Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite

References

• Kopperud SE, Rukke HV, Kopperud HM, et al. Light curing procedures – performance, knowledge level and safety awareness among dentists. J Dent. 2017;58:67–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferracane JL. Resin composite-state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004;29(5):481–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):87–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu HH, Quinn JB, Smith DT, et al. Effects of different whiskers on the reinforcement of dental resin composites. Dent Mater. 2003;19(5):359–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Short glass fiber reinforced restorative composite resin with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix. Dent Mater. 2007;23(11):1356–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zandinejad AA, Atai M, Pahlevan A. The effect of ceramic and porous fillers on the mechanical properties of experimental dental composites. Dent Mater. 2006;22(4):382–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garoushi S, Sailynoja E, Vallittu PK, et al. Physical properties and depth of cure of a new short fiber reinforced composite. Dent Mater. 2013;29(8):835–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garoushi SK, Hatem M, Lassila LVJ, et al. The effect of short fiber composite base on microleakage and load-bearing capacity of posterior restorations. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2015;1(1):6–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tiu J, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Rising R-curves in particulate/fiber-reinforced resin composite layered systems. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;103:103537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassila L, Keulemans F, Säilynoja E, et al. Mechanical properties and fracture behavior of flowable fiber reinforced composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2018;34(4):598–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attik N, Colon P, Gauthier R, et al. Comparison of physical and biological properties of a flowable fiber reinforced and bulk filling composites. Dent Mater. 2022;38(2):e19–e30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassila L, Säilynoja E, Prinssi R, et al. Characterization of a new fiber-reinforced flowable composite. Odontology. 2019;107(3):342–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molnár J, Fráter M, Sáry T, et al. Fatigue performance of endodontically treated molars restored with different dentin replacement materials. Dent Mater. 2022;38:83–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassila L, Säilynoja E, Prinssi R, et al. Bilayered composite restoration: the effect of layer thickness on fracture behavior. Biomater Investig Dent. 2020;7(1):80–85.
   Google Scholar
• Fráter M, Sáry T, Molnár J, et al. Fatigue performance of endodontically treated premolars restored with direct and indirect cuspal coverage restorations utilizing fiber-reinforced cores. Clin Oral Invest. 2022;26(4):3501–3513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fráter M, Sáry T, Jókai B, et al. Fatigue behavior of endodontically treated premolars restored with different fiber-reinforced designs. Dent Mater. 2021;37(3):391–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basavarajappa S, Perea-Lowery L, Aati S, et al. The effect of ethanol on surface of semi-interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) polymer matrix of glass-fibre reinforced composite. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;98:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J. Effects of surface properties on bond strength between layers of newly cured dental composites. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24(5):358–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijelic-Donova J, Garoushi S, Lassila LV, et al. Oxygen inhibition layer of composite resins: effects of layer thickness and surface layer treatment on the interlayer bond strength. Eur J Oral Sci. 2015;123(1):53–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truffier-Boutry D, Place E, Devaux J, et al. Interfacial layer characterization in dental composite. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(1):74–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlJehani YA, Baskaradoss JK, Geevarghese A, et al. Shear bond strength between fiber-reinforced composite and veneering resin composites with various adhesive resin systems. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(5):392–401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Omran TA, Garoushi S, Lassila L, et al. Bonding interface affects the load-bearing capacity of bilayered composites. Dent Mater J. 2019;38(6):1002–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basavarajappa S, Al-Kheraif AA, ElSharawy M, et al. Effect of solvent/disinfectant ethanol on the micro-surface structure and properties of multiphase denture base polymers. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;54:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio TT, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Lassila LV, et al. The effect of surface roughness on repair bond strength of light-curing composite resin to polymer composite substrate. Open Dent J. 2013;7:126–131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mangoush E, Lassila L, Vallittu PK, et al. Shear-bond strength and optical properties of short fiber-reinforced CAD/CAM composite blocks. Eur J Oral Sci. 2021;129(5):e12815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan M, Alander P, Vallittu PK, et al. Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2005;16(1):21–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Incremental layers bonding of silorane composite: the initial bonding properties. J Dent. 2008;36(7):560–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Musa AH, Al Nahedh HN. Incremental layer shear bond strength of low-shrinkage resin composites under different bonding conditions. Oper Dent. 2014;39(6):603–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallittu PK. Oxygen inhibition of autopolumerization of polymethyldimethacrylate-glass fiber composite. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1997;8(8):489–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, et al. Bonding performance and interfacial characteristics of short fiber-reinforced resin composite in comparison with other composite restoratives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124(3):301–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, et al. Relationship between mechanical properties and bond durability of short fiber-reinforced resin composite with universal adhesive. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124(5):480–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Zohairy AA, Saber MH, Abdalla A, et al. Efficacy of microtensile versus microshear bond testing for evaluation of bond strength of dental adhesive systems to enamel. Dent Mater. 2010;26(9):848–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar