‘Yes? I have no idea’: teacher turns containing epistemic disclaimers in upper primary school whole-class discussions

References

• Aijmer, K. 2009. ““So Er I Just Sort I Dunno I Think It’s Just Because … ”: A Corpus Study of I Don’t Know and Dunno in Learners’ Spoken English.” Language and Computers 68: 151–168.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, D. 2008. “Exploratory Talk for Learning.” In Exploring Talk in Schools. Inspired by the Work of Douglas Barnes, edited by N. Mercer and S. Hodgkinson, 1–15. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, W. A., and T. R. Metzger. 1997. “Claiming Insufficient Knowledge.” Human Communication Research 23 (4): 562–588. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00410.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolden, G. B. 2006. “Little Words That Matter: Discourse Markers “So” and “Oh” and the Doing of Other-Attentiveness in Social Interaction.” The Journal of Communication 56 (4): 661–688. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00314.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. 1988. Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A., and P. Björk-Willén. 2018. “Enchantment in Storytelling: Co-Operation and Participation in Children’s Aesthetic Experience.” Linguistics and Education 48: 52–60. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2018.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. M., R. Anderson, L. J. Kuo, I. H. Kim, A. Archodidou, and K. Nguyen-Jahiel. 2003. “Collaborative Reasoning: Expanding Ways for Children to Talk and Think in School.” Educational Psychology Review 15 (2): 181–198. doi:10.1023/A:1023429215151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, J. 1982. “Discourse Style, Classroom Interaction and Differential Treatment.” Journal of Reading Behavior 14 (4): 429–437. doi:10.1080/10862968209547468.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P. 1992. Contested Evidence in Courtroom Cross-Examination: The Case of a Trial for Rape. In Talk at Work, edited by P. Drew and J. Heritage, 470–520. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duran, D., and O. Sert. 2021. “Student-Initiated Multi-Unit Questions in EMI Classrooms.” Linguistics and Education 65: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2021.100980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durden, T., and J. R. Dangel. 2008. “Teacher-Involved Conversations with Young Children During Small Group Activity.” Early Years 28 (3): 251–266. doi:10.1080/09575140802393793.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Gosen, M. N., J. Berenst, and K. de Glopper. 2009. “Participeren Tijdens Het Voorlezen van Prentenboeken in de Kleuterklas: Een Pilot-Study.” Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen 81: 53–63. doi:10.1075/ttwia.81.06gos.
   Google Scholar
• Gosen, M. N. 2012. “Tracing learning in interaction: An analysis of shared reading of picture books at kindergarten.” Published Doctoral Dissertation, Groningen, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Gosen, M. N., J. Berenst, and K. de Glopper. 2015. “Shared Reading at Kindergarten: Understanding Book Content Through Participation.” Pragmatics and Society 6 (3): 367–397. doi:10.1075/ps.6.3.03gos.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, V. 2017. “Managing Knowledge Claims in Classroom Discourse: The Public Construction of a Homogeneous Epistemic Status.” Classroom Discourse 8 (2): 156–174. doi:10.1080/19463014.2017.1328699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmer, H., S. Reineke, and A. Deppermann. 2016. “A Range of Uses of Negative Epistemic Constructions in German: ICH Weiß NICHT as a Resource for Dispreferred Actions.” Journal of Pragmatics 106: 97–114. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 1984. “Conversation Analysis.” In Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology, edited by J. Heritage, 233–292. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., and G. Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-In-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15–38. doi:10.1177/019027250506800103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., and G. Raymond. 2012. “Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiesence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, edited by J. P. De Ruiter, 179–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 2012a. “Epistemics in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, 370–394. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 2012b. “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosoda, Y., and D. Aline. 2021. “Deployment of I Don’t Know and Wakannai in Second Language Classroom Peer Discussions.” Text and Talk 41 (1): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houen, S., S. Danby, A. Farrell, and K. Thorpe. 2019. “Adopting an Unknowing Stance in Teacher–child Interactions Through ‘I Wonder … ’ Formulations.” Classroom Discourse 10 (2): 151–167. doi:10.1080/19463014.2018.1518251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., and M. Abedin. 2013. “Classroom Dialogue: A Systematic Review Across Four Decades of Research.” Cambridge Journal of Education 43 (3): 325–356. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I. 2002. “Resisting the Incitement to Talk in Child Counselling: Aspects of the Utterance “I Don’t Know.” Discourse Studies 4 (2): 147–168. doi:10.1177/14614456020040020201.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, J. 2020. “Epistemic Management in Mathematics Classroom Interactions: Student Claims of Not Knowing or Not Understanding.” The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 58: 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.100754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jager, M., M. Huiskes, J. Metselaar, E. J. Knorth, A. F. de Winter, and S. A. Reijneveld. 2016. “Therapists’ Continuations Following I Don’t Know—responses of Adolescents in Psychotherapy.” Patient Education and Counseling 99 (11): 1778–1784. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.05.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakonen, T., and T. Morton. 2015. “Epistemic Search Sequences in Peer Interaction in a Content-Based Language Classroom.” Applied Linguistics 36 (1): 73–94. doi:10.1093/applin/amt031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 1986. “Notes on ‘Latency’ in Overlap Onset.” Human Studies 9 (2–3): 153–183. doi:10.1007/BF00148125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kääntä, L. 2014. “From Noticing to Initiating Correction: Students’ Epistemic Displays in Instructional Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 66: 86–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardas, I. N., U. Balaman, and A. E. Sahin. 2019. “The Interactional Management of Learner Initiatives in Social Studies Classroom Discourse.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 23: 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärkkäinen, E. 2003. Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of Its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on “I Think.”. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. 2011. “The Terms of Not Knowing.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, edited by T. Stivers, L. Mondada, and J. Steensig, 184–206. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. 2016. “Abandoning Dead Ends: The Estonian Junction Marker Maitea “I Don’t Know”.” Journal of Pragmatics 106: 115–128. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koole, T. 2010. “Displays of Epistemic Access: Student Responses to Teacher Explanations.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (2): 183–209. doi:10.1080/08351811003737846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koole, T. 2012. “The Epistemics of Student Problems: Explaining Mathematics in a Multilingual Class.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (13): 1902–1916. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-A. 2007. “Third Turn Position in Teacher Talk: Contingency and the Work of Teaching.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (6): 1204–1230. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindström, J., Y. Maschler, and S. Pekarek Doehler. 2016. “A Cross-Linguistic Perspective on Grammar and Negative Epistemics in Talk-In-Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 106: 72–79. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindström, J., and S. Karlsson. 2016. “Tensions in the Epistemic Domain and Claims of No-Knowledge: A Study of Swedish Medical Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 106: 129–147. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macbeth, D. 2003. “Hugh Mehan’s “Learning Lessons” Reconsidered: On the Differences Between the Naturalistic and Critical Analysis of Classroom Discourse.” American Educational Research Journal 40 (1): 239–280. doi:10.3102/00028312040001239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maschler, Y. 2017. “The Emergence of Hebrew Loydea/loydat (‘I Dunno Masc/fem’) from Interaction: Blurring the Boundaries Between Discourse Marker, Pragmatic Marker, and Modal Particle.” In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New Perspectives, edited by A. Sansò and C. Fedriani, 37–69. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, S. 2004. “Teacher–child Conversation in the Preschool Classroom.” Early Childhood Education Journal 31 (4): 227–232. doi:10.1023/B:ECEJ.0000024113.69141.23.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. W. 2012. “Everyone and No One to Turn To: Intellectual Roots and Contexts for Conversation Analysis.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, 11–31. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• McHoul, A. 1978. “The Organization of Turns at Formal Talk in the Classroom.” Language in Society 7 (2): 183–213. doi:10.1017/S0047404500005522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. 1979. ““What Time is It, Denise?”: Asking Known Information Questions in Classroom Discourse.” Theory into Practice 18 (4): 285–294.
   Google Scholar
• Melander, H. 2012. “Transformations of Knowledge Within a Peer Group. Knowing and Learning in Interaction.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 1 (3–4): 232–248. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., and L. Dawes. 2014. “The Study of Talk Between Teachers and Students, from the 1970s Until the 2010s.” Oxford Review of Education 40 (4): 430–445. doi:10.1080/03054985.2014.934087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2018. “Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1): 85–106. doi:10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. 2006. “Talk, Talk, Talk: Teaching and Learning in Whole Class Discourse.” Research Papers in Education 21 (1): 19–41. doi:10.1080/02671520500445425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H., and G. Wells. 2000. “What’s the Use of ‘Triadic Dialogue’?: An Investigation of Teacher-Student Interaction.” Applied Linguistics 21 (3): 376–406. doi:10.1093/applin/21.3.376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., and A. Gamoran. 1991. “Student Engagement: When Recitation Becomes Conversation.” In Effective Teaching: Current Research, edited by H. C. Waxman and H. J. Walberg, 257–276. Berkeley: McCurchan Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. 1997. “Dialogic Instruction: When Recitation Becomes Conversation.” In Opening Dialogue: Understanding the Dynamics of Language and Learning in the English Classroom, edited by M. Nystrand, 1–29. New York/London: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S. 2016. “More Than an Epistemic Hedge: French Je Sais Pas “I Don’t Know” as a Resource for the Sequential Organization of Turns and Actions.” Journal of Pragmatics 106: 148–162. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J. 2004. ”Discourse Analysis as a Way of Analysing Naturally Occurring Talk”. In Qualitative Analysis: Issues of Theory and Method, edited by D. Silverman, 2nd ed, 200–221. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rossano, F. 2012. “Gaze in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, 308–329. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rusk, F., M. Pörn, and F. Sahlström. 2016. “The Management of Dynamic Epistemic Relationships Regarding Second Language Knowledge in Second Language Education: Epistemic Discrepancies and Epistemic (Im)balance.” Classroom Discourse 7 (2): 184–205. doi:10.1080/19463014.2016.1171160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. 1996. “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, edited by E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, and S. A. Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuitema, J., H. Radstake, J. van de Pol, and W. Veugelers. 2018. “Guiding Classroom Discussions for Democratic Citizenship Education.” Educational Studies 44 (4): 377–407. doi:10.1080/03055698.2017.1373629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sert, O. 2013. “‘Epistemic Status Check’ as an Interactional Phenomenon in Instructed Learning Settings.” Journal of Pragmatics 45 (1): 13–28. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sert, O., and S. Walsh. 2013. “The Interactional Management of Claims of Insufficient Knowledge in English Language Classrooms.” Language and Education 27 (6): 542–565. doi:10.1080/09500782.2012.739174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sert, O. 2015. Social Interaction and L2 Classroom Discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sert, O., and C. Jacknick. 2015. “Student Smiles and the Negotiation of Epistemics in L2 Classrooms.” Journal of Pragmatics 77: 97–112. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogmyr Marian, K., S. Henricson, and M. Nelson. 2020. “Counselors’ Claims of Insufficient Knowledge in Academic Writing Consultations.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 65 (6): 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solem, M. S. 2016. “Negotiating Knowledge Claims: Students’ Assertions in Classroom Interactions.” Discourse Studies 18 (5): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Soter, A. O., I. A. Wilkinson, P. K. Murphy, L. Rudge, K. Reninger, and M. N. Edwards. 2008. “What the Discourse Tells Us: Talk and Indicators of High-Level Comprehension.” International Journal of Educational Research 47 (6): 372–391.
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., and A. Peräkylä. 2014. “Three Orders in the Organization of Human Action: On the Interface Between Knowledge, Power, and Emotion in Interaction and Social Relations.” Language in Society 43 (2): 185–207. doi:10.1017/S0047404514000037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., and J. D. Robinson. 2006. “A Preference for Progressivity in Interaction.” Language and Society 35 (3): 367–392. doi:10.1017/S0047404506060179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. 2008. “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57. doi:10.1080/08351810701691123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabak, I., and E. Baumgartner. 2004. “The Teacher as Partner: Exploring Participant Structures, Symmetry, and Identity Work in Scaffolding.” Cognition and Instruction 22 (4): 393–429. doi:10.1207/s1532690Xci2204_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten, H. P. 2007. Doing Conversation Analysis. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, B. M. 1991. “The Pragmatic Functions of I Don’t Know.” TEXT: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 11: 607–622.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherall, A. 2011. “I Don’t Know as a Prepositioned Epistemic Hedge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 44 (4): 317–337. doi:10.1080/08351813.2011.619310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 1993. “Reevaluating the IRF Sequence: A Proposal for the Articulation of Theories of Activity and Discourse for the Analysis of Teaching and Learning in the Classroom.” Linguistics and Education 5 (1): 1–37. doi:10.1016/S0898-5898(05)80001-4.
   Google Scholar
• Willemsen, A., M. N. Gosen, M. van Braak, T. Koole, and K. de Glopper. 2018. “Teachers’ Open Invitations in Whole-Class Discussions.” Linguistics and Education 45: 40–49. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2018.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willemsen, A. 2019. “The floor is yours: a conversation analytic study of teachers’ conduct facilitating whole-class discussions around texts.” Published Doctoral Dissertation, Groningen, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Willemsen, A., M. N. Gosen, T. Koole, and K. de Glopper. 2020a. “Gesture, Gaze and Laughter: Teacher Conduct Facilitating Whole-Class Discussions Among Students.” Social Interaction Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 2 (2). doi:10.7146/si.v2i2.118045.
   Google Scholar
• Willemsen, A., M. N. Gosen, T. Koole, and K. de Glopper. 2020b. “Teachers’ Pass-On Practices in Whole-Class Discussions: How Teachers Return the Floor to Their Students.” Classroom Discourse 11 (4): 297–315. doi:10.1080/19463014.2019.1585890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willemsen, A., M. N. Gosen, T. Koole, and K. de Glopper. 2021. “Asking for More: Teachers’ Invitations for Elaboration in Whole-Class Discussions.” Research on Children and Social Interaction 4 (2): 192–216. doi:10.1558/rcsi.12409.
   Google Scholar