Optical coherence tomography systems for evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic reconstructions

References

• Machoy M, Seeliger J, Szyszka-Sommerfeld L, et al. The use of optical coherence tomography in dental diagnostics: a state-of-the-art review. J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:7560645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson DM. An update on optical coherence tomography in dentistry. Dent Update. 2014;41(2):174–176.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt JM. Optical coherence tomography (OCT): a review. IEEE J Select Topics Quantum Electron. 1999;5(4):1205–1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haak R, Siegner J, Ziebolz D, et al. OCT evaluation of the internal adaptation of ceramic veneers depending on preparation design and ceramic thickness. Dent Mater. 2021;37(3):423–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimada Y, Sadr A, Sumi Y, et al. Application of optical coherence tomography (OCT) for diagnosis of caries, cracks, and defects of restorations. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2015;2(2):73–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al-Imam H, Michou S, Benetti AR, et al. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of acrylic bridges using optical coherence tomography. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;03:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Turk AG, Sabuncu M, Ulusoy M. Evaluation of adaptation of ceramic inlays using optical coherence tomography and replica technique. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Liu J, Zhang Z. Evaluation of marginal gap of lithium disilicate glass ceramic crowns with optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt. 2018;23(3):1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Son K, Park J, et al. Non-ionized, high-resolution measurement of internal and marginal discrepancies of dental prosthesis using optical coherence tomography. IEEE Access. 2019;7:6209–6218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son K, Lee S, Kang SH, et al. A comparison study of marginal and internal fit assessment methods for fixed dental prostheses. J Clin Med. 2019;8(6):785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y. Making yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia translucent. Dent Mater. 2014;30(10):1195–1203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahmiri R, Standard OC, Hart JN, et al. Optical properties of zirconia ceramics for esthetic dental restorations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(1):36–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlins PH, Wang RK. Theory, developments and applications of optical coherence tomography. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2005;38(15):2519–2535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh YS, Ho YC, Lee SY, et al. Dental optical coherence tomography. Sensors. 2013;13(7):8928–8949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podoleanu AG. Optical coherence tomography. J Microsc. 2012;247(3):209–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouad A, Pfefer TJ, Chen CW, et al. Variations in optical coherence tomography resolution and uniformity: a multi-system performance comparison. Biomed Opt Express. 2014;5(7):2066–2081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadam P, Bhalerao S. Sample size calculation. Int J Ayurveda Res. 2010;1(1):55–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, et al. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62(4):405–8408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolev E, Bitterman Y, Meirowitz A. Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(1):124–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min-Kyung J, Park JH, Sang-Won P, et al. Evaluation of marginal fit of 2 CAD-CAM anatomic contour zirconia crown systems and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic crown. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015;7(4):271–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miwa A, Kori H, Tsukiyama Y, et al. Fit of e.max crowns fabricated using conventional and CAD/CAM technology: a comparative study. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29(6):602–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrendero S, Salido MP, Valverde A, et al. Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(9):2403–2410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• l-Imam H, Gram M, Benetti AR, et al. Accuracy of stereolithography additive casts used in a digital workflow. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(4):580–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdelt K, Pinheiro Dias Engler ML, Beuer F, et al. Computable translucency as a function of thickness in a multi-layered zirconia. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(4):683–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsaka SE. Optical and mechanical properties of newly developed monolithic multilayer zirconia. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(1):e279–e284.
   Google Scholar
• Harada K, Raigrodski AJ, Chung KH, et al. A comparative evaluation of the translucency of zirconias and lithium disilicate for monolithic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(2):257–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aden A, Anderson P, Burnett GR, et al. Longitudinal correlation of 3D OCT to detect early stage erosion in bovine enamel. Biomed Opt Express. 2017;8(2):954–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar