Evaluation of cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity of different pulp capping liners

References

• Takita T, Hayashi M, Takeichi O, et al. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate on proliferation of cultured human dental pulp cells. Int Endodontic J. 2006;39(5):1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01097.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camargo SEA, Camargo CHR, Hiller K-A, et al. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of pulp capping materials in two cell lines. Int Endodontic J. 2009;42(3):227–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01506.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Huang L, Dong Y, et al. In vitro antibacterial activity of a novel resin-based pulp capping material containing the quaternary ammonium salt MAE-DB and Portland cement. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e112549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakerzadeh A, Esnaashari E, Dadfar S. In vitro comparison of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of three vital pulp capping materials. Iranian Endodontic J. 2017;12(4):419.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bjørndal L, Reit C, Bruun G, et al. Treatment of deep caries lesions in adults: randomized clinical trials comparing stepwise vs. direct complete excavation, and direct pulp capping vs. partial pulpotomy. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118(3):290–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00731.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg M, Smith AJ. Cells and extracellular matrices of dentin and pulp: a biological basis for repair and tissue engineering. Critic Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004;15(1):13–27. doi: 10.1177/154411130401500103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dominguez Reyes A, Muñoz Muñoz L, Aznar Martín T. Study of calcium hydroxide apexification in 26 young permanent incisors. Dental Traumatol. 2005;21(3):141–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2005.00289.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dammaschke T, Leidinger J, Schäfer E. Long-term evaluation of direct pulp capping—treatment outcomes over an average period of 6.1 years. Clin Oral Invest. 2010;14(5):559–567. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0326-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwendicke F, Brouwer F, Stolpe M. Calcium hydroxide versus mineral trioxide aggregate for direct pulp capping: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Endodontic. 2015;41(12):1969–1974. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro CS, Kuteken FA, Hirata Júnior R, et al. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial action of MTA, calcium hydroxide and Portland cement. J Appl Oral Sci. 2006;14(5):330–333. doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572006000500006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torabinejad M, Chivian N. Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endodontic. 1999;25(3):197–205. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80142-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almuhaiza M. Glass-ionomer cements in restorative dentistry: a critical appraisal. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016;17(4):331–336. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1850.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davidovich E, Weiss E, Fuks AB, et al. Surface antibacterial properties of glass ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment. J Am Dental Assoc. 2007;138(10):1347–1352. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou ElReash A, Hamama H, Grawish M, et al. A laboratory study to test the responses of human dental pulp stem cells to extracts from three dental pulp capping biomaterials. Int Endodontic J. 2021;54(7):1118–1128. doi: 10.1111/iej.13495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croll TP, Berg JH, Donly KJ. Dental repair material: a resin-modified glass-ionomer bioactive ionic resin-based composite. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015;36(1):60–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poggio C, Beltrami R, Colombo M, et al. In vitro antibacterial activity of different pulp capping materials. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015;7(5):e584–0. doi: 10.4317/jced.52401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arandi NZ. Calcium hydroxide liners: a literature review. CCIDE. 2017;9:67–72. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S141381.
   Google Scholar
• Arandi NZ, Rabi T. TheraCal LC: from biochemical and bioactive properties to clinical applications. Int J Dent. 2018;2018:1–6. doi: 10.1155/2018/3484653.
   Google Scholar
• Sahin N, Saygili S, Akcay M. Clinical, radiographic, and histological evaluation of three different pulp-capping materials in indirect pulp treatment of primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest. 2021;25(6):3945–3955. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03724-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Lee D, Song D, et al. Biocompatibility and bioactivity of set direct pulp capping materials on human dental pulp stem cells. Materials. 2020;13(18):3925. doi: 10.3390/ma13183925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrugia C, Lung CY, Schembri Wismayer P, et al. The relationship of surface characteristics and antimicrobial performance of pulp capping materials. J Endodontic. 2018;44(7):1115–1120. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.04.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes SP, Azevedo NF, Pereira MO. Quantitative assessment of individual populations within polymicrobial biofilms. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):9494. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27497-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kunert M, Rozpedek-Kaminska W, Galita G, et al. The cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of bioactive dental materials. Cells. 2022;11(20):3238. doi: 10.3390/cells11203238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedeljkovic I, Doulabi BZ, Abdelaziz M, et al. Cytotoxicity and anti-biofilm properties of novel hybrid-glass-based caries infiltrant. Dent Mater. 2022;38(12):2052–2061. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.11.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam S, Abdelsalam N, Fayyad D, et al. Comparative evaluation of the cytotoxic effect of different intracanal medicaments. Dental Sci Update. 2021;2(2):123–133. doi: 10.21608/dsu.2021.46129.1051.
   Google Scholar
• Poggio C, Arciola CR, Beltrami R, et al. Cyto­compatibility and antibacterial properties of capping materials. Sci World J. 2014;2014:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2014/181945.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss E, Shalhav M, Fuss Z. Assessment of antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers by a direct contact test. Dental Traumatol. 1996;12(4):179–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1996.tb00511.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zayed M, Hassan R, Riad M. Evaluation of the antibacterial efficacy of different bioactive lining and pulp capping agents. Tanta Dental J. 2015;12(2):132–139. doi: 10.1016/j.tdj.2015.04.003.
   Google Scholar
• Yalcin M, Arslan U, Dundar A. Evaluation of antibacterial effects of pulp capping agents with direct contact test method. Eur J Dentist. 2014;8(1):95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koruyucu M, Topcuoglu N, Tuna EB, et al. An assessment of antibacterial activity of three pulp capping materials on Enterococcus faecalis by a direct contact test: an in vitro study. Eur J Dent. 2015;09(02):240–245. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.156837.
   Google Scholar
• Elshamy FM, Elraih H, Gupta I, et al. Antibacterial effect of new bioceramic pulp capping material on the main cariogenic bacteria. J Contempor Dental Pract. 2016;17(5):349–353. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1854.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jamjoom HM. Clinical evaluation of directly pulp capped permanent teeth with glass ionomer materials. Cairo Dental J. 2008;24(2):177–185.
   Google Scholar
• McComb D, Ericson D. Antimicrobial action of new, proprietary lining cements. J Dent Res. 1987;66(5):1025–1028. doi: 10.1177/00220345870660050601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias-Moliz MT, Farrugia C, Lung CY, et al. Antimicrobial and biological activity of leachate from light curable pulp capping materials. J Dentist. 2017;64:45–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.06.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrolo F, Comba A, Scansetti M, et al. Effects of light-cured MTA like material on direct pulp capping. Dent Mater. 2014;30(30):e151. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.308.
   Google Scholar
• Pameijer CH, et al. Flexural strength and flexural fatigue properties of resin-modified glass ionomers. J Clin Dent. 2015;26(1):23–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stoddart MJ. Cell viability assays: introduction. Mammalian Cell Viabil. 2011;1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Nagarajan A, Uchil PD. Analysis of cell viability by the MTT assay. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2018;2018(6):pdb. prot095505. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot095505.
   Google Scholar
• Adıgüzel M, Ahmetoğlu F, Ünverdi Eldeniz A, et al. Comparison of cytotoxic effects of calcium silicate-based materials on human pulp fibroblasts mehmet. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2019;13(4):241–246. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2019.037.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jun S-K, Lee J-H, Lee H-H. The biomineralization of a bioactive glass-incorporated light-curable pulp capping material using human dental pulp stem cells. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2017/2495282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Suh BI. Cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of resin-free and resin-modified direct pulp capping materials: a state-of-the-art review. Dental Mater J. 2017;36(1):1–7. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modena KCdS, Casas-Apayco LC, Atta MT, et al. Cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of direct and indirect pulp capping materials. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(6):544–554. doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572009000600002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar