Interactional facilitators and barriers to social relationships between students who use AAC and fellow students

References

• Anderson, K., Balandin, S., & Clendon, S. (2011). “He cares about me and I care about him.” Children’s experiences of friendship with peers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27(2), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batorowicz, B., Campbell, F., von Tetzchner, S., King, G., & Missiuna, C. (2014). Social participation of school-aged children who use communication aids: The views of children and parents. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(3), 237–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., Bock, S., Thompson, J. R., & Kosuwan, K. (2002). Influence of communicative competence and augmentative and alternative communication technique on children’s attitudes toward a peer who uses AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(4), 217–227.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., Thompson, J. R., Clay, S. L., Hutchins, M., Vogt, W. P., Romaniak, B., & Sokolowski, B. (2001). Preservice professionals’ attitudes toward children who use augmentative/alternative communication. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36(3), 255–271. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23879979
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N. (2009). Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and inclusive education for students with the most severe disabilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(1), 93–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpe, A., Harder, K., Tam, C., & Reid, D. (2010). Perceptions of writing and communication aid use among children with a physical disability. Assistive Technology, 22(2), 87–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, M., & Maxwell, K. (1998). Promoting interaction with children using augmentative communication through a peer-directed intervention. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 45(1), 75–96.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Y.-C., Carter, E. W., & Sisco, L. G. (2012). Social interactions of students with disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication in inclusive classrooms. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117(5), 349–367.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Kirton, A. (2003). Patterns of interaction between children with physical disabilities using augmentative and alternative communication systems and their peers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 19(2), 135–151.
   Google Scholar
• Fey, M. (1986). Language intervention with young children. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finke, E. H., & Quinn, E. (2012). Perceptions of communication style and influences on intervention practices for young children with AAC needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28(2), 117–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, K. W., & Shogren, K. A. (2012). Integrating augmentative and alternative communication and peer support for students with disabilities: A social-ecological perspective. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27(2), 23–39.
   Google Scholar
• Guidera, A., Olsson, C., & Raghavendra, P. (2010). Supporting communicative participation for children with complex communication needs: How the evidence contributes to the journey. In H. Roddam & J. Skeat (Eds.), Embedding evidence-based practice in speech and language therapy: International examples (pp. 151–156). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, P. (2014). The practices of dealing with children with special needs in school: A Norwegian perspective. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 19(3), 296–310.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, S. S., Reichle, J., & Evans, J. (2004). Supporting augmentative and alternative communication use by beginning communicators with severe disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(1), 20–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., & Light, J. (2003). General education teachers’ experiences with inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19(2), 104–124.
   Google Scholar
• Koster, M., Nakken, H., Pijl, S. J., & Houten, E. V. (2009). Being part of the peer group: A literature study focusing on the social dimension of inclusion in education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(2), 117–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(1), 1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2015). Designing AAC research and intervention to improve outcomes for individuals with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(2), 85–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Smith, A. K. (1993). Home literacy experiences of preschoolers who use AAC systems and of their nondisabled peers. AAC Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 10–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, S., & Light, J. (2007). Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part III – Contributing factors. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(4), 323–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., & Light, J. (2005). Attitudes toward individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Research review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(1), 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midtlin, H. S., Næss, K.-A. B., Taxt, T., & Karlsen, A. V. (2015). What communication strategies do AAC users want their communication partners to use? A preliminary study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(14), 1260–1267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østvik, J., Ytterhus, B., & Balandin, S. (2017). Friendship between children using augmentative and alternative communication and peers: A systematic literature review. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 42(4), 403–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., Olsson, C., Sampson, J., McInerney, R., & Connell, T. (2012). School participation and social networks of children with complex communication needs, physical disabilities, and typically developing peers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28(1), 33–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røgeskov, M. L., Hansen, H., & Bengtsson, S. (2015). A comparison of social life among 11-year-old disabled children and 11-year-old in general. In R. Traustadóttir, B. Ytterhus, S. T. Egilson, & B. Berg (Eds.), Childhood and disability in the Nordic countries: Being, becoming, belonging (pp. 179–195). London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Shire, S. Y., & Jones, N. (2015). Communication partners supporting children with complex communication needs who use AAC. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 37(1), 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, G., Müller, E., Hunt, P., & Goetz, L. (2001). Critical issues in the inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication: An educational team perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17(2), 62–72.
   Google Scholar
• Thirumanickam, A., Raghavendra, P., & Olsson, C. (2011). Participation and social networks of school-age children with complex communication needs: A descriptive study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27(3), 195–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar