Publication Cover
PsyEcology
Bilingual Journal of Environmental Psychology / Revista Bilingüe de Psicología Ambiental
Volume 14, 2023 - Issue 3
62
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Impact of the perceived sensory dimensions of an atypical environment on perceived environmental restorativeness (Impacto de las dimensiones sensoriales percibidas de un ambiente atípico sobre la percepción de restauración ambiental)

Pages 389-410 | Received 05 Nov 2022, Accepted 14 Jun 2023, Published online: 29 Aug 2023

References / Referencias

  • Akpınar, A. (2021). How perceived sensory dimensions of urban green spaces are associated with teenagers’ perceived restoration, stress, and mental health? Landscape and Urban Planning, 214, 104185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104185
  • Balling, J. D., & Falk, J. H. (2009). Evolutionary influence on human landscape preference. Environment and Behaviour, 42(4), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509341244
  • Carrus, G., Lafortezza, R., Colangelo, G., Dentamaro, I., Scopelliti, M., & Sanesi, G. (2013). Relations between naturalness and perceived restorativeness of different urban green spaces. PsyEcology, 4(3), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1174/217119713807749869
  • CONABIO. ( s.f.). Ecosistemas de México, Matorrales. Biodiversidad mexicana. Retrieved December 25, 2022, from https://www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/ecosistemas/Matorral
  • Del Carmen-Robles, E. H., Andaverde-Vega, A. A., & Tirado-Medina, H. (2022). Caracterización desde la psicología ambiental de un ecosistema atípico en áreas verdes urbanas: Discutiendo la relevancia de los factores ecobiológicos en ambientes salutogénicos. Decumanus, 8(8), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.20983/decumanus.2022.1.3
  • Ellis, E. C., Beusen, A. H. W., & Goldewijk, K. K. (2020). Anthropogenic biomes: 10,000 BCE to 2015 CE. Land, 9(5), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9050129
  • Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2007). Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters, 3(4), 390–394. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149
  • Graciano-Ávila, G., Alanis, E., Treviño, E., González, M., Rubio-Camacho, E., & Mata, J. (2018). Caracterización y estructura florística de un grupo funcional vegetal del matorral espinoso tamaulipeco. Gayana – Botanica, 75(1), 512–523. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-66432018000100512
  • Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2010). The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning, 94(3–4), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.012
  • Hartig, T., Korpela, K., Evans, G. W., & Gärling, T. (1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 14(4), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02815739708730435
  • Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35(1), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
  • Haviland-Jones, J., Rosario, H. H., Wilson, P., & McGuire, T. R. (2005). An environmental approach to positive emotion: flowers. Evolutionary Psychology, 3(1), 104–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490500300109
  • Honold, J., Lakes, T., Beyer, R., & van der Meer, E. (2016). Restoration in urban spaces: Nature views from home, greenways, and public parks. Environment and Behavior, 48(6), 796–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514568556
  • Ivarsson, C. T., & Hagerhall, C. M. (2008). The perceived restorativeness of gardens – Assessing the restorativeness of a mixed built and natural scene type. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 7(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2008.01.001
  • Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
  • Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature. A psychological perspective. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
  • Malekinezhad, F., & Bin Lamit, H. (2017). Investigation into restoration experience: The effects of perceived sensory dimension and perceived restorativeness. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201708.0085.v1
  • Markevych, I., Schoeierer, J., Hartig, T., Chudnovsky, A., Hystade, P., Dzhambovf, A. M., de Vries, S., Triguero-Mash, & Fuertes, E. (2017). Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance. Environmental Research, 158, 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028
  • Martínez-Soto, J., de la Fuente, L. A., & Ruiz Correa, S. (2021). Exploring the links between biophilic and restorative qualities of exterior and interior spaces in Leon, Guanajuato, Mexico. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(717116), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717116
  • Martínez-Soto, J., & González-Santos, L. (2020). Affective psychological restoration through mediated exposure to the environment (Restauración psicológica afectiva a partir de la exposición mediada del ambiente). PsyEcology, 11(3), 289–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2020.1730133
  • Martínez-Soto, J., González-Santos, L., & Barrios, F. A. (2014). Affective and restorative valences for three environmental categories. Perceptual and Motor Skills: Perception, 119(3), 901–923. https://doi.org/10.2466/24.50.PMS.119c29z4
  • Martínez-Soto, J., & Montero y López-Lena, M. E. (2008). Escala de restauración ambiental percibida EPRA: Diferencias por edad y sexo en muestras de adolescentes y adultos mexicanos. In B. Rodríguez & M. Chapin (Eds.), Linking differences/defining actions: proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association (pp. 70–77). EDRA.
  • Memari, S., Pazhouhanfar, M., & Nourtaghani, A. (2017). Relationship between perceived sensory dimensions and stress restoration in care settings. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 26, 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.06.003
  • Molina-Guerra, V. M., Mora-Olivo, A., Alanís-Rodríguez, E., Soto-Mata, B. E., & Patiño-Flores, A. M. (2019). Plantas características del matorral espinoso tamaulipeco en México. Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo Léon.
  • Peron, E., Berto, R., & Purcell, T. (2002). Restorativeness, preference and the perceived naturalness of places. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano, 3(1), 19–34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284578875_Restorativeness_preference_and_the_perceived_naturalness_of_places
  • Peschard, K. K., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2013). Associations between park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small public urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 112, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.013
  • Peschardt, K. K. (2014). Health promoting pocket parks in a landscape architectural perspective [Doctoral Dissertation]. Departamento de Geociencias y Manejo de Recursos Naturales, University of Copenhagen.
  • Qiu, L., Chen, Q., & Gao, T. (2021). The effects of urban natural environments on preference and self-reported psychological restoration of the elderly. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(509), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020509
  • Rodríguez, J. P., Rodríguez-Clark, K. M., Baillie, J. M., Ash, N., Benson, J., Boucher, T., Brown, C., Burgess, N. D., & Zamin, T. (2011). Definición de Categorías de UICN para Ecosistemas Amenazados. Conservation Biology, 25(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01598.x
  • Sánchez, S., Flores, A., Cruz-Leyva, I. A., & Velázquez, A. (2009). Estado y transformación de los ecosistemas terrestres por causas humanas. In J. Sarukhán (Ed.), Capital natural de México (Vol. II, pp. 75–129). CONABIO. Estado de conservación y tendencias de cambio.
  • Sidenius, U. (2017). The Therapy Garden Nacadia®: The interplay between evidence-based health design in landscape architecture, nature-based therapy and the individual ( Doctoral Dissertation). Departamento de Geociencias y Manejo de Recursos Naturales, University of Copenhagen.
  • Stoltz, J. (2020). Perceived sensory dimensions. A human centred approach to environmental planning and design [Doctoral Dissertation]. Departamento de Geografía Física, Stockholm University.
  • Sullivan, W., & Kaplan, R. (2015). Nature! Small steps that can make a big difference. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9(2), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586715623664
  • Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85–125). Plenum Press.
  • Vujčić, M. J., & Tomićević-Dubljevi, J. (2018). Urban forest benefits to the younger population: The case study of the city of Belgrade, Serbia. Forest Policy and Economics, 96, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.006
  • Wang, R., Zhao, J., Meitner, M. J., Hu, Y., & Xu, X. (2019). Characteristics of urban green spaces in relation to aesthetic preference and stress recovery. Urban Forestry & Urban Greenery, 41, 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.005
  • Zhu, Z., Hassan, A., Wang, W., & Chen, Q. (2022). Relationship between PSD of park green space and attention restoration in dense urban areas. Brain Sciences, 12(6), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12060721

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.