Evaluating the Effectiveness of Electronic Monitoring with Probationers

References

• Aos, S., Miller, M., & Drake, E. (2007). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce future prison construction, criminal justice costs, and crime rates. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 19(4), 275–290.
   Google Scholar
• Bales, W., Mann, K., Blomberg, T., Gaes, G., Barrick, K., Dhungana, K., & McManus, B. (2010). A quantitative and qualitative assessment of electronic monitoring. Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. https://jrsa.org/events/conference/presentations-10/Bill_Bales_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bartles, L., & Martinovic, M. (2017). Electronic monitoring: The experience in Australia. European Journal of Probation, 9(1), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/2066220317697658
   Google Scholar
• Belur, J., Thorton, A., Tompson, L., Manning, M., Sidebottom, A., & Bowers, K. (2020). A systematic review of the effectiveness of the electronic monitoring of offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 68(2020), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101686
   Google Scholar
• Blumstein, A. (2002). Prisons: A policy challenge. In J. Q. Wilson & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime: Public policies for crime control (pp. 451–482). ICS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., Wallace-Capretta, S., & Rooney, J. (2000a). Can electronic monitoring make a difference? An evaluation of three Canadian programs. Crime & Delinquency, 46(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128700046001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., Wallace-Capretta, S., & Rooney, J. (2000b). A quasi-experimental evaluation of an intensive rehabilitation supervision program. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(3), 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854800027003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard, J., & Wong, J. S. (2018). The new panopticon? Examining the effect of home confinement on criminal recidivism. Victims & Offenders, 13(5), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2017.1392387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. M., McCabe, S. A., & Wellford, C. F. (2007). Global positioning system (GPS) technology for community supervision: Lessons learned (no. 219376). Noblis. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/219376.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finn, M. A., & Muirhead Steves, S. (2002). The effectiveness of electronic monitoring with violent male parolees. Justice Quarterly, 19(2), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820200095251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., Cullen, F. T., & Andrews, D. A. (2000). The effects of community sanctions and incarceration on recidivism. Forum on Corrections Research, 12(2), 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gies, S. V., Gainey, R., Cohen, M. I., Healy, E., Yeide, M., Bekelman, A., & Bobnis, A. (2013). Monitoring high-risk gang offenders with GPS technology: An evaluation of the California supervision program final report. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Gies, S., Gainey, R., & Healy, E. (2016). Monitoring high-risk sex offenders with GPS. Criminal Justice Studies, 29(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2015.1129088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, S., & Fraser, M. W. (2010). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkes, A. L., Sellbom, M., & Gilmour, F. E. (2023). Under surveillance: Does global positioning system monitoring of offenders reduce recidivism? Criminology & Criminal Justice, 0(0. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958231188414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernán, M. A., & Robins, J. M. (2020). Causal inference: What if. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Kilgore, J. (2018). Toward a research and action agenda for electronic monitoring in the United States. Journal of Community Corrections, Summer 27(4) , 7–21. https://www.civicresearchinstitute.com/online/article_abstract.php?pid=9&iid=1346&aid=8795
   Google Scholar
• King, G., & Nielsen, R. (2019). Why propensity scores should not be used for matching. Political Analysis, 27(4), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lab, S. P. (2020). Crime prevention: Approaches, practices, and evaluation (10th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lilly, J. R. (2006). Issues beyond empirical EM reports. Criminology and Public Policy, 5(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00105.x
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. L. (1997). Criminal Justice and Crime Prevention. In L. W. Sherman, D. Gottfredson, D. MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter, & S. Busway (Eds.), Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising: Areport to the United States Congress (pp. 9–76). U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, N., & Tonry, M. H. (1990). Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Omori, M. K., & Turner, S. F. (2015). Assessing the cost of electronically monitoring high-risk sex offenders. Crime and Delinquency, 61(6), 873–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712466373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett, K. G., Bales, W. D., & Blomberg, T. G. (2006). Under surveillance: An empirical test of the effectiveness and consequences of electronic monitoring. Criminology & Public Policy, 5(1), 61–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00102.x
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1992). An evaluation of intensive probation in California. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82(3), 610–658. https://doi.org/10.2307/1143747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Charitable Trusts. (2016). Use of electronic offender-tracking devices expands sharply. https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2016/09/use-of-electronic-offender-tracking-devices-expands-sharply
   Google Scholar
• Renzema, M., & Mayo-Wilson, E. (2005). Can electronic monitoring reduce crime for moderate to high-risk offenders? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(2005), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-1615-1
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387), 516–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCRAM Systems. (2024, February 5). SCRAM CAM® bracelet alcohol ankle monitor – SCRAM systems. https://www.scramsystems.com/monitoring/scram-continuous-alcohol-monitoring/
   Google Scholar
• Sugg, D., Moore, L., & Howard, P. (2001). Electronic monitoring and offending behaviour: Reconviction results for the second year of trials of curfew orders. Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Tonry, M. (1996). Sentencing matters. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, J., Western, B., & Redburn, S. (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, S. S. (2010). Cost-benefit analysis of reducing crime through electronic monitoring of parolees and probationers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(5), 1090–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Kang-Brown, J., & Kotler, A. (2024). People on electronic monitoring. Vera Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar