Multimedia resource use behaviour and learning outcomes

References

• Astur, R. S., Tropp, J., Sava, S., Constable, R. T., & Markus, E. J. (2004). Sex differences and correlations in a virtual Morris water task, a virtual radial arm maze, and mental rotation. Behavioural Brain Research, 151(1–2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2003.08.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazhenkova, O., Becker, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2011). Object–spatial imagery and verbal cognitive styles in children and adolescents: Developmental trajectories in relation to ability. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(3), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazhenkova, O., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2009). The new object-spatial-verbal cognitive style model: Theory and measurement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(5), 638–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos, A., & Campos-Juanatey, D. (2018). The representation of imagery in the city: The impact of studies and imagery ability. Japanese Psychological Research, 61(3), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Alonso, J. C., & Jansen, P. (2019). Sex differences in visuospatial processing. In J. C. Castro-Alonso (Ed.), Visuospatial Processing for Education in health and natural sciences (pp. 81–110). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8
   Google Scholar
• Castro-Alonso, J. C., & Sweller, J. (2022). The modality principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia learning (3rd ed., pp. 261–267). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Di, X., & Zheng, X. (2022). A meta-analysis of the impact of virtual technologies on students’ spatial ability. Educational Technology Research & Development, 70(1), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10082-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dousay, T. A., & Trujillo, N. P. (2019). An examination of gender and situational interest in multimedia learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 876–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douven, I. (2018). A bayesian perspective on likert scales and central tendency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(3), 1203–1211. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1344-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., & Harman, H. H. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Digital version of paper folding test was retrieved from http://www.cs.otago.ac.nz/brace/resources/Paper%20Folding%20Test%20Vz-2-BRACE%20Version%2007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2022). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia learning (3rd ed., pp. 185–198). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, R., Coward, F., & Crooks, S. M. (2010). Examining the influence of gender on the modality effect. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 39(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.39.1.g
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F., & Collaer, M. L. (2005). Sex differences in visuospatial abilities: More than meets the eye. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 170–212). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610448.006
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. A. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 121–169). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610448.005
   Google Scholar
• Heo, M., & Toomey, N. (2020). Learning with multimedia: The effects of gender, type of multimedia learning resources, and spatial ability. Computers & Education, 146(March), 103747. Article 103747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103747
   Google Scholar
• Höffler, T. N. (2010). Spatial ability: Its influence on learning with visualizations—a meta-analytic Review. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9126-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höffler, T. N., Koć-Januchta, M., & Leutner, D. (2017). More evidence for three types of cognitive style: Validating object-spatial imagery and verbal questionnaire using eye tracking when learning with text and pictures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, S. B. (2007). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity? Intelligence, 35(3), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A. (2017). Stop propagating the learning styles myth. Computers & Education, 106, 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, P. D. (2003). Rethinking the multiplicity of cognitive resources and curricular representations: Alternatives to'learning styles' and'multiple intelligences'. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(1), 45–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270210141891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koć-Januchta, M., Höffler, T., Thoma, G.-B., Prechtl, H., & Leutner, D. (2017). Visualizers versus verbalizers: Effects of cognitive style on learning with texts and pictures - an eye-tracking study. Computers in Human Behaviour, 68(March), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.028
   Google Scholar
• Kollöffel, B. (2012). Exploring the relation between visualizer-verbalizer cognitive styles and performance with visual or verbal learning material. Computers & Education, 58(2), 697–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological Bulletin, 133(3), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M., Blazhenkova, O., & Becker, M. (2010). Trade-off in object versus spatial visualization abilities: Restriction in the development of visual-processing resources. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.1.29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S., & Shephard, J. (2005). Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory & Cognition, 33(4), 710–726. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer, D. J. M., Rosenberg, L. M., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). The neural correlates of visual and verbal cognitive styles. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(12), 3792–3798. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4635-08.2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Antonenko, P. D., & Wang, J. (2019). Trends and issues in multimedia learning research in 1996–2016: A bibliometric analysis. Educational Research Review, 28(November), 100282. Article 100282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100282
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., Gong, D., Jia, S., Zhang, W., & Ma, Y. (2011). Object and spatial visualizers have different object-processing patterns: Behavioural and ERP evidence. Behavioural, Integrative and Clinical Neuroscience, 22(17), 860–864. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834b6d3b
   Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–1498. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodge, J. M., Hansen, L., & Cottrell, D. (2016). Modality preference and learning style theories: Rethinking the role of sensory modality in learning. Learning: Research and Practice, 2(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2015.1083115
   Google Scholar
• Luo, W. (2019). User choice of interactive data visualization format: The effects of cognitive style and spatial ability. Decision Support Systems, 122(July), 113061. Article 113061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3201_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2022a). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia learning (3rd ed., pp. 57–72). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2022b). The multimedia principle. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia learning (3rd ed., pp. 145–157). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (Eds.). (2022). Cambridge Handbook of multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Massa, L. J. (2003). Three facets of visual and verbal learners: Cognitive ability, cognitive style, and learning preference. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 833–846. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19(2), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528409529283
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M. B., Donovan, C. L., Bennett, C. M., Aminoff, E. M., & Mayer, R. A. (2012). Individual differences in cognitive style and strategy predict similarities in the patterns of brain activity between individuals. NeuroImage, 59(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskvina, V., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2011). Determining cognitive styles: Historical perspectives and directions for further research. In S. Rayner & E. Cools (Eds.), Style differences in cognition, learning, and management: Theory, research and practice (p. pp. 19−31). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Motes, M. A., Malach, R., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2008). Object-processing neural efficiency differentiates object from spatial visualizers. Neuroreport, 19(17), 1727–1731. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e328317f3e2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in Behavioural research: Explanation and prediction. Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T. R., & Feinstein, A. R. (1996). A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(12), 1373–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Fabello, M. J., Campos, A., & Felisberti, F. M. (2018). Object-spatial imagery in fine arts, psychology, and engineering. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27(March), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.005
   Google Scholar
• Postle, B., Mark, D., & Suzanne, C. (2005). Effects of verbal and nonverbal interference on spatial and object visual working memory. Memory & Cognition, 33(2), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, S. G. (2015). Cognitive styles and learning styles. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 110–117). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, V. A., Fraser, G. M., Kryklywy, J. H., Mitchell, D. G., & Wilson, T. D. (2016). The eye of the beholder: Can patterns in eye movement reveal aptitudes for spatial reasoning? Anatomical Sciences Education, 9(4), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, G., & Kim, C. (2015). Neural correlates of cognitive style and flexible cognitive control. NeuroImage, 113(June), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.046
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suh, J., & Cho, J. Y. (2021). A triangular relationship of visual attention, spatial ability, and creative performance in spatial design: An exploratory case study. Journal of Interior Design, 46(3), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(2), 599–604. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, L., Kong, F., Luo, Y., Zeng, S., Lan, J., & You, X. (2019). Gender differences in large-scale and small-scale spatial ability: A systematic review based on behavioural and neuroimaging research. Frontiers in Behavioural Neuroscience, 13. Article 128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar