Comparison of smear layer removing efficacy of Cold Atmospheric Pressure (CAP) Plasma Jet with different chelating agents. An ex-vivo study

References

• McComb D, Smith DC. A preliminary scanning electron microscopic study of root canals after endodontic procedures. J Endod. 1975;1(7):1–8. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80226-3.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves KM, Berman LH, Rotstein I. Cohen’s pathways of the pulp 11th Ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2016. p. 256–257.
   Google Scholar
• Violich DR, Chandler NP. The smear layer in endodontics - a review. Int Endod J. 2010;43(1):2–15. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01627.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahravan A, Haghdoost AA, Adl A, et al. Effect of smear layer on sealing ability of canal obturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2007;33(2):96–105. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torabinejad M, Khademi AA, Babagoli J, et al. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer. J Endod. 2003;29(3):170–175. doi:10.1097/00004770-200303000-00002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi Z, Shalavi S, Jafarzadeh H. Ethylenedia­minetetraacetic acid in endodontics. Eur J Dent. 2013;7(Suppl 1):S135–S142. doi:10.4103/1305-7456.119091.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mancini M, Armellin E, Casaglia A, et al. A comparative study of smear layer removal and erosion in apical intraradicular dentine with three irrigating solutions: a scanning electron microscopy evaluation. J Endod. 2009;35(6):900–903. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singla MG, Garg A, Gupta S. MTAD in endodontics: an update review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112(3):e70–6–e76. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.02.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang C, Schaudinn C, Jaramillo DE, et al. In vitro antimicrobial effect of a cold plasma jet against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. ISRN Dent. 2012;2012:1–6. doi:10.5402/2012/295736.
   Google Scholar
• Ritts AC, Li H, Yu Q, et al. Dentin surface treatment using a non-thermal argon plasma brush for interfacial bonding improvement in composite restoration. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118(5):510–516. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00761.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang C, Chen MT, Gorur A, et al. Nanosecond pulsed plasma dental probe. Plasma Processes and Polymers. 2009;6(8):479–483. doi:10.1002/ppap.200800133.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann A, Rueppell A, Schindler A, et al. Modification of enamel and dentin surfaces by non-thermal atmospheric plasma. Plasma Processes Polym. 2013;10(3):262–270. doi:10.1002/ppap.201200088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malur MH, Chandra A. Curvature height and distance of MB canal of mandibular molar with schneider angle and its comparison with canal access angle. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2018;8(3):212–216. doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2017.07.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prado M, Gusman H, Gomes BPFA, et al. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of the effectiveness of phosphoric acid in smear layer removal when compared with EDTA and citric acid. J Endod. 2011;37(2):255–258. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torabinejad M, Handysides R, Khademi AA, et al. Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: a review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;94(6):658–666. doi:10.1067/moe.2002.128962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod. 2006;32(5):389–398. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciucchi B, Khettabi M, Holz J. The effectiveness of different endodontic irrigation procedures on the removal of the smear layer: a scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J. 1989;22(1):21–28. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1989.tb00501.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong X, Li H, Chen M, et al. Plasma treatment of dentin surfaces for improving self-etching adhesive/dentin interface bonding. Clin Plasma Med. 2015;3(1):10–16. doi:10.1016/j.cpme.2015.05.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dong X, Ritts AC, Staller C, et al. Evaluation of plasma treatment effects on improving adhesive-dentin bonding by using the same tooth controls and varying cross-sectional surface areas. Eur J Oral Sci. 2013;121(4):355–362. doi:10.1111/eos.12052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torabinejad M, Cho Y, Khademi AA, et al. The effect of various concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on the ability of MTAD to remove the smear layer. J Endod. 2003;29(4):233–239. doi:10.1097/00004770-200304000-00001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabahang S, Torabinejad M. Effect of MTAD on Enterococcus faecalis–contaminated root canals of extracted human teeth. J Endod. 2003 Sep;29(9):576–579. doi:10.1097/00004770-200309000-00008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozayeni MA, Javaheri GH, Poorroosta P, et al. Effect of 17% EDTA and MTAD on intracanal smear layer removal: a scanning electron microscopic study. Aust Endod J. 2009;35(1):13–17. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00111.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai L, Khechen K, Khan S, et al. The effect of QMix, an experimental antibacterial root canal irrigant, on removal of canal wall smear layer and debris. J Endod. 2011;37(1):80–84. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.10.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul ML, Mazumdar D, Niyogi A, et al. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of different irrigants including MTAD under SEM. J Conserv Dent. 2013;16(4):336–341. doi:10.4103/0972-0707.114367.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vemuri S, Kolanu S, Varri S, et al. Effect of different final irrigating solutions on smear layer removal in apical third of root canal: a scanning electron microscope study. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(1):87–90. doi:10.4103/0972-0707.173207.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lotfi M, Vosoughhosseini S, Saghiri MA, et al. Effect of MTAD as a final rinse on removal of smear layer in ten-minute preparation time. J Endod. 2012;38(10):1391–1394. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L, Mu Y, Deng X, et al. Comparison of the effect of four decalcifying agents combined with 60 °C 3% sodium hypochlorite on smear layer removal. J Endod. 2012;38(3):381–384. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar