97
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

What are the implications of theorizing the enterprise architecture?

References

  • Abraham, R., Aier, S., and Winter, R. (2015). Crossing the line: overcoming knowledge boundaries in enterprise transformation. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(1), 3–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0361-1
  • Al-Nasrawi, S., and Ibrahim, M. (2013). An enterprise architecture mapping approach for realizing e-Government, Paper presented at the proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Communications and Information Technology: Digital Information Management & Security (pp. 17–21), 19–21 June, IEEE, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Azevedo, C. L., Iacob, M. E., Almeida, J. P. A., van Sinderen, M., Pires, L. F., and Guizzardi, G. (2015). Modeling resources and capabilities in enterprise architecture: a well-founded ontology-based proposal for ArchiMate. Information Systems, 54, 235–262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2015.04.008
  • Bente, S., Bombosch, U., and Langade, S. (2012). Collaborative Enterprise Architecture: Enriching EA with lean, Agile, and Enterprise 2.0 practices. Newnes: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
  • Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
  • Bradley, R. V., Pratt, R. M., Byrd, T. A., Outlay, C. N., and Wynn, D. E. Jr, (2012). Enterprise architecture, IT effectiveness and the mediating role of IT alignment in US hospitals. Information Systems Journal, 22(2), 97–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00379.x
  • Dahlberg, L., and McCaig, C. (2010). Different kinds of qualitative data collection methods. In L. Dahlberg, and C. McCaig (Eds.). Practical research and evaluation: A start-to-finish guide for practitioners (pp. 111–125). London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Foorthuis, R., Van Steenbergen, M., Brinkkemper, S., and Bruls, W. A. (2016). A theory building study of enterprise architecture practices and benefits. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(3), 541–564. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9542-1
  • Frampton, K., Shanks, G. G., Tamm, T., Kurnia, S., and Milton, S. K. (2015). Enterprise architecture service provision: Pathways to value. Paper presented at the proceedings of Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), 26–29 May, Münster, Germany.
  • Franke, U., Cohen, M., and Sigholm, J. (2018). What can we learn from enterprise architecture models? An experiment comparing models and documents for capability development. Software & Systems Modeling, 17(2), 695–711. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-016-0535-z
  • Franke, U., Johnson, P., and König, J. (2014). An architecture framework for enterprise IT service availability analysis. Software & Systems Modeling, 13(4), 1417–1445. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-012-0307-3
  • Fritscher, B., and Pigneur, Y. (2015). A visual approach to business IT alignment between business model and enterprise architecture. International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design, 6(1), 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/ijismd.2015010101
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge, UK; John Polity Press.
  • Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., and Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organisational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.
  • Glissmann, S. M., and Sanz, J. (2011). An Approach to Building Effective Enterprise Architectures. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4–7 January, Kauai, Hawaii.
  • Hiekkanen, K., Korhonen, J. J., Collin, J., Patricio, E., Helenius, M., and Mykkänen, J. (2013). Architects' perceptions on EA use–An empirical study. In Business Informatics (CBI), 2013 IEEE 15th Conference on (pp. 292–297). 15–18 July, Vienna, Austria: IEEE.
  • Howell, K. E. (2013). Methods of data collection. In An introduction to the philosophy of methodology (pp. 193–210). London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Iyamu, T. (2015). Enterprise architecture: from concept to practice. Australia: Heidelberg Press.
  • Iyamu, T. (2013). Underpinning theories: Order-of-use in information systems research. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 15(3), 1–13.
  • Kappelman, L. A., and Zachman, J. A. (2013). The enterprise and its architecture: ontology & challenges. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 53(4), 87–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645654
  • Khazanchi, D., and Munkvold, B. E. (2003). On the rhetoric and relevance of IS research paradigms: a conceptual framework and some propositions. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 6–9 January, Big Island, Hawaii.
  • Kotusev, S. (2016). Enterprise Architecture Is Not TOGAF. British Computer Society (BCS). http://www.bcs.org/content/conWebDoc/55547
  • Kriouile, H., and Kriouile, A. (2015). Towards services-based enterprise architecture for cloud computing-opened information systems. Journal of Computers, 10(3), 195–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.17706/jcp.10.3.195-202
  • Lapalme, J., Gerber, A., Van der Merwe, A., Zachman, J., De Vries, M., and Hinkelmann, K. (2016). Exploring the future of enterprise architecture: A Zachman perspective. Computers in Industry, 79, 103–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.06.010
  • Lapkin, A. (2005). Business strategy defines enterprise architecture value. Stamford, CT: Gartner Research.
  • Lapkin, A., Allega, P., Burke, B., and Burton, B. (2008). Gartner clarifies the definition of the term 'enterprise,. USA: Gartner Inc. 1–5.
  • Mohamed, M., Galal-Edeen, G., Hassan, H., and Hasanien, E. (2012). An evaluation of enterprise architecture frameworks for E-Government. Paper presented at the proceeding International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES ‘2012), pp. 255–261, 27–29 November, Cairo, Egypt.
  • Närman, P., Buschle, M., and Ekstedt, M. (2014). An enterprise architecture framework for multi-attribute information systems analysis. Software & Systems Modeling, 13(3), 1085–1116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-012-0288-2
  • Niemi, E., and Pekkola, S. (2017). Using enterprise architecture artefacts in an organisation. Enterprise Information Systems, 11(3), 313–338. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2015.1048831
  • Ross, J., Weill, P., and Robertson, D. (2006). Enterprise Architecture as a Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. United States of America: Harvard Business Press.
  • Rouhani, B. D., Mahrin, M. N. R., Nikpay, F., Ahmad, R. B., and Nikfard, P. (2015). A systematic literature review on Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodologies. Information and Software Technology, 62, 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.01.012
  • Safari, H., Faraji, Z., and Majidian, S. (2016). Identifying and evaluating enterprise architecture risks using FMEA and fuzzy VIKOR. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27(2), 475–486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0880-0
  • Shaanika, I., and Iyamu, T. (2014). Developing Enterprise Architecture skills: A Developing Country Perspective, IFIP Conference on Information Systems: Key Competencies in ICT and Informatics: Implications and Issues for Educational Professionals and Management, 1–4 July, Potsdam, Germany.
  • Simon, D., Fischbach, K., and Schoder, D. (2014). Enterprise architecture management and its role in corporate strategic management. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 12(1), 5–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-013-0213-4
  • Song, H., and Song, Y.-T. (2010). Enterprise architecture institutionalization and assessment. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS) (pp. 870–875), 18–20 August, Yamagata, Japan: IEEE/ACIS.
  • Tamm, T., Seddon, P., Shanks, G., and Reynolds, P. (2011). How does enterprise architecture add value to organisations? Communications of the Association of Information Systems, 28(10), 141–168.
  • Tang, A., Han, J., and Chen, P. (2004). A comparative analysis of architecture frameworks. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 11th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (pp. 640–647), November 30–December 3, IEEE, Busan, South Korea.
  • The Open Group (2003). The Open Group Architecture Framework Version 8.1 “Enterprise Edition”. 1–12.
  • Urbaczewski, L., and Mrdalj, S. (2006). A comparison of enterprise architecture frameworks. Issues in Information Systems, 7(2), 18–23.
  • Vallerand, J., Lapalme, J., and Moïse, A. (2017). Analysing enterprise architecture maturity models: a learning perspective. Enterprise Information Systems, 11(6), 859–883. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2015.1091951
  • Vargas, A., Cuenca, L., Boza, A., Sacala, I., and Moisescu, M. (2016). Towards the development of the framework for inter sensing enterprise architecture. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27(1), 55–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0901-z
  • Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., and Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 21–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02
  • Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 320–330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000589
  • Wang, X., and Zhou, X. (2009). Information resources planning based on enterprise architecture. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Service Operations, Logistics and Informatics (SOLI ‘09) (pp. 230–234), 22–24 July, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Wang, X., Zhou, X., and Jiang, L. (2008). Method of Business and IT Alignment Based on Enterprise Architecture. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics (SOLI 08) (pp. 740–745), 12–15 October, Beijing, China.
  • Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. London, UK: Sage Publications.
  • Zachman, J. (1987). A framework for information systems. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 276–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.263.0276

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.