Repair bond strength of bulk-fill composites: influence of different primers and direction of debonding stress

References

• Carvalho TS, Colon P, Ganss C, et al. Consensus report of the European federation of conservative dentistry: erosive tooth wear–diagnosis and management. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(7):1557–1561. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1511-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassebaum NJ, Bernabe E, Dahiya M, et al. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res. 2015;94(5):650–658. doi: 10.1177/0022034515573272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shellis RP, Addy M. The interactions between attrition, abrasion and erosion in tooth wear. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:32–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Widström E, Linden J, Tiira H, et al. Treatment provided in the public dental service in Finland in 2009. Community Dent Health. 2015;32:60–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintze SD, Rousson V. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2012;14:407–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitel ML. Low-shrink composite resins: a review of their history, strategies for managing shrinkage, and clinical significance. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013;34:578–590.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chesterman J, Jowett A, Gallacher A, et al. Bulk-fill resin-based composite restorative materials: a review. Br Dent J. 2017;222(5):337–344. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ende A, De Munck J, Lise DP, et al. Bulk-Fill composites: a review of the current literature. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19:95–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brantley CF, Bader JD, Shugars DA, et al. Does the cycle of rerestoration lead to larger restorations? J Am Dent Assoc. 1995;126(10):1407–1413. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum IR, Jagger DC, Wilson NH. Defective dental restorations: to repair or not to repair? Part 1: direct composite restorations. Dent Update. 2011;38(3):150–158. doi: 10.12968/denu.2011.38.3.150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. 2022;38(4):680–688. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.02.009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, et al. Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study. J Dent. 2012;40(10):829–835. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.06.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquino C, Mathias C, Barreto SC, et al. Repair bond strength and leakage of Non-Aged and aged bulk-fill composite. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020;18:783–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayar MK, Guven ME, Burduroglu HD, et al. Repair of aged bulk-fill composite with posterior composite: effect of different surface treatments. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(3):246–252. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Composite-composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent. 2003;31(8):521–525. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(03)00093-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio T, Lastumäki T, Vallittu PK. Bonding of restorative composite resin to some polymeric composite substrates. Dent Mater. 2001;17(1):80–86. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00064-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lastumäki T, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. The semi-interpenetrating polymer network matrix of fiber-reinforced composite and its effect on the surface adhesive properties. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2003;14(9):803–809. doi: 10.1023/a:1025044623421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lastumäki TM, Kallio TT, Vallittu PK. The bond strength of light-curing composite resin to finally polymerized and aged glass fiber-reinforced composite substrate. Biomaterials. 2002;23(23):4533–4539. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00197-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezvergil A, Lassila LVJ, Yli-Urpo A, et al. Repair bond strength of restorative resin composite to fiber-reinforced composite substrate. Acta Odontol Scand. 2004;62(1):51–60. doi: 10.1080/00016350310008210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallittu PK. Interpenetrating polymer networks (IPNs) in dental polymers and composites. J Adhes Sci Techn. 2009;23(7-8):961–972. doi: 10.1163/156856109X432785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matinlinna JP, Özcan M, Lassila LVJ, et al. Review: trialkoxy silane chemistry and its applications in dental biomaterials. Silanes and Other Coupling Agents. 2007;4:199–215.
   Google Scholar
• Akgül S, Kedici Alp C, Bala O. Repair potential of a bulk-fill resin composite: effect of different surface-treatment protocols. Eur J Oral Sci. 2021;129:e12814. AQ1AQ2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum IR, Martos R, Szalóki M, et al. Effects of different surface treatments and adhesive self-etch functional monomers on the repair of bulk fill composites: a randomised controlled study. J Dent. 2021;108:103637. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabeu GS, Giacomini MC, Scaffa PMC, et al. Solvation role of dimethyl sulfoxide on the interaction with dentin bonding systems after 30 months. Dent Mater. 2023;39(5):478–484. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.03.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suni AO, Lassila LVJ, Tuokko JK, et al. Adhesion of individually formed fiber post adhesively luted with flowable short fiber composite. Biomater Investig Dent. 2023;10:2209593. May 11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kilponen L, Varrela J, Vallittu PK. Priming and bonding metal, ceramic and polycarbonate brackets. Biomater Investig Dent. 2019;6(1):61–72. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2019.1684823.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakai M, Taira Y, Sawase T. Silane primers rather than heat treatment contribute to adhesive bonding between tri-n-butylborane resin and a machinable leucite-reinforced ceramic. Dent Mater J. 2011;30(6):854–860. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2011-103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oja J, Lassila L, Vallittu PK, et al. Effect of accelerated aging on some mechanical properties and wear of different commercial dental resin composites. Materials. 2021;14(11):2769. doi: 10.3390/ma14112769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Medeiros TC, de Lima MR, Bessa SC, et al. Repair bond strength of bulk fill composites after different adhesion protocols. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11(11):e1000–e1005. doi: 10.4317/jced.56129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ugurlu M, Al-Haj Husain N, Özcan M. Repair of Bulk-Fill and nanohybrid resin composites: effect of surface conditioning, adhesive promoters, and Long-Term aging. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(13):4688. doi: 10.3390/ma15134688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organisation of Standardization. ISO/TS 11405:2003. Dental materials – testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Geneva: International Organisation of Standarization. 2003
   Google Scholar
• Staxrud F, Dahl JE. Role of bonding agents in the repair of composite resin restorations. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011;119(4):316–322. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00833.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson ST, Dahl JE. Effect of curing and silanizing on composite repair bond strength using an improved micro-tensile test method. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2017;3(1):21–29. doi: 10.1080/23337931.2017.1301211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eliasson ST, Tibballs J, Dahl JE. Effect of different surface treatments and adhesives on repair bond strength of resin composites after one and 12 months of storage using an improved microtensile test method. Oper Dent. 2014;39(5):e206-16–E216. doi: 10.2341/12-429-L.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrilho E, Cardoso M, Marques Ferreira M, et al. 10-MDP based dental adhesives: adhesive interface characterization and adhesive stability – a systematic review. Materials. 2019;12(5):790. doi: 10.3390/ma12050790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staxrud F, Valen H. Potential of «universal» bonding agents for composite repair. Biomater Investig Dent. 2022;9(1):41–46. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2022.2073234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mendes LT, Loomans BAC, Opdam NJM, et al. Silane coupling agents are beneficial for resin composite repair: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis of In vitro studies. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22:443–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan M, Alander P, Vallittu PK, et al. Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005;16(1):21–27. doi: 10.1007/s10856-005-6442-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staxrud F, Dahl JE. Silanising agents promote resin-composite repair. Int Dent J. 2015;65(6):311–315. doi: 10.1111/idj.12188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Teixeira EC, et al. Fatigue bond strength of dental adhesive systems: historical background of test methodology, clinical considerations and future perspectives. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2022;58:193–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2022.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sano H, Chowdhury AFMA, Saikaew P, et al. The microtensile bond strength test: its historical background and application to bond testing. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2020;56(1):24–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2019.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar