Synthetic Biology and the Goals of Conservation

References

• Anthony, K., Bay, L. K., Costanza, R., Firn, J., Gunn, J., Harrison, P., Heyward, A., Lundgren, P., Mead, D., Moore, T., Mumby, P. J., van Oppen, M. J. H., Robertson, J., Runge, M. C., Suggett, D. J., Schaffelke, B., Wachenfeld, D., & Walshe, T. (2017). New interventions are needed to save coral reefs. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1(10), 1420. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0313-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J., & Fisher, A. C. (1974). Environmental preservation, uncertainty, and irreversibility. In C. Gopalakrishnan (Ed.), Classic papers in natural resource economics (pp. 76–84). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. (2019). How biological technology should inform the causal selection debate. Philosophy, Theory, & Practice in Biology, 11(20220112), 11. https://doi.org/10.3998/ptpbio.16039257.0011.002
   Google Scholar
• Bekessy, S. A., Wintle, B. A., Lindenmayer, D. B., Mccarthy, M. A., Colyvan, M., Burgman, M. A., & Possingham, H. P. (2010). The biodiversity bank cannot be a lending bank. Conservation Letters, 3(3), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00110.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, S. A., & Sismour, A. M. (2005). Synthetic biology. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6(7), 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blicharska, M., & Mikusiński, G. (2014). Incorporating social and cultural significance of large old trees in conservation policy. Conservation Biology, 28(6), 1558–1567. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, R. W., & Griffiths, A. D. (1994). Demographic variation and range contraction in the northern quoll, dasyurus hallucatus (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae). Wildlife Research, 21(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR9940203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramble, B. (2021). Painlessly killing predators. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 38(2), 217–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brister, E., & Newhouse, A. E. (2020). Not the same old chestnut: Rewilding forests with biotechnology. Environmental Ethics, 42(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics2020111614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch-Brown, J., & Archer, A. (2017). In Defense of Biodiversity. Biology and Philosophy, 32, 969–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-017-9587-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, E. (1757/1958). A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callender, C. (2021). On the horns of a dilemma: Let the northern white rhino vanish or intervene? Ethics, Policy & Environment, 26(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2021.1961199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBD. (1992) The convention on biological diversity. In UN conference on environment and development, Rio de Janeiro. The Convention on Biological Diversity. http://www.biodiv.org
   Google Scholar
• Ceballos, G., García, A., & Ehrlich, P. R. (2010). The sixth extinction crisis: Loss of animal populations and species. Journal of Cosmology, 8(1821), 31.
   Google Scholar
• Church, G. M., & Regis, E. (2014). Regenesis: How synthetic biology will reinvent nature and ourselves. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cleves, P. A., Tinoco, A. I., Bradford, J., Perrin, D., Bay, L. K., & Pringle, J. R. (2020). Reduced thermal tolerance in a coral carrying CRISPR-induced mutations in the gene for a heat-shock transcription factor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(46), 28899–28905. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920779117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cline, B. (2020). Irreplaceable design: On the non-instrumental value of biological variation. Ethics & the Environment, 25(2), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.25.2.03
   Google Scholar
• Cordell, H. K., Tarrant, M. A., & Green, G. T. (2003). Is the public viewpoint of wilderness shifting. International Journal of Wilderness, 9(2), 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Cronon, W. (1996). The trouble with wilderness: Or, getting back to the wrong nature. Environmental History, 1(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/3985059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature’s services. Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeLisi, C., Patrinos, A., MacCracken, M., Drell, D., Annas, G., Arkin, A., Church, G., Cook-Deegan, R., Jacoby, H., Lidstrom, M., Melillo, J., Milo, R., Paustian, K., Reilly, J., Roberts, R. J., Segrè, D., Solomon, S., Woolf, D., Wullschleger, S. D., & Yang, X. (2020). The role of synthetic biology in atmospheric greenhouse gas reduction: Prospects and challenges. BioDesign Research, 2020, 1016207. https://doi.org/10.34133/2020/1016207
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diehm, C. (2023). American Chestnut restoration: Accommodating others or scaling up? Ethics, Policy & Environment, 26(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2022.2133945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, R. (1982). Faking nature. Inquiry, 25(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748208601955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ereshefsky, M. (2007). Where the wild things are: Environmental preservation and human nature. Biology & Philosophy, 22(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-9023-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers, C. R., Wardropper, C. B., Branoff, B., Granek, E. F., Hirsch, S. L., Link, T. E. … Wilson, C. (2018). The ecosystem services and biodiversity of novel ecosystems: A literature review. Global Ecology and Conservation, 13, e00362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.e00362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faith, D. P. (1992). Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biological Conservation, 61(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faith, D. P. (2021). Biodiversity. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2021 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/biodiversity
   Google Scholar
• Frank, D. M. (2016). “Biodiversity” and biological diversities: Consequences of pluralism between biology and policy. In J. Garson, A. Plutynski, & S. Sarkar (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of biodiversity (pp. 100). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frankham, R. (1998). Inbreeding and extinction: Island populations. Conservation Biology, 12(3), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.96456.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritts, R. (2022). Cloning goes wild. Science, 375(6577), 134–137. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.acz9982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, D. G., Glass, J. I., Lartigue, C., Noskov, V. N., Chuang, R. Y., Algire, M. A. … Venter, J. C. (2010). Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome. Science, 329(5987), 52–56. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goeddel, D. V., Kleid, D. G., Bolivar, F., Heyneker, H. L., Yansura, D. G., Crea, R. … Riggs, A. D. (1979). Expression in Escherichia coli of chemically synthesized genes for human insulin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 76(1), 106–110. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.1.106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Baggethun, E., De Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1209–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, K., & Jansson, J. K. (1993). Ecological risk assessment of the deliberate release of genetically modified microorganisms. Ambio, 22(4), 236–242. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4314076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyngell, C., & Savulescu, J. (2017). Promoting biodiversity. Philosophy & Technology, 30(4), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0234-2
   Google Scholar
• Higgs, E. (2003). Nature by design: People, natural process, and ecological restoration. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, R. J., Arico, S., Aronson, J., Baron, J. S., Bridgewater, P., Cramer, V. A. … Zobel, M. (2006). Novel ecosystems: Theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00212.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, R. J., Higgs, E., & Harris, J. A. (2009). Novel ecosystems: Implications for conservation and restoration. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(11), 599–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobman, E. V., Mankad, A., Carter, L., Ruttley, C., & Voolstra, C. R. (2022). Genetically engineered heat-resistant coral: An initial analysis of public opinion. PLoS One, 17(1), e0252739. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ijäs, T., & Koskinen, R. (2021). Exploring biological possibility through synthetic biology. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00364-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly, C. J., Kelly, E., Gillespie, G. R., Phillips, B., & Webb, J. K. (2018). Out of the frying pan: Reintroduction of toad‐smart northern quolls to southern Kakadu National Park. Austral Ecology, 43(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaebnick, G. E., Gusmano, M. K., & Murray, T. H. (2014). The ethics of synthetic biology: Next steps and prior questions. Hastings Center Report, 44(S5), S4–S26. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.392
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kant, I. (1764/2003). Observations on the feeling of the beautiful and sublime. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karr, J. R. (1996). Ecological Integrity and Ecological Health Are Not The Same. In P. Schulze (Ed.), Engineering within Ecological Constraints (pp. 97–110). National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E. (1992). The big lie: Human restoration of nature. Research in Philosophy and Technology, 12, 231–241.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E. (2022). Considering de-extinction: Zombie arguments and the walking (and flying and swimming) dead. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 25(2), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2022.2071550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, E., & Phillips, B. L. (2019). Targeted gene flow and rapid adaptation in an endangered marsupial. Conservation Biology, 33(1), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolbert, E. (2021). Under a white sky: The nature of the future. Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Lean, C. H. (2017). Biodiversity realism: Preserving the tree of life. Biology & Philosophy, 32(6), 1083–1103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-017-9592-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lean, C. H. (2020). Why Wake the Dead? Identity and De-extinction. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 33, 571–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lean, C. H. (2021). Invasive species increase biodiversity and, therefore, services: An argument of equivocations. Conservation Science and Practice, 3(12), e553. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.553
   Google Scholar
• Lean, C. H. (2022). Authenticity and autonomy in de-extinction. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 25(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2022.2071553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lean, C., & Maclaurin, J. (2016). The value of phylogenetic diversity. In R. Pellens & P. Grandcolas (Eds.), Biodiversity conservation and phylogenetic systematics (pp. 19–37). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A. (2000). Ecological restoration and the culture of nature: A pragmatic perspective. In P. Gobster & B. Hull (Eds.), Restoring nature: Perspectives from the social sciences and humanities (pp. 49–70). Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, T. E. (1980). Changes in biological diversity. In G. O. Barney (Ed.), The global 2000 report to the President, vol. 2 (the technical report) (pp. 327–332). Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Maclaurin, J., & Sterelny, K. (2008). What is biodiversity?. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, D. S. (2012). What’s so good about biodiversity? (Vol. 19). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marris, E. (2011). Rambunctious garden: Saving nature in a post-wild world. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
   Google Scholar
• McShane, K. (2007). Why environmental ethics shouldn’t give up on intrinsic value. Environmental Ethics, 29(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics200729128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment report. Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minteer, B., & Collins, J. (2014). Ecosystems unbound: Ethical questions for an interventionist ecology. In R. Sandler (Ed.), Ethics and emerging technologies (pp. 456–469). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Minteer, B. A. (2015). The perils of de-extinction. Minding Nature, 8(1), 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Morar, N., Toadvine, T., & Bohannan, B. J. (2015). Biodiversity at twenty-five years: Revolution or red herring? Ethics, Policy & Environment, 18(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2015.1018380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, N. (1979). The sinking Ark. A new look at the problem of disappearing species. Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, B. J., Fraser, D., & Maloney, T. H. (2020). Transforming ocean conservation: Applying the genetic rescue toolkit. Genes, 11(2), 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11020209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, C. (2016). Saving species but losing wildness: Should we genetically adapt wild animal species to help them respond to climate change? Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 40(1), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/misp.12058
   Google Scholar
• Perring, M. P., Standish, R. J., & Hobbs, R. J. (2013). Incorporating novelty and novel ecosystems into restoration planning and practice in the 21st century. Ecological Processes, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-1709-2-18
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, B., & Hultgren, J. (2020). The case for a 21st Century wilderness ethic. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 23(2), 222–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2020.1848183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaggio, A. J., Segelbacher, G., Seddon, P. J., Alphey, L., Bennett, E. L., Carlson, R. H. … Wheeler, K. (2017). Is it time for synthetic biodiversity conservation? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 32(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. A., Newhouse, A. E., & Coffey, V. (2019). Developing blight-tolerant American Chestnut trees. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 11(7), a034587. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a034587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, C. J. (2014). Evolution and the deep past: Intrinsic responses to synthetic biology. In R. Sandler (Ed.), Ethics and emerging technologies (pp. 456–469). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, C. J. (2019). The synthetic age: Outdesigning evolution, resurrecting species, and reengineering our world. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redford, K. H., & Adams, W. M. (2021). Strange natures: Conservation in the era of synthetic biology. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, A. (2018). Ecologists try to speed up evolution to save Australian marsupial from toxic toads. Nature, 559(7714), 451–453. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05757-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rohwer, Y. (2022). Infringing upon environmental autonomy with the aim of enabling it. Environmental Ethics, 44(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics202251138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohwer, Y., & Marris, E. (2021). Ecosystem integrity is neither real nor valuable. Conservation Science and Practice, 3(4), e411. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.411
   Google Scholar
• Rolston, H. (1986). Philosophy gone wild: Essays in environmental ethics. Prometheus.
   Google Scholar
• Rylott, E. L., & Bruce, N. C. (2020). How synthetic biology can help bioremediation. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 58, 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltz, D., & Cohen, S. (2023). Naturalness and principle pluralism in conservation. Conservation Biology, 37(6), e14137. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Diego Zoo Alliance. (2022). NEWS RELEASE: Birth of cloned Przewalski’s foal offers genetic diversity for this endangered species. Retrieved January 30, 2023, from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PtvNhi7pbVML8X8zRaUJf8Ekyuh_SGR-/view
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, R. (2019). Should we engineer species in order to save them? Environmental Ethics, 41(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics201941323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, R. (2020). The ethics of genetic engineering and gene drives in conservation. Conservation Biology, 34(2), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santana, C. (2014). Save the planet: Eliminate biodiversity. Biology & Philosophy, 29(6), 761–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-014-9426-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, S. (2019). What should “biodiversity” be? In E. Casetta, J. M. da Silva, & D. Vecchia (Eds.), From assessing to conserving biodiversity: Conceptual and practical challenges (pp. 401–414). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Siipi, H. (2014). Authenticity of animals. In M. Oksanen & H. Siipi (Eds.), The ethics of animal re-creation and modification: Reviving, rewilding, restoring (pp. 22–39). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, M. (2021). Synthetic biology as a technoscience: The case of minimal genomes and essential genes. Studies in History & Philosophy of Science Part A, 85, 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleator, R. D. (2010). The story of mycoplasma mycoides JCVI-syn1. 0: The forty million dollar microbe. Bioengineered Bugs, 1(4), 231–232. https://doi.org/10.4161/bbug.1.4.12465
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soulé, M. E. (1985). What is conservation biology? BioScience, 35(11), 727–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terborgh, J. (1974). Preservation of natural diversity: The problem of extinction prone species. BioScience, 24(12), 715–722. https://doi.org/10.2307/1297090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, D. (2014). The restorationist argument for extinction reversal. In M. Oksanen & H. Siipi (Eds.), The ethics of animal re-creation and modification: Reviving, rewilding, restoring (pp. 40–59). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, D. (2022). Causal history, environmental art, and biotechnologically assisted restoration. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 25(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2022.2071557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, D., & Han, J. (2023). Living fossils and conservation values. Frontiers in Earth Sciences, 11, 1086066. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1086066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, D. D. (2017). De-extinction as artificial species selection. Philosophy & Technology, 30(4), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0232-4
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. (1996). The abstract wild. University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Wilderness Act. (1964). Périrrhantèria. Bulletin de correspondance hellénique, 88(2), 577. https://doi.org/10.3406/bch.1964.4986
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. (1988). Biodiversity. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zoderer, B. M., Carver, S., Tappeiner, U., & Tasser, E. (2020). Ordering ‘wilderness’: Variations in public representations of wilderness and their spatial distributions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 202, 103875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar