3,416
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Evidence of the ISTE Standards for Educators leading to learning gains

ORCID Icon
Pages 201-219 | Received 02 Dec 2022, Accepted 31 Jul 2023, Published online: 10 Aug 2023

References

  • Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002
  • Akiba, M., & Liang, G. (2017). Effects of teacher professional characteristics on student achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.817437
  • Aksit, O., & Wiebe, E. N. (2020). Exploring force and motion concepts in middle grades using computational modeling: A classroom intervention study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09800–z
  • Albion, P. R., Tondeur, J., Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Peeraer, J. (2015). Teachers’ professional development for ICT integration: Towards a reciprocal relationship between research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9401-9
  • Alcantara, E., Alcantara, E. C., Marie, J., & Bacsa, P. (2017). Critical thinking and problem-solving skills in mathematics of grade-7 public secondary students. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(4), 21–27. http://www.apjmr.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/APJMR-2017.5.4.2.03.pdf
  • Asterhan, C. S. C., & Rosenberg, H. (2015). The promise, reality, and dilemmas of secondary school teacher–student interactions in Facebook: The teacher perspective. Computers & Education, 85, 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.003
  • Aynas, N., & Aslan, M. (2021). The effects of authentic learning practices on academic success in science courses. Educational Research Quarterly, 44(4), 3–30.
  • Baker, T., Smith, L., & Anissa, N. (2019). Educ-AI-tion rebooted? Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges (Issue February). Nesta. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/Future_of_AI_and_education_v5_WEB.pdf
  • Blanchard, M. R., LePrevost, C. E., Tolin, A. D., & Gutierrez, K. S. (2016). Investigating technology-enhanced teacher professional development in rural, high-poverty middle schools. Educational Researcher, 45(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16644602
  • Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2018). Digital technologies for promoting “student voice” and co-creating learning experience in an academic course. Instructional Science, 46(2), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9436-y
  • Bold, T., Filmer, D., Martin, G., Molina, E., Rockmore, C., Stacy, B., Svensson, J., & Wane, W. (2017). What do teachers know and do? Does it matter? Evidence from primary schools in Africa. Policy Research Working Paper. 7956, World Bank.
  • Carpenter, J. P., & Justice, J. E. (2018). Can technology support teaching for global readiness? The case of the global read aloud. LEARNing Landscapes, 11(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v11i1.923
  • Chapman, A. L., & Marich, H. (2021). Using Twitter for civic education in K-12 classrooms. TechTrends, 65(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00542-z
  • Chatti, M. A., & Muslim, A. (2019). The PERLA framework: Blending personalization and learning analytics. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1), 244–261. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3936
  • Cherner, T., & Mitchell, C. (2021). Deconstructing edtech frameworks based on their creators, features, and usefulness. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(1), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1773852
  • Crompton, H. (2017). ISTE Standards for educators 2017: A guide for teachers and other professionals. International Society for Technology in Education.
  • Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2022). Artificial intelligence in K-12 education. SN Social Sciences, 2(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00425-5
  • Crompton, H., Burke, D., Jordan, K., & Wilson, S. (2022). Support provided for K-12 teachers teaching remotely with technology during emergencies: A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(3), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1899877
  • Crompton, H., & Sykora, C. (2021). Developing instructional technology standards for educators: A design-based research study. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100044
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
  • Dinçer, S. (2018). Are preservice teachers really literate enough to integrate technology in their classroom practice? Determining the technology literacy level of preservice teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2699–2718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9737-z
  • Dogan, S., Pringle, R., & Mesa, J. (2016). The impacts of professional learning communities on science teachers’ knowledge, practice and student learning: A review. Professional Development in Education, 42(4), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2015.1065899
  • Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2022). Assistive technology for the inclusion of students with disabilities: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(5), 1911–1930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10127-7
  • Franklin, D., Coenraad, M., Palmer, J., Eatinger, D., Zipp, A., Anaya, M., White, M., Pham, H., Gökdemir, O., & Weintrop, D. (2020). An analysis of use-modify-create pedagogical approach’s success in balancing structure and student agency [Paper presentation]. ICER 2020 - Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 14–24). https://doi.org/10.1145/3372782.3406256
  • Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum Publishing.
  • Gazi, Z. A. (2016). Internalization of digital citizenship for the future of all levels of education. Egitim ve Bilim, 41(186), 137–148. http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/viewFile/4533/2471
  • Gomez, F. C., Trespalacios, J., Hsu, Y.-C., & Yang, D. (2022). Exploring teachers’ technology integration self-efficacy through the 2017 ISTE standards. TechTrends: For Leaders in Education & Training, 66(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00639-z
  • Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Greenhow, C., Galvin, S. M., Brandon, D. L., & Askari, E. (2020). A decade of research on K-12 teaching and teacher learning with social media: Insights on the state-of-the-field. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 122(6), 1–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200602
  • Grover, S., Basu, S., Bienkowski, M., Eagle, M., Diana, N., & Stamper, J. (2017). A framework for using hypothesis-driven approaches to support data-driven learning analytics in measuring computational thinking in block-based programming environments. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 17(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3105910
  • Healey, G., & Walshe, N. (2020). Real-world geographers and geography students using GIS: Relevance, everyday applications and the development of geographical knowledge. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 29(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2019.1661125
  • Heidari, K. (2020). Critical thinking and EFL learners’ performance on textually-explicit, textually-implicit, and script-based reading items. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(August), 100703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100703
  • Henriksen, D., Creely, E., & Henderson, M. (2019). Failing in creativity: The problem of policy and practice in Australia and the United States. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 55(1), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2019.1549429
  • Huang, C. S., Yang, S. J., Chiang, T. H., & Su, A. Y. (2016). Effects of situated mobile learning approach on learning motivation and performance of EFL students. Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 263–276.
  • Hwang, G. J., Chiu, L. Y., & Chen, C. H. (2015). A contextual game-based learning approach to improving students’ inquiry-based learning performance in social studies courses. Computers & Education, 81, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.006
  • Ibáñez, M. B., Portillo, A. U., Cabada, R. Z., & Barrón, M. L. (2020). Impact of augmented reality technology on academic achievement and motivation of students from public and private Mexican schools. A case study in a middle-school geometry course. Computers & Education, 145, 103734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103734
  • ISTE. (2000). National educational technology standards for teachers. International Society for Technology in Education.
  • ISTE. (2008). National educational technology standards for teachers (2nd ed.). International Society for Technology in Education.
  • ISTE. (2017). ISTE standards for educators. International Society for Technology in Education. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards/for-educators
  • InTASC. (2013). Interstate teacher assessment and support consortium InTASC model core teaching standards and learning progressions for teachers 1.0: A resource for ongoing teacher development. InTasc. Council of Chief State School Officers.
  • Jakhelln, R., Eklund, G., Aspfors, J., Bjørndal, K., & Stølen, G. (2021). Newly qualified teachers’ understandings of research-based teacher education practices − Two cases from Finland and Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1659402
  • Kim, M., & Choi, D. (2018). Development of youth digital citizenship scale and implication for educational setting. Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 155–171. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26273877
  • Kiru, E. W., Doabler, C. T., Sorrells, A. M., & Cooc, N. A. (2018). A synthesis of technology-mediated mathematics interventions for Students with or at risk for mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417745835
  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPACK. In American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators (pp. 3–29). Routledge.
  • Lee, I. (2016). Reclaiming the roots of CT. CSTA Voice; the Voice of K-12 Computer Science Education and Its Educators, 12(1), 3–5.
  • Lin, M. H., Chen, H. C., & Liu, K. S. (2017). A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553–3564. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00744a
  • Luo, H., Li, G., Feng, Q., Yang, Y., & Zuo, M. (2021). Virtual reality in K-12 and higher education: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2019. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(3), 887–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12538
  • Maruf, I. R., Nugroho, B. S., Kurniawan, A., Musiafa, Z., & Satria, E. (2022). Virtual learning apps: Best instructional leadership practices in the digital age efforts to improve student learning outcomes. Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v7i1.2187
  • Maude, A. (2018). Geography and powerful knowledge: a contribution to the debate. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 27(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017.1320899
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2007). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK): Confronting the wicked problems of teaching with technology. In R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. A. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education (pp. 2214–2226). AACE.
  • Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
  • Moon, E. C. (2018). Teaching students out of harm’s way: Mitigating digital knowledge gaps and digital risk created by 1:1 device programs in K-12 education in the USA. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 16(3), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-02-2018-0012
  • Mystakidis, S., & Christopoulos, A. (2022). Teacher perceptions on virtual reality escape rooms for STEM education. Information, 13(3), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13030136
  • Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2016). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (7th ed.). Pearson.
  • Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Baldini Soares, C. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
  • Petrucco, C., & Agostini, D. (2020). Student perceptions of fake news. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 11(2), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDLDC.2020040103
  • Popova, A., Evans, D. K., Breeding, M. E., & Arancibia, V. (2022). Teacher professional development around the world: The gap between evidence and practice. The World Bank Research Observer, 37(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkab006
  • Qian, Y., & Lehman, J. D. (2019). Using targeted feedback to address common student misconceptions in introductory programming: A data-driven approach. SAGE Open, 9(4), 215824401988513. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019885136
  • Ronfeldt, M., Farmer, S. O., McQueen, K., & Grissom, J. A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 475–514. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215585562
  • Saltan, F., & Arslan, Ö. E. (2016). The use of augmented reality in formal education: A scoping review. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00628a
  • Saputri, A. C., Sajidan, S., Rinanto, Y., Afandi, A., & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Improving students’ critical thinking skills in cell-metabolism learning using Stimulating Higher Order Thinking Skills model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12122a
  • Sarkar, S., Mohapatra, S., & Sundarakrishnan, J. (2017). Assessing impact of technology based digital equalizer programme on improving student learning outcomes. Education and Information Technologies, 22(1), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9434-0
  • Scharber, C., Peterson, L., Baskin, K., Cabeen, J., Gustafson, D., & Alberts, J. (2021). A research-practice partnership about K12 technology integration: Technology as a catalyst for teacher learning through failure and creative risk-taking. TechTrends, 65(4), 626–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00621-9
  • Schwarz, B., & Caduri, G. (2016). Novelties in the use of social networks by leading teachers in their classes. Computers & Education, 102, 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.002
  • Sebastian, J., Huang, H., & Allensworth, E. (2017). Examining integrated leadership systems in high schools: Connecting principal and teacher leadership to organizational processes and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(3), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1319392
  • Seehorn, D., & Carey, S. (2011). CSTA K–12 computer science standards: Revised 2011. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2593249
  • Song, Y., & Wen, Y. (2018). Integrating various apps on BYOD (bring your own device) into seamless inquiry-based learning to enhance primary students’ science learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9715-z
  • Spiteri, M., & Chang Rundgren, S.-N. (2020). Literature review on the factors affecting primary teachers’ use of digital technology. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9376-x
  • Stein, K. C., Macaluso, M., & Stanulis, R. N. (2016). The interplay between principal leadership and teacher leader efficacy. Journal of School Leadership, 26(6), 1002–1032. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461602600605
  • Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7, 137–146. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol7/iss1/17
  • Stojanović, D., Bogdanović, Z., Petrović, L., Mitrović, S., & Labus, A. (2023). Empowering learning process in secondary education using pervasive technologies. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1806886
  • Sung, H. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. S. (2015). An integrated contextual and web-based issue quest approach to improving students’ learning achievements, attitudes and critical thinking. Educational Technology and Society, 18(4), 299–311.
  • Sung, H. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Yen, Y. F. (2015). Development of a contextual decision-making game for improving students’ learning performance in a health education course. Computers & Education, 82, 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.012
  • Tapingkae, P., Panjaburee, P., Hwang, G. J., & Srisawasdi, N. (2020). Effects of a formative assessment-based contextual gaming approach on students’ digital citizenship behaviours, learning motivations, and perceptions. Computers & Education, 159, 103998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103998
  • Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing preservice teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009
  • Uerz, D., Volman, M., & Kral, M. (2018). Teacher educators’ competencies in fostering student teachers’ proficiency in teaching and learning with technology: An overview of relevant research literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.005
  • UNESCO. (2018). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers, Version 3, UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721.
  • Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001
  • Vucaj, I. (2022). Development and initial validation of Digital Age Teaching Scale (DATS) to assess application of ISTE Standards for Educators in K–12 education classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(2), 226–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1840461
  • Winter, E., Costello, A., O’Brien, M., & Hickey, G. (2021). Teachers’ use of technology and the impact of Covid-19. Irish Educational Studies, 40(2), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1916559
  • Xie, H., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Wang, C. C. (2019). Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017. Computers & Education, 140, 103599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103599
  • Xie, K., Vongkulluksn, V., Justice, L. M., & Logan, J. (2019). Technology acceptance in context: Preschool teachers’ integration of a technology-based early language and literacy curriculum. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 40(3), 275–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2019.1572678
  • Yilmaz, M. R. (2018). Augmented reality trends in education between 2016 and 2017 years. State of the art virtual reality and augmented reality know how. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74943