Unmothering the Conversation on Gender in Academia

REFERENCES

• Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2013). Introduction: Sexism - A problem with a name. New Formations, 86, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.3898/NEWF.86.INTRODUCTION.2015
   Google Scholar
• Allen, K., Butler-Henderson, K., Reupert, A., Longmuir, F., Finefter-Rosenbluh, I., Berger, E., & Fleer, M. (2021). Work like a girl: Redressing gender inequity in academia through systemic solutions. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.3.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Serhan, A., & Ogbemudia, J. (2022). Personality and the dialectic of race and gender in British higher education: The issue with (mis) representation. Women’s Studies International Forum, 94, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. (2003). Positioning gender in discourse: A feminist methodology. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• BCN. (2018). Ficha básica: Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología, Conocimiento e Innovación. https://obtienearchivo.bcn.cl/obtienearchivo?id=recursoslegales/10221.3/46804/2/ficha_ministerio_ciencia.pdf
   Google Scholar
• de Beauvoir, S. (2018). El segundo sexo (J. García Puente, Trans.). DeBols!llo.
   Google Scholar
• Berrios, P. (2018). El sistema de prestigio en las universidades y el rol que ocupan las mujeres en el mundo académico. Calidad En La Educación. https://doi.org/10.31619/caledu.n23.301
   Google Scholar
• Berríos, P. (2015). La profesionalización académica en Chile: Crecimiento y profesionalización. In A. Bernascon (Ed.), La educación superior de Chile. Transformación, desarrollo y crisis (pp. 345–370). Ediciones UC. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt17t76g4.10
   Google Scholar
• Black, A. L., Crimmins, G., & Henderson, L. (2019). Positioning ourselves in our academic lives: Exploring personal/professional identities, voice and agency. Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(4), 530–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1398135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (2000). Designing social research. The logic of anticipation. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2007). Feminist epistemology after postmodernism: Critiquing science, technology and globalisation. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1179/030801807x183623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2006). Gender trouble. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, M., Finseraas, H., Midtbøen, A. H., & Rafnsdóttir, G. L. (2021). Gender bias in academic recruitment? Evidence from a survey experiment in the Nordic region. European Sociological Review, 37(3), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casad, B. J., Franks, J. E., Garasky, C. E., Kittleman, M. M., Roesler, A. C., Hall, D. Y., & Petzel, Z. W. (2020). Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 99, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code, L. (2014). Ignorance, injustice and the politics of knowledge. Australian Feminist Studies, 29(80), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2014.928186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. (2008). On not becoming man: The materialist politics of unactualized potential. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminism (pp. 52–84). Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, C. (2020). Is maternal guilt a cross-national experience? Qualitative Sociology, 44(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-020-09451-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CONICYT. (2012) . Política de equidad de género. Gobierno de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• CONICYT. (2016). Realidad nacional en formación y promoción de mujeres científicas en ciencia, tecnología, ingeniería y matemáticas. https://www.conicyt.cl/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Realidad-Nacional-en-Formacion-y-Promocion-de-Mujeres-STEM-2016-CONICYT-ISONOMA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CONICYT. (2017a). Caracterización de formación de capital humano avanzado con perspectiva de género.
   Google Scholar
• CONICYT. (2017b). Participación femenina en programas de CONICYT 2007–2016.
   Google Scholar
• CONICYT. (2017c). Política institucional de equidad de género en ciencia y tecnología 2017–2025. CONICYT, Gobierno de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• CONICYT. (2017d). Política Institucional Equidad de Género en Ciencias y Tecnología período 2017-2025. https://www.conicyt.cl/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Politica-Institucional-Equidad-de-Genero-en-CyT-Periodo-2017_2025.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CONICYT. (2019). Catastro de medidas de género incorporadas en convocatorias a financiamiento en CONICYT. Departamento de Estudios y Gestión Estratégica, Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Estratégica.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2012). Transsexual women and feminist thought: Toward new understanding and new politics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 37(4), 857–881. https://doi.org/10.1086/664478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crimmins, G., Oprescu, F., & Nash, G. (2017). Three pathways to support the professional and career development of casual academics. International Journal for Academic Development, 22(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2016.1263962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJonckheere, M., & Vaughn, L. (2019). Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: A balance of relationship and rigor. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.)., ( Trans.). The Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dinamarca-Noack, C., & Trujillo-Cristoffanini, M. (2021). Educación superior chilena y violencia de género: Demandas desde los feminismos universitarios. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 19(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.11600/rlcsnj.19.2.4537
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2013). Language and gender (2nd ed). Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, S. (2011). The implications of the new materialisms for feminist epistemology. In H. Grasswick (Ed.), Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science (pp. 68–83). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_4
   Google Scholar
• Gill, A., & Pires, T. (2019). From binary to intersectional to imbricated approaches: Gender in a decolonial and diasporic perspective. Contexto internacional, 41(2), 275–302. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-8529.2019410200003
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (1995). Space, time and perversion: Essays on the politics body. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (2008). Darwin and feminism: Preliminary investigations for a possible alliance. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminism (pp. 23–51). Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (2010). The practice of feminist theory. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 21(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2009-019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, A., & Fumerton, R. (2018). Foundationalist theories of epistemic justification. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/justep-foundational/
   Google Scholar
• Hengel, E. (2020). Publishing while female (summary). In S. Lundberg (Ed.), Women in economics (pp. 80–90). CEPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill Collins, P., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hiner, H., & López Dietz, A. (2021). ¡Nunca más solas! Acoso sexual, tsunami feminista, y nuevas coaliciones dentro y fuera de las universidades chilenas. Revista Latinoamericana POLIS, 20(59). https://doi.org/10.32735/S0718-6568/2021-N59-1590
   Google Scholar
• Ivancheva, M., Lynch, K., & Keating, K. (2019). Precarity, gender and care in the neoliberal academy. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(4), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenk, T., Antonowicz, D., Geschwind, L., Pinheiro, R., & Pokorska, A. (2022). Taking women on boards: A comparative analysis of public policies in higher education. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2022.2066014
   Google Scholar
• Law No. 2.028, Law S/N de 1884. Por la cual se modifica la ley de Elecciones. enero 16, 1884, Diario Oficial [D.O.] (Chile).
   Google Scholar
• Leboeuf, C. (2015). One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman”: The sex-gender distinction and Simone de Beauvoir’s account of woman. In K. Smits & S. Bruce (Eds.), Feminist moments (pp. 138–145). Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Llorens, A., Tzovara, A., Bellier, L., Bhaya-Grossman, I., Bidet-Caulet, A., Dronkers, N. F., Cross, Z. R., Dominguez-Faus, R., Flinker, A., Fonken, Y., Gorenstein, M. A., Holdgraf, C., Hoy, C. W., Ivanova, M. V., Jimenez, R. T., Jun, S., Kam, J. W. Y., Kidd, C. , Marcelle, E., … Dronkers, N. F. (2021). Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions. Neuron, 109(13), 2047–2074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, R. (2015). Doing the ideal academic - gender, excellence and changing academia. Aalto University Publication Series Science + Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Lundine, J., Bourgeault, I. L., Clark, J., Heidari, S., & Balabanova, D. (2018). The gendered system of academic publishing. The Lancet, 391(10132), 1754–1756. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30950-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykke, N. (2010). Feminist studies: A guide to intersectional theory, methodology and writing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203852774
   Google Scholar
• Mandiola, M. (2021). Juegos de mesa: Política de género en ciencia. Observatorio Económico.
   Google Scholar
• Mardones Leiva, K., Apablaza Santis, M., & Vaccari Jiménez, P. (2020). Binary discursivities in educational policies on gender and sexuality in Chile. Estudios Pedagógicos, 46(1), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052020000100399
   Google Scholar
• Martínez Labrín, S., & Urrutia, B. B. (2013). Los estereotipos en la comprensión de las desigualdades de género en educación, desde la psicología feminista. Psicologia & Sociedade, 25(3), 549–558. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-71822013000300009
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. A. (2013). Materialist mappings of knowing in being: Researchers constituted in the production of knowledge. Gender and Education, 25(6), 776–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.824072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkola, M. (2019). Feminist perspectives on sex and gender. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-gender/
   Google Scholar
• MinCTCI. (2021). Política nacional de igualdad de género en ciencia, tecnología, conocimiento e innovación. Plan de acción 50/50 para el 2030. Ministerio sde Ciencia, Tecnología, Conocimiento e Innovación (MinCTCI), Ministerio de la Mujer y la Equidad de Género, Subsecretaría de Educación Superior y Subsecretaría de Comunicaciones.
   Google Scholar
• MINEDUC. (2019). Hacia la equidad de género en órganos directivos de la educación superior. https://equidaddegenero.mineduc.cl/
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Garcia, A. L. (2020a). A conversation on sexism in gender policies in research. In S. Strid, D. Balkmar, J. Hearn, & L. Morley (Eds.), Does knowledge have gender? A festschrift for liisa husu on gender, science and academia (pp. 210–227). Orebro University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Garcia, A. L. (2020b). Reflexiones feministas para otra investigación posible. Cuadernos de Teoría Social, 12(12), 14–40.
   Google Scholar
• Munoz-Garcia, A. L., & Lira, A. (2019). Teorización feminista y la interrupción del status quo en la construcción de conocimiento en Chile. In A. Carrasco & L. Flores (Eds.), De la Reforma a la Transformación: Capacidades, innovaciones y regulación de la educación chilena (pp. 299–322). Ediciones UC.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, J. (2018). Intersectionality and its discontents. American Quarterly, 69(1), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2017.0006
   Google Scholar
• Orupabo, J., & Mangset, M. (2022). Promoting diversity but striving for excellence: Opening the ‘black box’ of academic hiring. Sociology, 56(2), 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385211028064
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, M. D. M. (2017). Power, knowledge and feminist scholarship: An ethnography of academia. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, C., & Serra, D. (2020). Female role models inspire women to major in male-dominated fields. In S. Lundberg (Ed.), Women in economics (pp. 51–56). CEPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pyke, K. D. (2018). Institutional betrayal: Inequity, discrimination, bullying, and retaliation in academia. Sociological Perspectives, 61(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121417743816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queupil, J. P., & Muñoz-García, A. L. (2018). The role of women scholars in the Chilean collaborative educational research: A social network analysis. Higher Education, 78, 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0333-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes-Housholder, C., & Roque, B. (2019). Chile 2018: Desafíos al poder de género desde la calle hasta la moneda. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 39(2), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2019000200191
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, L. A. (2017). When two bodies are (not) a problem: Gender and relationship status discrimination in academic hiring. American Sociological Review, 82(6), 1111–1138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417739294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, L. (1999). Sexing the brain. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, R. (2021). The trouble with ‘work-life balance’ in neoliberal academia: A systematic and critical review. Journal of Gender Studies, 31(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2021.1933926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanhueza Díaz, L., Fernández Darraz, C., & Montero Vargas, L. (2020). Segregación de género: Narrativas de mujeres desde la academia. Polis, Revista Latinoamericana, 19(55), 310–334. https://doi.org/10.32735/s0718-6568/2020-n55-1453
   Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, N., & Fearon, J. (2018). Time’s up for journal gender bias. The Lancet, 391(10140), 2601–2602. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31140-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, L. D., Anderson, R. E., Ollendick, T. H., Rauch, S. A. M., Silverman, W. K., Woods, D. W., & Woods, D. W. (2019). Preparing women in academic psychology for their first compensation negotiation: A panel perspective of challenges & recommendations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 49(4), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SERNAM. (2018). Plan de igualdad de oportunidades entre hombres y mujeres 2011-2020. Hacia un Chile justo y corresponsable. Servicio Nacional de la Mujer, Gobierno de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, J., & Kobrynowicz, D. (2006). A feminist epistemology. In J. S. Chafetz (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 25–43). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland, J. (2004). Gendered discourses. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Toffoletti, K., & Starr, K. (2016). Women academics and work-life balance: Gendered discourses of work and care. Gender, Work & Organization, 23(5), 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troncoso, L., Follegati, L., & Stutzin, V. (2019). Más allá de una educación no sexista: aportes de pedagogías feministas interseccionales. Pensamiento Educativo, 56(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.7764/PEL.56.1.2019.1
   Google Scholar
• Tuana, N. (2009). The speculum of ignorance: The women’s health movement and epistemologies of ignorance. Hypatia, 21(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01110.x
   Google Scholar
• Undurraga, R., Simbürger, E., & Mora, C. (2021). Desborde y desazón versus flexibilidad y concentración: teletrabajo académico y género en tiempos de pandemia. Polis, Revista Latinoamericana, 20(59), 12–38. https://doi.org/10.32735/S0718-6568/2021-N59-1594
   Google Scholar
• Van der Gaag, N., Heilman, B., Gupta, T., Nembhard, C., & Barker, G. (2019). State of the world’s fathers: Unlocking the power of men’s care. Promundo, 1–111. https://plan-international.org/uploads/2021/12/state_of_the_worlds_fathers_2019_full_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar