Willingness of farmers to participate in agri-environmental auctions in Finland

References

• Ajzen, I. (2002) Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 107–122. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall).
   Google Scholar
• Babcock, B., Lakshminarayan, B., Wu, J. & Zilberman, D. (1996) The economics of a public fund for environmental amenities: A study of CRP contracts. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78, 961–971. doi:10.2307/1243852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, C. D., Roberts, R. K., English, B. C. & Park, W. M. (1994) A logit analysis of participation in Tennessee's forest stewardship program. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 26(2), 463–472.
   Google Scholar
• Boon, T. E., Meilby, H., Thorsen, B. & Jellesmark, O. (2004) An empirically based typology of private forest owners in Denmark: Improving communication between authorities and owners. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19, 45–55. doi:10.1080/14004080410034056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B. B. & Hodge, I. D. (2006) Farmers’ preferences for new environmental policy instruments: Determining the acceptability of cross compliance for biodiversity benefits. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(3), 393–414. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00057.x
   Google Scholar
• Dedrick, J. P., Hall, T. E., Hull, I. V. & Johnson, J. E. (2000) The Forest BankTM: An experiment in managing fragmented forests. Journal of Forestry, 98(3), 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Defrancesco, E., Gatto, P., Runge, F. & Trestini, S. (2008) Factors affecting farmers’ participation in agri-environmental measures: A northern Italian perspective. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59, 114–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinola-Arrendondo, A. (2008) Green auction: A biodiversity study of mechanism design with externalities. Ecological Economics, 67, 175–183. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.04.014
   Google Scholar
• Ervin, C. A. & Ervin, D. E. (1982) Factors affecting the use of soil conservation practices: Hypotheses, evidence and policy implications. Land Economics, 58, 277–292. doi:10.2307/3145937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frondel, M., Lehmann, P. & Wätzold, F. (2012) The impact of information on landowners’ participation in voluntary conservation programs – Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence from an agri-environment program in Saxony, Germany. Land Use Policy, 29, 388–394. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gachter, S. & Fehr, E. (1999) Collective action as a social exchange. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organisation, 39, 341–369. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00045-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groth, M. (2008) An empirical examination of repeated auctions for biodiversity conservation contracts. University of Lüneburg Working Paper Series in Economics, no. 78. Leuphana Universität Lüneburg Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre.
   Google Scholar
• Hailu, A. & Schilizzi, S. (2004) Are auctions more efficient than fixed price schemes when bidders learn? Australian Journal of Management, 29(2), 147–168. doi:10.1177/031289620402900201
   Google Scholar
• Horne, P. (2006) Forest owners’ acceptance of incentive based policy instruments in forest biodiversity conservation – A choice experiment based approach. Silva Fennica, 40(1), 169–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iho, A., Ollikainen, M., Lankoski, J., Arovuori, K., Puustinen, M., Väisänen, S., Heliölä, J. & Kuussaari, M. (2011) Tarjouskilpailu maatalouden vesiensuojeluun ja luonnon-hoitoon: järjestelmän kehittely ja pilotointi. TARVEKE-hankkeen loppuraportti. MTT Raportti 33. (Auctions for agri-environmental contracts: designing and piloting the policy instrument). Available at: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-487-344-4
   Google Scholar
• Jack, B. K., Leimona, B. & FerraroP. J. (2008) A revealed preference approach to estimating supply curves for ecosystem services: Use of auctions to set payments for soil erosion control in Indonesia. Contributed Paper in Conservation Biology, 25(2), 359–367.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F. G., Wölfing, S. & Fuhrer, U. (1999) Environmental attitude and ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 1–19. doi:10.1006/jevp.1998.0107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karppinen, H. (2005) Forest owners choice of reforestation method: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Forest Policy and Economics, 7(3), 393–409. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2003.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Kauneckis, D. & York, M. A. (2009) An empirical evaluation of private landowner participation in voluntary forest conservation programs. Environmental Management, 44(3), 468–484. doi:10.1007/s00267-009-9327-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendra, A. & Hull, R. B. (2005) Motivations and behaviors of new forest owners in Virginia. Forest Science, 51, 142–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G. & Zeng, L. (2001a) Explaining rare events in international relationships. International Organization, 55(3), 693–715. doi:10.1162/00208180152507597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G. & Zeng, L. (2001b). Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9(2), 137–163. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a004868
   Google Scholar
• Klosowski, R., Stevens, T., Kittredge, D. & Dennis, D. (2001) Economic incentives for coordinated management of forest land: A case study of southern New England. Forest Policy and Economics, 2(1), 29–38. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(00)00035-6
   Google Scholar
• Korhonen, K., Hujala, T. & Kurttila, M. (2013) Diffusion of voluntary protection among family forest owners: Decision process and success factors. Forest Policy and Economics, 26, 82–90. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langpap, C. (2004) Conservation incentives programs for endangered species: An analysis of landowner participation. Land Economics, 80(3), 375–388. doi:10.2307/3654727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latacz-Lohmann, U. & Schilizzi, S. (2005) Auctions for Conservation Contracts: A Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature. Report to the Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/93853/0022574.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Latacz-Lohmann, U. & Schilizzi, S. (2007) Assessing the performance of conservation auctions: An experimental study. Land Economics, 83(4), 497–515.
   Google Scholar
• Latacz-Lohmann, U. & van der Hamsvoort, C. (1997) Auctioning conservation contracts: A theoretical analysis and an application. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79, 407–418. doi:10.2307/1244139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luzar, E. J. & Diagne, A. (1999) Participation in the next generation of agriculture conservation programs: The role of environmental attitudes. The Journal of Socio-economics, 28, 335–349. doi:10.1016/S1053-5357(99)00021-9
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, L. & Lovell, J. S. (2003) Combining spatial and survey data to explain participation in agricultural land preservation programs. Land Economics, 79(2), 259–276. doi:10.2307/3146870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynne, G. D. & Rola, L. R. (1988) Improving attitude–behaviour prediction models with economic variables: Farmer actions toward soil conservation. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 19–28. doi:10.1080/00224545.1988.9711680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynne, G. D., Shonkwiler, J. S. & Rola, L. R. (1988) Attitudes and farmer conservation behaviour. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70, 12–19. doi:10.2307/1241971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAVI. (2011) Mavi, maaseutuelinkeinohallinnon tietojärjestelmä. The Agency for Rural Affairs, Rural Business Administration Information Systems, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Maybery, D., Crase, L. & Gullifer, C. (2005) Categorizing farming values as economic, conservation and lifestyle. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 59–72. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2003.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntymaa, E., Juutinen, A., Mönkkönen, M. & Svento, R. (2009) Participation and compensation claims in voluntary forest conservation: A case of privately owned forests in Finland. Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 498–507. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2009.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J. A. (1989) Generalized Linear Models, 2nd ed. (New York: Chapman and Hall).
   Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P. (2004) Putting Auction Theory to Work (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Moon, K. & Cocklin, C. A. (2011) Participation in biodiversity conservation: Motivations and barriers of Australian landholders. Journal of Rural Studies, 27, 331–342. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myerson, R. B. (1981) Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research, 6, 58–73. doi:10.1287/moor.6.1.58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagubadi, V., McNamara, K. T., Hoover, W. L. & Mills, W. L. (1996) Program participation behaviour of nonindustrial forest landowners: A probit analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 28(2), 323–336.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, M. C. & Brown, G. (2011) Assessing conservation opportunity on private land: Socio-economic, behavioral, and spatial dimensions. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 2513–2523. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeson, A. F., Rodriguez, L. C., Whitten, S. M., Williams, K., Nolles, K., Windle, J. & Rolfe, J. (2011) Adapting auctions for the provision of ecosystem services at the landscape scale. Ecological Economics, 70, 1621–1627. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, P. A., Thompson, W. A. & Prokopy, S. L. (2012) The multi-dimensional nature of environmental attitudes among farmers in Indiana: Implications for conservation adoption. Agriculture and Human Values, 29, 29–40. doi:10.1007/s10460-011-9308-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross-Davis, A. L. & Broussard, S. R. (2007) A typology of family forest owners in North-Central Indiana. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 24, 282–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, R. (1989) Agricultural land values and rents under the Conservation Reserve Program. Land Economics, 2, 131–137. doi:10.2307/3146787
   Google Scholar
• Siikamäki, J. & Layton, D. (2007) Potential cost-effectiveness of incentive payment programs for the protection of non-industrial private forests. Land Economics, 83(4), 539–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderqvist, T. (2003) Are farmers prosocial? Determinants of the willingness to participate in a Swedish catchment-based wetlands creation program. Ecological Economics, 47(1), 105–120. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2002.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoneham, G., Chaudhri, V., Ha, A. & Strappazzon, L. (2003) Auctions for conservation contracts: An empirical examination of Victoria's BushTender trial. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47(4), 477–500. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2003.t01-1-00224.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, D. & Gillon, S. (2013) Scaling up to address new challenges to conservation on US farmland. Land Use Policy, 31, 223–236. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomz, M., King, G. & Zeng, L. (2003) RELOGIT: Rare Events Logistic Regression, Journal of Statistical Software, 8(2). http://www.jstatsoft.org/v08/i02
   Google Scholar
• van Putten, E. I., Jennings, M. S., Louviere, J. J. & Burgess, B. L. (2011) Tasmanian landowner preferences for conservation incentive programs: A latent class approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 2647–2656. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanslembrouck, I., van Huylenbroeck, G. & Verbeke, W. (2002) Determinants of the willingness of Belgian farmers to participate in agri-environmental measures. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53(3), 489–511. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2002.tb00034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vukina, T., Zheng, X., Marra, M. & Levy, A. (2008) Do farmers value the environment? Evidence from a conservation reserve program auction. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26, 1323–1332. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Wauters, E., Bielder, C., Govers, G. & Mathijs, E. (2010) Adoption of soil conservation practices in Belgium: An examination of the theory of planned behaviour in the agri-environmental domain. Land Use Policy, 27, 86–94. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. G. (1997) Factors influencing farmer participation in the environmentally sensitive areas scheme. Journal of Environmental Management, 50, 67–93. doi:10.1006/jema.1996.0095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, G., Crabtree, B. & Potts, J. (2001) Modelling farmer entry into the environmentally sensitive area schemes in Scotland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52(1), 65–82. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2001.tb00910.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D. & Flick, W. A. (2001) Stick, carrots and reforestation investment. Land Economics, 77, 443–456. doi:10.2307/3147135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar