Translating the determinant aspects on the study design in the dental implant field

References

• Pjetursson BE, Asgeirsson AG, Zwahlen M, et al. Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade: comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(Supplement):1–11. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g5.2.
   Google Scholar
• Zitzmann NU, Krastl G, Hecker H, et al. Endodontics or implants? A review of decisive criteria and guidelines for single tooth restorations and full arch reconstructions. Int Endodontic J. 2009;42(9):757–774. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01561.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitzmann NU, Krastl G, Hecker H, et al. Strategic considerations in treatment planning: deciding when to treat, extract, or replace a questionable tooth. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;104(2):80–91. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60096-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitzmann NU, Scherrer SS, Weiger R, et al. Preferences of dental care providers in maintaining compromised teeth in relation to their professional status: implants instead of periodontally involved maxillary molars? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(2):143–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02062.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French D, Ofec R, Levin L. Long term clinical performance of 10 871 dental implants with up to 22 years of follow-up: a cohort study in 4247 patients. Clin Implant Dent Rel Res. 2021;23(3):289–297. doi: 10.1111/cid.12994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Avila ED, Nagay BE, Pereira MMA, et al. Race for applicable antimicrobial dental implant surfaces to fight Biofilm-Related disease: advancing in laboratorial studies vs stagnation in clinical application. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022;8(8):3187–3198. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrade EL, Bento AF, Cavalli J, et al. Non-clinical studies required for new drug development – part I: early in silico and in vitro studies,new target discovery and validation,proof of principles and robustness of animal studies. Brazilian J Med Biol Res. 2016;49(11):1–9. doi: 10.1590/1414-431x20165644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danchin A. In vivo, in vitro and in silico: an open space for the development of microbe-based applications of synthetic biology. Microb Biotechnol. 2022;15(1):42–64. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowing G, Svendsen S, Svendsen CN. Ex vivo gene therapy for the treatment of neurological disorders. Prog Brain Res. 2017;230:99–132. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.11.003.
   Google Scholar
• Barão VA, Shyamsunder N, Yuan JC, et al. Trends in funding, internationalization, and types of study for original articles published in five implant-related journals between 2005 and 2009. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:69–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan J, Zhao Q. The impact of university—industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2013;80(7):1271–1286. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastani P, Mohammadpour M, Mehraliain G, et al. What makes inequality in the area of dental and oral health in developing countries? A scoping review. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021;19(1):54. 26 doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00309-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira MMA, Dini C, Souza JGS, et al. Industry support for dental implant research: a metatrend study of industry partnership in the development of new technologies. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;3913(22):00355–00359. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.026.
   Google Scholar
• Dini C, Pereira MMA, Souza JGS, et al. Association between industry support and the reporting of study outcomes in randomized clinical trials of dental implant research from the past 20 years. Clin Implant Dent Rel Res. 2022;24(1):94–104. doi: 10.1111/cid.13065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barão VAR, Shyamsunder N, Yuan JCC, et al. Authorship, collaboration, and funding trends in implantology literature: analysis of five journals from 2005 to 2009. Implant Dent. 2011;20(1):68–75. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181fce302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramo G, D’Angelo CA, Solazzi M. The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research. Scientometrics. 2011;86(3):629–643. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0284-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Way SF, Morgan AC, Larremore DB, et al. Productivity, prominence, and the effects of academic environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116(22):10729–10733. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817431116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disis M, Slattery JT. The road we must take: multidisciplinary team science. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(22):22–29. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarazona B, Vidal-Infer A, Alonso-Arroyo A. Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production in implantology (2009–2013). Clinical Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(7):864–870. doi: 10.1111/clr.12891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murad NH, Asi N, Alsawas M, et al. New evidence pyramid. Evid Based Med. 2016;21(4):125–127. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yegros-Yegros A, van de Klippe W, Abad-Garcia MA, et al. Exploring why global health needs are unmet by research efforts: the potential influences of geography, industry and publication incentives. Health Res Policy Sys. 2020;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00560-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne A, Siow A. Does federal research funding increase university research output? Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy. 2003;3(1):1018–1018. doi: 10.2202/1538-0637.1018.
   Google Scholar
• Rubagumya F, Hopman WM, Gyawali B, et al. Participation of lower and upper Middle–income countries in oncology clinical trials led by high-income countries. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(8):e2227252. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.27252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dini C, Pereira MMA, Souza JGS, et al. Mapping the trends and impact of research collaboration between countries in oral implantology publications: a bibliometric analysis from 1999 to 2019. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;3913(22):00653-9) doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.10.009.
   Google Scholar
• Nyström ME, Karltun J, Keller C, et al. Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher’s experiences from 20 projects. Health Res Policy Sys. 2018;16(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0322-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dusdal J, Powell JJW. Benefits, motivations, and challenges of international collaborative research: a sociology of science case study. Science and Public Policy. 2021;48(2):235–245. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scab010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luukkonen T, Persson O, Sivertsen G. Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 1992;17(1):101–126. doi: 10.1177/016224399201700106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balas EA. From appropriate care to evidence-based medicine. Pediatr Ann. 1998;27(9):581–584. doi: 10.3928/0090-4481-19980901-11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarin R, Ebenezer S, Benthaus K, et al. The impact of the ITI international team for implantology on implant dentistry: a retrospective and descriptive analysis of 30 years of research support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35(1):e1–e13. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham S. Moving technologies from lab to market. Res. Technol. Manag. 2002;45(6):31–42. doi: 10.1080/08956308.2002.11671531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Greene H, Li G, et al. Government-funded research increasingly fuels innovation. Science. 2019;364(6446):1139–1141. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw2373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poege F, Harhoff D, Gaessler F, et al. (2019) Science quality and the value of inventions. Sci Adv. 2019;5(12):eaay7323. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay7323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar