Recontextualising the teaching learning cycle within engineering education to improve the development of written communication skills

References

• Beck, A. 2004. “Collaborative Teaching, Genre Analysis, and Cognitive Apprenticeship: Engineering a Linked Writing Course.” Teaching English in the Two-Year College 31 (4): 388–398.
   Google Scholar
• Berdanier, C. G. P. 2019. “Genre Maps as a Method to Visualize Engineering Writing and Argumentation Patterns.” Journal of Engineering Education 108 (3): 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertel, L. B., M. Winther, H. W. Routhe, and A. Kolmos. 2022. “Framing and Facilitating Complex Problem-Solving Competences in Interdisciplinary Megaprojects: An Institutional Strategy to Educate for Sustainable Development.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 23 (5): 1173–1191. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2020-0423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodnar, C., and J. Kadlowec. 2018. “Initial Validation of a Technical Writing Rubric for Engineering Design.” International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJep) 8 (1): 81–91. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v8i1.7728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boettger, R. K., and S. Wulff. 2016. “‘Using Authentic Language Data to Teach Discipline-Specific Writing Patterns to STEM Students’.” In Proceedings of the 2016 International Professional Communication Conference, Austin, Texas, IEEE, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Bonk, R. J., P. T. Imhoff, and A. H. D. Cheng. 2002. “Integrating Written Communication within Engineering Curricula.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 128 (4): 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2002)128:4(152).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and N. Falchikov. 2006. “Aligning Assessment with Long-Term Learning.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 31 (4): 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679050.
   Google Scholar
• Breeze, R., and C. S. Guinda. 2017. “Genre-Based Strategies for Integrating Critical and Creative Thinking in Engineering and Journalism.” ESP Today 5 (2): 196–221. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2017.5.2.4.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, I.I. Cameron, C. Crosthwaite, B. Foley, T. Goldfinch, R. Hadgraft, and D. Hargreves. 2021. Engineering Change: The Future of Engineering Education in Australia. Australia: Australian Council of Engineering Deans.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, I., C. Reidsema, and R. Hadgraft. 2011. “‘Australian Engineering Academe: A Snapshot of Demographics and Attitudes’.” In The Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Fremantle, Western Australia, 107–113.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael, S., K.-Y. Wu, and J. Lee. 2012. “Designing and Evaluating a Genre-Based Technical Communication Course Incorporating a Task-Based Model of Instruction.” Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics 14 (2): 20–44.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, C. 2011. “Changing Engineering Curriculum in the Globalizing World.” New Horizons in Education 59 (3): 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Clippinger, D., K. Jernquist, S. Nozaki, and F. Nitterright 2019, ‘Improving Undergraduate STEM Writing Through Common Language as a Tool to Teach Engineering “Dialects”’, paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education 126th Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June 16-19.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J. 2010, ‘Engineers Learn to Write: Coaching the Art of Noticing with Writing Samples’, Poster session presented at the IEEE International Professional Comunication Conference, Enschede, Netherlands, June 7-9.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, S. 2018. “The Use of Passives and Impersonal Style in Civil Engineering Writing.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 32 (1): 38–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917729864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, M. J., and D. I. Hanauer, eds. 2014. Language, Literacy, and Learning in STEM Education: Research Methods and Perspectives from Applied Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• De Oliveira, L. C., and J. Iddings, eds. 2014. Genre Pedagogy Across the Curriculum: Theory and Application in U.S. Classrooms and Contexts. Sheffield: Sheffield Equinox Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Derewianka, B., and P. Jones. 2016. Teaching Language in Context. 2nd ed. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dettmers, J., and M. Brassler. 2017. “How to Enhance Interdisciplinary Competence – Interdisciplinary Problem-Based Learning versus Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 11 (2): 12. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1686.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, D. 2001. “Object-Centered – How Engineering Writing Embodies Objects: A Study of Four Engineering Documents.” Technical Communication 48 (3): 297–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, S., S. Humphrey, A. Mahboob, and J. R. Martin. 2016. Genre Pedagogy in Higher Education: The SLATE Project. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New york: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Drury, H., and P. Mort. 2012. “Developing Student Writing in Science and Engineering: The Write Reports in Science and Engineering (WRiSe) Project.” Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i0.183.
   Google Scholar
• Durrant, P. 2014. “Discipline and Level Specificity in University students’ Written Vocabulary.” Applied Linguistics 35 (3): 328–356. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrant, P. 2017. “Lexical Bundles and Disciplinary Variation in University students’ Writing: Mapping the Territories.” Applied Linguistics 38 (2): 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sakran, T., and A. Awad. 2012. “Voices from the United Arab Emirates: Engineering graduates’ Labour Market Requisite Competencies.” American Journal of Engineering Education (AJEE) 3 (2): 105–114. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajee.v3i2.7441.
   Google Scholar
• Engineers Australia. 2019. Stage 1 Competency Standard for Professional Engineers. Engineers Australia, Australia. viewed 1 May 2023. https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/sites/default/files/2019-11/Stage1_Competency_Standards.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fakhruddin, W. F. W. W., and A. Attan. 2013. “Putting Knowledge Gained into Practice in Civil Engineering Lab Reports.” Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences 70:1501–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.218.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. 2012. “Genres and Registers of Student Report Writing: An SFL Perspective on Texts and Practices.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11 (1): 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. 2016. “A Genre-Instantiation Approach to Teaching English for Specific Academic Purposes: Student Writing in Business, Economics and Engineering.” Writing and Pedagogy 8 (1): 149–176. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v8i1.27934.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S., and X. Xu. 2019. “Engineering Registers in the 21st Century: SFL Perspectives on Online Publications.” Language, Context and Text 1 (1): 65–101. https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00004.gar.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, A., and N. Millar. 2018. “The Language of Civil Engineering Research Articles: A Corpus-Based Approach.” English for Specific Purposes 51:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, C. S., and E. B. Moje. 2017. “Learning from the Professions: Examining How, Why, and When Engineers Read and Write.” Theory into Practice 56 (4): 300–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2017.1350491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, R., K. Willey, and D. Boud. 2019. “Investigating Invisible Writing Practices in the Engineering Curriculum Using Practice Architectures.” European Journal of Engineering Education 44 (1–2): 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1405241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadgraft, R. G., and A. Kolmos. 2020. “Emerging Learning Environments in Engineering Education.” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 25 (1): 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2020.1713522.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, G. P., D. E. Macpherson, and D. A. Williams. 2007. “Promoting Interdisciplinarity in Engineering Teaching.” European Journal of Engineering Education 32 (3): 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790701276775.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, J. 2015. “Introduction to Authentic Learning.” In Activity Theory, Authentic Learning and Emerging Technologies, edited by V. Bozalek, et al., 61–67. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, S., J. R. Martin, S. Dreyfus, and A. Mahboob. 2010. “The 3x3: Setting Up a Linguistic Toolbox for Teaching Academic Writing.’.” In Directions in Appliable Linguistics, edited by A. Mahboob and N. Knight, 185–199. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. 2018. “Developing Graduate Career Readiness in Australia: Shifting from Extra-Curricular Internships to Work-Integrated Learning.” International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning 19 (1): 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Jamison, A., A. Kolmos, and J. E. Holgaard. 2014. “Hybrid Learning: An Integrative Approach to Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 103 (2): 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim, A., M. Campbell, and M. Hasan. 2020. “A New Method of Integrating Project‐Based and Work‐Integrated Learning in Postgraduate Engineering Study.” The Curriculum Journal 31 (1): 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1659839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, R. 2008. Engineers for the Future: Addressing the Supply and Quality of Australian Engineering Graduates for the 21st Century. Sydney: Australian Council of Engineering Deans.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, J. 1984. “Can Engineers Write?” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 27 (1): 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.1984.6448762.
   Google Scholar
• Kolmos, A., R. G. Hadgraft, and J. E. Holgaard. 2015. “Response strategies for curriculum change in engineering.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 26 (3): 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9319-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydens, J. A. 2004, ‘Through the eyes of engineers: Writing in engineering contexts’ PhD thesis, Colorado State University, Colorado, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, <https://www.proquest.com/openview/55724f0ec1b4cf6ab80ea066a67ecada/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y>.
   Google Scholar
• Leydens, J. A. 2012. “Sociotechnical Communication in Engineering: An Exploration and Unveiling of Common Myths.” Engineering Studies 4 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2012.662851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebelt, M., S. Eglinton-Warner, W. Soong, S. F. Al-Sarawi, N. Brian, B. Phillips, and M. Sorell 2017, ‘An Engineering Approach to Engineering Curriculum Design’, in Proceedings of the 2017 Australiasian Association for Engineering Education, Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Manly, Sydney, 777–784.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, P., and S. Milligan. 2019. “Teaching Master Thesis Writing to Engineers: Insights from Corpus and Genre Analysis of Introductions.” English for Specific Purposes 55:40–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makhathini, T. 2016. “Work Integrated Learning Competencies: Industrial supervisors’ Perspectives.” Perspectives in Education 34 (3): 56–71. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v34i3.5.
   Google Scholar
• Male, S. A., M. B. Bush, and E. S. Chapman. 2010. “Perceptions of Competency Deficiencies in Engineering Graduates.” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 16 (1): 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2010.11464039.
   Google Scholar
• Male, S. A., M. B. Bush, and E. S. Chapman. 2015. “Understanding generic engineering competencies.” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 17 (3): 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2011.11464064.
   Google Scholar
• Male, S. A., and R. King. 2019. “Enhancing Learning Outcomes from Industry Engagement in Australian Engineering Education.” Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability 10 (1): 101–117. https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2019vol10no1art792.
   Google Scholar
• Mandal, N. K., and F. R. Edwards. 2022. “Student Work Readiness in Australian Engineering Workplaces Through Work Integrated Learning.” Higher Education, Skills & Work-Based Learning 12 (1): 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-02-2021-0025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, B. 1997. “How Engineers Write: An Empirical Study of Engineering Report Writing.” Applied Linguistics 18 (2): 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. E., A. Nyamapfene, K. Roach, and E. Tilley. 2021. “Faculty Wide Curriculum Reform: The Integrated Engineering Programme.” European Journal of Engineering Education 46 (1): 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1593324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, C. S., A. Patil, and P. Mertova. 2009. “Re-engineering graduate skills - a case study.” European Journal of Engineering Education 34 (2): 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790902829281.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, W. T. 2000, ‘The acceptability of writing by second language engineering students: acculturating to a profession’, PhD thesis, Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Spectrum Research Repository, https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/1273/.
   Google Scholar
• Paltridge, B., and A. Phakiti, eds. 2015. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Resource. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, C.-J., D. Peach, C. Pocknee, F. Webb, M. Fletcher, and G. Pretto 2009, The WIL (Work Integrated Learning) Report: A National Scoping Study, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Pinelli, T. E. 1995. “From Student to Entry-Level Professional: Examining the Role of Language and Written Communications in the Reacculturation of Aerospace Engineering Students.” Technical Communication 42 (3): 492–503.
   Google Scholar
• Poltavtchenko, E. 2013, ‘Engineering design reports in upper-division undergraduate engineering courses and in the workplace’, PhD thesis, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, https://www.proquest.com/openview/fe7e44ef763b3a3015ae210ab2c5454e/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, K., E. Tilley, and J. Mitchell. 2018. “How Authentic Does Authentic Learning Have to Be?” Higher Education Pedagogies 3 (1): 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1462099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, C., and G. Blair. 1995. “Writing Skills Training for Engineering Students in Large Classes.” The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning 30 (1): 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D., and J. R. Martin. 2012. Learning to Write, Reading to Learn: Genre, Knowledge and Pedagogy in the Sydney School. Bristol & Sheffield, UK: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Rothery, J. 1994. Exploring Literacy in School English, Vol 4, Write It Right Resources for Literacy and Learning. Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
   Google Scholar
• Rus, D. 2015. “Developing Technical Writing Skills to Engineering Students.” Procedia Technology 19:1109–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2015.02.158.
   Google Scholar
• Sales, H. E. 2002, ‘Engineering texts: A student of a community of aerospace engineers, their writing practices, and technical proposals’, PhD thesis, The University of Bermingham, Birmingham, University of Birminham eTheses Repository, <https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/241/1/Sales02PhD.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• Sales, H. E. 2006. Professional Communication in Engineering. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson-Smith, C. 2020. “Writing for Engineering.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 43 (1): 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.19009.sim.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson-Smith, C. 2021a. “Persuasion in Engineering Reports: Evaluative Resources and Targets in practice’.” Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics 12 (6): 6–21.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson-Smith, C. 2021b, ‘Writing Objectively: Functional Grammar as a Tool to Improve Engineering students’ Writing Style’, in Refereed proceedings of the Research in Engineering Education Symposium & Australasian Association for Engineering Eduation Conference, Australasian Association for Engineering Education, https://aaee.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/REES_AAEE_2021_paper_214.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson-Smith, C. 2022, ‘The Invisible Author? Factors Impacting Authorial Presence in Professional Engineering Written Reports’, in the Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Australiasian Association for Engineering Education, <https://aaee.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/The-invisible-author-Factors-impacting-authorial-presence-in-professional-engineering-written-reports.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson-Smith, C. 2023, ‘How Much Wriggle Room? Engagement as a Critical Resource In Engineering Discourse’, in V. To, T. Amundrud, and S. Humphrey edited by, Systemic functional linguistics theory and application in global contexts: Selected papers from the 1st International Online Systemic Functional Linguistics Interest Group Conference, University of Tasmania, Hobart.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, Z., and S. von Solms. 2019. “Project-Based Learning.” In Projects as Socio-Technical Systems in Engineering Education, edited by J. Meyer, Z. Simpson, and S. von Solms, 15–26. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Small, L., K. Shacklock, and T. Marchant. 2018. “Employability: A Contemporary Review for Higher Education Stakeholders.” Journal of Vocational Education & Training 70 (1): 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2017.1394355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. 2003. “The Role of Technical Expertise in Engineering and Writing Teachers’ Evaluations of Students’ Writing.” Written Communication 20 (1): 37–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303253570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, P. and Grant, L. 2018.““We mainly deal with maths”: New Zealand engineering lecturers’ and students’ perceptions of ‘engineering writing’.” New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics 24 (2): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• van Emden, J. 2005. Writing for Engineers. 3rd ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, K. 1999. “Using Genre Theory to Teach Students Engineering Lab Report Writing: A Collaborative Approach.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 42 (1): 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/47.749363.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, E., and L. Rusznyak. 2016. “Approaches to Assessing Pre-Service teachers’ Learning in Authentic and Rigorous Ways: The Case of an Inclusive Education Module.” Perspectives in Education 34 (1): 84–101. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v34i1.7.
   Google Scholar
• Warin, B., O. Talbi, C. Kolski, and F. Hoogstoel. 2016. “Multi-Role Project (MRP): A New Project-Based Learning Method for STEM.” IEEE Transactions on Education 59 (2): 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2015.2462809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson-Lopez, A., and S. Gregory. 2015. “Integrating Literacy and Engineering Instruction for Young Learners.” The Reading Teacher 69 (1): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingate, U. 2006. “Doing away with ‘study skills’’.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (4): 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600874268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winsor, D. A. 1990. “Engineering Writing/Writing Engineering.” College Composition and Communication 41 (1): 58. https://doi.org/10.2307/357883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winsor, D. A. 1998. “Rhetorical Practices in Technical Work.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 12 (3): 343–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651998012003004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winsor, D. A. 1999. “Genre and Activity Systems.” Written Communication 16 (2): 200–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088399016002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winsor, D. A. 2006. “Using Writing to Structure Agency: An Examination of engineers’ Practice.” Technical Communication Quarterly 15 (4): 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1504_1.
   Google Scholar
• Yong, E., and P. J. Ashman. 2019. “Integration of the Structured Development of Communication Skills within a Chemical Engineering Curriculum at the University of Adelaide.” Education for Chemical Engineers 27:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H. 2008. “Contextualize Technical Writing Assessment to Better Prepare Students for Workplace Writing: Student-Centered Assessment Instruments.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 38 (3): 265–284. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.38.3.e.
   Google Scholar