‘I like the song and nice video’: a pupil-led activity in the young learner EFL classroom with implications for pedagogy

References

• aus der Wieschen, M. V. 2017. “Classroom Practices in Early Foreign Language Teaching in Denmark: On the Role of Quantity and Quality of Exposure to English inside the Classroom.” PhD diss., University of Southern Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• aus der Wieschen, M. V. 2018. “Category-Bound Rights and Obligations of Young EFL Learners in Denmark: The Case of (Extreme) Differentiation.” Hacettepe University Journal of Education 33: 156–178. doi:10.16986/HUJE.2018038801.
   Google Scholar
• aus der Wieschen, M. V., and S. W. Eskildsen. 2019. “Embodied and Occasioned Learnables and Teachables in an Early EFL Classroom.” In Conversation Analytic Perspectives on English Language Learning and Teaching in Global Contexts: Constraints and Possibilities, edited by H. T. Nguyen and T. Malabarba, 31–58. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, W. A., and T. R. Metzger. 1997. “Claiming Insufficient Knowledge.” Human Communication Research 23 (4): 562–588. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00410.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadierno, T., and S. W. Eskildsen. 2018. “The Younger, the Better?: A Usage-Based Approach to Learning and Teaching of English in Danish Primary Schools.” European Journal of Applied Linguistics 6 (1): 171–182. doi:10.1515/eujal-2017-0018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadierno, T., M. Hansen, J. T. Lauridsen, S. W. Eskildsen, K. Fenyvesi, and S. Hannibal Jensen. 2022. “A Multi-Factor Study of the Development of English Receptive Skills by Young Danish Children.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 25 (4): 566–578. doi:10.1017/S1366728921001085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadierno, T., M. Hansen, J. T. Lauridsen, S. W. Eskildsen, K. Fenyvesi, S. Hannibal Jensen, and M. V. Aus der Wieschen. 2020. “Does Younger Mean Better? Age of Onset, Learning Rate and Short-Term L2 Proficiency in Danish Young Learners of English.” Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 17 (17): 57–86. doi:10.35869/vial.v0i17.1465.
   Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A. 2007. “A Child’s Development of Interactional Competence in a Swedish L2 Classroom.” The Modern Language Journal 91 (1): 45–62. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00509.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, V., and J. Eyckmans. 2017. “Game On! Young Learners’ Incidental Language Learning of English Prior to Instruction.” Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 7 (4): 673–694. doi:10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.4.6.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P. 1997. “‘Open’ Class Repair Initiators in Response to Sequential Sources of Troubles in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 28 (1): 69–101. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• d’Ydewalle, G., and M. Van de Poel. 1999. “Incidental Foreign-Language Acquisition by Children Watching Subtitled Television Programs.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28 (3): 227–244. doi:10.1023/A:1023202130625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. 2002. “Frequency Effects in Language Processing: A Review with Implications for Theories of Implicit and Explicit Language Acquisition.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24 (2): 143–188. doi:10.1017/S0272263102002024.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C., and D. Larsen-Freeman. 2009. “Constructing a Second Language: Analyses and Computational Simulations of the Emergence of Linguistic Constructions from Usage.” Language Learning 59 (Suppl. 1): 90–125. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00537.x.
   Google Scholar
• Eskildsen, S. W. 2011. “The L2 Inventory in Action: Conversation Analysis and Usage-Based Linguistics in SLA.” In L2 Learning as Social Practice: Conversation-Analytic Perspectives, edited by G. Pallotti and J. Wagner, 337–373. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
   Google Scholar
• Eskildsen, S. W. 2018a. “L2 Constructions and Interactional Competence: Subordination and Coordination in English L2 Learning.” In What is Applied Cognitive Linguistics? Answers from Current SLA Research, edited by A. Tyler, L. Huang, and H. Jan, 63–97. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Eskildsen, S. W. 2018b. “‘We’re Learning a Lot of New Words’: Encountering New L2 Vocabulary Outside of Class.” The Modern Language Journal 102 (Supplementary): 46–63. doi:10.1111/modl.12451.
   Google Scholar
• Eskildsen, S. W. 2020. “Creativity and Routinisation in L2 English – Two Usage-Based Case-Studies.” In Usage-Based Dynamics in Second Language Development, edited by W. Lowie, M. Michel, A. Rousse-Malpat, M. Keijzer, and R. Steinkrauss, 107–129. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Eskildsen, S. W., and A. R. Majlesi. 2018. “Learnables and Teachables in Second Language Talk: Advancing a Social Reconceptualization of Central SLA Tenets. Introduction to the Guest Edited Issue.” The Modern Language Journal 102 (supplement): 3–10. doi:10.1111/modl.12462.
   Google Scholar
• Fenyvesi, K. 2020. “English Learning Motivation of Young Learners in Danish Primary Schools.” Language Teaching Research 24 (5): 690–713. doi:10.1177/1362168818804835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. 2019. “Classroom Interaction Research: The State of the Art.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 52 (3): 212–226. doi:10.1080/08351813.2019.1631037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginman, M., and M. S. Pedersen. 2018. “Kommunikative færdigheder: Mundtlighedsdidaktik og meningsfulde sprogbrugssituationer.” [Communicative Skills: Oral Proficiency Didactics and Meaningful Situations of Language use.] In Tidligere Sprogstart. Ny Begynderdidaktik med Fokus på Flersprogethed [Earlier Foreign Language. New Beginner Didactics with a Focus on Multilingualism], edited by P. Daryai-Hansen and D. Albrechtsen, 64–75. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen and University College Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. K. 1995. “‘Aw, Man, Where You goin’?’: Classroom Interaction and the Development of L2 Interactional Competence.” Issues in Applied Linguistics 6: 37–62. doi:10.5070/L462005217.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. K., J. Hellermann, and S. Pekarek Doehler, eds. 2011. L2 Interactional Competence and Development. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Hannibal Jensen, S. 2017. “Gaming as an English Language Learning Resource Among Young Children in Denmark.” CALICO Journal 34 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1558/cj.29519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannibal Jensen, S. 2019. “Language Learning in the Wild: A Young User Perspective.“Language Learning and Technology 23 (1): 72–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, A. 2014. “Swedish Pupils’ Beliefs About Learning English in and Outside of School.” In Motivation and Foreign Language Learning: From Theory to Practice, edited by A. Lasagabaster, D. Aintzane, and J. M. Sierra, 93–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, A., H. Korp, P. Sundqvist, and C. Thorsen. 2018. “Motivational Strategies and the Reframing of English: Activity Design and Challenges for Teachers in Contexts of Extensive Extramural Encounters.” TESOL Quarterly 52 (2): 247–273. doi:10.1002/tesq.394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanagy, R. 1999. “Interactional Routines as a Mechanism for L2 Acquisition and Socialization in an Immersion Context.” Journal of Pragmatics 31 (11): 1467–1492. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00113-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunitz, S., N. Markee, and O. Sert, eds. 2021. Classroom-Based Conversation Analytic Research: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Pedagogy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lieven, E., D. Salomo, and M. Tomasello. 2009. “Two-Year-Old Children’s Production of Multiword Utterances: A Usage-Based Analysis.” Cognitive Linguistics 20 (3): 481–508. doi:10.1515/COGL.2009.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, E., and C. Muñoz. 2013. “The Influence of Exposure, Parents, and Linguistic Distance on Young European Learners’ Foreign Language Comprehension.” International Journal of Multilingualism 10 (1): 105–129. doi:10.1080/14790718.2012.679275.
   Google Scholar
• Little, D. 2007. “Language Learner Autonomy: Some Fundamental Considerations Revisited.” Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 1 (1): 14–29. doi:10.2167/illt040.0.
   Google Scholar
• Majlesi, A. R. 2018. “Instructed Vision: Navigating Grammatical Rules by Using Landmarks for Linguistic Structures in Corrective Feedback Sequences.” The Modern Language Journal 102 (suppl): 11–29. doi:10.1111/modl.12452.
   Google Scholar
• Markee, N., ed. 2015. Handbook of Classroom Discourse and Interaction. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Masuda, K. 2011. “Acquiring Interactional Competence in a Study Abroad Context: Japanese Language Learners’ Use of the Interactional Particle Ne.” The Modern Language Journal 95 (4): 519–540. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01256.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, A. K. 2017. “Service Learning and Community Engagement for English Classes.” English Teaching Forum 55: 20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mihaljević Djigunović, J., and M. Nikolov. 2019. “Motivation of Young Learners of Foreign Languages.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Motivation for Language Learning, edited by M. Lamb, K. Csizér, A. Henry, and S. Ryan, 515–553. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, C., T. Cadierno, and I. Casas. 2018. “Different Starting Points for Early English Language Learning: A Comparative Study of Danish and Spanish Young Learners.” Language Learning 68 (4): 1076–1109. doi:10.1111/lang.12309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolov, M. 1999. “‘Why Do You Learn English?’ ‘Because the Teacher is short.’ a Study of Hungarian Children’s Foreign Language Learning Motivation.” Language Teaching Research 3 (1): 33–65. doi:10.1177/136216889900300103.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S. 2018. “Elaborations on L2 Interactional Competence: The Development of L2 Grammar-For-Interaction.” Classroom Discourse 9 (1): 3–24. doi:10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., and U. Balaman. 2021. “The Routinization of Grammar as a Social Action Format: A Longitudinal Study of Video-Mediated Interactions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 54 (2): 183–202. doi:10.1080/08351813.2021.1899710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., and S. W. Eskildsen. 2022. “Emergent L2 Grammars in and for Social Interaction: Introduction to the Special Issue.” The Modern Language Journal 106 (S1): 3–22. doi:10.1111/modl.12759.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., and E. Pochon-Berger. 2015. “The Development of L2 Interactional Competence: Evidence from Turn-Taking Organization, Sequence Organization, Repair Organization and Preference Organization.” In Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning, edited by T. Cadierno and S. W. Eskildsen, 233–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., and K. Skogmyr Marian. 2022. “Functional Diversification and Progressive Routinization of a Multiword Expression in and for Social Interaction: A Longitudinal L2 Study.” The Modern Language Journal 106 (S1): 23–45. doi:10.1111/modl.12758.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., and E. A. Schegloff. 1979. “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and Their Interaction.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, edited by G. Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlström, J. F. 2002. “The Interactional Organization of Hand Raising in Classroom Interaction.” The Journal of Classroom Interaction 37 (2): 47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. 2000. “Overlapping Talk and the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language in Society 29 (1): 1–63. doi:10.1017/S0047404500001019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., G. Jefferson, and H. Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, J. K., and J.-A. Crandall. 2014. Teaching Young Learners English. Boston: National Geographic Learning/HEINLE Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. M., and R. M. Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skogmyr Marian, K. 2022. The Development of L2 Interactional Competence: A Multimodal Study of Complaining in French Interactions. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skogmyr Marian, K., and U. Balaman. 2018. “Second Language Interactional Competence and Its Development: An Overview of Conversation Analytic Research on Interactional Change Over Time.” Language and Linguistics Compass 12 (8): 1–16. doi:10.1111/lnc3.12285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, C. 2018. “Inddragelse af Hverdagen i Andetsprogsundervisningen.2.” [Using the Everyday Lifeworld in Second Language Teaching.] Sprogforum 24 (66): 40–46. doi:10.7146/spr.v24i66.125862.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, P., and L. K. Sylvén. 2014. “Language-Related Computer Use: Focus on Young L2 English Learners in Sweden.” ReCALL 26 (1): 3–20. doi:10.1017/S0958344013000232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, P., and L. K. Sylvén. 2016. Extramural English in Teaching and Learning. From Theory and Research to Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Theodórsdóttir, G., and S. W. Eskildsen. 2022. “Accumulating Semiotic Resources for Social Actions: A Case Study of L2 Icelandic in the Wild.” The Modern Language Journal 106 (S1): 46–68. doi:10.1111/modl.12752.
   Google Scholar
• Ushioda, E. 2011. “Motivating Learners to Speak as Themselves.” In Identity, Motivation and Autonomy in Language Learning, edited by G. Murray, Q. Gao, and T. Lamb, 11–24. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Ushioda, E. 2013. “Motivation and ELT: Looking Ahead to the Future.” In International Perspectives on Motivation: Language Learning and Professional Challenges, edited by E. Ushioda, 233–239. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. 1996. Interaction in the Language Curriculum: Awareness, Autonomy, and Authenticity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe, A. 2017. “Developing L2 Interactional Competence: Increasing Participation Through Self-Selection in Post-Expansion Sequences.” Classroom Discourse 8 (3): 271–293. doi:10.1080/19463014.2017.1354310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar