Transforming the worldwide market in personal information

References

• ABS (1993). Australian and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Retrieved 15 Sept 2015, <http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/66f306f503e529a5ca25697e0017661f/7cd8aebba7225c4eca25697e0018faf3!OpenDocument>.
   Google Scholar
• Acquisti, A. (2010). The economics of personal data and the economics of privacy. Background Paper for OECD Joint WPISP-WPIE Roundtable, 1
   Google Scholar
• Bakos, Y., & Bailey, J. (1997). An exploratory study of the emerging role of electronic intermediaries'. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 1(3), 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules: The power of modularity, Vol. 1, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Bask, A., Merisalo-Rantanen, H., & Tuunanen, T. (2014). Developing a modular service architecture for E-store supply chains: The small-and medium-sized enterprise perspective'. Service Science, 6(4), 251–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basole, R. C., & Karla, J. (2011). On the evolution of mobile platform ecosystem structure and strategy'. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 3(5), 313–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berinato, S. (2014). 'With Big Data Comes Big Responsibility'. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 100–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose, S., & Goswami, S. (2017). RSentiment. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RSentiment
   Google Scholar
• Brax, S. A., Bask, A., Hsuan, J., & Voss, C. (2017). Service modularity and architecture–an overview and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(6), 686–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekhuis, M., van Offenbeek, M., & van der Laan, M. (2017). What professionals consider when designing a modular service architecture. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(6), 748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew, E. K. (2015). iSIM: An integrated design method for commercializing service innovation.Information Systems Frontiers, 18(3), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. (2014). Persona missing, feared drowned: The digital persona concept, two decades later. Information Technology & People, 27(2), 182–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conger, S., Pratt, J. H., & Loch, K. D. (2013). Personal information privacy and emerging technologies. Information Systems Journal, 23(5), 401–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O., & Parker, G. G. (2018). Introduction—platforms and infrastructures in the digital age. Information Systems Research, 29(2), 381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosscloud (2017). Crosscloud, Retrieved February 25, 2017from http://crosscloud.org
   Google Scholar
• CtrlShift (2017). Personal Information Economy, Retrieved November 5, 2017 from https://www.ctrl-shift.co.uk/pie17/
   Google Scholar
• Dalgic, T., & Leeuw, M. (1994). Niche marketing revisited: Concept, applications and some European cases. European Journal of Marketing, 28(4), 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• de Blok, C., Meijboom, B., Luijkx, K., Schols, J., & Schroeder, R. (2014). Interfaces in service modularity: A typology developed in modular health care provision. Journal of Operations Management, 32(4), 175–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2017). 'The digital platform: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eissens-van der Laan, M., Broekhuis, M., van Offenbeek, M., & Ahaus, K. (2016). Service decomposition: a conceptual analysis of modularizing services. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(3), 308–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethiraj, S. K., & Levinthal, D. (2004). Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Science, 50(2), 159–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. S. (2009). How catalysts ignite: The economics of platform-based start-ups, in A. Gawer (ed.), Platforms, Markets and Innovation, Edward Elgar Publishing Inc., Northampton, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2005). The industrial organization of markets with two-sided platforms, CPI Journal, Competition Policy International, vol. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. C., & Gawer, A. (2016). The rise of the platform enterprise: A global survey, The Center for Global. https://www.thecge.net/app/uploads/2016/01/PDF-WEB-Platform-Survey_01_12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Facebook, Inc. (2012). Facebook Annual Report, Facebook, Inc. http://www.annualreportowl.com/Facebook/2012/Annual%20Report
   Google Scholar
• Farrelly, R., & Chew, E. (2016a). Designing a Personal Information Transaction Object. 2016 49th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), IEEE, Hawaii, pp. 4061–4071.
   Google Scholar
• Farrelly, R., & Chew, E. (2016). Towards a Primary Personal Information Market. Twelfth International Conference on Technology, Knowledge, and Society, 11(1), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Farrelly, R., & Chew, E. (2016c). Who’s in to win?: Participation rate in a primary personal information market. Proceedings of the 27th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS2016), University of Wollongong Faculty of Business. https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1021&context=acis2016
   Google Scholar
• Farrelly, R., & Chew, E. (2017).Designing a primary personal information market as an industry platform: A service innovation approach, 2017 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), IEEE, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2008). How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 28–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Data Protection Regulation (2017). GDPR Portal, Retrieved March 11, 2017, from http://www.eugdpr.org
   Google Scholar
• Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 3(30), 611–642.
   Google Scholar
• Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact'. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 337–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, V., & Teng, J. T. (2001). E-commerce and the information market. Communications of the Acm, 44(4), 79–86.
   Google Scholar
• Gummesson, E. (2002). Relationship marketing and a new economy: It's time for de-programming. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(7), 585–589.
   Google Scholar
• Hagel, J., & Singer, M. (1999). Net worth: shaping markets when customers make the rules, Harvard usiness Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P., & Cilento, M. (2016). Data Availability and Use. Retrieved from http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/data-access/draft
   Google Scholar
• HAT Research and Development (2017). Retrieved July 14, 2017, from http://hubofallthings.com/
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilpert, H., Pilarski, B., & Schumann, M. (2014). The quest for environmental information-towards a mobile application for GHG emission tracking in meat production processes. Paper presented to the Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah, <https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8d2e/f5c8e8e6f0f89072896ed7f8abe27ac20035.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Holdren, J. P., & Lander, E. S. (2014). Big Data and Privacy: A Technological Perspective, 2016. Retrieved fromhttps://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_big_data_and_privacy_-_may_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Infact Decisions (2017). Preparing For The Era Of Consumer Controlled Data. Retrieved March 11, 2017, from https://www.picatic.com/ConsumerControlledDataSydney
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. (2012). In search of a universal model for personal data. The University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
   Google Scholar
• Karunakaran, A., & Purao, S. (2012). Designing for recombination: Process design through template combination. In Peffers K, Rothenberge M, Kuechle B, (Eds.), Design Science Research in Information Systems. Advances in Theory and Practice, Springer, Las Vegas, pp. 36–51.
   Google Scholar
• Knol, A., Sol, H., & Van Wamelen, J. (2012). Decision enhancement for sourcing with shared service centres in the Dutch government. Design Science Research in Information Systems. Advances in Theory and Practice, Springer, pp. 239–255.
   Google Scholar
• Kuneva, M. (2009). 'Roundtable on online data collection, targeting and profiling, Vol. 156, Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-09-156_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Leickly, B. L. (2004). Infomediaries in information economies. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
   Google Scholar
• Levenstein, J. (2013). Email statistics report, 2013–2017. The Radicati Group Inc, PALO ALTO, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H. (2014). On advancing business intelligence in the electricity retail market.
   Google Scholar
• Loutas, N., Peristeras, V., & Tarabanis, K. (2011). Towards a reference service model for the Web of Services'. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 70(9), 753–774. ' no.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, M. L., Majchrzak, A., & Gasser, L. (2002). A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 179–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milberg, S. J., Smith, H. J., & Burke, S. J. (2000). Information privacy: Corporate management and national regulation. Organization Science, 11(1), 35–57. no.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T., & Holmes, K. R. (2010). Access to information: Vital for efficient markets and economic reform. In 2010 Index of Economic Freedom, Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation and Dow Jones & Company, Inc, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Muschalle, A., Stahl, F., Löser, A., & Vossen, G. (2013). Pricing approaches for data markets. In Enabling Real-Time Business Intelligence, Springer, pp. 129–144.
   Google Scholar
• Mydex (2017a). About Mydex CIC. Retrieved from https://mydex.org/about/
   Google Scholar
• Mydex (2017b). Mydex. Retrieved 25 February 2017, from https://mydex.org/
   Google Scholar
• Nenonen, S., & Storbacka, K. (2010). Business model design: Conceptualizing networked value co-creation'. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2(1), 43–59.
   Google Scholar
• Offermann, P., Levina, O., Schönherr, M., & Bub, U. (2009). Outline of a design science research process. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology. ACM, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Oxborrow, L., & Brindley, C. (2014). Disintermediation in the apparel supply chain. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 18(3), 252–268.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2014). Platform strategy survey. Boston University School of Management, Research Paper 2439323.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Jiang, X. (2016). Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm. Boston University Questrom School of Business Research Paper No. 2861574. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2861574
   Google Scholar
• Patrício, L., Fisk, R. P., & Falcão e Cunha, J. (2008). Designing multi-interface service experiences: The service experience blueprint. Journal of Service Research, 10(4), 318–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Tuunanen, T., & Vaezi, R. (2012). Design science research evaluation. Design Science Research in Information Systems. Advances in Theory and Practice, 398–410.
   Google Scholar
• Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S. (2006). A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research, Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77, DOI: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
   Google Scholar
• Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Personal Informatics (2014). Know Thyself, Personal Informatics.Retrieved April 2, 2104, from, http://personalinformatics.org/
   Google Scholar
• Prins, J. (2004). The propertization of personal data and identities. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 8(3), 1–7. https://www.ejcl.org/83/art83-1.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Purao, S. (2002). 'Design research in the technology of information systems: Truth or dare', GSU Department of CIS Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Quantified Self (2013). LifeLogging, Quantified Self, viewed 2nd April 2014, <http://quantifiedself.com/lifelogging/>.
   Google Scholar
• Radicati, S. (2013). Mobile Statistics Report, 2013-2017, The Radicati Group Inc, Palo Alto, Ca.
   Google Scholar
• Rawassizadeh, R., Tomitsch, M., Wac, K., & Tjoa, A. M. (2013). UbiqLog: A generic mobile phone-based life-long framework. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17(4), 621–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redrup, Y. (2017). Mandatory data breach notification laws pass lower house. Financial Review, Retrieved March 7, 2017, from http://www.afr.com/technology/web/security/mandatory-data-breach-notification-laws-pass-lower-house-20170208-gu86w4
   Google Scholar
• Riederer, C., Erramilli, V., Chaintreau, A., Krishnamurthy, B., & Rodriguez, P. (2011). For sale: Your data: By: you. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM WORKSHOP on Hot Topics in Networks, ACM, Cambridge, Massachusetts, p. 13.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, F. (1999). The Economics, Concept, and Design of Information Intermediaries, Springer, Denver, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, J., Rehse, O., & Röber, B. (2012). The value of our digital identity. Retrieved from http://www.libertyglobal.com/PDF/public-policy/The-Value-of-Our-Digital-Identity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roth, A. V., & Menor, L. J. (2009). Insights into service operations management: A research agenda. Production and Operations Management, 12(2), 145–164.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, M. B., Butler, B., & Steinfield, C. (1995). Intermediaries and cybermediaries: A continuing role for mediating players in the electronic marketplace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(3), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Schwade, F., & Schubert, P. (2017).Social Collaboration Analytics for Enterprise Collaboration Systems: Providing Business Intelligence on Collaboration Activities. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 401–410. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/41197
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, P. (2004). Property, privacy, and personal data. Harvard Law Review, 117(7), 2056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searby, S. (2003). Personalisation—an overview of its use and potential. BT Technology Journal, 21(1), 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Spagnoletti, P., Resca, A., & Lee, G. (2015). A design theory for digital platforms supporting online communities: A multiple case study. Journal of Information Technology, 30(4), 364–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiekermann, S., & Novotny, A. (2014). The Vision: Personal Information Markets AND Privacy, Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e1b7/3005f57c400c78b6c55a22f11be11c7cb330.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, F., Schomm, F., & Vossen, G. (2014). The data marketplace survey revisited, Working Papers, ERCIS-European Research Center for Information Systems, Münster, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, H. (2017). 22,000 people willingly agree to community service in return for free WiFi, Retrieved August 5, 2017 from , <https://purple.ai/purple-community-service/>
   Google Scholar
• Taitague, A. (2013). Instant Messaging Market, 2013–2017. The Radicati Group, Inc, Palo Alto, Ca.
   Google Scholar
• Tee, R., & Gawer, A. (2009). Industry architecture as a determinant of successful platform strategies: A case study of the i‐mode mobile Internet service. European Management Review, 6(4), 217–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Solid Project (2016). Retrieved from https://solid.mit.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. (2013). Platform ecosystems: Aligning architecture, governance, and strategy, Newnes.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., & Konsynski, B. (2010). Complementarities between organizational IT architecture and governance structure. Information Systems Research, 21(2), 288–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse, AC-B. (2003). Disintermediation of travel agents in the hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 22(4), 453–460.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tuunanen, T., Bask, A., & Merisalo-Rantanen, H. (2012). Typology for modular service design: review of literature. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology ( Technology), 3(3), 99–112.
   Google Scholar
• Tuunanen, T., & Cassab, H. (2011). Service process modularization: Reuse versus variation in service extensions. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 340–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, K. (1995). The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, 24(3), 419–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Alstyne, M., & Parker, G. (2017). Platform business: From resources to relationships. GfK Marketing Intelligence Review, 9(1), 24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Van Alstyne, M. W., Parker, G. G., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 54–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2012). A comprehensive framework for evaluation in design science research. In Design Science Research in Information Systems. Advances in Theory and Practice, Springer, New York, pp. 423–438.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, C. A., & Hsuan, J. (2009). Service architecture and modularity. Decision Sciences, 40(3), 541–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldfogel, J., & Reimers, I. (2015). 'Storming the gatekeepers: Digital disintermediation in the market for books. Information Economics and Policy, 31, 47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiese, J. (2013).'Enabling an ecosystem of personal behavioral data. Proceedings of the Adjunct Publication of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 41–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2508468.2508472
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L. Y., & Neal, D. M. (2012). The digital aggregated self: A literature review. 2012 International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery (CyberC), IEEE, Sanya, pp. 170–177.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, G. (2010). The data driven life. The New York Times, 26 April.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum and Bain & Company, I. (2011). Personal data: The emergence of a new asset class. An Initiative of the World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Ca.
   Google Scholar