Discourse, framing and narrative: three ways of doing critical, interpretive policy analysis

References

• Acosta, M., M. van Wessel, S. van Bommel, E. L. Ampaire, L. Jassogne, and P. H. Feindt. 2020. “The Power of Narratives.” Development Policy Review 38 (5): 555–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, B. 2023. “Decolonizing Policy Research as Restorative Research Justice.” Critical Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2022.2158481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. 2009. Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Representation to Be. Australia: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., and D. A. Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 611–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., and R. Rhodes. 2006. “Defending Interpretation.” European Political Science 5 (1): 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210059.
   Google Scholar
• Boje, D. M. 1991. “The Storytelling Organization.” Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (1): 106–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., and J. N. Druckman. 2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10:103–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Freitas Boullosa, R., R. Paul, and T. Smith-Carrier. 2023. “Democratizing Science is an Urgent, Collective, and Continuous Project: Expanding the Boundaries of Critical Policy Studies.” Critical Policy Studies 17 (1): 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, J. R., P. Roodbol-Mekkes, R. Beunen, A. M. Lokhorst, and N. Aarts. 2014. “Faking and Forcing Trust: The Performance of Trust and Distrust in Public Policy.” Land Use Policy 38:282–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., and R. Bouwen. 2012. “Issue Framing in Conversations for Change.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 48 (2): 168–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., M. Brugnach, C. J. A. M. Termeer, and H. Ingram. 2013. “Bridging Knowledge Frames and Networks in Climate and Water Governance.” In Water Governance as Connective Capacity, edited by J. Edelenbos, N. Bressers, and P. Scholten, 229–247. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., B. Gray, L. Putnam, R. Lewicki, N. Aarts, R. Bouwen, and C. van Woerkum. 2009. “Disentangling Approaches to Framing in Conflict and Negotiation Research.” Human Relations 62 (2): 155–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708100356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., T. Karpouzoglou, J. Warner, A. Wesselink, F. Mao, J. Vos, P. Tamas, et al. 2019. “The Power to Define Resilience in Social–Hydrological Systems: Toward a Power‐Sensitive Resilience Framework.” WIREs Water 6 (6): 210.
   Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., M. Mancero, G. Cárdenas, and D. Sucozhanay. 2011. “Fragmentation and Connection of Frames in Collaborative Water Governance: A Case Study of River Catchment Management in Southern Ecuador.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 77 (1): 50–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durose, C., and V. Lowndes. 2023. “Gendering Discretion: Why Street-Level Bureaucracy Needs a Gendered Lens.” Political Studies 00323217231178630. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217231178630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2013. “Critical Discourse Analysis and Critical Policy Studies.” Critical Policy Studies 7 (2): 177–197.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. 2003. Reframing Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., and J. Forester. 1993. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., and H. Gottweis. 2012. “Introduction.” In The Argumentative Turn Revisited, edited by F. Fischer and H. Gottweis, 1–30. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., D. Torgerson, A. Durnová, and M. Orsini, Eds. 2015. Handbook of Critical Policy Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1993. “Practice stories.” In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, edited by F. Fischer and J. Forester, 186–210. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J., and D. Howarth. 2007. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Griggs, S., and D. Howarth. 2013. The Politics of Airport Expansion in the United Kingdom. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griggs, S., and D. Howarth. 2019. “Discourse, Policy and the Environment.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21 (5): 464–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., M. A. Hajer, and H. Wagenaar. 2003. Deliberative Policy Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. 2010. “Power, Discourse, and Policy.” Critical Policy Studies 3 (3–4): 309–335.
   Google Scholar
• Jorge, R. R. 2009. “Sociological Discourse Analysis: Methods and Logic [71 Paragraphs].” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 10 (2): Art. 26. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0902263
   Google Scholar
• Keller, R. 2012. Doing Discourse Research: An Introduction for Social Scientists. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laruffa, F., and R. Hearne. 2023. “Towards a Post-Neoliberal Social Policy: Capabilities, Human Rights and Social Empowerment.” Critical Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2023.2232432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and H. Wagenaar. 2019. “Revisiting Deliberative Policy Analysis: Introduction.” Policy Studies 40:427–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metze, T. 2018. “Framing the Future of Fracking.” Journal of Cleaner Production 197:1737–1745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metze, T., and J. Dodge. 2016. “Dynamic Discourse Coalitions on Hydro-Fracking in Europe and the United States.” Environmental Communication 10 (3): 365–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H. T. 2020. “Policy Narratives: The Perlocutionary Agents of Political Discourse.” Critical Policy Studies 14 (4): 488–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H. T., and R. Lofaro. 2023. “Political contestation in policy implementation.” Critical Policy Studies 17 (1): 43–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, E. 1986. The Analysis of Interview-Narratives. edited by T. Sarbin, 233–255. New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Ospina, S. M., and J. Dodge. 2005. “It’s About Time: Catching Method Up to Meaning—The Usefulness of Narrative Inquiry in Public Administration Research.” Public Administration Review 65 (2): 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00440.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. 2008. Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, E. 1994. Narrative Policy Analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D., and M. Rein. 1994. Frame Reflection. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. H. 1980. “Narrative Versions, Narrative Theories.” Critical inquiry 7 (1): 213–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith Ochoa, C. 2020. “Trivializing Inequality by Narrating Facts: A Discourse Analysis of Contending Storylines in Germany.” Critical Policy Studies 14 (3): 319–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. A. 1997. Policy Paradox. New York: Scott.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, K., C. Bevc, and E. Kuligowski. 2006. “Metaphors Matter: Disaster Myths, Media Frames, and Their Consequences in Hurricane Katrina.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 604 (1): 57–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1986. “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions.” The Journal of Business 59 (4): S251–S278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bommel, S., and M. van der Zouwen. 2013. “Creating Scientific Narratives.” In Forest and Nature governance. Arts et Al, edited by B. Arts, J. Behagel, S. Van Bommel, J. De Koning, and E. Turnhout, 217–239. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, M. and T. Metze. 2006. Words Matter in Policy and Planning. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Urban and Regional Research.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hulst, M. 2012. “Storytelling, a Model of and a Model for Planning.” Planning Theory 11 (3): 299–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hulst, M., and D. Yanow. 2016. “From policy ‘frames’ to ‘framing’: Theorizing a More Dynamic, Political Approach.” The American Review of Public Administration 46 (1): 92–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lieshout, M., A. Dewulf, N. Aarts, and C. Termeer. 2017. “The Power to Frame the Scale?” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 19 (5): 550–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ostaijen, M. 2016. “Between Migration and Mobility Discourses.” Critical Policy Studies 11 (2): 166–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ostaijen, M. 2020. “Legitimating Intra-European Movement Discourses: Understanding Mobility and Migration.” Comparative European Politics 18 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00152-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2011. Meaning in Action. London: ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. E. A., and W. Van Dooren. 2017. “How Policies Become Contested: A Spiral of Imagination and Evidence in a Large Infrastructure Project.” Policy Sciences 50 (3): 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9275-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. 1993. “The Communication of Policy Meanings.” Policy Sciences 26 (1): 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01006496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. 1995. “Practices of Policy Interpretation.” Policy Sciences 28 (2): 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. 2000. Interpretive Policy Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. 2007. “Interpretation in Policy Analysis.” Critical Policy Analysis 1 (1): 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2007.9518511.
   Google Scholar