Peri-implant bone resorption risk of anterior maxilla narrow single implants: a finite-element analysis

References

• Ducommun J, El Kholy K, Rahman L, et al. Analysis of trends in implant therapy at a surgical specialty clinic: Patient Pool, indications, surgical procedures, and rate of early failures-A 15-year retrospective analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2019;30(11):1097–1106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, et al. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late? Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):84–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazor CE, Al-Shammari K, Sarment DP, et al. Implant plastic surgery: a review and rationale. J Oral Implantol. 2004;30(4):240–254.
   Google Scholar
• Schiegnitz E, Al-Nawas B. Narrow-diameter implants: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2018;29(S16):21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(7):43–61.
   Google Scholar
• Chen K, Li Z, Liu X, et al. Immediate implant placement with buccal bone augmentation in the anterior maxilla with thin buccal plate: a One-Year Follow-Up case series. J Prosthodont. 2021;30(6):473–480.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng K, Yoda N, Chen J, et al. Effects of buccal thickness augmentation on bone remodeling after maxillary anterior implantation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2020;19(1):133–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang G, Chen L, Gao Y, et al. Risk factors and reoperative survival rate of failed narrow-diameter implants in the maxillary anterior region. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22(1):29–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teughels W, Merheb J, Quirynen M. Critical horizontal dimensions of interproximal and buccal bone around implants for optimal aesthetic outcomes: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):134–145.
   Google Scholar
• Yoda N, Zheng K, Chen J, et al. Bone morphological effects on post-implantation remodeling of maxillary anterior buccal bone: a clinical and biomechanical study. J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61(4):393–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappuis V, Engel O, Reyes M, et al. Ridge alterations post-extraction in the esthetic zone: a 3D analysis with CBCT. J Dent Res. 2013;92(12 Suppl):195s–201s.
   Google Scholar
• Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005;25(2):113–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momberger N, Mukaddam K, Zitzmann NU, et al. Esthetic and functional outcomes of narrow-diameter implants compared in a cohort study to standard diameter implants in the anterior zone of the maxilla. Quintessence Int. 2022;53(6):502–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin SC. Static and dynamic stress analysis of standard- and Narrow-Diameter implants: a 3D finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35(4):e58–e68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost HM. Wolff’s law and bone’s structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod. 1994;64(3):175–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JS, Lim YJ. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of stress induced by different lengths of osseointegrated implants in the anterior maxilla. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2013;16(11):1143–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley J Nelson, Major M Ash, Jr. Wheeler’s dental anatomy, physiology, and occlusion., 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Editor Saunders; 2010. p. 401.
   Google Scholar
• Poiate IAVP, Vasconcellos AB, Mori M, et al. 2D and 3D finite element analysis of Central incisor generated by computerized tomography. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2011;104(2):292–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, et al. Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(1):18–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willie BM, Zimmermann EA, Vitienes I, et al. Bone adaptation: Safety factors and load predictability in shaping skeletal form. Bone. 2020;131:115114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost HM. Bone "mass" and the "mechanostat": a proposal. Anat Rec. 1987;219(1):1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin D, Li Q, Li W, et al. Dental implant induced bone remodeling and associated algorithms. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2009;2(5):410–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost HM. Bone’s mechanostat: a 2003 update. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2003;275(2):1081–1101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin Y-S, Yu J-H, Chang Y-Z, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of an orthodontic miniimplant used With revolving (translation and rotation) temporary anchorage device by finite element analysis and experimental testing. Implant Dentistry. 2013;22(1):77–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki A, Masuda T, Takahashi I, et al. Changes in stress distribution of orthodontic miniscrews and surrounding bone evaluated by 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140(6):e273-80–e280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Li H, Shi L, et al. A mathematical model for simulating the bone remodeling process under mechanical stimulus. Dent Mater. 2007;23(9):1073–1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zupancic Cepic L, Frank M, Reisinger A, et al. Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible. Int J Implant Dent. 2022;8(1):8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellal A, Wiskott HWA, Botsis J, et al. Stimulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone. Comparison of three numerical models and validation by in vivo data. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(2):239–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutu E. Role of initial density distribution in simulations of bone remodeling around dental implants. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2018;20(4):23–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valera-Jimenez JF, et al. Finite element analysis of narrow dental implants. Dent Mater. 2020;36(7):927–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pommer B, et al. Extra-short (<7 mm) and extra-narrow diameter (<3.5 mm) implants: a Meta-analytic literature review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(Suppl 1):S137–S146.
   Google Scholar
• Atlas AM, Behrooz E, Barzilay I. Can bite-force measurement play a role in dental treatment planning, clinical trials, and survival outcomes? A literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int. 2022;53(7):632–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Zhang W, Ajmera DH, et al. Simulated bone remodeling around tilted dental implants in the anterior maxilla. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2016;15(3):701–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, Park J, Kang I, et al. Effects of assessing the bone remodeling process in biomechanical finite element stability evaluations of dental implants. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022;221:106852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao M, Wang C, Wang C, et al. Influence of bone morphology on the mechanobiological stimuli distribution of maxillary anterior labial bone: a biomechanical study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(7):1085–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leblebicioğlu Kurtuluş I, et al. Finite element analysis of the stress distribution associated with different implant designs for different bone densities. J Prosthodont. 2022;31(7):614–622.
   Google Scholar
• Blaszczyk M, Hackl K. Multiscale modeling of cancellous bone considering full coupling of mechanical, electric and magnetic effects. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2022;21(1):163–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christen D, Webster DJ, Muller R. Multiscale modelling and nonlinear finite element analysis as clinical tools for the assessment of fracture risk. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2010;368(1920):2653–2668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar