Validation of phototesting for estimation of individual skin ultraviolet sensitivity based on a lengthwise attenuating ultraviolet B field

References

• Kochevar, I.E., Taylor, C.R., and Krutman, J., 2003, Fundamentals of Cutaneous Photobiology and Photoimmunology. In: Freedberg I.M., Eisen, A.Z., Wolff K., Austen, F., Goldsmith, L.A., Katz, I.S., editors. Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in general medicine, 6th edn. (New York: Mc Graw-Hill Inc.), pp. 1031–1048
   Google Scholar
• Diffey, B.L., and Farr, P.M., 1991, Quantitative aspects of ultraviolet erythema. Clinical Physics & Physiological Measurement, 12, 311–325
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawk, J.L.M., and Ferguson, J., 2010, Cutaneous photobiology. In: Burns T., Cox N., Griffiths C., editors. Rook's Textbook of dermatology, 7th edn. (Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd), pp. 29.5–29.7
   Google Scholar
• Ross, M.H., 2006, Integumentary system. In: Ross M.H., editor. Histology: A text and atlas, 5th edn. (Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins), pp. 448–451
   Google Scholar
• Leiter, U., and Garbe, C., 2008, Epidemiology of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer - the role of sunlight. Advances in Experimental Medicine & Biology, 624, 89–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, T.B., 1988, The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Archives of Dermatology, 124, 869–871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bylaite, M., Grigaitiene, J., and Lapinskaite, G.S., 2009, Photodermatoses: Classification, evaluation and management. British Journal of Dermatology, 161(Suppl 3), 61–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, M., and Anderson, C., 2008, Prevention of skin cancer in primary healthcare: An evaluation of three different prevention effort levels and the applicability of a phototest. European Journal of General Practice, 14, 68–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Falk, M., and Magnusson, H., 2011, Sun protection advice mediated by the general practitioner: An effective way to achieve long-term change of behaviour and attitudes related to sun exposure? Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 29, 135–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doshi, A., Zaheer, A., and Stiller, M.J., 1997, Methods for assessing erythema: A critique of parametric and nonparametric techniques. International Journal of Dermatology, 36, 334–337
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ilias, M.A., Wårdell, K., Falk, M., and Anderson, C., 2001, Phototesting based on a divergent beam - a study on normal subjects. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine, 17, 189–196
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Doherty, J., Henricson, J., Enfield, J., Nilsson, GE., Leahy, MJ., Anderson, CD., 2011, Tissue viability imaging (TiVi) in the assessment of divergent beam UVB provocation. Archives of Dermatological Research, 303, 79–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernick, D.P., and Shore, A.C., 2000, Characteristics of laser Doppler perfusion imaging in vitro and in vivo. Physiological Measurement, 21, 333–340
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson, G.E., Tenland, T., and Oberg, P.A., 1980, Evaluation of a laser Doppler flowmeter for measurement of tissue blood flow. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 27, 597–604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Doherty, J., Henricson, J., Anderson, C., Leahy, MJ, Nilsson, GE, Sjöberg, F., 2007, Sub-epidermal imaging using polarized light spectroscopy for assessment of skin microcirculation. Skin Research & Technology, 13, 472–484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, M., Ilias, M., and Anderson, C., 2008, Inter-observer variability in reading of phototest reactions with sharply or diffusely delineated borders. Skin Research & Technology, 14, 397–402
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Falk, M., Ilias, M., Wårdell, K., and Anderson, C., 2003, Phototesting with a divergent UVB beam in the investigation of anti-inflammatory effects of topically applied substances. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine, 19, 195–202
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brennan, P., and Silman, A., 1992, Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. British Medical Journal, 304, 1491–1494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar