84
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The Influence of Board Characteristics on Corporate Social Performance

, &

References

  • Adegbite, Emmanuel, Yilmaz Guney, Frank Kwabi, and Suleiman Tahir. 2019. “Financial and Corporate Social Performance in the UK Listed Firms: The Relevance of Non-Linearity and Lag Effects.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 52 (1): 105–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-018-0705-x.
  • Agnese, Paolo, Francesca Battaglia, Francesco Busato, and Simone Taddeo. 2023. “ESG Controversies and Governance: Evidence from the Banking Industry.” Finance Research Letters 53: 103397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103397.
  • Alkhawaja, Abdallah, Fang Hu, Shireenjit Johl, and Sivathaasan Nadarajah. 2023. “Board Gender Diversity, Quotas, and ESG Disclosure: Global Evidence.” International Review of Financial Analysis 90: 102823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102823.
  • Almaqtari, Faozi A., Tamer Elsheikh, Hamood M. Al-Hattami, and Nandita Mishra. 2023. “The Impact of Board Characteristics on Environmentally Friendly Production: A Cross Country Study in Asia and Europe.” Journal of Cleaner Production 392: 136257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136257.
  • Aoi, Michikazu, Shigeru Asaba, Keiichi Kubota, and Hitoshi Takehara. 2015. “Family Firms, Firm Characteristics, and Corporate Social Performance: A Study of Public Firms in Japan.” Journal of Family Business Management 5 (2): 192–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-08-2013-0019.
  • Arellano, Manuel, and Olympia Bover. 1995. “Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error- Components Models.” Journal of Econometrics 68 (1): 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D.
  • Arellano, Manuel, and Stephen Bond. 1991. “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” The Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968.
  • Baltagi, Badi H. 2013. “Panel Data Forecasting.” In Handbook of Economic Forecasting, edited by Graham Elliott, Clive W. J. Granger, and Allan Timmermann, 995–1024. Vol. 2. Amsterdam, The Netherland: North Holland.
  • Beji, Rania, Ouidad Yousfi, Nadia Loukil, and Abdelwahed Omri. 2021. “Board Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from France.” Journal of Business Ethics 173 (1): 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04522-4.
  • Ben-Amar, Walid, Millicent Chang, and Philip McIlkenny. 2017. “Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Response to Sustainability Initiatives: Evidence from the Carbon Disclosure Project.” Journal of Business Ethics 142 (2): 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2759-1.
  • Biswas, Pallab K., Mansi Mansi, and Rakesh Pandey. 2018. “Board Composition, Sustainability Committee and Corporate Social and Environmental Performance in Australia.” Pacific Accounting Review 30 (4): 517–540. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-12-2017-0107.
  • Blundell, Richard, and Stephen Bond. 1998. “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics 87 (1): 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8.
  • Bowsher, Clive G. 2002. “On Testing Overidentifying Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Economics Letters 77 (2): 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00130-1.
  • Brooks, Chris, and Ioannis Oikonomou. 2018. “The Effects of Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosures and Performance on Firm Value: A Review of the Literature in Accounting and Finance.” The British Accounting Review 50 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.11.005.
  • Bun, Maurice J. G., and Frank Windmeijer. 2010. “The Weak Instrument Problem of the System GMM Estimator in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” The Econometrics Journal 13 (1): 95–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2009.00299.x.
  • Burke, Jenna J., Rani Hoitash, and Udi Hoitash. 2019. “The Heterogeneity of Board-Level Sustainability Committees and Corporate Social Performance.” Journal of Business Ethics 154 (4): 1161–1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3453-2.
  • Bussoli, Candida, Danilo Conte, and Marco Barone. 2023. “Board Diversity as a Determinant of the Social Performance in the European Banking Sector.” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 42 (2): 248–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-05-2022-0129.
  • Byron, Kris, and Corinne Post. 2016. “Women on Boards of Directors and Corporate Social Performance: A Meta-Analysis.” Corporate Governance 24 (4): 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12165.
  • Cambrea, Domenico R., Francesco Paolone, and Nicola Cucari. 2023. “Advisory or Monitoring Role in ESG Scenario: Which Women Directors Are More Influential in the Italian Context?” Business Strategy and the Environment 32 (7): 4299–4314. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3366.
  • Campanella, Francesco, Luana Serino, Anna Crisci, and Antonello D'Ambra. 2021. “The Role of Corporate Governance in Environmental Policy Disclosure and Sustainable Development. Generalized Estimating Equations in Longitudinal Count Data Analysis.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 28 (1): 474–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2062.
  • Cerciello, Massimiliano, Francesco Busato, and Simone Taddeo. 2023. “The Effect of Sustainable Business Practices on Profitability. Accounting for Strategic Disclosure.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 30 (2): 802–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2389.
  • Cheng, Ningning, and Youngsok Bang. 2021. “A Comment on the Practice of the Arellano-Bond/Blundell-Bond Generalized Method of Moments Estimator in is Research.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems 48 (1): 423–442. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04838.
  • Chouaibi, Salim, Yamina Chouaibi, and Ghazi Zouari. 2022. “Board Characteristics and Integrated Reporting Quality: evidence from ESG European Companies.” EuroMed Journal of Business 17 (4): 425–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-11-2020-0121.
  • Cruz, Cristina, Rachida Justo, Martín Larraza-Kintana, and Lucía Garcés-Galdeano. 2019. “When Do Women Make a Better Table? Examining the Influence of Women Directors on Family Firm’s Corporate Social Performance.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 43 (2): 282–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718796080.
  • Deschênes, Sébastien, Miguel Rojas, Hamadou Boubacar, Brigitte Prud’homme, and Alidou Ouedraogo. 2015. “The Impact of Board Traits on the Social Performance of Canadian Firms.” Corporate Governance 15 (3): 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2014-0097.
  • Disli, Mustafa, Mustafa K. Yilmaz, and Farah F. M. Mohamed. 2022. “Board Characteristics and Sustainability Performance: empirical Evidence from Emerging Markets.” Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 13 (4): 929–952. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2020-0313.
  • Donaldson, Thomas, and Lee E. Preston. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: concepts, Evidence, and Implications.” The Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 65–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887.
  • Ducassy, Isabelle, and Sophie Montandrau. 2015. “Corporate Social Performance, Ownership Structure, and Corporate Governance in France.” Research in International Business and Finance 34: 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.02.002.
  • Dunn, Paul, and Barbara Sainty. 2009. “The Relationship among Board of Director Characteristics, Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance.” International Journal of Managerial Finance 5 (4): 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1108/17439130910987558.
  • Elmaghrabi, Mohamed E. 2021. “CSR Committee Attributes and CSR Performance: UK Evidence.” Corporate Governance 21 (5): 892–919. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2020-0036.
  • Feder-Sempach, Ewa, and Tomasz Miziołek. 2023. “How Precisely European Equity ETFs Mirror Their Flagship Benchmarks? Evidence from Funds Replicating Performance of Euro Stoxx 50 Index.” Journal of Asset Management 24 (2): 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-022-00287-9.
  • Fernandez, Whitney D., Meredith F. Burnett, and Carolina B. Gomez. 2019. “Women in the Boardroom and Corporate Social Performance: negotiating the Double Bind.” Management Decision 57 (9): 2201–2222. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2017-0738.
  • Freeman, R. Edward. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Theory. Boston: Pitman.
  • García Martín, C. José, and Begoña Herrero. 2020. “Do Board Characteristics Affect Environmental Performance? A Study of EU Firms.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27 (1): 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1775.
  • Giannarakis, Grigoris, Ioannis Mallidis, Nikolaos Sariannidis, and George Konteos. 2023. “The Impact of Corporate Governance Attributes on Environmental and Social Performance: The Case of European Region excluding Companies from the Eurozone.” Business Strategy and the Environment 32 (6): 3489–3512. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3312.
  • Govindan, Kannan, Merve Kilic, Ali Uyar, and Abdullah S. Karaman. 2021. “Drivers and Value-Relevance of CSR Performance in the Logistics Sector: A Cross-Country Firm-Level Investigation.” International Journal of Production Economics 231: 107835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107835.
  • Hafsi, Taïeb, and Gokhan Turgut. 2013. “Boardroom Diversity and Its Effect on Social Performance: Conceptualization and Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Business Ethics 112 (3): 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1272-z.
  • Hambrick, Donald C. 2007. “Upper Echelons Theory: An Update.” Academy of Management Review 32 (2): 334–343. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20159303. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254.
  • Hambrick, Donald C., and Phyllis A. Mason. 1984. “Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers.” The Academy of Management Review 9 (2): 193–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434.
  • Haque, Faizul. 2017. “The Effects of Board Characteristics and Sustainable Compensation Policy on Carbon Performance of UK Firms.” The British Accounting Review 49 (3): 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.01.001.
  • Harrison, Jeffrey S., and Joseph E. Coombs. 2006. “Financial Leverage and Social Performance.” Academy of Management Proceedings 2006 (1): F1–F6. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2006.27182170.
  • Hillman, Amy J., and Thomas Dalziel. 2003. “Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives.” Academy of Management Review 28 (3): 383–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040728.
  • Hillman, Amy J., Christine Shropshire, and Albert A. Cannella. 2007. “Organizational Predictors of Women on Corporate Boards.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (4): 941–952. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20159898. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279222.
  • Ho, Foo N., Hui-Ming D. Wang, and Scott J. Vitell. 2012. “A Global Analysis of Corporate Social Performance: The Effects of Cultural and Geographic Environments.” Journal of Business Ethics 107 (4): 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1047-y.
  • Holtz-Eakin, Douglas, Whitney Newey, and Harvey S. Rosen. 1988. “Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data.” Econometrica 56 (6): 1371–1395. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913103.
  • Hussain, Nazim, Ugo Rigoni, and René P. Orij. 2018. “Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance.” Journal of Business Ethics 149 (2): 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5.
  • Iannuzzi, Antonia Patrizia, Stefano Dell’Atti, Elisabetta D'Apolito, and Simona Galletta. 2023. “Nomination Committee Characteristics and Exposure to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Controversies: evidence from European Global Systemically Important Banks.” Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 23 (6): 1314–1338. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2022-0119.
  • Islam, Ranjita, Erica French, and Muhammad Ali. 2022. “Evaluating Board Diversity and Its Importance in the Environmental and Social Performance of Organizations.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 29 (5): 1134–1145. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2259.
  • Jarboui, Anis, Nada Dammak Ben Hlima, and Dhouha Bouaziz. 2023. “Do Sustainability Committee Characteristics Affect CSR Performance? Evidence from India.” Benchmarking 30 (2): 628–652. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2021-0225.
  • Johnson, Richard A., and Daniel W. Greening. 1999. “The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 42 (5): 564–576. https://doi.org/10.5465/256977.
  • Jones, Thomas M. 1995. “Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics.” The Academy of Management Review 20 (2): 404–437. https://doi.org/10.2307/258852.
  • Jouber, Habib. 2022. “Women Leaders and Corporate Social Performance: do Critical Mass, CEO Managerial Ability and Corporate Governance Matter?” Management Decision 60 (5): 1185–1217. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2020-0953.
  • Kamran, Muhammad, Hadrian G. Djajadikerta, Saiyidi Mat Roni, Erwei Xiang, and Pakeezah Butt. 2023. “Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility in an International Setting.” Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies 13 (2): 240–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-05-2021-0140.
  • Khatri, Iswar. 2023. “Board Gender Diversity and Sustainability Performance: Nordic Evidence.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 30 (3): 1495–1507. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2432.
  • Kyaw, Khine, Mojisola Olugbode, and Barbara Petracci. 2017. “Can Board Gender Diversity Promote Corporate Social Performance?” Corporate Governance 17 (5): 789–802. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2016-0183.
  • Kyaw, Khine, Sirimon Treepongkaruna, and Pornsit Jiraporn. 2022. “Board Gender Diversity and Environmental Emissions.” Business Strategy and the Environment 31 (7): 2871–2881. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3052.
  • Lagasio, Valentina, and Nicola Cucari. 2019. “Corporate Governance and Environmental Social Governance Disclosure: A Meta-Analytical Review.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 26 (4): 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1716.
  • Liao, Lin., Le Luo, and Qingliang Tang. 2015. “Gender Diversity, Board Independence, Environmental Committee and Greenhouse Gas Disclosure.” The British Accounting Review 47 (4): 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002.
  • Liu, Chelsea. 2018. “Are Women Greener? Corporate Gender Diversity and Environmental Violations.” Journal of Corporate Finance 52: 118–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.08.004.
  • Lozano, M. Belén, and Jennifer Martínez-Ferrero. 2022. “Do Emerging and Developed Countries Differ in Terms of Sustainable Performance? Analysis of Board, Ownership and Country-Level Factors.” Research in International Business and Finance 62: 101688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101688.
  • LSEG Data & Analytics. 2023. Environmental, social and governance scores from LSEG. https://www.lseg.com/content/dam/data-analytics/en_us/documents/methodology/lseg-esg-scores-methodology.pdf.
  • Lu, Jing, and Irene M. Herremans. 2019. “Board Gender Diversity and Environmental Performance: An Industries Perspective.” Business Strategy and the Environment 28 (7): 1449–1464. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2326.
  • Mallin, Christine A., and Giovanna Michelon. 2011. “Board Reputation Attributes and Corporate Social Performance: An Empirical Investigation of the US Best Corporate Citizens.” Accounting and Business Research 41 (2): 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2011.550740.
  • Manita, Riadh, Maria Giuseppina Bruna, Rey Dang, and L’Hocine Houanti. 2018. “Board Gender Diversity and ESG Disclosure: evidence from the USA.” Journal of Applied Accounting Research 19 (2): 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-01-2017-0024.
  • McGuinness, Paul B., João P. Vieito, and Mingzhu Wang. 2017. “The Role of Board Gender and Foreign Ownership in the CSR Performance of Chinese Listed Firms.” Journal of Corporate Finance 42: 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.11.001.
  • Naciti, Valeria. 2019. “Corporate Governance and Board of Directors: The Effect of a Board Composition on Firm Sustainability Performance.” Journal of Cleaner Production 237: 117727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117727.
  • Nadeem, Muhammad, Stephen Bahadar, Ammar A. Gull, and Umer Iqbal. 2020. “Are Women Eco-Friendly? Board Gender Diversity and Environmental Innovation.” Business Strategy and the Environment 29 (8): 3146–3161. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2563.
  • Nguyen, Linh T. M., and Phong T. Nguyen. 2023. “The Board Profiles That Promote Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure–Evidence from S&P 500 Firms.” Finance Research Letters 55: 103925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103925.
  • Nguyen, Thanh T. P., and Hanh M. Thai. 2022. “Effects of Female Directors on Gender Diversity at Lower Organization Levels and CSR Performance: Evidence in Japan.” Global Finance Journal 53: 100749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2022.100749.
  • Nielsen, Sabina, and Morten Huse. 2010. “The Contribution of Women on Boards of Directors: Going beyond the Surface.” Corporate Governance 18 (2): 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00784.x.
  • Nuber, Claudio, and Patrick Velte. 2021. “Board Gender Diversity and Carbon Emissions: European Evidence on Curvilinear Relationships and Critical Mass.” Business Strategy and the Environment 30 (4): 1958–1992. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2727.
  • Orazalin, Nurlan, and Mady Baydauletov. 2020. “Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy and Corporate Environmental and Social Performance: The Moderating Role of Board Gender Diversity.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27 (4): 1664–1676. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1915.
  • Orazalin, Nurlan, and Monowar Mahmood. 2021. “Toward Sustainable Development: Board Characteristics, Country Governance Quality, and Environmental Performance.” Business Strategy and the Environment 30 (8): 3569–3588. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2820.
  • Orazalin, Nurlan. 2020. “Do Board Sustainability Committees Contribute to Corporate Environmental and Social Performance? The Mediating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy.” Business Strategy and the Environment 29 (1): 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2354.
  • Patharia, Ishani, Sahil Gupta, and Sanjay Rastogi. 2023. “An Empirical Investigation of Determinants of Corporate Social Performance Using Multi-Dimensional Panel Data Analysis.” Journal of Public Affairs 23 (1): e2843. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2843.
  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Gerald R. Salancik. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
  • Pozzoli, Matteo, Alessandra Pagani, and Francesco Paolone. 2022. “The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on ESG Performance in the European Union Member States: Empirical Evidence before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Cleaner Production 371: 133411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133411.
  • Qureshi, Muhammad A., Sina Kirkerud, Kim Theresa, and Tanveer Ahsan. 2020. “The Impact of Sustainability (Environmental, Social, and Governance) Disclosure and Board Diversity on Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Industry Sensitivity.” Business Strategy and the Environment 29 (3): 1199–1214. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2427.
  • Radu, Camélia, Nadia Smaili, and Adela Constantinescu. 2022. “The Impact of the Board of Directors on Corporate Social Performance: A Multivariate Approach.” Journal of Applied Accounting Research 23 (5): 1135–1156. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-05-2021-0141.
  • Reverte, Carmelo, Eduardo Gómez-Melero, and Juan G. Cegarra-Navarro. 2016. “The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices on Organizational Performance: Evidence from Eco-Responsible Spanish Firms.” Journal of Cleaner Production 112: 2870–2884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.128.
  • Sanan, Neeti K. 2016. “Board Gender Diversity, Financial and Social Performance of Indian Firms.” Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective 20 (4): 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262916673006.
  • Shaukat, Amama, Yan Qiu, and Grzegorz Trojanowski. 2016. “Board Attributes, Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy, and Corporate Environmental and Social Performance.” Journal of Business Ethics 135 (3): 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2460-9.
  • Shu, Pei-Gi, and Sue-Jane Chiang. 2020. “The Impact of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Performance: Cases from Listed Firms in Taiwan, Pacific-Basin.” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 61: 101332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101332.
  • Spitzeck, Heiko. 2009. “The Development of Governance Structures for Corporate Responsibility.” Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 9 (4): 495–505. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700910985034.
  • Udayasankar, Krishna. 2008. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Size.” Journal of Business Ethics 83 (2): 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9609-8.
  • Ullah, Subhan, Pervaiz Akhtar, and Ghasem Zaefarian. 2018. “Dealing with Endogeneity Bias: The Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) for Panel Data.” Industrial Marketing Management 71: 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.11.010.
  • Uyar, Ali., Merve Kilic, Mehmet A. Koseoglu, Cemil Kuzey, and Abdullah S. Karaman. 2020. “The Link among Board Characteristics, Corporate Social Responsibility Performance, and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Hospitality and Tourism Industry.” Tourism Management Perspectives 35: 100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100714.
  • Walls, Judith L., Pascual Berrone, and Phillip H. Phan. 2012. “Corporate Governance and Environmental Performance: Is There Really a Link?” Strategic Management Journal 33 (8): 885–913. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1952.
  • Zhang, Lu. 2012. “Board Demographic Diversity, Independence, and Corporate Social Performance.” Corporate Governance 12 (5): 686–700. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701211275604.
  • Zubeltzu-Jaka, Eugenio, Igor Álvarez-Etxeberria, and Eduardo Ortas. 2020. “The Effect of the Size of the Board of Directors on Corporate Social Performance: A Meta-Analytic Approach.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27 (3): 1361–1374. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1889.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.