Advances in the field of developing biomarkers for re-irradiation: a how-to guide to small, powerful data sets and artificial intelligence

References

• K AV. Web of science search. 2023 [cited 2023 Jul 10]; search engine. Available from: https://www.webofscience.com/
   Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Yu K, Cui Y, et al. Combination of immunotherapy and radiotherapy for recurrent malignant gliomas: results from a prospective study. Front Immunol. 2021;12. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.632547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarria P, Pessina F, Clerici E, et al. Re-irradiation for recurrent high grade glioma (HGG) patients: results of a single arm prospective phase 2 study. Radiother Oncol. 2022;167:89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren X, Fu Y, Liu Z, et al. Image-guided interstitial brachytherapy for recurrent cervical cancer after radiotherapy: a single institution experience. Front Oncol. 2022;12:943703. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.943703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eekers DBP, Roelofs E, Jelen U, et al. Benefit of particle therapy in re-irradiation of head and neck patients. Results of a multicentric in silico ROCOCO trial. Radiother Oncol. 2016;121(3):387–394. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.08.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirai K, Ohno T, Saitoh J-I, et al. Prospective study of Isolated recurrent tumor re-irradiation with carbon-Ion beams. Front Oncol. 2019;9:9. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held T, Tessonnier T, Franke H, et al. Ways to unravel the clinical potential of carbon ions for head and neck cancer reirradiation: dosimetric comparison and local failure pattern analysis as part of the prospective randomized CARE trial. Radiat Oncol. 2022;17(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02093-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarria P, Minniti G, Clerici E, et al. Re-irradiation for recurrent glioma: outcome evaluation, toxicity and prognostic factors assessment. A multicenter study of the Radiation Oncology Italian Association (AIRO). J Neurooncol. 2019;142(1):59–67. doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-03059-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessel KA, Hesse J, Straube C, et al. Validation of an established prognostic score after re-irradiation of recurrent glioma. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(3):422–426. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1276621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessel KA, Hesse J, Straube C, et al. Modification and optimization of an established prognostic score after re-irradiation of recurrent glioma. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0180457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulinich DP, Sheppard JP, Nguyen T, et al. Radiotherapy versus combination radiotherapy-bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021;163(7):1921–1934. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04794-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang RD, Sun Z, Wang X-H, et al. Development of a Comorbidity-Based Nomogram to predict survival after salvage reirradiation of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Era. Front Oncol. 2020;10:625184. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.625184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu J, Huang Q, Gao J, et al. Clinical outcomes of carbon-ion radiotherapy for patients with locoregionally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 2020 Dec 1;126(23):5173–5183. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33197. Epub 2020 Sep 15. PMID: 32931035; PMCID: PMC7693227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L-T, Chen Q-Y, Tang L-Q, et al. With or without reirradiation in advanced local recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a case–control study. BMC Cancer. 2016;16(1):774. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2803-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Agostino GR, Di Brina L, Mancosu P, et al. Reirradiation of locally recurrent prostate cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;104(3):614–621. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.02.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taillez A, Bimbai A-M, Lacornerie T, et al. Studies of intra-fraction prostate motion during stereotactic irradiation in first irradiation and Re-irradiation. Front Oncol. 2021;11:690422. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.690422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung SY, Koom WS, Keum KC, et al. Treatment outcomes of Re-irradiation in locoregionally recurrent rectal cancer and clinical significance of proper patient selection. Front Oncol. 2019;9:9. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirai K, Ohno T, Saitoh J-I, et al. Prospective study of Isolated Recurrent tumor Re-irradiation with Carbon-Ion Beams. Front Oncol. 2019;9:181. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutera P, Bernard ME, Wang H, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for locally progressive and recurrent pancreatic cancer after prior radiation. Front Oncol. 2018;8:52. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang R-D, Sun Z, Wang X-H, et al. Development of a Comorbidity-Based Nomogram to predict survival after salvage reirradiation of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Era. Front Oncol. 2021;10:10. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.625184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Fong AHW, Liu N, et al. Molecular subtyping of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and a microRNA-based prognostic model for distant metastasis. J Biomed Sci. 2018;25(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12929-018-0417-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen Y-P, Chan ATC, Le Q-T, et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet. 2019;394(10192):64–80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30956-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauko A, Lo A, Ahluwalia MS, et al. Cancer cell heterogeneity & plasticity in glioblastoma and brain tumors. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;82:162–175. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding R-B, Chen P, Rajendran BK, et al. Molecular landscape and subtype-specific therapeutic response of nasopharyngeal carcinoma revealed by integrative pharmacogenomics. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3046. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23379-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitfield BT, Huse JT. Classification of adult-type diffuse gliomas: impact of the World Health Organization 2021 update. Brain Pathol. 2022;32(4):e13062. doi: 10.1111/bpa.13062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minniti G, Niyazi M, Alongi F, et al. Current status and recent advances in reirradiation of glioblastoma. Radiat Oncol. 2021;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01767-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng WT, Soong YL, Ahn YC, et al. International recommendations on reirradiation by intensity modulated radiation therapy for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021;110(3):682–695. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia S, Norris B, Speers C, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression as a prognostic factor in a large tissue microarray series of node-negative breast cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(35):5697–704. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.8659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patani N, Martin LA, Dowsett M. Biomarkers for the clinical management of breast cancer: international perspective. Int J Cancer. 2013;133(1):1–13. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1320–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayant C, Page MJ, Vassar M. Evaluation of Reproducible Research Practices in oncology systematic reviews with meta-analyses referenced by national comprehensive cancer network guidelines. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(11):1550–1555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen EY, Raghunathan V, Prasad V. An overview of cancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Based on the surrogate end point of response rate. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(7):915–921. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhasin MK, Ndebele K, Bucur O, et al. Meta-analysis of transcriptome data identifies a novel 5-gene pancreatic adenocarcinoma classifier. Oncotarget. 2016;7(17):23263–23281. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8139
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang B, Huang H, Zhang S, et al. Artificial intelligence in pancreatic cancer. Theranostics. 2022;12(16):6931–6954. doi: 10.7150/thno.77949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai TI, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, et al. Considering relationship of proteins for radiotherapy prognosis of bladder cancer cells in small data set. Methods Inf Med. 2018;57(4):220–229. doi: 10.3414/ME17-02-0003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao GY, Tsai T-I, Lu T-J, et al. A new approach to prediction of radiotherapy of bladder cancer cells in small dataset analysis. Expert Syst Appl. 2011;38(7):7963–7969. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause J, Grabsch HI, Kloor M, et al. Deep learning detects genetic alterations in cancer histology generated by adversarial networks. J Pathol. 2021;254(1):70–79. doi: 10.1002/path.5638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubaldi L, Valenti V, Borgese RF, et al. Strategies to develop radiomics and machine learning models for lung cancer stage and histology prediction using small data samples. Phys Med. 2021;90:13–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodzinski M, Banzato T, Atzori M, et al. Training deep neural networks for small and highly heterogeneous MRI datasets for cancer grading. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020;2020:1758–1761.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhu XL, Shen H-B, Sun H, et al. Improving segmentation and classification of renal tumors in small sample 3D CT images using transfer learning with convolutional neural networks. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022;17(7):1303–1311. doi: 10.1007/s11548-022-02587-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li DC, Liu CW, Hu SC. A fuzzy-based data transformation for feature extraction to increase classification performance with small medical data sets. Artif Intell Med. 2011;52(1):45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2011.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul R, Hawkins S, Balagurunathan Y, et al. Deep feature transfer learning in combination with traditional features predicts survival among patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Tomography. 2016;2(4):388–395. doi: 10.18383/j.tom.2016.00211
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Usman M, Zia T, Tariq A. Analyzing transfer learning of vision transformers for interpreting chest radiography. J Digit Imaging. 2022;35(6):1445–1462. doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00666-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang R-X, Zhou P-K. DNA damage response signaling pathways and targets for radiotherapy sensitization in cancer. Signal Transduct Ther. 2020;5(1):60. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0150-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Concato J, Peduzzi P, Holford TR, et al. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards analysis. I. Background, goals, and general strategy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48(12):1495–1501. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00510-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley K. Design of randomized controlled trials. Circulation. 2007;115(9):1164–1169. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.594945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaikhina T, Khovanova NA. Handling limited datasets with neural networks in medical applications: a small-data approach. Artif Intell Med. 2017;75:51–63. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2016.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasci E, Zhuge Y, Camphausen K, et al. Bias and class imbalance in oncologic data—towards inclusive and transferrable AI in large scale oncology data sets. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(12):2897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candemir S, Nguyen XV, Folio LR, et al. Training strategies for radiology deep learning models in data-limited scenarios. Radiol. 2021;3(6):e210014. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2021210014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu J, Gong P, Ye J, et al. A survey on machine learning from few samples. Pattern Recognition. 2023;139:109480. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roh Y, Heo G, Whang SE. A survey on data collection for machine learning: a big data-ai integration perspective. IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Eng. 2019;33(4):1328–1347. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2019.2946162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vabalas A, Gowen E, Poliakoff E, et al. Machine learning algorithm validation with a limited sample size. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0224365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin LS, Hu SC, Lin YS, et al. A new approach to generating virtual samples to enhance classification accuracy with small data-a case of bladder cancer. Math Biosci Eng. 2022;19(6):6204–6233. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH, et al. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Vol. 2. Stanford, California: Springer; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Arlot S, Celisse A. A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Statistics Surveys. 2010;4(none). doi: 10.1214/09-SS054
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tasci E, Jagasia S, Zhuge Y, et al. RadWise: a rank-based hybrid feature weighting and selection method for proteomic categorization of chemoirradiation in patients with Glioblastoma. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(10):2672. doi: 10.3390/cancers15102672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasci E, Zhuge Y, Kaur H, et al. Hierarchical voting-based feature selection and ensemble learning model scheme for glioma grading with clinical and molecular characteristics. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(22):14155. doi: 10.3390/ijms232214155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyon I, Elisseeff A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. J Mach Learn Res. 2003;3(Mar):1157–1182.
   Google Scholar
• Gokalp O, Tasci E, Ugur A. A novel wrapper feature selection algorithm based on iterated greedy metaheuristic for sentiment classification. Expert Syst Appl. 2020;146:113176. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthukrishnan R, Rohini R. LASSO: a feature selection technique in predictive modeling for machine learning. In 2016 IEEE international conference on advances in computer applications (ICACA); Coimbatore, India. 2016. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Sagi O, Rokach L. Ensemble learning: a survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: data mining and knowledge discovery. 2018;8(4):e1249.
   Google Scholar
• Tasci E, Uluturk C, Ugur A. A voting-based ensemble deep learning method focusing on image augmentation and preprocessing variations for tuberculosis detection. Neural Comput Appl. 2021;33(22):15541–15555. doi: 10.1007/s00521-021-06177-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan SJ, Yang Q. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Eng. 2009;22(10):1345–1359. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2009.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Engelen JE, Hoos HH. A survey on semi-supervised learning. Mach Learn. 2020;109(2):373–440. doi: 10.1007/s10994-019-05855-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Yao Q, Kwok JT, et al. Generalizing from a few examples: a survey on few-shot learning. ACM Comput Surveys. 2020;53(3):1–34. doi: 10.1145/3386252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kairouz P, McMahan HB, Avent B, et al. Advances and open problems in federated learning. Found Trends Mach Learn. 2021;14(1–2):1–210. doi: 10.1561/2200000083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozaki S, Kaji S, Nawa K, et al. Training of deep cross-modality conversion models with a small data set, and their application in megavoltage CT to kilovoltage CT conversion. Med Phys. 2022;49(6):3769–3782. doi: 10.1002/mp.15626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the Rule of Ten Events per variable in logistic and cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;165(6):710–718. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwk052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1373–1379. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley RD, Snell KIE, Ensor J, et al. Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: part I – Continuous outcomes. Stat Med. 2019;38(7):1262–1275. doi: 10.1002/sim.7993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley RD, Snell KI, Ensor J, et al. Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: part II - binary and time-to-event outcomes. Stat Med. 2019;38(7):1276–1296. doi: 10.1002/sim.7992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Smeden M, de Groot JAH, Moons KGM, et al. No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0267-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bellman RE. Adaptive control processes. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Chen L. Curse of dimensionality. In: Liu L ÖZsu MT, editors. Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Boston (MA): Springer US; 2009. p. 545–546.
   Google Scholar
• Gorban AN, Tyukin IY. Blessing of dimensionality: mathematical foundations of the statistical physics of data. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2018;376(2118):20170237. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson J, Goyal N, Rademacher L, et al. The more, the merrier: the blessing of dimensionality for learning large gaussian mixtures. J Mach Learn Res. 2013;35.
   Google Scholar
• Mariano D. Classificação de indivíduos com base em duas características. 2022 Jun 3 [cited 2023 Jul 11]; Feature learning for classification of groups. Available from: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aprendizagem_n%C3%A3o_supervisionada.png
   Google Scholar
• Kathuria A. Intro to optimization in deep learning: gradient descent. 2023. 2018 [cited 2023 Jul 11]; Blessing of dimentionality. Goal of neural networks to reach global minima. Available from: https://blog.paperspace.com/intro-to-optimization-in-deep-learning-gradient-descent/
   Google Scholar
• Fgpacini. Diagram Of The Feature Learning Paradigm In Machine Learning For Application To Downstream Tasks. 2022 Oct 8 [cited 2023 Jul 11]; Diagram which explains the motivation and use of feature learning. Available from: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Feature_Learning_Diagram.png
   Google Scholar
• Pestov V. Is the k-NN classifier in high dimensions affected by the curse of dimensionality? Comput Math Appl. 2013;65(10):1427–1437. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berisha V, Krantsevich C, Hahn PR, et al. Digital medicine and the curse of dimensionality. NPJ Digit Med. 2021;4(1):153. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00521-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirrone G, Matrone F, Chiovati P, et al. Predicting local failure after partial prostate Re-irradiation using a dosiomic-based machine learning Model. JPM. 2022;12(9):1491. doi: 10.3390/jpm12091491
   Google Scholar
• Carles M, Popp I, Starke MM, et al. FET-PET radiomics in recurrent glioblastoma: prognostic value for outcome after re-irradiation? Radiat Oncol. 2021;16(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01744-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldrini L, Romano A, Chiloiro G, et al. Magnetic resonance guided SBRT reirradiation in locally recurrent prostate cancer: a multicentric retrospective analysis. (1748-717X (electronic)). 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Cuccia F, Rigo M, Figlia V, et al. 1.5T MR-Guided Daily Adaptive Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Re-Irradiation: A Preliminary Report of Toxicity and Clinical Outcomes. Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 13;12:858740.
   Google Scholar
• Ng J, Gregucci F, Pennell RT, et al. MRI-LINAC: A transformative technology in radiation oncology. Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 27;13:1117874
   Google Scholar
• Lohmann P, Franceschi E, Vollmuth P, et al. Radiomics in neuro-oncological clinical trials. Lancet Digital Health. 2022;4(11):e841–e849. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00144-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tran T, Luo W, Phung D, et al. A framework for feature extraction from hospital medical data with applications in risk prediction. BMC Bioinf. 2014;15(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12859-014-0425-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lok BH, Jiang G, Gutiontov S, et al. Palliative head and neck radiotherapy with the RTOG 8502 regimen for incurable primary or metastatic cancers. Oral Oncol. 2015;51(10):957–62. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corry J, Peters LJ, Costa ID, et al. The ‘QUAD SHOT’—a phase II study of palliative radiotherapy for incurable head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2005;77(2):137–142. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamez ME, AGARWAL M, HU KS, et al. Hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy with concurrent radiosensitizing chemotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer using the “QUAD-SHOT regimen”. Anticancer Res. 2017;37(2):685–691. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toya R, Saito T, Yamaguchi K, et al. Hypofractionated palliative volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy with the Radiation Oncology study group 8502 “QUAD shot” regimen for incurable head and neck cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2020;15(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01548-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamran SC, Harshman LC, Bhagwat MS, et al. Characterization of efficacy and toxicity after high-dose pelvic reirradiation with palliative intent for genitourinary second malignant neoplasms or local recurrences after full-dose radiation therapy in the pelvis: a high-volume cancer center experience. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2017;2(2):140–147. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2017.01.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guren MG, Undseth C, Rekstad BL, et al. Reirradiation of locally recurrent rectal cancer: a systematic review. Radiother Oncol. 2014;113(2):151–157. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.11.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drodge CS, Ghosh S, Fairchild A. Thoracic reirradiation for lung cancer: a literature review and practical guide. Ann Palliat Med. 2014;3(2):75–91. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-5820.2014.03.04
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao Z, Zhang K-N, Wang Q, et al. Chinese glioma genome atlas (CGGA): a comprehensive resource with functional genomic data from Chinese glioma patients. Int J Genomics Proteomics. 2021;19(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2020.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Hudson TJ, Anderson W, Aretz A, et al. International network of cancer genome projects. Nature. 2010;464(7291):993–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter C, Zenklusen JC. The cancer genome atlas: creating lasting value beyond its data. Cell. 2018;173(2):283–285. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko S, Choi J, Ahn J. GVES: machine learning model for identification of prognostic genes with a small dataset. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):439. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79889-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelly CJ, Karthikesalingam A, Suleyman M, et al. Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1426-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar