Effects of task characteristics and task-switching on remote associates test problem solving

References

• Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1063–1087. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N. Z., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker S (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models usinglme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaty, R. E., & Johnson, D. R. (2021). Automating creativity assessment with SemDis: An open platform for computing semantic distance. Behavior Research Methods, 53(2), 757–780. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01453-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Jauk, E., & Benedek, M. (2014). The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory & Cognition, 42(7), 1186–1197. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0428-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, M., Davis, S., & Cabeza, R. (2022). Between automatic and control processes: How relationships between problem elements interact to facilitate or impede insight. Memory & Cognition, 50(8), 1719–1734. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01277-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(4), 634–639. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195543
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brophy, D. R. (1998) Understanding, measuring, and enhancing individual creative problem-solving efforts, Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrysikou, E. G. (2019). Creativity in and out of (cognitive) control. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, A. L., Kenett, Y. N., Beaty, R. E., & Diaz, M. T. (2021). Quantifying flexibility in thought: The resiliency of semantic networks differs across the lifespan. Cognition, 211, 104631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davelaar, E. J. (2015). Semantic search in the remote associates test. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7(3), 494–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Deyne, S., Navarro, D. J., Perfors, A., Brysbaert, M., & Storms, G. (2019). The “Small World of Words” English word association norms for over 12,000 cue words. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3), 987–1006. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1115-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijksterhuis, A., & Aarts, H. (2010). Goals, attention, and (un)consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 467–490. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, T., & Wiley, J. (2019). Fixation, flexibility, and forgetting during alternate uses tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(3), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P., & MacLeod, C. J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günther, F., Dudschig, C., & Kaup, B. (2015). LSAfun - An R package for computations based on Latent Semantic Analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 930–944. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0529-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, N., Jang, Y., Mednick, S. C., & Huber, D. E. (2012). The road not taken. Psychological Science, 23(3), 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611429710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hass, R. W. (2017). Semantic search during divergent thinking. Cognition, 166, 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2012). Convergent and divergent operations in cognitive search. In P. M. Todd, T. T. Hills, & T. W. Robbins (Eds.), Cognitive search: Evolution, algorithms, and the brain (pp. 221–235). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kenett, Y. N., & Faust, M. (2019). A semantic network cartography of the creative mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(4), 271–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A, Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen R. H. B. (2017). lmerTestpackage: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. S., & Therriault, D. J. (2013). The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: A latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes. Intelligence, 41(5), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. A. (2019). interactions: Comprehensive, User-Friendly Toolkit for Probing Interactions. R package version 1.1.0, https://cran.r-project.org/package=interactions
   Google Scholar
• Lu, J. G., Akinola, M., & Mason, M. F. (2017). ““Switching On” creativity: Task switching can increase creativity by reducing cognitive fixation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 139, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki, W. S., McKinley, L. N., & Thompson, A. G. (2004). Semantic distance norms computed from an electronic dictionary (WordNet). Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195590
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marko, M., Michalko, D., & Riečanský, I. (2019). Remote associates test: An empirical proof of concept. Behavior Research Methods, 51(6), 2700–2711. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1131-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marko, M., & Riečanský, I. (2021). The structure of semantic representation shapes controlled semantic retrieval. Memory (Hove, England), 29(4), 538–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.1906905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 34–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463281003765323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oltețeanu, A. M., & Schultheis, H. (2019). What determines creative association? Revealing two factors which separately influence the creative process when solving the remote associates test. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(3), 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatz, J., Jones, S. J., & Laird, J. E. (2022). Modeling the remote associates test as retrievals from semantic memory. Cognitive Science, 46. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sio, U. N., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2017). Interrupted: The roles of distributed effort and incubation in preventing fixation and generating problem solutions. Memory & Cognition, 45(4), 553–565. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0684-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sio, U. N., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2022). Determinants of creative thinking: The effect of task characteristics in solving remote associate test problems. Thinking & Reasoning, 28(2), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2021.1959400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. A., Huber, D. E., & Vul, E. (2013). Multiply-constrained semantic search in the Remote Associates Test. Cognition, 128(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M., Gerkens, D. R., & Angello, G. (2017). Alternating incubation effects in the generation of category exemplars. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storm, B. C., & Angello, G. (2010). Overcoming fixation. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1263–1265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610379864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, T. (1993). Remote associate problem sets in performance feedback paradigms. Personality and Individual Differences, 14(1), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90169-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troyer, A. K., Moscovitch, M., & Winocur, G. (1997). Clustering and switching as two components of verbal fluency: Evidence from younger and older healthy adults. Neuropsychology, 11(1), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.11.1.138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valba, O., Gorsky, A., Nechaev, S., & Tamm, M. (2021). Analysis of English free association network reveals mechanisms of efficient solution of remote association tests. PLoS One, 16(4), e0248986. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vul, E., & Pashler, H. (2007). Incubation benefits only after people have been misdirected. Memory & Cognition, 35(4), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, O. C., & Watkins, M. J. (1975). Buildup of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1(4), 442–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.1.4.442
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, J. (1998). Expertise as mental set: The effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 26(4), 716–730. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C.-L., Huang, S.-Y., Chen, P.-Z., & Chen, H.-C. (2020). A systematic review of creativity-related studies applying the remote associates test from 2000 to 2019. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaniv, I., & Meyer, D. E. (1987). Activation and metacognition of inaccessible stored information: Potential bases for incubation effects in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.2.187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeigarnik, B. (1938). On finished and unfinished tasks. In W. D. Ellis (Ed. & Trans.), A source book of gestalt psychology (pp. 300 –314). New York, NY: Harcourt–Brace. (Original work published 1927). https://doi.org/10.1037/11496-025
   Google Scholar
• Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., & Elphick, C. S. (2010). A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00001.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar