Strategies for maintaining academic integrity in remote unproctored and proctored online assessments for engineering courses

References

• Alejandro Molina, O. M., Limones, G., Aviles, A., & Madrid, E. (2020). MOOC assessment: A comparison between online assessment and face to face practical assessment. In 2020 IEEE Learning with MOOCS (LWMOOCS), 2020, Antigua Guatemala, Guatemala, 105–111.
   Google Scholar
• Alhazmi, A. K., Zafar, H., & Al-Hammadi, F. (2015). Framework for integrating outcome-based assessment in online assessment: Research in progress. In 2015 Science and Information Conference (SAI), London, UK, 217–221.
   Google Scholar
• Ardid, M., Go´mez-Tejedor, J. A., Duen˜as, J., Riera, J., & Vidaurre, A. (2014). Online exams for blended assessment. study of different application methodologies. Computers & Education, 81, 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, I. (2016). Cheating at online formative tests: Does it pay off? The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awdry, R. (2020). Assignment outsourcing: Moving beyond contract cheating. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkey, D., & Halfond, J. (2015). Cheating, student authentication, and proctoring in online programs. New England Journal of Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Black, E. J. G., Dawson, K., & Dawson, K. (2019). Academic dishonesty in traditional and online classrooms: Does the “media equation” hold true? Online Learning, 12(3–4), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v12i3-4.1681
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I, the cognitive domain. David McKay & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Bolliger, D. U., & Martin, F. (2021). Critical design elements in online courses. Distance Education, 42(3), 352–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brent, E., & Atkisson, C. (2011). Accounting for cheating: An evolving theory and emergent themes. Research in Higher Education, 52(6), 640–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouhan, R. (2022). Enhanced engagement through instructor-created interactive video assignments in a flipped electrical engineering classroom. IEEE EDUCON 2022, 28-31 March 2022, Tunisia, https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766787.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, D., & Witthaus, G. (2021). Reimagining and reexamining assessment in online learning. Distance Education, 42(2), 179–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dargusch, J., Harris, L. R., Reid-Searl, K., & Taylor, B. A. (2017). Creating first-year assessment support: Lecturer perspectives and student access. Distance Education, 38(1), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1299566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWaard, H., & Roberts, V. (2021). Revisioning the potential of freire’s principles of assessment: Influences on the art of assessment in open and online learning through blogging. Distance Education, 42(2), 310–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez, C., Garcia-Izquierdo, F. J., Jaime, A., Perez, B., Rubio, A. L., & Zapata, M. A. (2021). Using process mining to analyze time-distribution of self-assessment and formative assessment exercises on an online learning tool. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 14(5), 709–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(53).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feathers, T. (2020). Colleges say they don’t need exam surveillance tools to stop cheating. Vice.
   Google Scholar
• Fioravanti, M. L., de Oliveira Sestito, C. D., de Deus, W. S., Scatalon, L. P., & Barbosa, E. F. (2021). Role-playing games for fostering communication and negotiation skills. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(3), 384–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gikandi, J., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, D., & Harris, T. (2021). Reimagining online grading, assessment, and testing using situated cognition. Distance Education, 42(2), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1911627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, D. (2002). Duxbury.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, K., Sharma, B., Khan, G. J., Nusair, S., & Raghuwaiya, K. (2020). An exploration on effectiveness of anonymous peer assessment strategy in online formative assessments. In 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Uppsala, Sweden, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, C. (2018). Adding authenticity to controlled conditions assessment: Introduction of an online, open book, essay based exam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(26). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0108-z
   Google Scholar
• Olt, M. (2002). Ethics and distance education: Strategies for minimizing academic dishonesty in online assessment. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 3(5).
   Google Scholar
• Paredes, S. G., Jasso Peña, F. D. J., & de La Fuente Alcazar, J. M. (2021). Remote proctored exams: Integrity assurance in online education? Distance Education, 42(2), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1910495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rettinger, D., & Kramer, Y. (2009). Situational and personal causes of student cheating. Research in Higher Education, 50(3), 640–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9116-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romeu Fontanillas, T., Romero Carbonell, M., & Guitert Catasu´s, M. (2016). E-assessment process: Giving a voice to online learners. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(20). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0019-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, N. C. (2004). Cheating in online student assessment: Beyond plagiarism.
   Google Scholar
• Sancho-Vinuesa, T., & Escudero Viladoms, N. (2012). A proposal for formative assessment with auto- matic feedback on an online mathematics subject. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 9(2), 240–260. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v9i2.1285
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, A. (2020). With ‘cheat-sheet’ in online tests, iits try out measures to raise honesty bar. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/education/with-cheat-sheet-in-online-tests-iits-try-out-measures-to-raise-honesty-bar-7072294/
   Google Scholar
• Swart, A. J. (2010). Evaluation of final examination papers in engineering: A case study using bloom’s taxonomy. IEEE Transactions on Education, 53(2), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2009.2014221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarricone, P., & Newhouse, C. (2016). Using comparative judgement and online technologies in the assessment and measurement of creative performance and capability. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(16). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0018-x
   Google Scholar
• TCSIon. (2020). Tata Consultancy Services. https://www.tcsion.com
   Google Scholar