-s4gx-p050
   Google Scholar
• Noack, D. R. (1995). Visiting Museums virtually. Internet World Oct, 86–91.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, H. A. (2001). The power to name: Representation in library catalogs. Signs, 26(3), 639–668. https://doi.org/10.1086/495624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, H. A., & Schlegl, R. (2001). Standardization, objectivity, and user focus: A meta-analysis of subject access critiques. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 32(2), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v32n02_06
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D., Meyerson, J., Parsons, M. A., Castro, J., Lassere, M., Wright, D. J., Arnold, H., Galvan, A. S., Hswe, P, Nowviskie, B., Russell, A., Vinsel, L., & Acker, A. (2019). Information maintenance as a practice of care. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3236410
   Google Scholar
• Owens, T. (2013). Digital cultural heritage and the crowd. Curator, 56(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, R. (2010). Digital Heritage and the rise of theory in museum computing. In R. Parry (Ed.), Museums in a digital age (pp. 454–469). Taylor & Francis Group. .
   Google Scholar
• Pavlik, J. V. (1996). New media technology: Cultural and commercial perspectives. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Penny, S. (1992). Virtual reality as the end of the enlightenment project. Culture on the Brink: Ideologies of Technology Accessed from: https://simonpenny.net/1990Writings/enlightenment.html.
   Google Scholar
• Perlin, R. R. (1998). Media, Art museums, and distant audiences. In S Thomas & A. Mintz (Eds.). The virtual and the real: Media in the Museum (pp. 73–87). American Association of Museums.
   Google Scholar
• Petrini, C., Furlan, C., & Hunt, J. (2007). Slow food nation: Why our food should be good, clean, and fair. Rizzoli Ex Libris.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, R. B. (2015). Dancing the mask, potlatching the exhibition: Performing art and culture in a global museum world. THEMA. La Revue Des Musees de la Civilisation [Review of the Museum of Civilization] 3, 12–27.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, R. C. (2016). Managing digitization priorities with metrics. Mid-Atlantic Regional Archives Conference presentation. https://doi.org/10.13016/M2C76R
   Google Scholar
• Popowich, Sam. Confronting the democratic discourse of librarianship: A Marxist approach. Library Juice Press, Sacramento (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Raicovich, L. (2021). Culture strike: Art and Museums in an age of protest. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• RavenSpace. (2022). About Us. Accessed August 15, 2022, from https://www.ravenspacepublishing.org/about-us/.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, M. (2018). Curatorial activism: Towards an ethics of curating. Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, C. (2000). Digital libraries: An overview. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 26(6), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(00)00159-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seadle, M., & Greifeneder, E. (2007). Defining a digital library. Library Hi Tech, 25(2), 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830710754938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweibenz, W. (2019). The Virtual Museum: An overview of its origins, concepts, and terminology. The Museum Review, 4(1), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. S. (2006). The future of the museum. In S. Macdonald (Ed.). A companion to museum studies. (Blackwell). 543–554.
   Google Scholar
• Society of American Archivists. (2023). “Statement of Principles.” Describing Archives: A Content Standard. https://saa-ts-dacs.github.io/dacs/04_statement_of_principles.html.
   Google Scholar
• Society for Science & the Public (2023). Research at Home: Citizen Science. https://www.societyforscience.org/research-at-home/citizen-science/.
   Google Scholar
• Spindler, R. P. (2014). An evaluation of crowdsourcing and participatory archives projects for archival description and transcription. Arizona State University Library.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, T. C., & Clark, B. (2022). Creating and democratizing linked open data in digital archives: Report of the core MARC formats transition interest group meeting, ALA Core Virtual Interest Group Week, March 2022. Technical Services Quarterly, 39(4), 461–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2022.2125681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Ohio State University Libraries. (2023). Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility (DEIA).” https://library.osu.edu/equity-diversity-inclusion.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, H. (2016). The computerization of material culture catalogues: Objects and infrastructure in the Smithsonian Institution’s Department of Anthropology. Museum Anthropology, 39(2), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/muan.12122
   Google Scholar
• UCLA Library (2021). Toward ethical and inclusive descriptive practices in UCLA Library Special Collections. Accessed December 1, 2021, from https://www.library.ucla.edu/location/library-special-collections/toward-ethical-inclusive-descriptive-practices-ucla-library-special-collections.
   Google Scholar
• University of Notre Dame. (2023). “Marble: Museums, archives, rare books & libraries exploration. https://marble.nd.edu.
   Google Scholar
• University of Wisconsin-Madison Libraries. (2022). Submitting a digital collections project proposal. Accessed August 2, 2022. https://www.library.wisc.edu/uwdcc/submitting/.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. General Services Administration. (2023). Citizenscience.gov. https://www.citizenscience.gov/#.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D., & Loving, C. (2018). The Hesburgh Libraries and Snite Museum of Art, University of Notre Dame: Proposal for a unified preservation and exhibition platform. October 31. https://osf.io/dmt47/.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, P. (1997). The web and the unassailable voice. In D. Bearman & J. Trant (Eds.), Museums and the Web 97: Selected Papers (pp, 69–76). Archives & Museum Informatics.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, B. M. (2021). Advancing equitable cataloging. NASKO, 8(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.7152/nasko.v8i1.15887
   Google Scholar
• Witcomb, A. (1997). On the Side of the Object: an Alternative Approach to Debates About Ideas, Objects and Museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 16(4), 383–399.
   Google Scholar
• Witcomb, A. (2003). Re-imagining the Museum: Beyond the Mausoleum. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Witcomb, A. (2007). The materiality of virtual technologies: A new approach to thinking about the impact. In F. Cameron & S. Kenderdine (Ed.), Theorizing digital cultural heritage: A critical discourse (pp. 35–48). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witten, I. H. (2004). Digital libraries: Developing countries, universal access, and information for all. In International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries (pp. 35–44). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Yale. (2023). LUX: Yale collections discovery. https://lux.collections.yale.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Yousefi, B. (2017). On the disparity between what we say and what we do in libraries. In S. Lew, & B. Yousefi (Eds.), Feminists among us: Resistance and advocacy in library leadership (pp. 91–105). Library Juice Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, S. (2021). It matters who does this work: An interview with Tonia Sutherland. Journal of Critical Digital Librarianship, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.31390/jcdl.1.1.02
   Google Scholar
• Zolberg, V. L. (1994). An Elite experience for everyone: Art museums, the public, and cultural literacy. In D. J. Sherman, and I. Rogoff (Eds.), Museum culture: Histories, discourses, spectacles (pp. 49–65). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zoller, G., & DeMarsh, K. (2013). For the record. Art Documentation, 32(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1086/669989
   Google Scholar
• Zorich, D. M. (2008). Information policy in museums. In P. F. Marty and K. Jones, Museum informatics: People, information, and technology in Museums (pp. 85–106). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203939147
   Google Scholar