Effectiveness of iodoform-based filling materials in root canal treatment of deciduous teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38:52–288.
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2017;39:325–333.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte ML, Pires PM, Ferreira DM, et al. Is there evidence for the use of lesion sterilization and tissue repair therapy in the endodontic treatment of primary teeth? A systematic review and meta-analyses. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(9):2959–2972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcelos R, Santos MP, Primo LG, et al. ZOE paste pulpectomies outcome in primary teeth: a systematic review. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;35(3):241–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barja-Fidalgo F, Moutinho-Ribeiro M, Oliveira MA, et al. A systematic review of root canal filling materials for deciduous teeth: is there an alternative for zinc oxide-eugenol? ISRN Dent. 2011;2011:367318.
   Google Scholar
• Smaïl-Faugeron V, Glenny AM, Courson F, et al. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 5:CD003220.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Najjar RS, Alamoudi NM, El‐Housseiny AA, et al. A comparison of calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste and zinc oxide eugenol as root filling materials for pulpectomy in primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2019;5(3):294–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primosch RE, Glomb TA, Jerrell RG. Primary toothpulp therapy as taught in predoctoral pediatric dentalprograms in the United States. Pediatr Dent. 1997;19:118–122.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Ostwani AO, Al-Monaqel BM, Al-Tinawi MK. A clinical and radiographic study of four different root canal fillings in primary molars. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016;34(1):55–59.
   Google Scholar
• Mortazavi M, Mesbahi M. Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol, and vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2004;14(6):417–424.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rewal N, Thakur AS, Sachdev V, et al. Comparison of endoflas and zinc oxide eugenol as root canal filling materials in primary dentition. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014;32(4):317–321.
   Google Scholar
• Goel H, Mathur S, Sachdev V. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of four different zinc-oxide integrated root canal obturating materials used in primary teeth. Pediatric Dent J. 2018;28(2):73–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy VV. Fernandes . Clinical and radiological evaluation of zinc oxide-eugenol and maisto's paste as obturating materials in infected primary teeth–nine months study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 1996; 14:39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Ozalp N, Saroğlu I, Sönmez H. Evaluation of various root canal filling materials in primary molar pulpectomies: an in vivo study. Am J Dent. 2005; 18:347–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trairatvorakul C, Chunlasikaiwan S. Success of pulpectomy with zinc oxide-eugenol vs calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste in primary molars: a clinical study. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30(4):303–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pramila R, Muthu MS, Deepa G, et al. Pulpectomies in primary mandibular molars: a comparison of outcomes using three root filling materials. Int Endod J. 2016;49(5):413–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Liu X, Zhong J. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpectomy in primary teeth: a 18-months clinical randomized controlled trial. Head Face Med. 2017;13(1):12.
   Google Scholar
• Pandranki J, V Vanga NR, Chandrabhatla SK. Zinc oxide eugenol and endoflas pulpectomy in primary molars: 24-month clinical and radiographic evaluation. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2018;36(2):173–180.
   Google Scholar
• Subramaniam P, Gilhotra K. Endoflas, zinc oxide eugenol and metapex as root canal filling materials in primary molars-a comparative clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;35(4):365–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goinka C, Reddy KS, Ganapathi A, et al. Comparative evaluation of three different an obturating materials in pulpectomy; an in vivo study. Indian J Dent Sci. 2020;12:68–72.
   Google Scholar
• Moness AM, Khattab NN, Waly NG. Evaluation of three root canal filling materials for primary teeth (in vivo and in vitro study). Egypt Dent J. 2012; 59:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Das G. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of zinc oxide eugenol and metapex in root canal treatment of primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011;29(3):222–228.
   Google Scholar
• Dunston B, Coll JA. A survey of primary tooth pulptherapy as taught in US dental schools and practiced bydiplomates of the american board of pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30:43–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tchaou WS, Turng BF, Minah GE, et al. Inhibition of pure cultures of oral bacteria by root canal filling materials. Pediat Dent. 1996;18:444–449.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reddy S, Ramakrishna Y. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal filling materials used in primary teeth: a microbiological study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2007;31(3):193–198.
   Google Scholar
• Sadrian R, Coll JA. A long-term follow-up on the retention rate of zinc oxide–eugenol filler after primary tooth pulpectomy. Pediatr Dent. 1993;15(4):249–253.
   Google Scholar
• Doneria D, Thakur S, Singhal P, et al. In search of a novel substitute: clinical and radiological success of lesion sterilization and tissue repair with modified 3mix-mp antibiotic paste and conventional pulpectomy for primary molars with pulp involvement with 18 months follow-up. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017;8(4):514–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakornchai S, Banditsing P, Visetratana N. Clinical evaluation of 3Mix and vitapex as treatment options for pulpally involved primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2010;20(3):214–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qadeer I, Munir B, Dar SY. Comparison of effectiveness of triple antibiotic paste (3mix) and vitapex for root canal treatment of pulpally involved primary molars. Pak Oral Dent J. 2016; 36:654–657.
   Google Scholar
• Zacharczuk GA, Toscano MA, López GE, et al. Evaluation of 3Mix-MP and pulpectomies in non-vital primary molars. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2019;32(1):22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Ranly DM. Pulpotomy therapy in primary teeth: new modalities for old rationales. Pediat Dent. 1994; 16:403–409.
   Google Scholar
• Mani SA, Chawla HS, Tewari A, et al. Evaluation of calcium hydroxide and zinc oxide eugenol as root canal filling materials in primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child. 2000;67(2):142–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ba-Hattab R, Al-Jamie M, Aldreib H, et al. Calcium hydroxide in endodontics: an overview. OJST. 2016;06(12):274–289.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Godoy F. Evaluation of an iodoform paste in root canal therapy for infected primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child. 1987;54(1):30–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottapalli P, Madu GP, Ambati NR, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of mixture of zinc oxide powder and nanohydroxyapatite as an obturating material in primary molars. BDS. 2019;22(1):63–69.
   Google Scholar
• Divya DV, Prasad MG, Radhakrishna AN, et al. Triple antibiotic paste versus propolis: a clinical quest for the reliable treatment of periapical lesions in primary molars. Saudi Endod J. 2019; 9:34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Calixto-Chanca KS, Correa-Olaya EI, Anchelia-Ramírez SH. Efectividad clínica y radiográfica de dos pastasantibióticas empleadas en necrosis pulpar en niños de un hospital nacional del perú. KIRU. 2014; 11:115–122.
   Google Scholar
• Cassol DV, Duarte ML, Pintor AVB, et al. Iodoform vs calcium hydroxide/zinc oxide based pastes: 12-month findings of a randomized controlled trial. Braz Oral Res. 2019; 33:e002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha C, Barcelos R, Primo L. Soluções irrigadoras e materiais obturadores utilizados na terapia endodôntica de dentes decíduos. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clín Integr. 2005;5:75–83.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla H, Setia S, Gupta N, et al. Evaluation of a mixture of zinc oxide, calcium hydroxide, and sodium fluoride as a new root canal filling material for primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2008;26(2):53–58.
   Google Scholar
• Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med. 2021;18(3):e1003583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group, et al. The cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coser RM, Giro EMA. Tratamento endodôntico de molares decíduos humanos com necrose pulpar e lesão periapical. PGR- Pós-Grad Rev Fac Odontol. 2002; 5:84–92.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou W, Zheng Q, Tan X, et al. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and iroot bp plus root repair material as root-end filling materials in endodontic microsurgery: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Endod. 2017;43(1):1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rontani MP, Peters CF, Worliczeck AM. Tratamento endodôntico de dentes decíduos com necrose pulpar. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent. 1994; 48:1235–1238.
   Google Scholar
• Silveira EG, Silva RHH. Tratamento dos canais radiculares de molares decíduos com uma pasta de iodofórmio e glicerina. Rev Odontopediatr. 1994; 3:65–72.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas AM, Chandra S, Chandra S, et al. Elimination of infection in pulpectomized deciduous teeth: a short-term study using iodoform paste. J Endod. 1994;20(5):233–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramar K, Mungara J. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpectomies using three root canal filling materials: an in-vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010;28(1):25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Cassol DV. Comparação clínica e radiográfica de materiais obturadores utilizados no tratamento de canais radiculares de dentes decíduos. Dissertação (mestrado). Programa de Pós-graduação em Odontologia (Odontopediatria) da Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Chen XX, Lin BC, Zhong J, et al. [Degradation evaluation and success of pulpectomy with a modified primary root canal filling in primary molars]. Beij Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015; 47:529–535.
   Google Scholar
• Doneria D, Thakur S, Singhal P, et al. Comparative evaluation of clinical and radiological success of zinc oxide-ozonated oil, modified 3mix-mp antibiotic paste, and vitapex as treatment options in primary molars requiring pulpectomy: an in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2017;35(4):346–352.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang XF, Xu XB. [Clinical evaluation of zinc oxide eugenol and vitapex as root canal filling materials in primary teeth]. Shang Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2003;12:377–379.
   Google Scholar
• Lei Z, Zhang M, Ding J. [Efficacy evaluation of primary teeth canal filling with coral paste]. Med J Wuhan Univ. 2006;27:220–222.
   Google Scholar
• Chibinski ACR, Reis A, Kreich EM, et al. Evaluation of primary carious dentin after cavity sealing in deep lesions: a 10-to 13-month follow-up. Pediatr Dent. 2013; 35:e107-112.
   Google Scholar
• Carrotte P. Endodontic treatment for children. Br Dent J. 2005;198(1):9–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar