Sodium sulfate and magnesium sulfate resistances of mortar with multi-binder systems of calcined kaolinite clay, fly ash, and limestone powder

References

• Tangtermsirikul S. Durability and mix design of concrete. Thailand: Printing House of Thammasat University; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Skalny J, Marcha J, Odler I. Sulfate attack on concrete. United Kingdom: St Edmundsbury Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Krammart P, Tangtermsirikul S. Expansion, strength reduction and weight loss of fly ash concrete in sulphate solution. ASEAN J Sci Technol Dev. 2004;21:373–390.
   Google Scholar
• Sirisawat I, Saengsoy W, Baingam L, et al. Durability and testing of mortar with interground fly ash and limestone cement in sulfate solutions. Constr Build Mater. 2014;64:39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen F, Gao J, Qi B, et al. Deterioration mechanism of plain and blended cement mortars partially exposed to sulfate attack. Constr Build Mater. 2017;154:849–856. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Z, Ferreiro S, Lothenbach B, et al. Sulfate resistance of calcined clay–limestone–Portland cements. Cem Concr Res. 2019;116:238–251. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen TBT, Saengsoy W, Tangtermsirikul S. Effect of initial moisture of wet fly ash on workability and compressive strength of mortar and concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2018;183:408–416. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaewmanee K, Krammart P, Sumranwanich T, et al. Effect of free lime content on properties of cement-fly ash mixtures. Constr Build Mater. 2013;38:829–836. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanna S, Saengsoy W, Toochinda P, et al. Effects of sand powder on sulfuric acid resistance, compressive strength, cost benefits, and CO2 reduction of high CaO fly ash concrete. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2020;2020:1–12. doi: 10.1155/2020/3284975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrivener K, Martirena F, Bishnoi S, et al. Calcined clay limestone cement (LC3). Cem Concr Res. 2018;114:49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollanders S, Adriaens R, Skibsted J, et al. Pozzolanic reactivity of pure calcined clays. Appl Clay Sci. 2016;132–133:552–560. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2016.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma M, Bishnoi S, Martirena F, et al. Limestone calcined clay cement and concrete: a state-of-the-art review. Cem Concr Res. 2021;149:106564. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zunino F, Dhandapani Y, Haha MB, et al. Hydration and mixture design of calcined clay blended cement: review by the RILEM TC 282-CCL. Mater Struct. 2022;55(9):234. doi: 10.1617/s11527-022-02060-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avet F, Scrivener K. Investigation of the calcined kaolinite content on the hydration of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3). Cem Concr Res. 2018;107:124–135. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhandapani Y, Sakthivel T, Santhanam M, et al. Mechanical properties and durability performance of concretes with limestone calcined clay cement (LC3). Cem Concr Res. 2018;107:136–151. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreiro S, Herfort D, Damtoft JS. Effect of raw clay type, fineness, water-to-cement ratio and fly ash addition on workability and strength performance of calcined clay–limestone Portland cements. Cem Concr Res. 2017;101:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasuwanich P, Kuentag C. Clay deposits of Thailand. Proceedings of Geology and Mineral Resources of Thailand; 1983 Nov 19–28; Bangkok, Thailand. Department of Mineral Resources: Thailand; 1983. p. 220–225.
   Google Scholar
• Sudswong C, Saengsoy W, Sinthupinyo S, et al. Study on properties of mortars and concretes containing calcined clay in combination with fly ash and limestone powder. Proceedings of the 3rd ACF Symposium 2019 Assessment and Intervention of Existing Structures; 2019 Sep 10–11; Sapporo, Japan. Asian Concrete Federation, Japan Concrete Institute, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University: Japan; 2019. pp. S1-2-3.
   Google Scholar
• Kijjanon A, Sumranwanich T, Saengsoy W, et al. Chloride penetration resistance, electrical resistivity, and compressive strength of binary and ternary binder concrete with calcined kaolinite clay, fly ash and limestone powder. J Mater Civ Eng. 2023;35(3):04022462. doi: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0004643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou W, Liu J, Liu Z, et al. Calcium transfer process of cement paste for ettringite formation under different sulfate concentrations. Constr Build Mater. 2022;384:128706. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128706.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C150. Standard specification for Portland cement, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA., 2007.
   Google Scholar
• TIS 15-2555. Portland cement part 1 specification. Thai Industrial Standard, Bangkok, Thailand, 2012. (in Thai).
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C618. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete, Annaul Book of ASTM Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., 2019.
   Google Scholar
• TIS 2135-2545. Coal fly ash for use as an admixture in concrete, Thai Industrial Standard, Bangkok, Thailand, 2002. (in Thai); 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Zhang Y, He S, et al. Rheology control of limestone calcined clay cement pastes by modifying the content of fine-grained metakaolin. J Sustain Cement Based Mater. 2023;12(9):1126–1140. doi: 10.1080/21650373.2023.2169965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui H, Hou P, Liu Y, et al. Limestone calcined clay cement: mechanical properties, crystallography, and microstructure development. J Sustain Cement Based Mater. 2022;12(4):427–440. doi: 10.1080/21650373.2022.2074911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BS 1881-116. Method for determination of compressive strength of concrete cubes, British Standards Institution, London, United Kingdom, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C109/C 109M. Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (using 2-in. or [50-mm] cube specimens). Annual book of ASTM standards, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., 2007.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C1012. Standard test method for length change of hydraulic-cement mortars exposed to a sulfate solution, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, U.S.A. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C490. Standard practice for use of apparatus for the determination of length change of hardened cement paste, mortar and concrete. Annual book of ASTM Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., 2007.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C267. Standard test method for chemical resistance of mortars, grouts, and monolithic surfacings and polymer concrete. Annual book of ASTM Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ayati B, Newport D, Wong H, et al. Low-carbon cements: potential for low-grade calcined clays to form supplementary cementitious materials. Clean Mater. 2022;5:100099. doi: 10.1016/j.clema.2022.100099.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan S, Emmanuel AC, Bishnoi S. Hydration and phase assemblage of ternary cements with calcined clay and limestone. Constr Build Mater. 2019;222:64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhandapani Y, Santhanam M. Assessment of pore structure evolution in the limestone calcined clay cementitious system and its implications for performance. Cem Conc Compos. 2017;84:36–47. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mindess S, Young JF, Darwin D. Concrete. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Hooton RD. Concrete and durability and sustainability as influenced by resistance to fluid ingress and selection of cementitious materials. Proceeding of the 6th International Conference on Concrete under Severe Conditions (CONSEC'10); 2010 Jun 7–9; Merida Yucatan, Mexico. Pedro Castro-Borges: CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, United States; pp. 99–114.
   Google Scholar
• Cordoba G, Sposito R, Köberl M, et al. Chloride migration and long-term natural carbonation on concrete with calcined clays: a study of calcined clays in Argentina. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2022;17:e01190. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01190.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang W, et al. Study on sulfate resistance of concrete with initial damage under drying–wetting cycles. J Sustain Cement Based Mater. 2018;7(5):311–322. doi: 10.1080/21650373.2018.1499564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menéndez E, García-Rovés R, Aldea B, et al. Combination of immersion and semi-immersion tests to evaluate concretes manufactured with sulfate-resisting cements. J Sustain Cement Based Mater. 2019;8(6):337–352. doi: 10.1080/21650373.2019.1624659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lothenbach B, Bary B, Bescop PL, et al. Sulfate ingress in Portland cement. Cem Concr Res. 2010;40(8):1211–1225. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen TBT, Chatchawan R, Saengsoy W, et al. Influences of different types of fly ash and confinement on performances of expansive mortars and concretes. Constr Build Mater. 2019;209:176–186. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizzozero J, Scrivener KL. Limestone reaction in calcium aluminate cement–calcium sulfate systems. Cem Concr Res. 2015;76:159–169. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.05.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu C, Li Z, Liu J. Degradation of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) mortars under sulfate attack. Low Carbon Mater Green Constr. 2023;1(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s44242-022-00003-1.
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Li J, Ren Q, et al. Degradation mechanism of blended cement pastes in sulfate-bearing environments under applied electric field: sulfate attack vs. decalcification. Compos B. 2022;246(110255):110255. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110255.
   Google Scholar
• Zunino F, Scrivener K. The reaction between metakaolin and limestone and its effect in porosity refinement and mechanical properties. Cem Concr Res. 2021;140:106307. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Yan P. Effect of limestone powder on microstructure of concrete. J Wuhan Univ Technol Mater Sci Ed. 2010;25(2):328–331. doi: 10.1007/s11595-010-2328-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aye T, Oguchi CT. Resistance of plain and blended cement mortars exposed to severe sulfate attacks. Constr Build Mater. 2011;25(6):2988–2996. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang G, Wu C, Hou D, et al. Effect of environmental pH values on phase composition and microstructure of Portland cement paste under sulfate attack. Compos B. 2021;216:108862. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Wang Y, Zhang Z, et al. Recent progress of utilization of activated kaolinitic clay in cementitious construction materials. Compos B. 2021;211:108636. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng P, Miao C, Bullard JW. Factors influencing the stability of AFm and AFt in the Ca–Al–S–O–H system at 25 °C. J Am Ceram Soc. 2015;99(3):1031–1041. doi: 10.1111/jace.13971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar