An in vitro assessment of biaxial flexural strength, degree of monomer conversion, color stability, and ion release in provisional restorations containing Sr-bioactive glass nanoparticles

References

• Sadek HMA, El-Banna A. Biaxial flexural strength of different provisional restorative materials under chemo-mechanical aging: an in vitro study. J Prosthodont. 2023;1-8. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13662.
   Google Scholar
• Pituru SM, Greabu M, Totan A, et al. A review on the biocompatibility of PMMA-Based dental materials for interim prosthetic restorations with a glimpse into their modern manufacturing techniques. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(13):2894. doi: 10.3390/ma13132894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altintas SH, Yondem I, Tak O, et al. Temperature rise during polymerization of three different provisional materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2008;12(3):283–286. doi: 10.1007/s00784-007-0163-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam R, Singh RD, Sharma VP, et al. Biocompatibility of polymethylmethacrylate resins used in dentistry. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012;100(5):1444–1450. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.32673.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jun SK, Cha JR, Knowles JC, et al. Development of Bis-GMA-free biopolymer to avoid estrogenicity. Dent Mater. 2020;36(1):157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.11.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd CJ, Dickens SH. Network structure of Bis-GMA- and UDMA-based resin systems. Dent Mater. 2006;22(12):1143–1149. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.10.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo M, Volpato CAM, Henriques B, et al. Color stability of a bis-acryl composite resin subjected to polishing, thermocycling, intercalated baths, and immersion in different beverages. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(5):449–456. Epub 20180908 doi: 10.1111/jerd.12404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozel GS, Guneser MB, Inan O, et al. Evaluation of C. Albicans and S. Mutans adherence on different provisional crown materials. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9(5):335–340. Epub 20171016 doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai LL, Mei ML, Chu CH, et al. Mechanisms of bioactive glass on caries management: a review. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(24):4183. Epub 20191212. doi: 10.3390/ma12244183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando D, Attik N, Pradelle-Plasse N, et al. Bioactive glass for dentin remineralization: a systematic review. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;76:1369–1377. Epub 20170314 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaichana W, Insee K, Chanachai S, et al. Physical/mechanical and antibacterial properties of orthodontic adhesives containing Sr-bioactive glass nanoparticles, calcium phosphate, and andrographolide. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):6635. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10654-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai LL, Mei ML, Chu CH, et al. Remineralizing effect of a new strontium-doped bioactive glass and fluoride on demineralized enamel and dentine. J Dent. 2021;108:103633. Epub 20210311. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki JI, Kiba W, Abe GL, et al. Fabrication of strontium-releasable inorganic cement by incorporation of bioactive glass. Dent Mater. 2019;35(5):780–788. Epub 20190301 doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baheiraei N, Eyni H, Bakhshi B, et al. Effects of strontium ions with potential antibacterial activity on in vivo bone regeneration. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):8745. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88058-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang JH, Lee MG, Ferracane JL, et al. Effect of bioactive glass-containing resin composite on dentin remineralization. J Dent. 2018;75:58–64. Epub 20180525 doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.05.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potiprapanpong W, Naruphontjirakul P, Khamsuk C, et al. Assessment of mechanical/chemical properties and cytotoxicity of resin-modified glass ionomer cements containing Sr/F-bioactive glass nanoparticles and methacrylate functionalized polyacids. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(12):10231. doi: 10.3390/ijms241210231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khvostenko D, Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL, et al. Bioactive glass fillers reduce bacterial penetration into marginal gaps for composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2016;32(1):73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi S, Gwinner F, Mitchell JC, et al. Cytotoxicity of resin composites containing bioactive glass fillers. Dent Mater. 2015;31(2):195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.12.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkut E, Torlak E, Altunsoy M. Antimicrobial and mechanical properties of dental resin composite containing bioactive glass. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2016;14(3):e296-301–e301. Epub 20160726 doi: 10.5301/jabfm.5000271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirchandani B, Padunglappisit C, Toneluck A, et al. Effects of Sr/F-Bioactive glass nanoparticles and calcium phosphate on monomer conversion, biaxial flexural strength, surface microhardness, mass/volume changes, and color stability of Dual-Cured dental composites for core Build-Up materials. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022;12(11):1897. doi: 10.3390/nano12111897.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delgado AHS, Young AM. Methacrylate peak determination and selection recommendations using ATR-FTIR to investigate polymerisation of dental methacrylate mixtures. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0252999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panpisut P, Khan MA, Main K, et al. Polymerization kinetics stability, volumetric changes, apatite precipitation, strontium release and fatigue of novel bone composites for vertebroplasty. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0207965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akinmade AO, Nicholson JW. Poisson’s ratio of glass-polyalkenoate (glass-ionomer) cements determined by an ultrasonic pulse method. J Mater Sci: mater Med. 1995;6(8):483–485. doi: 10.1007/BF00123374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung SM, Yap AU, Koh WK, et al. Measurement of Poisson’s ratio of dental composite restorative materials. Biomaterials. 2004;25(13):2455–2460. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgs WA, Lucksanasombool P, Higgs RJ, et al. A simple method of determining the modulus of orthopedic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;58(2):188–195. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(2001)58:2<188::AID-JBM1006>3.0.CO;2-v.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardu S, Duc O, Di Bella E, et al. Color stability of recent composite resins. Odontology. 2017;105(1):29–35. Epub 20160218 doi: 10.1007/s10266-016-0234-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panpisut P, Praesuwatsilp N, Bawornworatham P, et al. Assessment of physical/mechanical performance of dental resin sealants containing Sr-Bioactive glass nanoparticles and calcium phosphate. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(24):5436. doi: 10.3390/polym14245436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padunglappisit C, Posaya-Anuwat S, Sompoch V, et al. Effects of different amine activators on the monomer conversion, biaxial flexural strength, and color stability of experimental provisional dental restorations. Eur J Dent. 2021;15(3):488–494. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721908.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fang J, Shen J, Jiang W, et al. Cytotoxicity of polymethyl methacrylate cement on primary cultured metastatic spinal cells. Mol Cell Toxicol. 2016;12(2):125–132. doi: 10.1007/s13273-016-0016-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durner J, Obermaier J, Draenert M, et al. Correlation of the degree of conversion with the amount of elutable substances in nano-hybrid dental composites. Dent Mater. 2012;28(11):1146–1153. Epub 20120831 doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrpour H, Farjood E, Giti R, et al. Evaluation of the flexural strength of interim restorative materials in fixed prosthodontics. J Dent (Shiraz). 2016;17(3):201–206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yao J, Li J, Wang Y, et al. Comparison of the flexural strength and marginal accuracy of traditional and CAD/CAM interim materials before and after thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(3):649–657. Epub 20140412 doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuersching SN, Hickel R, Edelhoff D, et al. Initial biocompatibility of novel resins for 3D printed fixed dental prostheses. Dent Mater. 2022;38(10):1587–1597. Epub 20220822 doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Habib E, Zhu XX. Evaluation of the filler packing structures in dental resin composites: from theory to practice. Dent Mater. 2018;34(7):1014–1023. Epub 20180416 doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.03.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santing HJ, Kleverlaan CJ, Werner A, et al. Occlusal wear of provisional implant-supported restorations. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(1):179–185. Epub 20130417 doi: 10.1111/cid.12072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaskova T, Zarrelli M, Borisova A, et al. Method of quantitative analysis of filler dispersion in composite systems with spherical inclusions. Compos Sci Technol. 2011;71(13):1543–1549. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aminoroaya A, Neisiany RE, Khorasani SN, et al. A review of dental composites: challenges, chemistry aspects, filler influences, and future insights. Compos. B: Eng. 2021;216:108852. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Standard. Dentistry polymer-based crown and veneering materials (ISO 10477:2018). Switzerland: BSI Standards; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, et al. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27 Suppl 1(S1): s 1–9. Epub 20150417 doi: 10.1111/jerd.12149.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca AS, Labruna Moreira AD, de Albuquerque PP, et al. Effect of monomer type on the CC degree of conversion, water sorption and solubility, and color stability of model dental composites. Dent Mater. 2017;33(4):394–401. Epub 20170227 doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.01.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz L, Fauxpoint G, Arntz Y, et al. In vitro comparison of the surface roughness of polymethyl methacrylate and bis-acrylic resins for interim restorations before and after polishing. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(5):833 e1–e10. Epub 20210306 doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfakhri F, Alkahtani R, Li C, et al. Influence of filler characteristics on the performance of dental composites: a comprehensive review. Ceram Int. 2022;48(19):27280–27294. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.06.314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuncdemir MT, Gulbahce N. Addition of antibacterial agent effect on color stability of composites after immersion of different beverages. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(5):508–513. Epub 20190718 doi: 10.1111/jerd.12513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saghiri MA, Vakhnovetsky J, Vakhnovetsky A, et al. Functional role of inorganic trace elements in dentin apatite tissue-Part 1: Mg, Sr, Zn, and Fe. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2022;71:126932. Epub 20220115. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2022.126932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun SK, Lee JH, Lee HH. The biomineralization of a bioactive glass-incorporated light-curable pulp capping material using human dental pulp stem cells. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2495282–2495289. doi: 10.1155/2017/2495282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia K, Nayak R, Ginjupalli K. Comparative evaluation of a bioactive restorative material with resin modified glass ionomer for calcium-ion release and shear bond strength to dentin of primary teeth-an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;46(6):25–32. Epub 20221101 doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2022.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanachai S, Chaichana W, Insee K, et al. Physical/mechanical and antibacterial properties of orthodontic adhesives containing calcium phosphate and nisin. J Funct Biomater. 2021;12(4):73. doi: 10.3390/jfb12040073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong J, Kim JH, Shim JH, et al. Bioactive calcium phosphate materials and applications in bone regeneration. Biomater Res. 2019;23(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40824-018-0149-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nasri K, El Feki H, Sharrock P, et al. Spray-Dried monocalcium phosphate monohydrate for soluble phosphate fertilizer. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2015;54(33):8043–8047. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Par M, Spanovic N, Bjelovucic R, et al. Long-term water sorption and solubility of experimental bioactive composites based on amorphous calcium phosphate and bioactive glass. Dent Mater J. 2019;38(4):555–564. Epub 20190201 doi: 10.4012/dmj.2018-145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar