Development and assessment of the STEM storytellers program

References

• Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science. (2022). Retrieved June 9, 2021, from https://aldacenter.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Alda, A. (2017). If I understood you, would I have this look on my face? Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Alterio, M., & McDrury, J. (2003). Learning through storytelling in higher education (0 ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C., & Nisbet, M. (2013). How scientists view the public, the media and the political process. Public Understanding of Science, 22(6), 644–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511418743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock, O. M., Colón Amill, D., Shulman, H. C., & Dixon, G. N. (2019). Jargon as a barrier to effective science communication: Evidence from metacognition. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 845–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519865687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cafe Scientifique. (2022). Cafe Scientifique. http://cafescientifique.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Calarco, J. M. (2020). A field guide to grad school: Uncovering the hidden curriculum. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. (2003). The hero’s journey: Joseph Campbell on his life and work. New World Library.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S. N. (2021). The importance of storytelling in chemical education. Nature Chemistry, 13(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-020-00617-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corum, J. (2022). Design for an audience. http://style.org/ku/.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R. (2008). Constructing communication: Talking to scientists about talking to the public. Science Communication, 29(4), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008316222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2016). Narrative thinking and storytelling in science education. In Y. Hadzigeorgiou (Ed.), Imaginative science education (pp. 83–119). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshner, A. (2018). Graduate STEM education for the 21st century. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. C. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed). University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marteau, T. M., & Bekker, H. (1992). The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State—Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31(3), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb00997.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1978). Validity of the PRCA as an index of oral communication apprehension. Communication Monographs, 45(3), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757809375965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1982). An introduction to rhetorical communication (4th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, K. (2019). The Pixar Storytelling Formula. The Scientist Videographer. http://thescientistvideographer.com/wordpress/the-pixar-storytelling-formula/.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, C. (2009). Unscientific America. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, N. M., Weber, C. Q., Goldman, S. V., Schatz, D. L., Allen, S., & Menlove, R. (2019). Beyond the deficit model: The ambassador approach to public engagement. BioScience, 69(4), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, I. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for Reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerd Nite. (2022). Nerd Nite be there and be square. https://nerdnite.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, R. (2013). Connection: Hollywood storytelling meets critical thinking. Prairie Starfish Productions.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Reference. (2022). Oxford Reference. https://doi.org/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095615816.
   Google Scholar
• Pedro, H. (2021). Use of analogies in science education, a systematic mapping study. Comuter Science and Iformation Technology - CSCP 2021, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.5121/csit.2021.111008
   Google Scholar
• Podolefsky, N., & Finkelstein, N. (2007). Analogical scaffolding and the learning of abstract ideas in physics: Empirical studies. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, (3), 109-1–109-12. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020104
   Google Scholar
• Reincke, C. (2020). From deficit to dialogue in science communication. EMBO Reports, 21(9), e51278. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202051278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins Dudeck, T. (2018). Applied improvisation. Methuen Drama.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, L. M., Paul, G. D., & Shibley, L. R. (2012). The development and test of the public speaking competence rubric. Communication Education, 61(3), 205–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2012.670709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, E. A., Reinhold, A. M., Raile, E. D., Poole, G. C., Ready, R. C., Izurieta, C., McEvoy, J., Bergmann, N. T., & King, H. (2019). Data from: Characters matter: how narratives shape affective responses to risk communication (Version 6, p. 4577466 bytes) [dataset]. https://doi.org/10.5061/DRYAD.B8GTHT784.
   Google Scholar
• Skopeliti, I., Gerakaki, S., & Vosniadou, S. (2009, July 24). The role of analogies in college students’ understanding of counter-intuitive expository texts. Philosophy and History.
   Google Scholar
• Three Minute Thesis Queensland. (2022). https://threeminutethesis.uq.edu.au/.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Skopeliti, I. (2019). Evaluating the effects of analogy enriched text on the learning of science: The importance of learning indexes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(6), 732–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, N. (2021). improvPHYSation. Nancy Watt Communications. https://nancywattcomm.com/improvphysation/.
   Google Scholar
• Willoughby, S. D., Johnson, K., & Sterman, L. (2020). Quantifying scientific jargon. Public Understanding of Science, 29(6), 634–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520937436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar