Impact of funding size on research outputs: evidence from South Korea’s government-funded programme

References

• Ahn, J., Yoon, S. Y., & Hamh, S. (2023). Mid to long-term policy suggestions for the basic research support system by academic fields’, A report from Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso-Borrego, C., Romero-Medina, A., & Sanchez-Mangas, R. (2017). The impact of public research contracts on scientific productivity. Applied Economics, 49(5), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1200181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amara, N., Landry, R., & Halilem, N. (2015). What can university administrators do to increase the publication and citation scores of their faculty members? Scientometrics, 103(2), 489–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1537-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANR. (2020). Funding research in all its diversity. 2020 annual report. ANR, Information and Communication Division, French National Research Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (2005). The impact of NSF support for basic research in economics. Annals of Economics and Statistics, 79, 91–117.
   Google Scholar
• Auranen, O., & Nieminen, M. (2010). University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison. Research Policy, 39(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoubi, C., Pezzoni, M., & Visentin, F., (2019). The important thing is not to win, it is to take part: What if scientists benefit from participating in research grant competitions? Research Policy, 48, 84–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banal-Estanol, A., Jofre-Bonet, M., & Lawson, C. (2015). The double-edged sword of industry collaboration: Evidence from engineering academics in the UK. Research Policy, 44(6), 1160–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. (1994). Human capital revisited. Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd ed., pp. 15–28). The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D. A., Risbey, K. R., & Staples, J. (2006). The impact of appointment type on the productivity and commitment of full-time faculty in research and doctoral institutions. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 89–123. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2006.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordons, M., Garcia-Jover, F., & Barrigon, S. (1993). Is collaboration improving research visibility? Spanish scientific output in pharmacology and pharmacy. Research Evaluation, 3(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/rev/3.1.19
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Yang, G., He, F., & Chen, K. (2019). Exploring the effect of political borders on university-industry collaborative research performance: Evidence from China’s Guangdong province. Technovation, 82-83, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J., Hirsch, G., Jensen, P. H., & Webster, E. (2016). Research funding mechanisms and biomedical research outputs. Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy, 35(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-3441.12130
   Google Scholar
• Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. R. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39(6), 607–631. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018705823763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., & McKelvey, M. (1998). High R&D intensity without high tech products: A Swedish paradox?. In K. Nielsen & B. Johnson (Eds.), Institutions and economic change: New perspectives on markets, firms and technology (pp. 18). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Franzoni, C., Stephan, P. E., & Veugelers, R. (2022). Funding risky research. Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, 1(1), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1086/719252
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, R., & Tunzelmann, N. (2006). Sectoral determinants of performance in collaborative R&D projects. International Journal of Technology Management, 25(8), 766–778.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B., & Lerner, J. (2010). The financing of R&D and innovation. In B. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The handbook of the economics of innovation (pp. 609–639, Vol. 1), chap. 2. Elsevier Press.
   Google Scholar
• Han, H. (2022). 2021 status of scientific and technological paper publications and citations in Korea’, KISTEP brief 62. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Heo, J., Kim, H., Cho, Y., Cho, S., & Cho, S. (2008). Developing bibliometric indicators for analysis & evaluation of national R&D programs. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 11, 376–399.
   Google Scholar
• Heyard, R., & Hottenrott, H. (2021). The value of research funding for knowledge creation and dissemination: A study of SNSF research grants. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 217. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00891-x
   Google Scholar
• Holliday, E. B., Jagsi, R., Wilson, L. D., Choi, M., Thomas Jr, C. R., & Fuller, C. D. (2014). Gender differences in publication productivity, academic position, career duration, and funding Among U.S. Academic radiation oncology Faculty. Academic Medicine, 89(5), 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hottenrott, H., & Thorwarth, S. (2011). Industry funding of university research and scientific productivity. Kyklos’ Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin an der Universitat Leipzig, 64(4), 534–555.
   Google Scholar
• Hourihan, M. (2020). ‘AAAS Guide to the President's budget: Research & development FY 2021’, a report from American Association for the Advancement of Science. https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/2020-06/AAAS%20Guide%20to%20R%26D%20FY%202021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, S., Oh, I., Kang, M., & Jang, J. (2022). Impact of R&D subsidy size on the performance of beneficiary firms’, A report from. Science and Technology Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, B. A., & Lefgren, L. (2011). The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9-10), 1168–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, H. (2019). A decision support framework for robust R&D budget allocation using machine learning and optimization. Decision Support Systems, 121, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, K. (2010). R&D investment and project performance: Research on industrial R&D programs of government. Journal of Technology Innovation, 18, 75–89.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, J., Jung, K., Choi, Y., Han, S., Kim, J., Kim, J., Bae, H., Ahn, S., Cho, Y., Ha, R., Jang, H., & Kim, Y. (2020). A study for the improvement of R&D preliminary feasibility study’, An internal report from the Science and Technology Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyvik, S., & Olsen, T. (2008). Does the aging of tenured academic staff affect the research performance of universities? Scientometrics, 76(3), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1767-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Choi, Y., & Seo, H. (2020). Comparative analysis of the R&D investment performance of Korean local governments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leisyte, L. (2016). New public management and research productivity – A precarious state of affairs of academic work in The Netherlands. Studies in Higher Education, 41(5), 828–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1147721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerchenmueller, M. (2018). Does more money lead to more innovation? Evidence from the life sciences. Academy of Management Proceedings, 16372. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.16372abstract
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. (2009). Macro-level indicators of the relations between research funding and research output. Journal of Informetrics, 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mali, F., Pustovrh, T., Platinovsek, R., Kronegger, L., & Ferligoj, A. (2017). The effects of funding and co-authorship on research performance in a small scientific community. Science & Public Policy, 44, 486–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariethoz, G., Herman, F., & Dreiss, A. (2021). The imaginary carrot: No correlation between raising funds and research productivity in geosciences. Scientometrics, 126(3), 2401–2407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03855-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1968). The matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitze, T., Alecke, B., Reinkowski, J., & Untiedt, G. (2015). Linking collaborative R&D strategies with the research and innovation performance of SMEs in peripheral regions: Do spatial and organizational choices make a difference? The Annals of Regional Science, 55(2-3), 555–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0719-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokyr, J. (2010). The contribution of economic history to the study of innovation and technical change: 1750-1914. In B. Hall & N. Rosenberg (eds), The handbook of the economics of innovation (pp. 11–-50, Vol. 1, chap. 2). Elservier Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nag, S., Yang, H., Buccola, S., & Ervin, D. (2013). Productivity and financial support in academic bioscience. Applied Economics, 45(19), 2817–2826. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2012.676737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science & Technology Information Service. (2023). Science and technology statistics. Retrieved August 20, 2023, from https://www.ntis.go.kr/rndsts/selectStatsDivIdctVo.do.
   Google Scholar
• Neufeld, J. (2016). Determining effects of individual research grants on publication output and impact: The case of the Emmy Noether Programme (German Research Foundation). Research Evaluation, 25(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, D. J. (1986). Little science, Big science … and beyond. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pudovkin, A. I., & Garfield, E. (2004). Rank-Normalized impact factor: A way to compare journal performance across subject categories. Proceedings of the 67th ASIS&T Annual Meeting, 41, 507–515.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, D. A., Cook, D. A., Beckman, T. J., Levine, R. B., Kern, D. E., & Wright, S. M. (2007). Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. JAMA, 298(9), 1002–1009. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.9.1002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandström, U., & Van den Besselaar, P. (2018). Funding, evaluation and the performance of national research system. Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M., Peglow, F., Frtisch, M., & Gunther, J. (2012). What drives innovation output from subsidized R&D cooperation?—Project-level evidence from Germany. Technovation, 32(6), 358–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, P. E. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1199–1235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, P. E. (2012). How economics shapes science. Vol. 1. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, P.E., & Levin, S.G., (1992) Striking the mother lode: The importance of age, place, and time. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sturman, M. C. (2003). Searching for the inverted U-shaped relationship between time and performance: Meta-analyses of the experience/performance, tenure/performance, and age/performance relationships. Journal of Management, 29(5), 609–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00028-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Um, I., & Lee, J. (2020). The efficiency evaluation and future direction of national innovation system’, A report from Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Vilkkumaa, E., Salo, A., Liesio, J., & Siddiqui, A. (2015). Fostering breakthrough technologies — How do optimal funding decisions depend on evaluation accuracy? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96, 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, T., Li, M., Wu, C., Yan, X., Fan, Y., Di, Z., & Wu, J. (2013). Do scientists trace hot topics? Scientific Reports, 3(1), 2207. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02207
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. doi:10.1126/science.1136099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar